10 Jan: LJ Re: LJvGHJ: Mag Buhr ruling, Setdown

* Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Millers Inc, Arno Crous, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys, Desere Barnard
* 10 Jan: LJ Re: LJvGHJ: Mag Buhr ruling, Setdown
» 11 Jan: Correction: [PDF: 28 Nov 2003: Cross Examination: Dr Giselle Rausch: pp91; pp.78]
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GHJ, LJ v FTM  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson [mailto:eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 9:46 PM
To: ‘Millers Inc: Arno Crous’; ‘Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies’
Cc: ‘Frode Moe’; ‘Talitha Moe’; ‘Graeme Johnstone’; ‘Hilary Johnstone’
Subject: LJvGHJ: Mag Buhr ruling, Setdown


TO: Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard
TO: Millers Inc: Arno Crous
Ref: 12 Dec: LJ T Disc Re: H 51/19: LJ v GHJ: AEJ Affidavit.

Desere Barnard & Arno Crous

LJvGHJ: Mag Buhr ruling, Setdown

* Magistrate Buhrs bomb threat ruling
* Lone Ranger vs Group activism.
* H 51/19: Setdown:
* 01 Jan 2021: PoW Status of EoP OKC TRC Negotiations

I found the court transcript of regional Magistrate Buhr’s – no mental disorder and no personality disorder – ruling [PDF: 04-04-05 Mag Buhr Ruling: pp.10] response to Dr Giselle Rausch’s expert witness [PDF: 28 Nov 2003: Cross Examination: Dr Giselle Rausch: pp.91; pp.78] efforts to convince Mag Buhr that I have a personality disorder.

Mag Buhr: Regards to expert evidence given by Dr van der Westhuizen and Dr Rouche. I must say that they have conceded to many aspects during cross-examination by you. It is evident that you are a highly intelligent person with a unique personality trait. A trait that may not be to the cost of an orderly and law-abiding society. Maybe Dr Rouche’s remarks or remark could be of much use to you, I quote “I think an activist also has a degree of discernment whereby they have a consideration for the other side. If you are going to be an activist I think you should belong to an activist body because then you can get a team, team kind of an approach. To act alone is a sign of self-entitlement’” [State v LJ: 04-04-05: Mag Buhr Ruling PDF: pp.10]

I appealed Mag Buhr’s bomb threat conviction [PDF: 696-04 Heads of Argument: pp.48; PDF: NPA-WC Appeal letter; PDF: 696-04 Appeal Table of Contents: pp.30] Summary: State did not provide any evidence to contradict my necessity defence. Onus of Proof: The onus of proof in a defense of necessity, ruling out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity, lies on the State. [S v Pretorius 1975 (2) SA 85 (SWA) Judge AJ Le Grange]

The Director of Public Prosecutions refused to place my appeal onto the court roll, at the High Court in Capetown. My 2007 – Crimen Injuria – disagreement with Patricia de Lille, for calling her a Kufr – liar deceiver – was in part a result of my request for her to please help me by asking the WC Director of Public Prosecutions why they were refusing to place my appeal on the High Court roll.

The High Court Registrar authorized my In Forma Pauperis lawyer request for help to appeal the De Lille Crimen Injuria conviction [Five crimen injuria charges: Guilty on two counts, not guilty on three counts]; and appointed Arno Crous. Arno Crous refused to accept the appointment to represent me; because he said the appeal court would not accept the evidence that there is more than one legal definition for Kufr / Kuffar / Kaffir. Maybe he knows of only one legal definition for Kufr [Wikipedia: Kafir]. Perhaps its reasonable to conclude that an individual or lawyer who considers skin colour more important than honesty, will gravitate to skin colour legal definitions, as opposed to honesty / deception definitions.

23 Dec 2020 Request for EoP v WiP Law information correspondence to Legal Services Ombudsman: Judge Siraj Desai [23 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombudsman Info; 29 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombud Info]; is referenced in filing to Judge Merrick Garland [08 Jan: Filing: CADC: Jdg Garland: McV20 v Trump20 & Biden20].


Lone Ranger vs Group Activism:

AOC was a waitress, before her brother helped her:

Given that she’s the youngest person ever sworn in to Congress and the talk of D.C., you’d imagine that a support network would come in handy for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—and two of the political powerhouse’s biggest supporters are her family members, her brother Gabriel Ocasio-Cortez and her mother Blanca. Gabriel was the person who initially sent his sister’s information to a Democratic political recruiting group, per Insider, who met with AOC and encouraged her to run. Gabriel was firmly in her corner throughout her candidacy, and remains so: “I‘m the proudest Brother in the World. No Debate,” he wrote on Twitter in December. [Marie LeClaire: Who Is Alexandria Ocasio Cortez’s Brother Gabriel? He’s an Artist and Musician; Knock Down the House: Trailer]

At the time that I made the PW Botha Airport bomb threat I was a member of a team family and team culture.

Team culture: Radical Honesty culture – whose members included Brad Blanton and others, one of whom – Brad – was like me an activist, who often conducted activist activities with other activist groups.. As noted in EoP law Amicus application to Concourt in Citizen v McBride Heads of Argument [Concourt PDF: pp.52] In 2000, I was arrested & detained for 3 hours, with Brad Blanton, Ronny Dugger, founding editor of Texas Observer and Alliance for Democracy, & others in the Washington DC, Capital of the Rotunda, where we were protesting in support of Campaign Finance Reform. The District Attorney declined to Prosecute. Brad has often been arrested on campaign financé protests. [Politico: 6 arrested at Capitol protest].

Team Family: Johnstone, Johnsons, Vockins, Riddick, etc. My family team did not write letters to the court in support of my case. My family did not issue a family press release in support of my right to a free and fair trial. Excluing my parents, none of my family members ever said: How can I help? My lawyer and uncle ‘helped’ by accusing me of mental disorders.

I was and am a peacenik social science activist. Ted Kaczynski [WP: Ted Kaczynski] and Katya Komisaruk [WP: Katya Komisaruk] are activists. Ted and I were appointed lawyers who cooperated with prosecutors to deny us our necessity defence. Katya had lawyers who obeyed her necessity defence orders and filed applications demanding a necessity defence on behalf of her actions [LA Times: Katya Komisaruk’s Revolution: Why a Berkeley MBA Trashed a Multimillion-Dollar Air Force Computer in the Name of Peace].

Theodore John “Ted” Kaczynski, the “Unabomber,” was charged with a crime for which he wanted to stand trial. He objected to his defense counsel’s attempts to have him examined by a psychiatrist for “schizophrenia.” Kaczynski did not want his political motives for mailing letter bombs to be undermined by a diagnosis of schizophrenia. He clearly understood that both the defense and prosecutors were attempting to do this. Mass killer Anders Breivik has likewise resisted the Norwegian legal system’s classification of insanity, again with the goal of advancing his political beliefs. It is interesting to note that not once have people arrested for Islamic terrorist activities either requested or been coerced into pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. [Cato Unbound: Jeffrey Schaler: Strategies of Psychiatric Coercion; CCHR: Jeffrey Schaler: Psychiatry as Fraud]

My ‘mental disorder nutjob’ activism was ignored by society. Ted’s ‘mental disorder nutjob’ activism was disparaged, censoring and silencing his anti-industrial society activism message. Katya was not accused of being a mental disorder nutjob, but was referred to as a necessity defence activist, and became an anarchist necessity defence lawyer.

Neither psychiatrist – Lynnie Boon from George Hospital Psychiatric Ward and Giselle Rausch from Lentegeur – contacted Brad Blanton. Lynnie Boon said Brad was a figment of my imagination.

Currently I am not a member of a team Ecology of Peace culture, as there is only one person who has confirmed themselves as a member of the Ecology of Peace culture [eop-axis-oath]. However I cooperate with other lone ranger liberal, conservative, rich, poor, old, young etc individuals and/or group activists when strategic and/or tactical goals align. If I made a bomb threat today, Dr Rausch would be in error to assume that lone ranger – peacenik [WP: leaderless resistance] or violent [WP: Lone Wolf] – activism is a sign of self entitlement.

Nearly all great scientists start out as heretics nailing their theories to the door of conventional scientific wisdom. Galileo, Darwin and Einstein were all at some point in a minority of one; Alfred Wegener was dead before continental drift was taken seriously. So somewhere today there is a scientific heretic being ridiculed by the orthodox scientific clerisy, but who will later be recognised as a visionary. Trouble is, the fact that all great scientists were heretics does not mean that all heretics are right. Science is plagued by self-proclaimed geniuses furious at the establishment’s refusal to recognise their disproof of relativity. Scientists are human. They allow their prejudices, their interests and their loyalties to get in the way of reason. Sometimes, ideas in science cannot prevail until their diehard opponents have died hard. Theory, it is said, advances “funeral by funeral”. [Wired: ‘Nearly all great scientists start out as heretics’]

Were Galileo [Bio: Galileo], Darwin [BBC: Darwin] and Einstein [Bio: Einstein] self entitled, because they demanded their theories to be proven wrong by evidence, not violent psychiatric coercion?

EoP v WiP Evolution: In a biological evolutionary sense [SDFS: Looking for the Genetic Roots of the Japanese:]: EoP law enables the evolutionary survival of honest citizens. WiP law enables the evolutionary survival of unconscious – fragile ego lack of ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.36-37/70] character – and conscious dishonest citizens. One of the primary methods of unconscious  – fragile ego lack of ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.36-37/70] character – or conscious intentional fraud dishonesty is an individual or organizations negligent failure or intentional refusal to (a) clearly define their abstract – truth, forgiveness, liberation, reconciliation, democracy, freedom, combatant, civilian, etc [SQ-G2G: John Friedlander: Abstract, Concrete, General and Specific Terms] – concepts; and (b) engage in honest and sincere reading/listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle] answers to questions about their strategic or tactical goals; to enable clear and unambiguous fully informed consenting – allies, non-aligned, enemies – agreements about accomplishing whatever their alleged strategic and/or tactical goals are.
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Jul: McV20: EoP Law A: WiP Law. Vusi Mohadi Q: Who Killed Economy?.


Re H 51/19: Setdown:

I shall draft the setdown documents, and wait to see what the response is from Judge Desai, with regard to my request for referral of my EoP law Pro Se applicant cases to Judge Colin Lamont [23 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombudsman Info; 29 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombud Info].


01 Jan 2021: PoW Status of EoP OKC TRC Negotiations:

The deadline for the filing of LJ v LS [lj-v-ls] by a LJ v LS Head of State respondent; with the UNGA and/or ICJ; was 31 December 2020. Besides myself I did not manage to find any of the millions of people publicly representing themselves as peaceniks, willing to provide any Head of State with their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oath] mandate. It was not filed by the deadline.

As noted in my submission to Judge Garland [08 Jan: Filing: CADC: Jdg Garland: McV20 v Trump20 & Biden20] the current focus of EoP OKC TRC negotiations is requesting H 111/19: LJ v LS Third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; to authorize the Swiss UN Ambassador; to submit LJ v LS – to UN General Assembly; for a UNGA vote – which includes allowing any UNGA member nation, who would prefer to hold a national EoP v WiP referendum prior to the UNGA vote, to do so; and once so done – to provide EoP v WiP international law legal certainty. In the event of a UNGA: No EoP OKC TRC vote; the vote will provide written authorization to LJ v LS First and Ninth Respondents – President of South Africa and Russian Federation – Heads of State to authorize and assist US officials; with Tim and my No EoP OKC TRC Siberia Assisted Suicide documentation and travel logistics.

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]


Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Frode & Talitha Moe:
Frode Moe (fro.moe@online.no); Talitha Moe (lee.moe@telkomsa.net); Millers Inc: Arno Crous (arno@millers.co.za);

Graeme and Hilary Johnstone:
Graeme Johnstone (graeme.johnstone@gmail.com); Hilary Johnstone (hilary.johnstone@gmail.com); Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies (rachel@bvdblegal.co.za)


Leave a Comment