* Day Brown
* 30 Jan: EoP Re: Day Brown: Scientific Truthseeker LibCons Genepool Elections.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: SQSwans / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
LJ Post: 30 Jan 2021: 13:17 hrs.
Hey Day: Hope you are well.
I can’t find the source of your quote on PIE and I can’t search your timeline. So posting a comment here, so I can use it as temporary source.
Day Brown: Most “liberals’ are just as neurotic as most conservatives. We need a new word for those who actually follow the science. Understanding the diffs in gene pools is not racism so long as you recognize talent and character where it exists; every gene pool has some, but the ratio determines whether a majority will elect leaders or demagogues.
thanx Lara. I still stand by every word- but expect apocalyptic chaotic pandemic to make the point moot. Posters go on about AK or Canada, but there isnt enuf time to both prepare for severe winters and attain self sufficiency. The best bet is a custom built low . profile, shallow draft house boat on the Arkansas that you disappear into the Mississippi delta swamps when TSHTF.
Posters go on about guns and ammo, but someone calculated, that if you empty the cities, there’ll be 97 hunters per sq mile of national forest. solar roof will power you thru bayous where a 50$ cast net gets you dinner with no noise.
A fixed base will attract hundreds of hunters. Or parents showing up for yout feed their kids. And if govt does exist, they’ll take everything as taxes.
been to paulekman.com? It lots easier to detect lies in pale faces.
thanx day. interesting thoughts on apocalyptic chaotic pandemic. yes i checkedout paulekman after reading your comment. not enough to figure out details, but did browse.
Remember lying eyes by the Eagles? Ekman says its not just the eyes. the truth is fast. It takes the prefrontal lobes 200 ms to calculate what the face should look like to support a lie. Stand with your back to the sun for more light. prefer pale faces. Ekman says the fake smile and eyes dont look right. If familiar. strange non-white faces are inscrutable.
Don’t recall lying eyes by the eagles. Don’t know much about pop music. I will have to check ekman again, but his website did not make a big impression. How can he know if someone is telling a lie from their facial expression? Anyway, I can’t provide an informed comment, if I am not clear what the evidentiary foundation of his working hypothesis conclusions are. I’d have to read more to provide a more informed response.
Lara Zhivago Ekman began with monkeys, who cant lie, but have the same facial expressions. the autonomic nerves produce the smile that the fake cant activate. High speed video shows the diff, and you can learn to pick it up. FMRI show the mid-brain memory is true, but lies use the prefrontal lobes- which takes 200 ms to calculate. Soma disturbs the time sense; Aryans always knew who the liars were.
Sounds complicated. I am not saying he is not right, or that his conclusions are incorrect. I am not informed enough about his work to make anything remotely coming close to an informed comment.
I am skeptical of people who call themselves ‘truth’ tellers or ‘lie’ exposers; who dont define truth.
Who decides what the definition of objective or subjective truth is in the particular moment. Then you have to ask whether the other party knows that particular definition of truth, objectively or subjectively. If not: how are they lying? And then there is conscious lying and unconscious self deception lying. Sometimes a subjective conscious lie, may be unconsciously an objective truth. When people don’t define objective or subjective ‘truth’; how can they come to conclusions that something that is not ‘the truth’ is a lie?