08 Jan: Founding Affidavit: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland

* US Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit, Judge Merrick Garland, Clerk Mark Langer, CO District Court, Chief Judge Philip A Brimmer, Clerk of Court: Jeffrey P Colwell, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, Chief Judge Timothy Tymkovich, Clerk of Court Christopher M Wolpert
* 08 Jan: Filing: CADC: Jdg Garland: McV20 v Trump20 & Biden20; 08 Jan: McV20: Ntc of Filing: McV20 v Trump20 & Biden20: Notice of Motion; Draft Order; Draft Answering Affidavit; Founding Affidavit: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McV v TP BH, McVeigh2020, US v TJ McVeigh, LJ v LS / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

IN THE US COURT OF APPEALS DC CIRCUIT and US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO and US COURT OF APPEALS: TENTH CIRCUIT and EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT; HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA:

Case No: _____________________

EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland

In the matter/s between:

Timothy McVeigh 2020 – Applicant

and

Donald Trump 2020, Joe Biden 2020 – Respondents

Request Respondents EoP OKC TRC / No EoP OKC TRC information.

**************************************

United States – Plaintiff

and

Timothy James McVeigh – Defendant

10th Crt: 119 F.3d 806
CO: No. 96-CR-68-M

Re: Conviction and Sentence of McVeigh for 19 Apr 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing

**************************************

Lara Johnson – Applicant

and

Lindiwe Sisulu: Min of Intnl Relations & Cooperation; Hasso Plattner: RSA Rep. of Giving Pledge; Helene Budliger Artieda, Swiss Amb; Masimba Tafirenyika: UN Amb; Lin Songtian: China Amb; Marcus Cornaro: EU Amb; Didier Vanderhasselt: Belgium & NATO Amb; Jessye Lapenn: US Ch D’Affairs; Mikhail Petrakov: Russia Amb – Respondents

Grg High Crt: H 111/2019

Notice of McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP / OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations

Req EoP/OKC TRC: EoP UN Resolution; or No EoP/OKC TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide vote info.

Founding EoP TRC Affidavit

 .

Introduction:

[1] I the undersigned, do hereby make oath and say, I am the Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) law culture applicant in this matter, a South African citizen, resident at 16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, South Africa.

[2] The objective and/or subjective truth facts set out herein fall within my personal knowledge, unless otherwise indicated by the context, and are to the best of my belief true and correct.

Parties:

[3] I am the Ecology of Peace law prisoner of WiP Law War – Pro Se applicant in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others (“LJ v LS”) and administrative clerk on behalf of Timothy McVeigh 2020 EoP Law Write In Candidate US Presidential campaign applicant in this matter. I am a qualified paralegal but have never worked as a paralegal. As of date – for the past twenty years – I have not been able to find a lawyer in South Africa or America willing to represent me in a civil or criminal case; in accordance to my Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty cultural values. The Ecology of Peace law culture advocates on behalf of abolition of Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) law [Summary EoP v WiP Law: Annex A: pp.05; E: pp.308-312/350].

[4] The first respondent is Donald Trump 2020 Donald Trump was elected by WiP Law voters as US President in 2016. President Donald Trump is the eighth respondent in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [Annex: D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350]. Donald Trump was the second respondent in McVeigh 2020: Filing: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate. [Annex: E: pp.350].  

[5] The second respondent is Joe Biden 2020 Joe Biden was allegedly elected by WiP Law voters as US President in 2020. As alleged President Elect: President Joe Biden is the impending US administrations eighth respondent in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [Annex: D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350]. Joe Biden was the fifth respondent in McVeigh 2020: Filing: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate.[Annex: E: pp.350].

Jurisdiction:

[6] If Judge Merrick Garland is an EoP and WiP Law [Annex: A: Summary EoP v WiP law: pp.05; E: pp.308-312/350] jurist; it is submitted that the resolution of this dispute falls within the mediation jurisdiction of Judge Merrick Garland in his [A] current capacity as United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and [B] future capacity as President-elect Joe Biden administrations appointed United States Attorney General[1], [C] who as a federal prosecutor in the United States Department of Justice, played a leading role in the investigation and prosecution of the Oklahoma City bombers[2], one of them – Timothy McVeigh – the EoP law candidate referred to in this application.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND:

 McVeigh2020 EoP-RH-FR Sincere Peacenik Legal Definition:

[7] As of date the EoP law definition of sincere peacenik / honourable warrior objective reality [eop-rh-fr: Annex E: IA SoS Filing: pp.73-77/350] has not been legally declared as scientifically or culturally inaccurate; in any negligent or intentional WiP Law Only court, by any negligent or intentional WiP law prosecutor and/or lawyer or their psychiatrists or psychologists or well funded clients.

[8] As of date neither respondent candidate, and/or their lawyers or voters has informally or formally legally disputed McVeigh2020 EoP law scientific sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal definition [Annex E: IA SoS Filing: pp.73-77/350], as a scientifically inaccurate sincere peacenik / honourable warrior definition; nor provided any written objections clarifying any scientific or cultural law errors in EoP UN Resolution [Annex E: pp.55-96/350] to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law.

[9] EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw[3]] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint[4]] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown[5] – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR: EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr[6]] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw[7]] as international law.

[10] EoP Radical Honoursty Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:

[11] Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr[8]] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw[9]] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of global geopolitical reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.

[12] EoP RH FR: Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality[10]:

[12.1] Factual Reality:

[A] Earth is round, not flat.

[B] Resources are finite.

[C] When beings who call themselves humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.

[D] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.

[E] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits are the Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law allowing individuals who call themselves humans to breed and consume above carrying capacity limits.

[12.2] Interpretive Reality:

[A] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace – EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw[11]] – clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

[13] Ecology of Peace – Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War – UN Resolution to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw[12]] as international law; will [A] enable responsible freedom [responsible-freedom[13]] orderly and humane – prisoner release [prisoner-pardon[14]], land reform [eop-landreform[15]] and denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn[16]] – de-industrialization and depopulation shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy [eop-sdwipecon[17]]; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed [one-child-law[18]] and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint[19]]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression[20]]; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom[21]] oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule [cult-law-self-rule[22]] for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration [property-ration[23]] land reform [eop-landreform[24]] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

EoP Axis Oath / EoP Law Voter:

[14] Summary of EoP v WiP Law: [Annex A: pp.05; E: pp.308-312/350]

[15] Applicants EoP Axis Oath [Annex B: pp.06; C: pp.39-44/44].

[16] The purpose of an EoP Axis Oath is as follows:

[16.1] An EoP Axis oath [eop-axis-oath[25]] is a promise – a form of labour or information barter exchange reciprocity [Dmitry Orlov Twilight of the Antipodes[26]] – purchase of labour or information sharing cooperation with very clear unambiguous honest communication as to what the collective strategic goal is. If or when there is a mutual overlap agreement on strategic goal between two or more individuals, they can sign an unconditional or conditional cooperator oath, to clarify the level of their unconditional or conditional cooperator commitment to the strategic goal. The oath is a process to learn to practice in decision-making, communication and relating responsible freedom self government 24/7/365: If or when my ego gets in the way of me cooperating, towards our strategic goal; I will not run away or play some passive aggressive egomindfuck games. I will be my own or your Sgt Major and bitch slap my own or your fragile ego Private through the face with clear sincere verbal feedback, to help quick resolution of our misunderstanding, disagreement with you my fellow Oath co-operator; to enable us to uphold our cooperation agreement towards our shared strategic goal, through potentially difficult times. It’s a statement of: our strategic goal is our cooperative master, not our individual ego’s.

[17] There are two types of EoP Axis Oaths:

[17.1] Unconditional co-operator; and

[17.2] Conditional co-operator.

[17.3] Unconditional co-operator oaths are equivalent to EoP law voter registration ballot

[17.4] Conditional co-operator oaths provide unconditional co-operator EoP law voters with an EoP law voter mandate.

[18] Unconditional Co-operator Oath:

[18.1] An unconditional co-operator oath confirms the oath takers commitment to unconditional ego-eco literacy EoP TRC strategic and tactical negotiations cooperation; towards the EoP UN Resolution strategic global and national security goal.

[18.2] Responsible Freedom Oath [Annex D: pp.60-61/70; E: pp.90-91/350] provide a draft template of the responsible freedom oath, that all citizens will be required to sign, subsequent to implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural Law as international law.

[19] Conditional Co-operator Oath Statement:

[19.1] A conditional co-operator oath provides EoP Axis Alliance Heads of State, and/or unconditional cooperator EoP law voter/s; with a fully informed consent written oath EoP Axis Alliance mandate to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law, via UN General Assembly vote and/or Intnl Court of Justice Declaratory Order.

[19.2] Draft Text of a Conditional Co-operator Oath:

[A] I hereby declare my conditional co-operator mandate consent for the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law; to [A] enable orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release {prisoner-pardon}, land reform {eop-landreform} and denuclearization {eop-denuke-defn} – economic degrowth shut down of the Babylon War is Peace Ponzi Swamp economy {eop-sdwipecon} transition to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy; by [B] requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed {one-child-law} and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits {eop-footprint}; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool {crimes-of-aggression}; [C] nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath {responsible-freedom} citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule territorial homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities {cult-law-self-rule}; and (ii) guaranteed for life property ration (property-ration} land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] I further understand that if or when EoP SciCult law is implemented as international law, I shall – like all global citizens – legally be required to cooperate sign my unconditional cooperator responsible freedom oath; and should I refuse; I shall be convicted of negligent and/or intentional crimes of aggression {crimes-of-aggression}.

 [I] EoP OKC PoW Law Pro Se Direct Access:

[20] Evidentiary information confirming EoP law voter applicant and EoP law voter McVeigh candidate; are Abel EoP law prisoners of Kane WiP international law war, and WiP Law Only jurist and lawyer combatants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

[20.1] Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law Relief Re: WiP Law Only Lawyers Denial of Counsel to EoP Law Applicants: SA George High Court: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: Practice Note, Heads of Argument & Order [Annex C: pp.44]

[20.2] EoP Law voter request to South African Legal Services Ombudsman: Judge Siraj Desai; enquiring whether his office is an EoP and WiP law; or WiP Law Only Legal Services Ombudsman office. [{G9}: 23 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombudsman Info; {G10}: 29 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombud Info]. As of date I have not received any response.

[20.3] EoP Law – H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others: EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC Negotiations – application to Third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; to authorize CH-UN Ambassador Baeriswyl Pascale; to submit LJ v LS – to UN General Assembly for an EoP v WiP international law legal certainty vote; and if the vote is No EoP OKC TRC the vote to provide for authorization for LJ v LS First and Ninth Respondents – President Cyril Ramaphosa and President Vladimir Putin – Heads of State to authorize and assist with No EoP OKC TRC Siberia Assisted Suicide documentation and travel logistics for EoP law voter and candidate [Annex D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350].

[20.4] EoP Law Voter notification to President of the Senate: VP Mike Pence [Annex F: pp.334] of EoP Law Voter Secretaries of State [Annex F: pp.02-269/334] – excluding CT – of EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote – EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote (excl AZ & CT): McVeigh: 520, Trump: 0; Biden: 0. includes:

[A] EoP Law request to Senator Joe Lieberman – in response to Senator Lieberman’s statements on Fox News [Fox: Joe Lieberman: In America we settle conflicts in court, not the streets[27]]; to enquire whether he or any of his Kasowitz colleagues know of any US courts that accept EoP law Pro Se Applications, and/or whether he would make enquiries to find out whether any US courts accept EoP law Pro Se Applications; or whether he would instruct any of his assistants to do so [06 Nov: EoP Q: Re: JL: In America we settle conflicts in court, not the streets[28]; 19 Nov: KBT-VG Re EoP Ntc GSA: EoP Law voter USA 2020 Pres Election Results; 20 Nov: EoP Re: KBT-JL Re EoP Q Re JL: In America we settle conflicts in court, not the streets[29]]. If there is a US court that accepts EoP law Pro Se applications, such a court can be requested to help to resolve EoP v WiP law election issues in dispute; by requesting the WiP Law President and President Elect to confirm for EoP and WiP law voters, their final EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC answers [30 Oct: Status of Biden & Trump2020 Re: EoP OKC TRC Peace[30]: Draft: DNC/GOP 2020: EoP OKC TRC Campaign Answers[31]; 09 Nov: EoP Re: Donald Biden Needs Cooperation from Donald Biden Voters: EoP OKC TRC QA[32]].

[B] EoP Law Voter Request to Judge Stephanos Bibas, in response to Judge Stephanos Bibas ruling that voters ballots, not lawyers briefs elect the President and decide elections [NPR: ‘Voters, Not Lawyers, Choose The President’: Trump Team Dealt Another Blow In Court[33]]; to enquire whether Judge Bibas accepts EoP law Pro Se applications in his court [28 Nov: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q Re: Voters Ballots, not Lawyers Briefs decide Elections[34]]. If so informed: I would file an application to his clerk, for his juridical supervision of the EoP v WiP law election issues in dispute; request to the WiP Law President and President Elect to confirm for EoP and WiP law voters, their final EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC answers. If not I informed Judge Bibas of EoP Law Voter [03 Nov: Filing FECEC: EoP voter US Presidential vote[35]: EoP Law Electoral College vote: McVeigh: 538, Trump: 0; Biden: 0[36]] EoP v WiP Law [eop-v-wip-law[37]] Fraudulent Election Investigation Negotiations [28 Nov: McV20: EoP Pres Elect Offer: Consent to suspension of FEC-EC Vote pending EoP v WiP Law Election Fraud – EoP Axis Oath Office or EoP v WiP Law Referendum – Investigation[38]].

[20.5] See also: [II] to [V]

 [II] Standby Counsel if Respondents WiP Counsel Obstruct – scientific sincere peacenik / honourable warrior reconciliation – Merits Enquiry:

[21] Applicants evidence in support of an Order appointing Applicant Standby Counsel if Respondents Counsel Obstruct a truthseeking evidentiary enquiry into merits of EoP law voter application issues in dispute.

[21.1] Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law – Assistance of Counsel / Standby Counsel – Relief Re: WiP Law Only Combatant Lawyers Denial of Counsel to EoP Law Applicants [SA George High Court: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: Practice Note, Heads of Argument & Order: Annex C: pp.44].

[A] Objected to Culture of Honesty: They demanded that I engage in behaviour that I objectively and/or subjectively considered to be legal strategic and/or tactical advice that I should engage in conscious deception of the court – in legal terms fraud or perjury – that violated my honesty cultural values – and I refused.

[B] Objected to Culture of Honest Race Relations: They objected to my cultural values of buck stops here honest race relations: honesty with black people about procreation above ecological carrying capacity limits causes of resource conflict; honesty with white people about consumption above ecological carrying capacity causes of resource conflict.

[C] Objected to Cultural Advocacy Exposing Masonic War is Peace Law as root cause of all resource conflict: They refused my legal strategic and/or tactical orders to inform the court of information and/or evidence in support of my cultural values to advocate on behalf of the strategic goal of exposing Masonic War is Peace law as root cause of all resource conflict, and implementing Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law. The respondents consciously or unconsciously practice Masonic War is Peace law; and don’t want to take responsibility for their choice of legal services practice; by honestly advertising themselves as ‘Masonic War is Peace lawyers’: lawyers who consciously or unconsciously ignore or avoid educating their clients of the — clauses of international law allowing and/or enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc parasitically profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from ecological overshoot – overpopulation & consumption colliding with finite resources – and failed state collapse. 

[21.2] As of date there has been no response from respondents – possibly on the instructions of their lawyers – to McVeigh2020 correspondence related to cooperatively resolving EoP v WiP law election fraud issues [{G4} 06 Nov: EoP Q: Re: JL: In America we settle conflicts in court, not the streets. {G5}: 07 Nov: McV20 Re: AP declares Biden wins US Presidential Race. {G6}: 28 Nov: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q Re: Voters Ballots, not Lawyers Briefs decide Elections: Encl: 28 Nov: McV20: EoP FEC-EC Election Fraud Inv Offer. {G7}: 17 Dec: EoP Law Voter Filing: HSGAC: Examining Irregularities in 2020 Election. {G8}: 19 Dec: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q to TP20 & BH20: SecDef: Chris Miller & Lloyd Austin].

[21.3] EoP Law voter invitations to – among other peaceniks – American ‘Trump – Biden; Left – Right; White – Black Reconciliation’ Peaceniks and Black Lives Matter to join EoP Axis Alliance / register as McVeigh2020 EoP law voters: [{G1}:09 Apr: EoP Ntc to ICTJ: Judge Goldstone et al: LJ v TRC: Defining Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior. [pp.10]; {G2}: 04 Jun: EoP Law Voters Request to US Navy JAG via Gen Mattis to setup EoP Axis Oath Office for Floyd Protestors: Encl: 20 Apr: McVeigh 2020: TN to NATO: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO [pp.13]. {G3} 14 Jun: McV20 WA-OK Filing: TN McV20 A’s to CHAZ Black Voices Demand : Encl: 14 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: Free Capital Hill Black Voices Demands. [pp.15]]

[21.4] EoP Law voter invitations to Me Too Movement to join EoP Axis Alliance / register as McVeigh2020 EoP law voters: {G7}: 17 Dec: EoP Law Voter Filing: HSGAC: Examining Irregularities in 2020 Election [pp.07].

[21.5] See also: [I]; [III-V]

[III] Confirm Applicants as EoP Prisoners of WiP Law & WiP Law Only Lawyers and Jurist Combatants:

[22] Evidence in support of Order confirming EoP law voter applicant and EoP law voter McVeigh candidate; to be Abel EoP law prisoners of Kane WiP international law war; and Kane WiP Law Only judges and lawyer combatants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

[22.1] See [I]: EoP OKC PoW Law Pro Se Direct Access; [II] Standby Counsel if Respondents WiP Counsel Obstruct – scientific sincere peacenik / honourable warrior reconciliation – Merits Enquiry.

[22.2] See also: [IV] – [V]

.

[IV] Request for H 111/19: LJ v LS EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC Info:

[23] Evidence in support of request for Order confirming Respondents Biden Harris 2020 and Trump Pence 2020 response to H 111/19: LJ v LS: EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC information requested.

[23.1] H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others: EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC Negotiations [Annex D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350]

[23.2] Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate. [Annex E: pp.350]

[23.3] EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote: Pres of Senate: VP Pence [Annex F: pp.334]

[23.4] EoP Law Voter / McVeigh2020 LJ v LS correspondence: {G5}: 07 Nov: McV20 Re: AP declares Biden wins US Presidential Race [pp.02]. {G6}: 28 Nov: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q Re: Voters Ballots, not Lawyers Briefs decide Elections: Encl: 28 Nov: McV20: EoP FEC-EC Election Fraud Inv Offer. [pp.13]. {G8}: 19 Dec: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q to TP20 & BH20: SecDef: Chris Miller & Lloyd Austin [pp.13]. {G11}: 29 Dec: EoP Ntc: Judge Brimmer & Tymkovich: Re: CO: 96-CR-68-M; 10th: 119 F.3d 806; US v Tim McVeigh [pp.02]. {G12} 01 Jan: EoP Req Info Ntc: Judge Brimmer & Tymkovich: Re: CO: 96-CR-68-M; 10th: 119 F.3d 806; US v Tim McVeigh. [pp.03]. (G13} 03 Jan: EoP Filing: Pres of US Senate: Mike Pence: EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote (excl AZ & CT): McVeigh: 520, Trump: 0; Biden: 0. [pp.09]

[23.5] See also: [I]-[III]; [V]

[V] Swiss Federal Council PoW referral to UNGA for EoP v WiP law vote:

[24] Evidence in support of request for Order confirming Respondent consent/objection to H 111/19: LJ v LS Third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; authorizing CH-UN Ambassador Baeriswyl Pascale; to submit LJ v LS – to UN General Assembly; to enable any UNGA nation, who would prefer to hold an EoP v WiP referendum prior to the UNGA vote, to do so; and once so done; the UNGA vote to provide EoP v WiP international law legal certainty; and If No EoP OKC TRC the vote to provide for authorization for LJ v LS First and Ninth Respondents Heads of State to authorize and assist with No EoP OKC TRC Siberia Assisted Suicide documentation and travel logistics for EoP law voter and candidate.

[24.1] H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others: EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC Negotiations [Annex D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350]

Signed and Sworn at George on 07 January 2021, Deponent acknowledging that she knows and understands the Affidavit contents, has no objection to taking the prescribed oath and that the oath is binding on her conscience.

[Signed]
____________________________
Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se
16 Taaibos Ave, George, 6529, RSA
Signed EoP Axis Oath[39]:
23 Sep 2017[40]: Lara Johnson[41]

.

Enclosures:
[A]    Summary EoP v WiP Law [A: pp.05; E: pp.308-312/350]
[B]    EoP Law voter EoP Axis Oath responsible freedom ballot [B: pp.06; C: pp.39-44/44]
[C]    H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law Relief Re WiP Law Only Lawyers Denial of Counsel to EoP Law Applicants: Practice Note, Heads of Argument & Order [C: pp.44[42]]
[D]    H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others: EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC Negotiations [D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350]
[E]    Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice[43]: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate. [E: pp.350[44]]
[F]    EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote: Pres of Senate: VP Pence [F: pp.334[45]]
[G]       EoP Law Voter correspondence to, cc: Trump / Biden campaigns [G: pp.111[46]]:

.

—– Footnotes ——

[1] Joe Biden to Pick Appeals Court Judge Merrick Garland as Attorney General
https://sputniknews.com/us/202101071081690307-joe-biden-to-pick-appeals-court-judge-merrick-garland-as-attorney-general/

[2] KFOR: Merrick Garland, judge with strong ties to Oklahoma, to be named AG

Merrick Garland, judge with strong ties to Oklahoma, to be named AG

[3] http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/      archive.is/QneCw

[4] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/eop-footprint/        archive.is/Guli3

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown_(abolitionist)

[6] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/eop-rh-fr/                  archive.is/BSOAb

[7] http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/      archive.is/QneCw

[8] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/eop-rh-fr/                  archive.is/BSOAb

[9] http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/      archive.is/QneCw

[10] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/eop-rh-fr/                  archive.is/BSOAb

[11] http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/      archive.is/QneCw

[12] http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/      archive.is/QneCw

[13] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/responsible-freedom/       archive.is/rXzYe

[14] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/prisoner-pardon/          archive.fo/rXKVD

[15] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/land-reform/         archive.is/2c9XD

[16] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-denuke-defn/        archive.is/ofrGD

[17] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/sd-wip-econ/      archive.is/hWAdA

[18] http://ss-defcon.tygae.org.za/2010/07/humans-an-endangered-species-v/   archive.fo/qnrNz

[19] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/eop-footprint/        archive.is/Guli3

[20] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/crimes-of-aggression/    archive.is/esaH6

[21] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/responsible-freedom/       archive.is/rXzYe

[22] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/cult-law-self-rule/    archive.fo/BfgMu

[23] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/property-ration/    archive.fo/AWxH8

[24] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/land-reform/         archive.is/2c9XD

[25] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za

[26] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecfxl1wZDpE

[27] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl4NuL2UOmw

[28] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/11/06_19-25_lj-jlieberman/

[29] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/11/20_13-54_lj-kbt-vglover/

[30] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/30_20-48_lj-remanuel-jkushner/

[31] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/30_20-48_dnc-gop/

[32] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/11/09_14-56_eopokctrcqa/

[33] https://www.npr.org/2020/11/27/939526545/voters-not-lawyers-choose-the-president-trump-teamdealt-another-blow-in-court

[34] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/11/28_15-23_lj-jsbibas/

[35] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/11/11_21-40_lj-fec/

[36] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/11/03_21-05_fecfiling/

[37] http://eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za/

[38] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/11/28_12-09_lj-sbannon/

[39] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/              archive.is/Yv2t3

[40] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/       http://archive.fo/NrdRC

[41] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

[42] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/C_19-10-30_LJvCRL_PN-HoA-Order_SgdCrtStp.pdf

[43] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/02/07-feb-lj-ia-sos-dpate/

[44] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/E_20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_GrgCrtStp_AE-Epp.pdf

[45] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/F_21-01-02_McV20_VP-Pence_ELV-FEC-EC-Vote_Encl.pdf

[46] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/G_20-04-09_21-01-03_CovL_ELV-corr-BH-TP.pdf

2 Comments

    1. […] Garland: McV20 v Trump20 & Biden20: Notice of Motion; Draft Order; Draft Answering Affidavit; Founding Affidavit: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals […]

Leave a Comment