27 Jan: McVeigh 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Prisoners of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Jurists and Lawyers Petition

* Inter-American Commission on Human Rights; CH-US Amb Jacques Pitteloud; US Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit:  Chief Judge: Sri Srinivasan, CO District Crt: Chief Judge: Philip A Brimmer, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals: Chief Judge Timothy Tymkovich, Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson, Donald Trump 2020, Butch Bowers, Rudolph Giuliani, Republican Attorneys General, Chris Carr, US-ZA Emb: Jessye Lapenn, CH Fed Cncl: Simonetta Sommaruga, CH-ZA Emb: Helene Budliger Artieda, Beth Wilkinson, Stephen Jones, Michael Tigar, RU-ZA Emb: Ilya Igorevich Rogachev, RU-US Emb: Anatoly Antonov, RU-CH Emb: Harmonin Sergey Viktorovich, RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya
* 27 Jan: McV Filing: IACHR: McV v USA: EoP PoW Voter Petition: McVeigh 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Prisoners of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Jurists and Lawyers Petition.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, McV v USA, McV v TP20 & BH20, US v TJM, EoP v CHPM, EoP US DoJ, EoP v D Trump, EoP v J Biden, EoP v USPR, EoP v USPP, EoP v B Wilkinson, EoP v RU-ZA Emb, LJ v LS / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA: EoP NTE GMRU: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

IN THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS; and US COURT OF APPEALS DC CIRCUIT and US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO and US COURT OF APPEALS: TENTH CIRCUIT and EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT; HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA:

Case No: _____________________

EoP Law Voter Pro Se Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Authorization; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

In the matter/s between:

Timothy McVeigh 2020 – Applicant

and

United States of America – Respondent

Petition for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Order

**************************************

Timothy McVeigh 2020 – Applicant

and

Donald Trump 2020, Biden Harris 2020 – Respondents

CADC: ________________________

Petition for EoP PoW of WiP Law War Declaratory Order.

**************************************

United States – Plaintiff

and

Timothy James McVeigh – Defendant

10th Crt: 119 F.3d 806
CO: No. 96-CR-68-M

Re: Conviction and Sentence of McVeigh for 19 Apr 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing

**************************************

Lara Johnson – Applicant

and

Lindiwe Sisulu: Min of Intnl Relations & Cooperation; Hasso Plattner: RSA Rep. of Giving Pledge; Helene Budliger Artieda, Swiss Amb; Masimba Tafirenyika: UN Amb; Lin Songtian: China Amb; Marcus Cornaro: EU Amb; Didier Vanderhasselt: Belgium & NATO Amb; Jessye Lapenn: US Ch D’Affairs; Mikhail Petrakov: Russia Amb – Respondents

Grg High Crt: H 111/2019

Notice of McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP / OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations

Req EoP/OKC TRC: EoP UN Resolution; or No EoP/OKC TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide vote info.

PETITION TO THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

 

submitted by

McVeigh 2020 campaign

on behalf of

EoP Law Voter Prisoners of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Jurists and Lawyers

against

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

EoP Law Voter Pro Se Application for IACHR – EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War – Declaratory Authorization for Swiss Federal Council to submit H 111/19: LJ v LS; to UNGA, on behalf of EoP Law voter and McVeigh2020 candidate applicants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; for an EoP v WiP international law UNGA vote.

 .

 Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se

16 Taaibos Ave, George, 6529, South Africa

Cell: 071 170 1954.        Email: eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za

EoP Law Voter Registration: EoP Axis Oath[1]: 23 Sep 2017[2]: Lara Johnson[3]

Dept of Homeland Sec: INS File: INS # A77 177 28

.

[I] Petitioner:

[1] EoP Law Voter: Lara Johnson; petition in her capacity as (a) deported US legal resident: Dept of Homeland Security: Immigration and Naturalization Case: INS # A77 177 28; (b) EoP law prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se applicant in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others (“LJ v LS”); and (c) administrative clerk on behalf of Timothy McVeigh 2020 EoP Law Write In Candidate US Presidential campaign.

[II] Settlement Agreement Negotiations Assistance / Relief Orders Requested

[A] EoP OKC PoW Law Pro Se Direct Access:

[2] Order authorizing Pro Se Direct access to confirm Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) law voter applicant and EoP law voter McVeigh candidate; to be Abel EoP law prisoners of Kane Babylon War is Peace “(WiP”) international law war, and WiP Law Only jurists and lawyer combatants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

[B] Standby Article 37: Inter-American Defender Counsel if Respondents WiP Counsel Oppose Application and/or Obstruct Merits Enquiry:

[3] Order appointing Applicant Standby Article 37 Inter-American Defender Counsel if Respondents and/or their WiP law Only counsel obstruct a truthseeking evidentiary enquiry into merits of EoP law voter (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) Notice of McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud; issues in dispute.

[C] Confirm availability of EoP and WiP Law US courts; and if none: Applicants as EoP Prisoners of WiP Law & WiP Law Only Lawyers and Jurists:

[4] In the absence of the US Dept of Justice confirming the existence of a US court clerk and judge willing to accept Ecology of Peace law voter Pro Se applications; to enable the EoP Law voter (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud issues in McVeigh 2020 v Trump Pence 2020 and Biden Harris 2020 [mcv-v-djtjrb[4]] dispute to be heard in such US court, before a US judge and jury; an Order confirming Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) law voter applicant and EoP law voter McVeigh candidate; to be Abel EoP law prisoners of Kane Babylon War is Peace “(WiP”) international law war, and American WiP Law Only jurist and lawyer combatants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

[D] Swiss Federal Council PoW referral to UNGA for EoP v WiP law vote:

[5] If so: Authorizing H 111/19: LJ v LS Third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; to authorize the Swiss UN Ambassador; to submit LJ v LS to UN General Assembly; for a UNGA vote; to provide UNGA legal certainty written authorization for (a) EoP: global implementation of EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution and EoP Law Candidate EoP OKC TRC prisoner-pardon [prisoner-pardon[5]]; or (b) WiP: UNGA nations ambassadors ongoing geopolitical EoP v WiP international law relations negotiations; and EoP law voter and candidates Siberia Assisted Suicide logistics negotiations arrangements.

[III] Jurisdiction:

[6] The Commission is competent to receive and act on this petition pursuant to Articles 1.2(b), 18 and 20 of the Commission’s Statute.

[IV] Victims and Petitioner:

[7] Known Unconditional Cooperator Prisoner of WiP Law Victims:

[7.1] As of date EoP law voter petitioner is the only publicly self identifying unconditional cooperator Prisoner of WiP law, and WiP Law Only Jurists and lawyers victim.

[8] Unknown Unconditional & Conditional Cooperator Prisoner of WiP Law Victims:

[8.1] As of date EoP law voter petitioner does not know how many US citizens – if any, excluding Timothy McVeigh and Michael Martin – would publicly – unconditional or conditional cooperator – self identify as Prisoner of WiP law, and WiP Law Only Jurists and lawyers victims; if there was (i) a US lawyer willing to provide standby counsel to EoP law voter applicants; and (ii) a US judge willing to accept EoP law voter standby counsel Pro Se applications to his/her court; enabling a national legal scientific active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle[6]] truthseeking public enquiry discussion of (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud issues in McVeigh 2020 v Trump Pence 2020 and Biden Harris 2020 [mcv-v-djtjrb[7]] issues in dispute.

[V] Facts:

[9] As of date there has been no response to the 08 Jan 2021 EoP law voter – Notice of (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud – Pro Se filing; from US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Clerk Mark Langer; on behalf of US Court of Appeals DC Circuit (a) Clerk’s office; and/or (b) Judge Merrick Garland; or (c) Judges office.

[10] The facts and supporting evidence are documented in detail in the EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland[8], hereby summarized as follows:

[10] United States (a) prosecutors, judges, lawyers and Oklahoma City bombing victims; who were involved in the prosecution and defense trial of Timothy James McVeigh for his role in the Oklahoma City bombing; (b) government officials – judges, lawyers, prosecutors, legislators etc – who were current and/or former members of the executive, legislature and judiciary in the Presidential administrations of George W Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump; (c) American and international publishers, editors and journalists representing their media publications as Oklahoma City Bombing conflict resolution and truthseeking investigation publications[9]; have been informed of Oklahoma City Bombing Truth and Reconciliation information documented in LJ v LS [D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350] Affidavit [para 34-38]

Oklahoma City Bombing Truth and Reconciliation:

[34] In May 2001, I wrote a letter to President Bush requesting President Bush to suspend Timothy McVeigh’s execution pending OKC bombing Truth and Reconciliation, to facilitate honest forgiveness and truth-seeking problem solving related to the US domestic and foreign policy causes of the OKC bombing. If the OKC TRC proceedings did not grant Timothy McVeigh amnesty, they would choose to sentence Timothy McVeigh and myself to death.

[35] 07 Oct – Dec 2001: Timothy McVeigh’s Oklahoma City bombing commanding officer: Timothy McVeigh’s execution was faked: Sometime on the morning of 07 October or between 6 and 17 December 2001 – the initial meeting occurred during media reports about the bombing of Tora Bora in Afghanistan – I accidentally met US Special Forces Native American – Seminole tribe – soldier Michael Martin – not his real name, which I do not know – at the Westridge park Flying J Truckers Parking lot – Flying J #611, at 6700 Latham St, on the corner of Papago Freeway and N 67th Avenue – in Phoenix Arizona. We traveled together for the day and spent the night at the Geronimo Motel in Flagstaff, discussing among others the OKC bombing, then returned to Phoenix the next day. Michael Martin informed me that Timothy McVeigh’s execution had been faked, and he knew this, because he had personally run into Timothy – who had been partially disguised – at a homeless shelter, in the week of 4th of July 2001, a few weeks after Timothy’s alleged execution. Initially we decided we would travel to various militia compounds where Michael thought McVeigh could be found, or who would know where we could find McVeigh. However, my funds were low, and I had to be back in California for a court date, and so we agreed that Michael would go back to Washington DC to speak with his Pentagon superiors to ascertain their level of interest if any for the disclosure of Oklahoma City bombing events via Truth and Reconciliation proceedings, and I would return to the Bay Area. A few weeks later Michael Martin returned to the Bay Area from DC, where I picked him up at the San Francisco bus station, where I got a parking ticket waiting for his bus to arrive. He stated his Pentagon superiors did not object to his enquiry whether the OKC bombing events could be disclosed via Truth and Reconciliation proceedings, but they did say that it would open a can of worms that went directly back to the John F Kennedy Assassination, and they did not know whether American citizens really want to know the truth about what is done for them in their name.

[36] Upon returning to California I went to CA Governor Gray Davis office where I proceeded to inform Steve West, Former US Special Forces and then Secret Service Officer in the office of Governor Gray Davis of Michael Martin’s information regarding the faked execution of Timothy McVeigh. Mr. West doubted my assertions but I refused to leave the office unless he promised to request Governor Gray Davis to ask President Bush to confirm or deny the information. A few weeks later, I returned and Steve West confirmed that his previous conclusions about the execution of Timothy James McVeigh had been incorrect. Governor Gray Davis had requested President George Bush to confirm or deny Michael Martin’s information about McVeigh’s faked execution, and President Bush had confirmed it; when he met President Bush at their recent meeting in San Bernadino County. Consequently he confirmed for me that Timothy McVeigh had not been executed on 11 June 2001; his execution was faked. Mr. West then thanked me for informing Governor’s Davis office of this information for him to verify with President George W Bush.

[37] All my EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations legal applications and correspondence since 2002 has been – a result of my OKC Bomb TRC offer – and an effort to cooperate with US Pentagon officials to ascertain the level of American and international support for such Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation to End to the Cold War.

[38] On 30 Oct 2018, I submitted informal EoP TRC application to Judge Timothy Tymkovich, a Federal Judge on the 10th Circuit court, CC: US Supreme Court Judges; re: ongoing OKC bomb Truth and Reconciliation efforts: EoP Re: 10th Circuit Court: John Roberts v Brett Kavanaugh & US v Tim McVeigh . The submission concludes that: “If or when it is determined by FSB Gen Bortnikov and NSA: Gen Nakasone that there are insufficient EoP cooperating 2% elite: EoP Applicants consent to Gen Nakasone to release Tim McVeigh [us-v-tjm.tygae.org.za] to travel to South Africa and to Russia with EoP MILED Clerk for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia.”

[12] As of date they appear to have ignored the information.

[13] As of date neither President George W Bush or his Attorney General/s; President Barack Obama or his Attorney General/s; President Donald Trump or his Attorney General/s; have provided EoP Law voter with a written answer to:

[13.1] McVeigh Faked Execution issues in dispute referenced in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others (“LJ v LS”): EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC information requested; and if US Government Answer is No EoP OKC TRC: executive, juridical and/or legislative written authorization for US NSA and Dept of Justice officials to provide assistance for EoP law voter and candidates WiP Siberia Assisted Suicide logistics arrangements.

Judicial Enquiries:

[14] Petitioner has not been informed of any official law enforcement, legislative, executive, judicial or media – (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud – inquiry being conducted in response to EoP law voter’s submission of Michael Martin’s LJ v LS Faked Execution of McVeigh information to any legislative, executive, judicial or media officials; prior or subsequent to the filing of H 111/19: LJ v LS; and subsequent parallel McVeigh2020 campaign filings; finally resulting in the 08 Jan 2021 Pro Se filing with US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Clerk Mark Langer; for the attention of US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland.

Timeliness:

[15] The petition falls within article 32.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Procedure, requirements that a petition to the Commission should be lodged within six months of notification of the final ruling that constitutes the exhaustion of domestic remedies.

Parallel International Proceedings:

[16] The EoP law voter’s – Notice of McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP / OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations – application in the George High Court: H 111/19: LJ v LS, includes third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

[17] As of date, all South African respondents – 01: SA President Cyril Ramaphosa via DIRCO: Naledi Pandor, formerly Lindiwe Sisulu[10]; 02: Giving Pledge Chairman: Bill Gates via Hasso Plattner: RSA Rep. of Giving Pledge[11] – have been served by the SA Sheriffs office. The only South African Ambassador of a Foreign Nation Head of State Respondent; who has accepted service by the SA Sheriffs office has been Marcus Cornaro[12]: EU Amb on behalf of EU President.

[18] On 05 Sep 2019, the Swiss government – Federal Chancellery; Communications Section – acknowledged receipt of the LJ v LS application per email[13].

[19] As noted in the Relief Requested, this petition requests United States Government:

[19.1] Confirm existence of EoP and WiP Law US Court:

[A] To confirm the existence of a US court clerk and judge willing to accept Ecology of Peace law voter Pro Se applications; to enable the EoP Law voter – (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud – issues in McVeigh 2020 v Trump Pence 2020 and Biden Harris 2020 [mcv-v-djtjrb[14]] dispute to be heard in such US court, before a US judge and jury;

[19.2] If none: consent to EoP law voters: Prisoner of WiP Law legal status:

[A] Settlement agreement consent; made an IACHR order of court; authorization for H 111/19: LJ v LS Third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; to authorize the Swiss UN Ambassador; to submit LJ v LS to UN General Assembly; for a UNGA vote; to provide UNGA legal certainty written authorization for (a) EoP: global implementation of EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution and EoP Law Candidate EoP OKC TRC prisoner-pardon [prisoner-pardon[15]]; or (b) WiP: UNGA nations ambassadors ongoing geopolitical EoP v WiP international law relations negotiations; and EoP law voter and candidates Siberia Assisted Suicide logistics negotiations arrangements.

[19.3] If no US Consent Settlement Agreement: IACHR Order Authorizing EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP law legal status:

[A] An IACHR order confirming Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) law voter applicant and EoP law voter McVeigh candidate; to be Abel EoP law prisoners of Kane Babylon War is Peace “(WiP”) international law war, and American WiP Law Only jurist and lawyer combatants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; thereby providing authorization for H 111/19: LJ v LS Third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; to authorize the Swiss UN Ambassador; to submit LJ v LS to UN General Assembly; for a UNGA vote; to provide UNGA legal certainty written authorization for (a) EoP: global implementation of EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution and EoP Law Candidate EoP OKC TRC prisoner-pardon [prisoner-pardon[16]]; or (b) WiP: UNGA nations ambassadors ongoing geopolitical EoP v WiP international law relations negotiations; and EoP law voter and candidates Siberia Assisted Suicide logistics negotiations arrangements..

Failed Legal Remedies:

[20] As of date EoP Law Voter Petitioner has been unable to get any US judge, clerk and/or lawyer’s assistance to submit EoP Law voter – (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud – application to a US court; hence the Application for IACHR to confirm the EoP Law voters as Prisoners of WiP Law, WiP Law Only Jurists and Lawyers.

[21] The Petitioner was and is unable to institute court proceedings in the United States of America; to resolve the issues in dispute; presumably because as of date (1) the domestic laws of the United States of America do not provide for due process of law to protect the rights of EoP law voter citizens access to courts and court due process legal enquiry and conflict resolution due process proceedings; (2) the petitioner has been denied access to the legal due process conflict resolution remedies under US domestic law or has been prevented from exhausting them; and (3) this denial of access to due process conflict resolution US court proceedings; has resulted in an unwarranted delay in providing for a final judgment on the aforementioned issues in dispute.

United States Responsibility for the Violation of EoP Law voters Rights:

[22] As noted by S James Anaya in The Border Action Network against United States of America, as amended to EoP law voters:

[23] Right to Physical Integrity and Security of Person:

[23.1] The right to physical integrity and security of person is well enshrined in international law, both in the inter-American and United Nations (“UN”) systems. Article I of the American Declaration states that “[every human being has the right to life, liberty and the security of his person.” The Commission has held this norm prohibits arbitrary detention, physical assault, torture, and other affronts to individual physical liberty and integrity imposed by state actors, and the larger corpus of international human rights law extends the norm to protection against threats and other degrading treatment or punishment.

[23.2] In addition to prohibiting direct violations by state actors, Article I of the Declaration also represents a more general state responsibility to protect individuals within its borders from bodily harm at the hands of other individuals. Following the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the Commission has declared that “[a] State must answer for the acts of its agents performed in their official capacity and for their omissions, even if they were acting outside the scope of their authority or in violation of domestic This responsibility imposes a duty of “diligence” on law enforcement officials and public prosecutors to take preventative measures and to enforce criminal laws against persons who violate others’ human rights, and holds the State accountable where they err in failing to press charges or allow for unconscionable delays in prosecution. The Commission has held that the failure of a state “to conduct a prompt, efficient investigation constitutes in itself a specific, independent violation.”

[23.3] Further, Article 9 of the U.S.-ratified International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that “[everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.. .No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.” Related to Article 9 is Article 7, which affirms that “[no one shall be subject to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of punishment.” The UN Human Rights Committee has interpreted both articles to require state protection of individuals against affronts to their physical security by public officials or private individual.

[23.4] In this case, the inaction of federal and state juridical officials incurs S. responsibility for failing to protect the physical integrity of EoP Law voter victims access to courts, to enable the issues in dispute to be amicably resolved.

[24] Right to Judicial Protection:

[24.1] The failure of federal and state law enforcement officials and prosecutors to hold accountable judges and prosecutor violators of EoP law voters access to courts also amounts to a violation of the right to judicial protection, a right firmly established in instruments and jurisprudence of the inter-American system. Article XVIII of the American Declaration states: “[every person may resort to the courts to ensure respect for his legal rights. There should likewise be available to him a simple, brief procedure whereby the courts will protect him from acts of authority that, to his prejudice, violate any fundamental constitutional rights.” Article XVIII, like articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, ensures individuals a judicial system that is accessible to them and that functions effectively to protect their rights. An absence of effective judicial remedies, as in this case, not only exonerates a petitioner to the Commission from having to exhaust domestic remedies, but also constitutes a violation of the right to judicial protection.

[24.2] The right to judicial protection reflected in Article XVIII of the American Declaration goes beyond requiring direct access by individuals to judicial proceedings. It also is a right that ensures investigation and prosecution of human rights violations by the state in a timely and effective manner. In its decision in the Velasquez-Rodriguez case, the Inter-American Court stated: [Investigations] must be undertaken in a serious manner and not as a mere formality preordained to be ineffective. An investigation must have an objective and be assumed by the State as its own legal duty, not as a step taken by private interests that depends on the initiative of the victim or his family or upon their offer of proof, without an effective search for the truth by the government.

[24.3] In sum, in the absence of any factors to justify the failure of state authorities to fully investigate and prosecute denial of due process rights to EoP law voters, the United States is responsible for violating victims’ rights to judicial protection.

[25] Right to Equal Protection and Freedom from Discrimination under the Law:

[25.1] Article II of the American Declaration states that “[all persons are equal before the law and have the rights and duties established in this Declaration, without distinction as to race, sex, language, creed or any other factor.” The Universal Declaration on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights also contain similar provisions guaranteeing individual protection against discrimination based on race or national origin.

[25.2] Because of its persistent failure to provide access to US courts to EoP law voters; the United States is responsible for failing to provide equal protection of the law to these voters. The right to equal protection under the law, like human rights norms in general, must be adhered to by the United States with respect to all persons falling under its jurisdiction.

[25.3] The Court has specifically recognized problems of discrimination that may arise in the administration of justice, and has admonished that states must be vigilant and – take special measures to prevent such discrimination: [The judicial process must recognize and correct any real disadvantages that those brought before the bar may have, thus observing the principle of equality before the law and the courts and the corollary principle prohibiting discrimination. The presence of real disadvantages necessitates countervailing measures that help to reduce or eliminate the obstacles and deficiencies that impair or diminish an effective defense of one’s interests. Absent those countervailing measures, widely recognized in various stages of the proceeding, one could hardly say that those who have the disadvantages enjoy a true opportunity for justice and the benefit of the due process of law equal to those who do not have those disadvantages.

Request for Relief:

[26] By reason of the foregoing, EoP law voter applicant respectfully requests that the Commission:

[26.1] Authorize Pro Se Direct access to confirm Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) law voter applicant and EoP law voter McVeigh candidate; to be Abel EoP law prisoners of Kane Babylon War is Peace “(WiP”) international law war, and WiP Law Only jurists and lawyer combatants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

[26.2] Appoint Standby Article 37: Inter-American Defender Counsel if Respondents and/or their WiP law Only counsel obstruct a truthseeking evidentiary enquiry into – (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud – merits of EoP law voter application issues in dispute.

[26.3] In the absence of the US Dept of Justice confirming the existence of a US court clerk and judge willing to accept Ecology of Peace law voter Pro Se applications; to enable the EoP Law voter – (a) Prisoner of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Judges and Lawyers; (b) McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations; and (c) EoP v WiP law voter fraud – issues in McVeigh 2020 v Trump Pence 2020 and Biden Harris 2020 [mcv-v-djtjrb[17]] dispute to be heard in such US court, before a US judge and jury; an order confirming Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) law voter applicant and EoP law voter McVeigh candidate; to be Abel EoP law prisoners of Kane Babylon War is Peace “(WiP”) international law war, and American WiP Law Only jurist and lawyer combatants; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War.

[26.4] If so: Authorizing H 111/19: LJ v LS Third Respondent: Swiss Federal Council President Simonetta Sommaruga; in the capacity of the Swiss Federal Council’s neutral mediation responsibilities in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War; to authorize the Swiss UN Ambassador; to submit LJ v LS to UN General Assembly; for a UNGA vote; to provide UNGA legal certainty written authorization for (a) EoP: global implementation of EoP OKC TRC UN Resolution and EoP Law Candidate EoP OKC TRC prisoner-pardon [prisoner-pardon[18]]; or (b) WiP: UNGA nations ambassadors ongoing geopolitical EoP v WiP international law relations negotiations; and EoP law voter and candidates Siberia Assisted Suicide logistics negotiations arrangements.

Signature, Designation of Representative, and Consent to Disclose Identity of Petitioner:

[27] Lara Johnson, EoP Law Voter, and EoP MILED Clerk administrator of McVeigh2020, has the authority to sign this petition on behalf of the organization and does so below, attesting to the veracity of the facts set forth herein to the best of her information and belief.

[28] By affixing her signature hereto, Lara Johnson also designates, as the representative of McVeigh2020 for the purposes of this petition and all associated proceedings, the address as provided. All notices and communications to the petitioner and related to this case should be sent to the Pro Se EoP Law voter petitioner at the address below.

[29] The petitioner agrees that its identity may be disclosed to all concerned with this petition.

[30] Signed on 27 Jan 2021, at George, South Africa, Pale Blue Dot.

[Signed: L Johnson]

____________________________
Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se
16 Taaibos Ave, George, 6529, South Africa
Cell: 071 170 1954.        Email: eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za
EoP Law Voter Registration: EoP Axis Oath[19]: 23 Sep 2017[20]: Lara Johnson[21]
Dept of Homeland Sec: INS File: INS # A77 177 28

.

Annexures:  Available Online for Download:

EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland

Notice of Motion, Draft Order, Draft Answering Affidavit, Founding Affidavit [pp.29] Proof of Service per electronic mail [pp.05].

Founding Affidavit Enclosures
[A]    Summary EoP v WiP Law [A: pp.05; E: pp.308-312/350]
[B]    EoP Law voter EoP Axis Oath responsible freedom ballot [B: pp.06; C: pp.39-44/44]
[C]    H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law Relief Re WiP Law Only Lawyers Denial of Counsel to EoP Law Applicants: Practice Note, Heads of Argument & Order [C: pp.44]
[D]    H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others: EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC Negotiations [D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350]
[E]    Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate. [E: pp.350]
[F]    EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote: Pres of Senate: VP Pence [F: pp.334]
[G]    EoP Law Voter correspondence to, cc: Trump / Biden campaigns [G: pp.111]

.

Notice of Motion, Draft Order, Draft Answering Affid, Founding Affidavit [pp.29]
http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-07_McV-v-DJT-JRB_NoM-Order-Affid.pdf
[web.archive.org]  https://web.archive.org/web/20210115085036/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-07_McV-v-DJT-JRB_NoM-Order-Affid.pdf

Proof of Service [pp.05]:
http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-08_18-48_lj_notice_mcv-v-djtjrb_pos.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210112120546/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-08_18-48_lj_notice_mcv-v-djtjrb_pos.pdf

Founding Affidavit Annexures: [C: pp.44; E: pp.350; F: pp.334; G: pp.111]
C: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/C_19-10-30_LJvCRL_PN-HoA-Order_SgdCrtStp.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109092448/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/C_19-10-30_LJvCRL_PN-HoA-Order_SgdCrtStp.pdf
E: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/E_20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_GrgCrtStp_AE-Epp.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109092647/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/E_20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_GrgCrtStp_AE-Epp.pdf
F: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/F_21-01-02_McV20_VP-Pence_ELV-FEC-EC-Vote_Encl.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109092730/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/F_21-01-02_McV20_VP-Pence_ELV-FEC-EC-Vote_Encl.pdf
G: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/G_20-04-09_21-01-03_CovL_ELV-corr-BH-TP.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109093200/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/G_20-04-09_21-01-03_CovL_ELV-corr-BH-TP.pdf

SUBMITTED TO:

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
1889 F Street, NW, Washington DC 20006, United States
Fax: (202) 458-3992 or 6215
E: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (cidhdenuncias@oas.org)

.

TRANSPARENCY COPIES:

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Monty Wilkinson
Acting Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson: John C. Demers: National Security Division (nsd.public@usdoj.gov); Press (usavae.press@usdoj.gov);

Trump Pence 2020:
Donald Trump 2020 (pressoffice@donaldtrump.com); Counsel: Butch Bowers (butch@butchbowers.com); Miller Law Group: Stacy Miller II (stacy@millerlawgroupnc.com); Mike Pence: Counsel: John Coghlan (john.coghlan2@usdoj.gov); Victoria Toensing (dt@digenovatoensing.com); diGenova & Toensing (dt@diGenovaToensing.com); Joseph diGenova (jd@digenovatoensing.com); Sidney Powell (Sidney@federalappeals.com); Kolodin Law Group: Alexander Kolodin (Alexander.Kolodin@KolodinLaw.com); Howard Kleinhendler (howard@kleinhendler.com); Rudolph Giuliani via Giuliani Partners (info@giulianipartners.com); JoAnn Zafonte (JoAnn.Zafonte@giulianipartners.com); Jon Sale (jon.sale@nelsonmullins.com); Republican Attorneys General (info@republicanags.com); Chairman Chris Carr (chairman@republicanags.com)

USA v TJ McVeigh:
Beth Wilkinson (bwilkinson@paulweiss.com); Joseph Wyderko (joseph.wyderko@usdoj.gov); Larry A Mackey (lmackey@btlaw.com); Sean Connelly (sean@sconnellylaw.com); Danny Defenbaugh (Info@DannyDefenbaugh.com)

Timothy McVeigh: Counsel: Stephen Jones
Stephen Jones Law
214-A North Independence Avenue, Enid, OK 73701
P.O. Box 472, Enid, Oklahoma 73701
Tel: (580) 242-5500  / Fax: (580) 242-4556
Counsel: Stephen Jones (sjones@stephenjoneslaw.com) Richard Burr (Dick@BurrandWelch.com); Nathan Dale Chambers (nchambers@nathanchamberslaw.com); Jeralyn Merritt (jeralynm@gmail.com); Nichols Counsel: Michael Tigar (mtigar@wcl.american.edu); Barry Alan Schwartz (barry.schwartz@denvergov.org); John Richilano (jmr@richilanoshea.com); N Reid Neureiter (n_reid_neureiter@cod.uscourts.gov); Susan Lynn Foreman (susanlforeman@comcast.net).

SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL

CH-US Amb Jacques Pitteloud
Embassy of Swiss Confederation
2201 Wisconsin Ave. N.W., Suite 300
Washington, DC 20007-4105
United States of America
E: CH-US Amb Jacques Pitteloud (washington@eda.admin.ch)

On behalf of: Simonetta Sommaruga: President Swiss Confederation:
Simonetta Sommaruga: President Swiss Confederation: Federal Chancellery (info@bk.admin.ch); Media (media@bk.admin.ch); CH-ZA Emb: Helene Budliger Artieda (pretoria@eda.admin.ch); CH-IR Emb: Markus Leitner (tehran@eda.admin.ch); CH-US Emb: Jacques Pitteloud (washington@eda.admin.ch); CH-NL Emb: Heinz Walker-Nederkoorn (thehague@eda.admin.ch); CH-RU Emb: Yves Rossier (moscow@eda.admin.ch); CH-BE Emb: Christian Meuwly (bru.vertretung@eda.admin.ch); CH-CN Emb: Jean-Jacques de Dardel (bei.vertretung@eda.admin.ch); CH-UN Emb: Baeriswyl Pascale (newyork.un@eda.admin.ch);

US COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Chief Judge: Sri Srinivasan
Clerk Mark Langer
US Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
E Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse
333 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001
Ref:: McVeigh 2020 v Trump Pence 2020 & Biden Harris 2020
Pro Se Filings (ProSeFilings@cadc.uscourts.gov)

US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Clerk of Court: Jeffrey P Colwell Esq
Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, Room A105
901 19th Street, Denver, CO 80294-3589
Ref: US v McVeigh, Criminal Action No. 96-CR-68-M
CO District Crt: EFC Help Desk (cod_cmecf@cod.uscourts.gov)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS: TENTH CIRCUIT

Chief Judge Timothy Tymkovich
Clerk of Court: Christopher M Wolpert
Byron White Court House
1823 Stout Street, Denver, CO 80257
Ref: US v McVeigh 119 F.3d 806.
10th Circuit Court of Appeals: Clerk (clerk@ca10.uscourts.gov)

GEORGE HIGH COURT

Registrar of the High Court
Eastern Circuit of Western Cape High Court Held at George
Room 207, Second Floor, George Magistrates Court
Cnr. York & Courtenay St, Camfers Drift, George, 6529
Ref: H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others Negotiations.

H 111/19: LJ v LS Respondents:

CH-ZA Amb Helene Budliger Artieda
Embassy of Swiss Confederation
225 Veale St, Parc Nouveau, New Muckleneuk, 0181
Tel: 012 452 0660 / Fax: 012 346 6605
E: CH-ZA Emb: Helene Budliger Artieda (pretoria@eda.admin.ch)

US-ZA Emb: Jessye Lapenn: Charge D’Affairs
United States Embassy in Pretoria
877 Pretorius St, Arcadia, Pretoria, 0083
PO Box 9536, Pretoria, 0001
Tel: (012) 431-4000 / Fax: (012) 342-2299
E: US-ZA Emb: Jessye Lapenn (protocolpretoria@state.gov);

RU-ZA Emb: Ilya Rogachev
Russian Federation Embassy in Pretoria
316 Brooks Street, Menlo Park, 0081, Pretoria.
Tel: 012 362 1337/9  | Fax: 012 362 0116
E: RU-ZA Emb: Ilya Igorevich Rogachev (ruspospr@mweb.co.za); RU-US Emb: Anatoly Antonov (RusPressUSA@mid.ru); RU-CH Emb: Harmonin Sergey Viktorovich (rusbotschaft@bluewin.ch); RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya: Fedor Strzhizhovskiy (press@russiaun.ru)

.

——- Footnotes ———

[1] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/              archive.is/Yv2t3

[2] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/       http://archive.fo/NrdRC

[3] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

[4] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/

[5] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/prisoner-pardon/          archive.fo/rXKVD

[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyKW7Jebgck

[7] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/

[8] EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland

Notice of Motion, Draft Order, Draft Answering Affidavit, Founding Affidavit [pp.29]
Proof of Service per electronic mail [pp.05].    Founding Affidavit Enclosures

[A]     Summary EoP v WiP Law [A: pp.05; E: pp.308-312/350]
[B]     EoP Law voter EoP Axis Oath responsible freedom ballot [B: pp.06; C: pp.39-44/44]
[C]     H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law Relief Re WiP Law Only Lawyers Denial of Counsel to EoP Law Applicants: Practice Note, Heads of Argument & Order [C: pp.44]
[D]     H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others: EoP OKC TRC or No EoP OKC TRC Negotiations [D: pp.70; E: pp.31-100/350]
[E]     Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate. [E: pp.350]
[F]     EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote: Pres of Senate: VP Pence [F: pp.334]
[G]     EoP Law Voter correspondence to, cc: Trump / Biden campaigns [G: pp.111]

Notice of Motion, Draft Order, Draft Answering Affidavit, Founding Affidavit [pp.29]:
http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-07_McV-v-DJT-JRB_NoM-Order-Affid.pdf
[web.archive.org]  https://web.archive.org/web/20210115085036/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-07_McV-v-DJT-JRB_NoM-Order-Affid.pdf

Proof of Service [pp.05]:
http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-08_18-48_lj_notice_mcv-v-djtjrb_pos.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210112120546/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-01-08_18-48_lj_notice_mcv-v-djtjrb_pos.pdf

Founding Affidavit Annexures: [C: pp.44; E: pp.350; F: pp.334; G: pp.111]
C: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/C_19-10-30_LJvCRL_PN-HoA-Order_SgdCrtStp.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109092448/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/C_19-10-30_LJvCRL_PN-HoA-Order_SgdCrtStp.pdf
E: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/E_20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_GrgCrtStp_AE-Epp.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109092647/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/E_20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_GrgCrtStp_AE-Epp.pdf
F: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/F_21-01-02_McV20_VP-Pence_ELV-FEC-EC-Vote_Encl.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109092730/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/F_21-01-02_McV20_VP-Pence_ELV-FEC-EC-Vote_Encl.pdf
G: http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/G_20-04-09_21-01-03_CovL_ELV-corr-BH-TP.pdf
[web.archive.org] https://web.archive.org/web/20210109093200/http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/pdf/G_20-04-09_21-01-03_CovL_ELV-corr-BH-TP.pdf

[9] Outpost of Freedom: Gary Hunt; Buffalo News: Dan Herbeck & Lou Michel; etc:
17 May: LJ v LSisulu Re: McVeigh OKC bombing TRC EoP UN Resolution
http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/05/17-may-lsisulu/

Two Minutes Past Nine: Leah Sottile
02 Oct: McV20 Re: Two Minutes Past Nine
http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/02_19-13_lj-lsottile/

Wikipedia & Conservapedia: Timothy McVeigh pages
28 Jul: EoP McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page
http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/07/28_23-23_lj-wp-tjmcveigh/

15 Aug: EoP McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Conservapedia Page
http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/08/15_19-17_lj-cpedia/

[10] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-06-24_SRS-01_DIRCO-Sisulu_NoM-Afd-Encl.pdf

[11] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-07-23_SRS-02_GP-Plattner_NoM-Afd-Encl.pdf

[12] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-07-23_SRS-06_EU-Cornaro_NoM-Afd-Encl.pdf

[13] Dear Mrs Lara Johnson: We have received your enquiry and have forwarded it to the appropriate person/office. As we receive many enquiries and try to resolve all matters passed on to us, it may take a little while for you to receive a reply. Nonetheless, we will do our utmost to ensure that you receive your reply as quickly as possible. Kind regards, Federal Chancellery; Communications Section. Gurtengasse 5, 3003 Bern          http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/09/05-sep-ch-fccs/

[14] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/

[15] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/prisoner-pardon/          archive.fo/rXKVD

[16] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/prisoner-pardon/          archive.fo/rXKVD

[17] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za/

[18] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/prisoner-pardon/          archive.fo/rXKVD

[19] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/              archive.is/Yv2t3

[20] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/       http://archive.fo/NrdRC

[21] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

.

Leave a Comment