23 Jan: EoP PAIA Req for Info: Mediclinic: Johan Fourie

* Mediclinic George, Mediclinic Geneva, Johan Fourie, Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys, Desere Barnard, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Clive Johnstone, Brad Blanton
* 23 Jan: EoP PAIA Req for Info: Mediclinic: Johan Fourie
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GHJ, LJ v CHJ, LJ v BB / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 11:43:19 +0200
To: Mediclinic George <hospmngrgenev@mediclinic.co.za>, Mediclinic Geneva  <hospmngrgeorg@mediclinic.co.za>
Cc: “Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies” <rachel@bvdblegal.co.za>, Graeme Johnstone <graeme.johnstone@gmail.com>, Hilary Johnstone <hilary.johnstone@gmail.com>, Clive Johnstone <clanne@telkomsa.net>, Brad Blanton <brad@radicalhonesty.com>
Subject: PAIA Req for Info: Mediclinic: Johan Fourie


Sent from an Internet Café:

TO: Mediclinic George: Johan Fourie
CC: Graeme Johnstone Counsel: Desere Barnard
CC: Clive Johnstone
CC: Dr Brad Blanton

Johan Fourie:

PAIA Req for Info: Mediclinic: Johan Fourie.

This is a request for information in terms of [A] PAIA: Promotion of Access to Information act in terms of Section 32 (1) (b) of the Constitution right of access to information held by another person when that information is required for the exercise or protection of any rights; and [B] S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18 SA Constitutional Cultural and Psychological Integrity Rights; and The South African Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) and SASOP State Employed Special Interest Group (SESIG) Position Statements on Psychiatric Care in the Public Sector.

Position Statement 9 on culture, mental health and psychiatry
Culture, religion and spirituality should be considered in the current approach to the local practice and training of specialist psychiatrists. This should, however, be performed within the professional and ethical scope of the discipline, and all faith traditions and belief systems in the heterogenous SA society should be respected and regarded equally. In the public sector domain, no preference for one particular tradition should be given over another, as a result of a practitioner or a dominant group being from the one tradition or the other. Building relationships of mutual trust and understanding will require training and health education initiatives aimed at psychiatric practitioners, their patients, carers and students, and cultural and religious practitioners whom patients and their carers may choose to consult.
» A Journal of Psychiatry: The South African Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) and SASOP State Employed Special Interest Group (SESIG) Position Statements on Psychiatric Care in the Public Sector; SciELO: South African Society of Psychiatrists guidelines for the integration of spirituality in the approach to psychiatric practice [PDF]

Specifically I am requesting information details about an appointment made with your office; as documented in correspondence by Graeme Johnstone to Ann Johnstone:

[5] Pa became so concerned about Lara’s state of mind that he asked for our advice. Hilary suggested that Pa speak to Johan Fourie, a local psychiatrist and offered to make an appointment on his behalf. [6] After the appointment with Johan Fourie, Pa was convinced that Lara needed psychiatric treatment.
[Email Sent: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 22:37: From: Graeme Johnstone: Subject: Affidavit]
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jan: LJ Re: Graeme emails to AEJ Re AEJ Affidavit: GHJ & AEJ Emails Re AEJ Affidavit PDF.


PAIA Request for information:

[01] Dates and times of any appointment you had with Clive Johnstone or Graeme Johnstone, about alleged mental disorder allegations against Lara Johnson also known as Lara Johnstone.

[02] Who requested the appointment? Who made the mental disorder allegation submissions? What was their scientific and/or cultural law mental disorder legal definition they were using to measure the quality and in/accuracy of their supporting mental disorder evidence?

[03] Your written report conclusions based upon the information provided to you by Graeme Johnstone and/or Clive Johnstone.


Ecology of Peace Culture:

As of date I am the only unconditional cooperator member [eop-axis-oath: LJ] of the Ecology of Peace culture in South Africa. I was formerly the only member of the Radical Honesty culture [PDF] in South Africa.

Psychologist, Dr Brad Blanton, the founder of the Radical Honesty culture filed the following affidavits in criminal and civil court proceedings, while I was a member of the Radical Honesty culture:

* 02 Dec 2009: Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’; submitted into the High Court, Western Cape, Case # 19963-09, Application for Review, of conviction of Lara Johnstone, of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, on the charge of ‘crimen injuria’. [PDF: pp.11]

* 18 May 2010: Written Statement of Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness [PDF: pp.04]

Subsequent to notifying the Radical Honesty culture of my withdrawal from Radical Honesty; I have provided Brad the opportunity to withdraw or amend his affidavits. He has not done so.

Ecology of Peace definition of religion and culture are interchangeable.

A Culture/Religion is a Group-Shared System of Thought and Action that Offers the Individual a Frame of Orientation and an Object of Devotion:

Erich Fromm: To clarify, “religion” as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols, but to any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not having religion. This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it.  A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct. Often however, individuals are not even aware of the real objects of their personal devotion and mistake their “official” beliefs for their real, though secret religion. If, for instance, a man worships power while professing a religion of love, the religion of power is his secret religion, while his so-called official religion, for example Christianity, is only an ideology.” – SQSwans: To Have or to Be.

In the context of that religion / culture definition; the existential strategic goal of the Ecology of Peace culture is to build a global EoP Axis Alliance of unconditional and conditional cooperators [eop-axis-oath] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law.

Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.

* Objective Factual Reality:
[1] Earth is not flat.
[2] Resources are finite.
[3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
[4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
[5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.

* Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality:
[6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing

Implementing Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law would enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation return to a sustainable international law social contract of zero population growth and zero economic growth. In that context EoP culture advocates for the orderly and humane abolition of industrialization modernity; for a future of racial and religious and ideological cultural law self rule homelands all living in their particular amish-like pre-industrial low tech agrarian villages economy lifestyles, like the Steppe Aryans did for thousands of years, and the Mosuo in China still do.

A handshake is a very low cost way of making contracts, but is worthless in a community with lotsa liars. Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. [SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017; SQ-DS: The Mosou Matriarchy: Men Live Better where Women are in Charge.]


EoP Law Psych ITO SASOP Culture Position Statements:

Question of Law: DSM Bible Questions:

Questions: [A] Is a mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; based upon scientific or cultural law?  [B] If cultural law: what are cultural ethics values to avoid negligent and/or malicious cross-cultural ‘mental disorder’ allegations.

EoP Law Pro Se Applicant Question of Law Answers:

[A] Any mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-1, DSM-2, DSM-3, DSM-4 or DSM-5 – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; is based upon cultural law. [B] Cultural ethics should require cultures with cultural law mental disorder definitions to educate their cultural members, that such definitions are not based on scientific law, but cultural conformity law, and in a fully informed consent multi-cultural community, society or nation, cultural laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups cultural values. [PDF: pp.27].

Mental Health – Right to Refuse Treatment – Parity:

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 does not require group health plans to cover mental health (MH) and substance use disorder (SUD) benefits but, when plans do cover these benefits, MH and SUD benefits must be covered at levels that are no lower and with treatment limitations that are no more restrictive than would be the case for the other medical and surgical benefits offered by the plan. There are three relatively uncontroversial situations in which treatment proceeds legally without consent: The first is the medical treatment of children. The second is the treatment of people when they are literally unconscious. And the third is the treatment of persons with contagious disease.

EoP Law recognizes Mental Health – Right to Refuse Treatment – Parity:

[1] Scientific Law: Scientific Law refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.39-42/70] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured.

[2] Cultural Law: Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.36-37/70] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement.

[3] Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific & Cultural Law: Property Ration [property-ration: PDF: pp.59/70] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed and abide by their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom: PDF: pp.60-61/70] oaths.

[4] Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific & Cultural Law: Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression: PDF: pp.31-33/70]]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression.


Ecology of Peace Culture Re: Trying to Help:

As noted in the EoP Law Question of Law affidavit answers, I am a former student, colleague, friend and activist of Dr. Richard Korn [Richard Korn: The Private Citizen, the Social Expert and the Social Problem; SQ-NYT: Richard Korn: What Hits You is the Total Human Waste; SQ-Time: Richard Korn: Prisons].

One of Professor Richard Korn’s criminology and psychology counseling expert abilities was his research focus on what kind of counseling ‘help’ to a prisoner or medical or psychology patient ‘works’ and what kind of ‘help’ ‘does not work’. Summary: If you don’t know what the patients strategic goal is, if your help is overt coercion or covert passive aggressive do-gooder manipulation coercion help; it won’t work. If you know what a person wants, you can help them. If you don’t know what they want, because they don’t know what they want, or because they are ashamed of being political incorrect about what they want; then you can help them to create an environment more conducive to honesty than political correctness to help them learn to be more honest with themselves and others about what they want. Once they are capable of honestly clarifying what they want, you can honestly inform them whether you have the skills or resource to help them to get what they want. If you do, you can help them; if you don’t, you don’t waste their time and resources pretending that you can help them.

When psychologist and criminologist Dr Richard Korn was sent to a mental institution as the resident psychologist; he would – professional ego strategic suicide – refuse to confirm any resident as ‘insane’, unless that resident could each one teach one simply and clearly explain to him why he needed to be considered insane. His path to healing, for his patients, was similar to RD Laings…. He’d say something like: Well, the Doctors tell me that you guys got something wrong with you, but I’m not too sure; what do you think? Patients were encouraged to provide their own diagnosis and analysis of their alleged mental disorder disease, and how they got there, and if they had it, and so on. He said he had some of the most fascinating conversations in his life!

If Dr Korn came to visit and asked me: Are you sane? I would answer; well it would depend on your scientific or cultural law definition of sanity. There are many cultural law definitions of mental health; some of them are direct contradictions of each other. According to some of those cultural law definitions, I am insane, and so are you. Which cultural law definition are we talking about?

If your cultural law definition is a WiP law cultural ideological capitalist / communist definition; then I am not a good WiP law cultural ideological capitalist / communist, and if evaluated in accordance with that WiP law cultural ideological capitalist / communist mental disorder definition; a psychiatrist or psychologist will conclude that I have a mental disorder.

If your cultural law definition is a WiP law cultural religious Kane Christian / Muslim / Buddhist / Futilitarian definition; then I am not a good Kane Christian / Muslim / Buddhist / Futilitarian; and if evaluated in accordance any WiP Kane Christian or Kane Muslim or Kane Buddhist or Kane Futilitarian cultural law cultural conformity mental disorder definition; a psychiatrist or psychologist will conclude I have a mental disorder.

However I have never claimed to be a Kane capitalist, Kane communist, Kane Muslim, Kane Christian, Kane Buddhist, or Kane Futlitarian. I have never claimed to be a member of any Kane racial or religious or ideological or gender culture. I have never accused any of the people who are conscious and intentional members of any Kane religious or ideological culture, of mental disorders. I have cooperated with people who are potential EoP Abel Christians and EoP Abel Muslims and EoP Abel capitalists and EoP Abel communists, and informed them of the legal – EoP v WiP law [eop-v-wip-law] – differences between EoP Abel Christians Muslims capitalists and communists and WiP Kane Christians, Muslims, capitalists and communists; and informed them of EoP Abel Christians Muslims, capitalists and communists strategic goals to implement EoP Abel international law.

If Dr Korn asked me: What do you want? I’d say, strategically speaking what I want is documented in H 111/19: LJ v LSisulu & Eight Others [lj-v-ls: PDF]. All other legal applications are tactical applications to acquire information for the issues in dispute in LJ v LS. If there is something about what I want anyone doesn’t understand, please ask questions, and I will answer them. All answers are published at eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za correspondence. If you understand what I want. Can you help or not? If yes, how can I labour barter exchange pay you for your help; so our helping is mutually beneficial. If you don’t want to help, no big deal. Please don’t waste my time and resources pretending you want to help. If you know someone who may want to help, please refer me to them; so I can ask them if they can help.

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]


Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Mediclinic George: Johan Fourie:
Mediclinic George (hospmngrgenev@mediclinic.co.za); Mediclinic Geneva (hospmngrgeorg@mediclinic.co.za)

Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard:
Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies (rachel@bvdblegal.co.za);

Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone:
Graeme Johnstone (graeme.johnstone@gmail.com); Hilary Johnstone (hilary.johnstone@gmail.com);

Clive Johnstone:
Clive Johnstone (clanne@telkomsa.net)

Brad Blanton:
Brad Blanton (brad@radicalhonesty.com);


Leave a Comment