30 Jan: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency / CHPM TN Senators Feinstein & Hawley: IACHR: McV 2020 v USA: EoP PoW Voter Petition.

* Robert L. Grenier, New York Times, Kathleen Kingsbury, Sidley, David Hoffman, Alix Partners, Louis Freeh, APA Ethics Dir, Stephen Behnke, Dianne Feinstein D-CA, Josh Hawley R-MO, CHFC Simonetta Sommaruga, CH-EG Emb: Paul Garnier; CH-PK Emb: Thomas Kolly.
* 30 Jan: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency / CHPM TN Senators Feinstein & Hawley: IACHR: McV 2020 v USA: EoP PoW Voter Petition.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP FBI, EoP v US Senate, EoP v US Pol Parties, EoP v USPR, EoP v Alt Right, EoP v CHPM, LJ v LS / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 6:20 PM
To: ‘Robert L. Grenier’
Cc: ‘NYT OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury’
Subject: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 6:24 PM
To: ‘Dianne Feinstein D-CA: John Watts’; ‘Eric Oginsky’; ‘Chesna Foord’; ‘Andrew Fuentes’; ‘Josh Hawley R-MO: Ellen James’; ‘Sidley: David Hoffman’; ‘Alix Partners: Louis Freeh’; ‘Simon Freakley’; ‘Louis Dudney’; ‘APA: Ethics Dir: Stephen Behnke’
Cc: ‘Simonetta Sommaruga: President Swiss Confederation: Federal Chancellery’; ‘CH-EG Emb: Paul Garnier’; ‘CH-DZ Emb: Muriel Berset Kohen’; ‘CH-AZ Emb: Philipp Stalder’; ‘CH-PK Emb: Thomas Kolly’; ‘CH-SA Emb: André Schaller’; ‘CH-IL Emb: Jean-Daniel Ruch’; ‘CH-PK Emb: Thomas Kolly’
Subject: CHPM TN: IACHR: McV 2020 v USA: EoP PoW Voter Petition.
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 6:52 PM
To: ‘APA Ethics Dir: Stephen Behnke: APA: Maureen OBrien’; ‘Jennifer Kelly’; ‘Frank Worrell’; ‘Sandra Shullman’; ‘Arthur Evans’; ‘Lynne Cooper’; ‘Randall White’; ‘Candice Hargons’; ‘Eric Butter’; ‘Anthony Chambers’; ‘Pamela Scott-Johnson’; ‘Susan Clayton’; ‘Robin Mockenhaupt’; ‘Shannon Wiltsey’; ‘Blanka Angyal’
Cc: ‘Robert L. Grenier’
Subject: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency


TO: Robert Grenier
CC: NYT: OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury.
Re: NYT: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency

FY – EoP v WiP [mcv-v-djtjrb] Law [F: JMG] Elections EndgameJourney negs – Info:
CC: Dianne Feinstein D-CA; David Hoffman, Louis Freeh, Stephen Behnke
Re: Robert Grenier: From Truth and Reconciliation to Lies and Obsfuscation: The Senate RDI Report; NYT: Outside Psychologists Shielded U.S. Torture Program, Report Finds; Business Wire: Defamation Suit against APA, David Hoffman, and Sidley Austin LLP Expands; Suit Brought by Louis J. Freeh of Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan, LLP (Counsel for Dr. Behnke) and Dr. Bonny J. Forrest (Counsel for the Other Plaintiffs)
Ref: EoP v WiP [eop-v-wip] ism [eop-v-wip-ism] Law [eop-v-wip-law] Psych [eop-v-wip-psych]

FY – EoP v WiP [mcv-v-djtjrb] Law [F: JMG] Elections EndgameJourney negs – Info:
CC: Josh Hawley R-MO:
Re: BusIns: GOP Sen. Josh Hawley wrote a column in defense of militia members in the wake of Oklahoma City bombing when he was 15.
Ref: 27 Jan: McV Filing: IACHR: McV 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Prisoners of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Jurists and Lawyers Petition.

CC: CHFC Simonetta Sommaruga, CH-EG Emb: Paul Garnier; CH-PK Emb: Thomas Kolly:
Re: NATO: Climate Change; Global Observatory: Climate Change is Urgent Food Water Wars Refugee Mass Migration Global Security Threat; Reuters: Two is enough, Pres Al-Sisi tells poor families as population booms; Express Tribune: Justice Nisar: population control is Pakistans top priority after water conservation; Supreme Court recommends national task force for population control; Energy Skeptic: Wilkin: Zero to One Child per woman; the only possible solution at this late date; Fossil-fueled industrial heat hard to impossible to replace with renewables; 328 Million Americans use 3.2 million pounds of minerals, metals, and fuels in their lifetime; SQ-WA: Clugston: NNR Scarcity End of Industrial Civilization; SQ-PM: Every Child Increases a Parents Carbon Footprint by a Factor of 20; SQ-JB: A Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce.
Ref: 31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations.

Robert Grenier:

EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency

I read your New York Times Op-ed [NYT: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency]. I don’t have NYT in my RSS newsfeed. I noticed it while reading Bill Moyers article [Bill Moyers: Invitation to the Party]; while doing a Moyers search for GoP at the crossroads [Bill Moyers: The GOP at the Crossroads].

But consider: What if … Senator Feinstein/Hawley had instead been honest, and risen to the Senate floor to say, in effect, the following: “After the grievous, shocking losses of Oklahoma bombing / 9/11 attacks, the American government, out of understandable fear of future horrors which might lie in store, took vigorous and, in retrospect, sometimes ill-considered action to ensure no such attack would ever happen again. In the process, we lost our moral bearings, and violated some of the values we hold most dear, those that distinguish us from the terrorists, including the rights to privacy and the sanctity of the individual. There was broad complicity in these actions, extending from the White House, to the Department of Justice, to the Defense Department, to CIA and the Intelligence Community, and — yes — to the Congress as well. Let us therefore make a detailed examination of the past, to let the American people know precisely what was done in their name, who approved it and who condoned it, and on that basis to make legislative and other necessary reforms now, before the next such attack, when we may otherwise be tempted to repeat these mistakes.” [Robert Grenier: From Truth and Reconciliation to Lies and Obsfuscation: The Senate RDI Report]

Dick Cheney did a forty day internship at the Wyoming legislature. Dick Cheney: There are no professional politicians in the Wyoming legislature. Everybody had a real job, the legislature was something you did every other year for forty days. If you are a farmer we want you on the agriculture committee, because you know something about it. It produced good government. Nothing improper about it at all. [Wyoming PBS: Dick Cheney – A Heartbeat Away] …. Grover Norquist: I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub. [BBC: Panorama: The War Party] ….. Derrick Jensen: Americans could become the most enlightened woke redpilled progressive peacenik beings on the planet, and [if we continued to breed and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits] it wouldn’t matter, the US military would still have to be huge, because otherwise how are we going to get access to our oil, that is under somebody else’s land? [EoP Amended End of Empire: Derrick Jensen: Civilization and Enlightenment; What A Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire; EndCiv: Resist or Die]
» EoP Leg Sub: 27 Sep: McV20: EoP Re Meeting the Red Pill Hail-Ego Judge Enemy; 02 Dec: EoP – Bathtub Gov – UN Resolution TN to Dick Cheney & Grover Norquist; 28 Nov: McV20: EoP FEC-EC Election Fraud Inv Offer: Re: DJT: Time Isn’t on Our Side; 04 Jan: EoP Amicus Re USvJPA Extradition Ruling / SecDef Q: What is your academic scientific definition for sincere peacenik? / FBI-TN Q: Scopes – EoP Limbic Human v WiP Li$ard Dev-Evolution – Law Election Trial? / HELM Q: Wanted: Honest Lives Matter EoP Axis Oath Philanthropists & programmers.

Re: Media figures must concede inconvenient facts:

Robert Grenier: Media figures must concede inconvenient facts, rather than tarring the other side with an emotionally satisfying broad brush. This is far from saying that all thoughts and ideas have equal validity: They do not. But truth is unavailing if not presented with clear underlying fact, and if not conveyed with respect. Success in restoring evidence-based truth as the language of public discourse is by no means assured, but lack of effort will doom us to failure. [NYT: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency]

Mary Boyle: I got the very powerful impression that Laird and Clark seemed to sense that fully engaging with context would make it much more difficult to pursue their core arguments that the main causes of misery are anxiety and depression. That the major reason for misery’s persistence is how people think; and that a major part of the solution is individual therapy. Now it certainly complicates funding discussions with government; as you can imagine, if they did engage with context. So this brings me to my second question, what is it about confronting well evidenced role of social context; in both the development and the persistence of mental health problems; which seems so difficult even threatening. I think there is quite a few possibilities and I’ll deal with a few briefly. But familiarly over all of them is both our insecurity as a discipline and a profession. So the threats are: Its not science. Its not psychology. Creates feelings of helplessness. Need for acceptance by Psychiatry. Involves telling truth to power. …. Now psychology as a whole is intensely concerned about its academic and social acceptance; as a science. Jim Orford once said “We still suffer from an inferiority complex making us do things just because they appear scientific. So we emphasise our similarity to the biological and natural sciences. We give the highest to the methods of the natural sciences. We are also very preoccupied with avoiding accusations of social and political bias; of being influenced by subjective values; rather than objective facts.” …. Why our avoidance of context matters so much, the major implication is that our theories and research are always potentially influential. Whether we approve it, intend it or whether we are even aware of it; what we say and do will have influence in so far as particular psychological ideas become part of a construction of reality; which can then be drawn on by those with the power to frame social problems and their perceived solutions. … It suggests that when we as psychologists conceptualize people and their problems; it becomes a kind of cultural resource; and above all, a relation to this avoidance of context; I think this model shores how our theories can help maintain the social and economic status-quo. ..  through narratives of justification. Now its often been pointed out that maintaining harmful social practices or inequalities; usually needs some sort of public story; which makes them seem reasonable. And if we look at it from the point of view of those who benefit from inequalities; an especially powerful narrative is one which distracts attention from context; which could help us understand why some groups are persistently disadvantaged or suffering; why their behaviour seems difficult; and instead focuses on mental or biological characteristics; which seem to explain these outcomes. Historically psychology has provided a major role in providing these narratives. … Now it’s important to emphasise that we don’t intend social harm, but our profession simply has to provide the intellectual framework — and of course give it scientific respectability — others will do the rest. … Context also make it much more difficult for those in power to avoid addressing the psychological impact of social and economic policies; and also they are not incompatible with helping individuals. I don’t think its an exageration to say that clinical psychology is at a watershed in terms of who we are and what we stand for.  I hope we will acknowledge that how we relate to social context is absolutely central to those questions; and I also hope we will choose to implement the conference theme in major and very public ways. I think we can be both confident that we have a scientific and ethical mandate, but also I think we may be surprised at just how many allies we would have. [British Psychological Society: Prof Mary Boyle: Is clinical psychology fearful of social context?]

I noticed your NYT oped negligently or intentionally did not include an “Important Notice for Voters: Re Root Cause of All Resource Conflict” paragraph:

Important Notice for Voters: Re Root Cause of All Resource Conflict:
Earth is not flat. Resources are finite. When voters vote for politicians – left or right, white or black, man or woman, religious or secular, oligarch or comedienne, freedom fighter or terrorist, etc – who legislate laws allowing for breeding and/or consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource depletion, ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.  All local, national and international military, political, and economic racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict are symptoms of clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits.
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Jan: EoP Law Voter HR: Media Ethics: Prevention of Bad Newz Kennels Media Terrorism Act of 2020: Draft: HR Prevention of Bad Newz Kennels Media Terrorism Act of 2020.

If that is what you meant by ‘media figures must concede inconvenient facts’; then I imagine the New York Times Oped Editor, would have known more clearly what you meant by ‘media figures must concede inconvenient facts*’ if you expressed it to her in such crystal clear terms by including the *Important Notice for Voters: Re Root Cause of All Resource Conflict; in your article, or requesting the NYT to include it as a *Important Notice for Voters: Re Root Cause of All Resource Conflict footer to your article.

If you request the NYT to include the ‘Important Notice for Voters: Re Root Cause of All Resource Conflict’ in your footer, by midnight on 05 Feb 2021; I won’t remove you as an EoP Applicant.

If the NYT has not included the ‘Important Notice for Voters: Re Root Cause of All Resource Conflict’ in your or their footer, by midnight on 05 Feb 2021. I will remove you from the EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] list; pending your written clarification of your strategic enemy policy [AJ: Former Undercover CIA Officer Talks War and Peace] definition.

You are welcome to rejoin EoP Applicants list whenever you share the EoP Law strategic enemy policy definition [See: EoP Law Strategic Policy Enemy Definition]; although it will have to be as an unconditional or conditional cooperator [eop-axis-oath] or in absence of committed lawyer/judge cooperator: EoP Axis Alliance Database Cooperator [13 Jan: EoP Law Voter / Axis Oath Alliance Database Cooperator Statement].

The Ecology of Peace law definition of strategic national and global security: Build EoP Axis Alliance to authorize EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] for submission to UN General Assembly and/or Intnl Court of Justice to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law.

EoP MILED Clerk Answers to Robert Grenier NYT Statements:

I will be happy to provide you with a detailed active listening answer paragraph per paragraph; on all your statements, if interested.

Robert Grenier: As a former overseas operative who has struggled both on the side of insurgents and against them, the past few days have brought a jarring realization: We may be witnessing the dawn of a sustained wave of violent insurgency within our own country, perpetrated by our own countrymen. Three weeks ago, it would have been unthinkable that the United States might be a candidate for a comprehensive counterinsurgency program. But that is where we are. [NYT: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency]

EoP Law – left, right – voters do not consider each other insurgents. They have the same EoP law – global and national security goal is to implement EoP SciCult law [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] as international law – master.

Robert Grenier: The present case is no exception. Rather than taking responsibility for changes in counterterrorism policy on itself, it is a far safer, if more insidious course — one instinctive to Congress — to abuse the CIA to the point where it self-regulates. But as noted above, there are serious downsides to that approach. U.S. national security will not be served by fostering a culture within CIA in which the organization decides for itself which of its lawful orders it will choose to follow, and makes those judgments based on what CIA officers consider best for themselves and their institution, rather than on what their elected masters deem best for the country. That is not the way the system is supposed to work. The federal bureaucracy is supposed to follow legal orders. That is what CIA has always done, frequently to its cost, and that is what the American people need it to do. If they don’t like what their elected leaders have done, they can throw them out. They shouldn’t look to CIA to make these decisions for them — on their own, and for their own purposes. But if Senator Feinstein and her colleagues are successful, institutionalized insubordination is likely to be the unhealthy legacy of the Senate report on detention and interrogation. Actions have consequences. Gross injustice has its costs. Congress is incorrigible. But the American people should take notice.  [Robert Grenier: From Truth and Reconciliation to Lies and Obsfuscation: The Senate RDI Report]

EoP MILED Clerk: Surplus vote fodder citizens may convert to becoming cannon-fodder citizens by joining the military to commit conquering or culling acts of murder and theft, as long as their murder and theft is sanctioned as a lawful conquer, culling or theft order, by one or more groups of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen. In this Babylon Innocence for $ale Indulgences WiP Matrix Reality legal world, soldiers tasked with the national security conquering and culling responsibilities, of conquering to thieve another tribe’s resources, and culling population ‘useless eaters’ and ‘oxygen thieves’ surplus population excesses; on behalf of the conquering and culling profiteering demands of civilized patriarchy’s civilian corporate and political elite; constantly find themselves confronted with the conquer-or-culling “Befehl ist Befehl” Catch 22 dilemma: To obey, or not to obey, a ‘Lebensraum’, ‘Difaqane’, ‘Operation Freedumb’ and the thousands like them, order to conquer or cull; since a lawful conquer or culling order, by one group of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen, can easily be reinterpreted to be an unlawful order, by another group of opposing left/right conquer-and multiply legal indulgence salesmen; presenting a Catch 22 dilemma from which there is no legal escape. One who refuses a ‘lawful’ conquering or culling order will still probably be jailed for refusing orders, and one who accepts an ‘unlawful order will be jailed for committing unlawful culling or conquering acts. Who decides, what is, and what is not, a conquering or culling lawful, or unlawful order? ….. “I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’” Alice said. Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’” “But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected. “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.” [Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll]
» EoP Leg Sub: 08 Aug: EoP Law Re: Babylon – Innocence for $ale Indulgences – WiP Law.

If you – Robert Grenier and/or New York Times; and/or NYT on behalf of Chamber of Commerce CIA [VWN: Mike Ruppert: Truth and Lies of 911; War Machine: Trailer: Economy; SQ-HP: We Have Met the Enemy; It is Us: Food Aid to Enable Our own Colonisation by Immigration] – want to make the negligent and/or intentional WiP law DNC left or GOP right, and/or their Biden or Trump voters; your insurgent – In Search of Enemies [Amazon: In Search of Enemies; IG: Kienholz: Big Double Cross; JFK: Mr X: 01:02] – enemy; some of you or all of you are welcome to negligently or intentionally do so.

Spy Game: Its not how you play the whose-4-breakfast game, its how the whose-4-dinner game plays you [Spy Game: Trailer]  …… Pawn: Every – It’s the WiP law yum yum breeding slaves and cannon fodder economy stupid – crime is a game and every player is expendable. Survival depends on knowing who is playing who [Pawn: Trailer] …… Aaron David Miller: You do not have an Israeli, Palestinian or American leader right now, who is prepared to pay the price of what it would take to lay the basis for a conflict ending agreement of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. [Frontline: Netanyahu at War] …… Gatekeepers: The motto of the film the Gatekeepers is strategy vs tactics. [ABC RN Breakfast: The Gatekeepers: Israel’s spy leaders call for peace; Israel Policy Forum CIS Commanders: Mossad: Shabtai Shavit; IDF Central Command: Avi Mizrahi] ………. Sun Tzu: If the strategic and/or tactical orders of the military, political or legal general are unclear and the troops do not obey, it is the fault of the general that the troops do not obey. If the strategic and/or tactical orders of the military, political or legal general are clear and the troops do not obey, it is the fault of the subordinate officers and troops for refusing to obey. [History Channel: Sun Tzu – The Art of War].
» EoP Leg Sub: 29 Sep: EoP NATO Re: XR launch Truthteller.Life whistleblower gateway; 03 Apr: EoP Covid Cold War Obs: Crozier v NavSec; US v Moreno; 11 Apr: EoP Re: Saddam Chirac support for Josep Trudeau EU Covid-19 battle; 01 Apr: EoP Re MP-BB: What to worry about next.


EoP Law Strategic Policy Enemy Definition:

The EoP law definition of enemy is documented in among others EoP TRC correspondence to IJR: Stanley Henkeman and Lady Feral: Alana McLaughlin [20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy; 28 Dec: EoP Re: Alana McLaughlin: A note on transgender military service]

The strategic policy [AJ: Former Undercover CIA Officer Talks War and Peace] enemy of ego/eco literate [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.36-37/70] and a majority of ego/eco illiterate persons of all races, religions and genders; is global Babylon WiP international law [eop-v-wip-law] that enables and allows procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, that is the root cause enabler of imperialism and its nationalist and homophobic and racist and ideological bigotry racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict. …… Strategic vs Tactical Enemies: Most of those Trans for Trump homonationalist imperialist whom you consider your enemies are – unconscious lack of ego/eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy] character – tactical – not strategic – enemies. You can spend your time finding unconditional or conditional cooperators to help you accomplish your strategic goal to abolish your strategic enemy; or waste your time picking fights with unconscious tactical enemies. Put differently they are eco and/or ego illiterate. The greater your ego/eco literacy, the greater your chances of reaching any of them who are potentially secretly sincerely confused; and helping them to gain ego/eco literacy skills.
» EoP Leg Sub: 28 Dec: EoP Re: Alana McLaughlin: A note on transgender military service]

Prior to EoP SciCult Law:
An – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior genepoool – enemy is an objective and/or subjective 2% elite decision-maker; who consciously and intentionally endorses WiP law; who (a) objects to abolition of WiP international law and global implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law single scientific standard of procreation, consumption and cultural subjective honesty relating standard laws documented in EoP – Gandhi Roosevelt – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70]; and (b) has fuck all commitment to ego literate scientific evidentiary truthseeking to ascertain the scientific in/accuracy of his/her ‘peacenik / warrior expert’ objections.

Under EoP SciClt Law:
An – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior genepoool – enemy will be any citizen convicted of intentional EoP SciCult law crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.31-33/70].

Lara Zhivago: In the absence of sincere and active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle]; any dis/agreement is self delusional bullshit. [FB: Lara Zhivago]

Day Brown: Most “liberals’ are just as neurotic as most conservatives. We need a new word for those who actually follow the science. Understanding the diffs in gene pools is not racism so long as you recognize talent and character where it exists; every gene pool has some, but the ratio determines whether a majority will elect leaders or demagogues. [Day Brown: 30 Jan 2021].
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jan: EoP: Re: Day Brown: Scientific Truthseeker LibCons Genepool Elections.

EoP Applicants may have many negligent and/or unconscious enemies.

Better to be slapped with the truth, than kissed with a lie. – Russian Proverb
I love you, and because I love you, I would sooner have you hate me for telling you the truth than adore me for telling you lies. — Pietro Aretino, Catholic Church
Better an honest enemy than a false friend. – German Proverb
An enemy, who is honest and shows his/her hate openly is better than a friend who is liar and putting you down secretly. – Unknown
I’d rather have honest enemies than fake friends. – Unknown
Better to be an honest open sinner, than a false saint – Unknown
Wounds from a sincere friend are better than many kisses from an enemy. – Proverbs 27:6
» EoP Leg Sub: 05 Jan: Stan Goff .. Prince Alwaleed bin Tilal; 28 May: Alt Right: Council of European Canadians .. Vox Popoli; 31 Jul: EoP Obs: Putin 755 Diplomats to Depart Russia .. Slapped with the Truth.

“We’ve been looking for the enemy for some time now. We’ve finally found him. We’re surrounded. That simplifies our problem of getting to these people and killing them.” [Badasss of the Week: USMC General Lewis Burwell “Chesty” Puller (June 26, 1898 – October 11, 1971)].
» IG: 17-08-03_thomassankara-egoecoliteracyfoxhole; 09 Feb: EoP Re: Jeff Bezos Martin de Becker v American Media: David Pecker.

Either we have no enemies, or all our enemies are cowards. As of date I have not found an enemy willing to declare themselves a conscious and intentional honourable – white information operations – conscious and intentional WiP Law Only enemy.

Black Five: When you engage someone openly with “white” information operations, i.e. IO where your identity is clear and explicit, you imply that they are roughly your equal.  By speaking to or of them directly, you point up that they are important enough to demand your attention and your reply. [Black Five: A Lesson in Information Operations] …….  Black Five: Since this is an IO post, it’s worth noting that those methods are generally more effective than white IO for taking on groups that you don’t want to risk legitimizing. White IO v. hostile groups is best reserved for occasions when you are the weaker group, or when the stronger group is actively trying to raise the stature of a group. Why would they wish to do so? If you google “the Gravity Well” at Blackfive, you’ll find an essay I wrote that might explain why. Sometimes the most effective thing you can do is choose the one of your enemies that you prefer, and raise their stature so that they begin to draw in more of the people who are predisposed to the hostile cause. For example, you may find that one group that is overtly hostile to you nevertheless obeys certain rules of engagement that makes them a more honorable or preferable opponent. By raising their stature as an enemy, you may undercut the recruitment of other hostile groups — and thus get to fight the opponent you prefer to fight. [Black Five: COIN: The Gravity Well]

Scott Ritter: This gap between politicized rhetoric and the actual deeds that define American foreign policy was perhaps brought out best by someone who is not counted among America’s friends. “All American presidents commit crimes and end up taking the Nobel Prize and appear as a defender of human rights and the ‘unique’ and ‘brilliant’ American or Western principles,” Syrian President Bashar Assad told the Syrian press in 2019, “but all they are is a group of criminals who only represent the interests of the American lobbies of large corporations in weapons, oil and others.” Trump, Assad noted, “speaks with transparency to say, ‘We want the oil.’” “I tell you,” Assad went on, “he [Trump] is the best American president. Why? Not because his policies are good, but because he is the most transparent president,” adding coyly, “What do we want more than a transparent foe?” [Steel City Scribblings: Scott Ritter: No Changes for Europe].


Conservatism as Ecology of Peace or Ghandian Teddy Qutb Leninism:

The Muslim Brotherhood blended Islamic fundamentalism with elements from the political ideologies of the 20th century. The leading intellectual in the Muslim Brotherhood and the man whose ideas would shape Al Qaeda was Sayyid Qutb. Fouad Ajami: Was he the Lenin of the Islamic Movement? Perhaps so. I don’t think the Islamic thought and the thought of the Islamicst jihadists would have gotten us to where we are today without the crucial role of Sayyid Qutb. Qutb spent most of 1949 in Greeley, Colorado, and found, to his horror and satisfaction, that his American hosts were squandering their lives on gossip, trivial entertainments, and lawn maintenance.  From this Dark Night of Suburbia, he concluded that western civilization was so spiritually barren that it must be destroyed. Sayyid Qutb: This great America, what is it worth in the scale of human values? I wish I could find someone to talk with about human affairs, morality and spirit, not just dollars, movie stars, lawn maintenance and cars. Christiane Amanpour: It is a moral indictment of America, written in the 1950’s, the author a man who found America to be a spiritual wasteland. His name was Sayyid Qutb. He inspired the likes of Osama bin Laden and his lieutenant Ayman Al Zawari. Qutb’s works laid the foundation for the modern jihad movement. [KPBS: Sayyid Qutb: Grandfather of Al Qaeda; CNN: Gods Muslim Warriors: The America Qutb hated; Adam Curtis: The Power of Nightmares].
» EoP Leg Sub: 19 Dec: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q to TP20 & BH20: SecDef: Chris Miller & Lloyd Austin

Brenton Tarrant: To Conservatives: Ask yourself, truly, what has modern conservatism managed to conserve? What does it seek to conserve? The natural environment? Western Culture? Ethnic autonomy? Religion? The nation? The race? Nothing is conserved. The natural environment is  industrialized, pulverized and commoditized. Western culture is trivialized, pulped and blended into a smear of meaningless nothing, with the only tenets and beliefs seemingly held to are the myth of the individual, the value of work (productivity for the benefit of your capitalist owners) and the sovereignty of private property (to ensure none of us get grand ideas of taking the unearned wealth of our owners). Ethnic autonomy? Destroyed in the name of cheap labour, whilst they may publicly object to the illegal immigration of the third world masses, privately they push for as much migration as possible, anything to decrease the labour cost of production and line their pockets with the profits. They removed the Europeans peoples autonomy and sovereignty for their own lust for power and wealth. Religion? What remains? Empty churches and full shopping centers? Drive through confessionals and no fault divorce? Any religious ideal that stood between the wealthy and wealth generation was downplayed, sidelined and quietly dismantled. All so that they could line their pockets without complaints or objections. Not a thing has been conserved other than corporate profits and the the ever increasing wealth of the 1% that exploit the people for their own benefit. Conservatism is dead. Thank god. Now let us bury it and move on to something of worth. Green nationalism is the only true nationalism. There is no Conservatism without nature, there is no nationalism without environmentalism, the natural environment of our lands shaped us just as we shaped it. We were born from our lands and our own culture was molded by these same lands .The protection and preservation of these lands is of the same importance as the protection and preservation of our own ideals and beliefs. – Brenton Tarrant: The Great Replacement.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Aug: EoP Amicus Submission to NZ v BH Tarrant & US v PW Crusius: EoP Law Amicus Affidavit in Support of Mitigation of Sentencing [PDF]

Theodore Roosevelt: Address to the Deep Waterway Convention, Memphis (4 Oct 1907): The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem [ by implementing EoP SciCult conservation of natural resources international law] it will avail us little to solve all others. [EoP Amended: Today in Science; American History; Congressional Record HR 4 27 Feb 2003 Timothy J Ryan; Environmental Education Foundation Inc]

Mahatma Gandhi wanted an [EoP Steppe Aryan law: sustainable procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits] self sufficient villages agrarian economy. Nehru wanted a [WiP law] industrial economy.  [EoP Amended: Daniel Yergin: Commanding Heights: Battle for World Economy 01. Battle of Ideas; 02. Agony of Reform; 03. New Rules of the Game]
» EoP Leg Sub: 12 Jul: McV20: Mohadi Q 4 Hayek & Keynes econ-gurus: mandate for EoP Woke Therapy?; Boris Blair Q 4 Gordievsky via E M-Buller: EoP Axis Alliance Mandate?; 15 Aug: EoP – Mahatma Timol: End Abel and Kane Cold War TRC – UN Resolution; 13 Apr: EoP Re: Vorster TN: CCMA: LJ v TRC; 06 May: McVeigh 2020: EoP Law Q: Paul Erasmus & Winnie Mandela EoP TRC Legacy?; 26 Jul: EoP Re WESSA-CRS Re EoP Re: Gremlin: 101 Meade supports 1 million seats on the streets.


Globally there are two potential international law legal systems, requiring two different forms of agriculture and freedom; and leading to two different international and/or national economic and peace and war systems; with two different types of peacenik / military warriors [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]. Abel Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) international law will require citizens to practice – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits, and fully informed consent honest relating  – responsible freedom, and will lead to sustainable steady state – no population and economic growth – low tech sustainable subsistence agriculture agrarian economies [Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy; NBC: Eustace Conway’s Turtle Island; RN: Russia’s Rural Villagers are Unphased by Economic Collapse; NH: Russian Family Gardens Produce 40% of Russian Food; TB: In 1999, 35 million small family plots produced 90% of Russia’s potatoes, 77% of vegetables, 87% of fruits, 59% of meat, 49% of milk]. Kane Babylon Masonic War is Peace (“WiP”) law allows cattle-citizens [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] the freedom to procreate and consume as much as they want, and practice certain forms of relating deception [IG: 15-07-31]; and leads to totalitarian agriculture [TSWabbit: Daniel Quinn on Totalitarian Agriculture: Excerpt: What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire] boom – slaughterhouse cattle feast – bust economic systems. In a global WiP international law system, everyone is consciously or unconsciously – lab rats on a treadmill – trapped in the growth-boom-bust [OKC: The Boom the Bust and the Bomb; FactXTract: Flatten Weimar Curve?; Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Al Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy] econo-legal system. The growth-boom-bust system can only be reformed – prior to bust collapsing – if a sufficient number of elite are willing to cooperate to abolish it and replace it with a legal system enabling orderly and humane degrowth return to a sustainable steady state system. Some are consciously – prisoners – trapped, others are unconsciously – prison guards – trapped [My Dinner with Andre: Guard/Prisoner Reality]. All Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) Yum Yum Cannibal Boom Bust economy’s are economic systems where the Babylon elite unconsciously or consciously – some more honest and others with a preference for flattery deception – profiteer off race, religious, class and gender Yum Yum boom-bust resource conflict misery. One of the ways in which citizens are encouraged to increase consumption at even faster levels are through banking lending practices. It is not for nothing that usury [DC: Usury: Mathematical Fraud Explained; Bill Maher: Elizabeth Warren: Usury] – a financial growth symptom of Babylon WiP procreation/consumption growth law – was made illegal by some nations and religions, but those nations and religions failed to address the root – Babylon WiP procreation, consumption and deception law – causes of – among others – financial boom bust economic symptom of usury.
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Jul: McV20: EoP Law A: WiP Law. Vusi Mohadi Q: Who Killed the Economy?; 16 Aug: EoP Law Peaceful Protestor Defn; TN: McVeigh EoP law Cons & Wiki Pedia Edit.

Its worth repeating that Mother Natures laws do set a single – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits – standard [eop-footprint: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.40-43/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.39-42/70] for resource abundance prosperity; for the inhabitants of any ecological system. Its also worth noting that in the absence of the beings calling themselves citizen voters cooperating to legislate international laws that obey Mother Natures single procreation and consumption standard of procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-un-res: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70]; enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation return to Mother Natures single responsible freedom prosperity standard; Mother Natures armies can and will Bon Voyage Motherfuckers all of the citizen voters armies – Pentagon [Global Observatory: Climate Change is Urgent Global Security Threat], Red Army [Reds: Trailer], NATO [NATO: Climate Change], People’s Army [ASPO: Al Bartlett: China’s One Child Policy]; Muslim Brotherhood [Reuters: Two is enough, Egypt tells poor families as population booms; Express Tribune: Justice Nisar: population control is Pakistans top priority after water conservation; Supreme Court recommends national task force for population control] – combined back to the stone age; as she has done many times before [Military Gospel: 11 Feb: NASA: Human & nature dynamics: Modeling inequality resource use in the collapse or sustainability of societies].
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: TAC: Here Come the Bourgeoisie Bolsheviks; 13 Jul: McV20: McV20 Q 4 Kudrin, Gref & Chubais: Putin mandate for EoP Woke Therapy?

Ecology of Peace Psych Culture Re: Trying to Help:

As noted in the EoP Law Question of Law – Is a DSM Bible mental disorder diagnosis based on scientific or cultural law – affidavit answers [PDF: pp.27], I am a former student, activist colleague and friend Dr. Richard Korn [Richard Korn: The Private Citizen, the Social Expert and the Social Problem; SQ-NYT: Richard Korn: What Hits You is the Total Human Waste; SQ-Time: Richard Korn: Prisons].

One of Professor Richard Korn’s criminology and psychology counseling expert abilities was his research focus on what kind of counseling ‘help’ to a prisoner or medical or psychology patient – or perhaps in this context presumed insurgent – ‘works’ and what kind of ‘help’ ‘does not work’. Summary: If you don’t know what the patients strategic goal is, if your help is overt coercion or covert passive aggressive do-gooder manipulation coercion help; it won’t work. If you know what a person wants, you can help them. If you don’t know what they want, because they don’t know what they want, or because they are ashamed of being political incorrect about what they want; then you can help them to create an battle of ideas commons discussion environment more conducive to honesty than political correctness to help them learn to be more honest with themselves and others about what they want. Once they are capable of honestly clarifying what they want, you can honestly inform them whether you have the skills or resource to help them to get what they want. If you do, you can help them; if you don’t, you don’t waste their time and resources pretending that you can help them.

When psychologist and criminologist Dr Richard Korn was sent to a mental institution as the resident psychologist; he would – professional ego strategic suicide – refuse to confirm any resident as ‘insane’, unless that resident could each one teach one simply and clearly explain to him why he needed to be considered insane. His path to healing, for his patients, was similar to RD Laings…. He’d say something like: Well, the Doctors tell me that you guys got something wrong with you, but I’m not too sure; what do you think? Patients were encouraged to provide their own diagnosis and analysis of their alleged mental disorder disease, and how they got there, and if they had it, and so on. He said he had some of the most fascinating conversations in his life!

If Dr Korn came to visit and asked me: Are you sane? I would answer; well it would depend on your scientific or cultural law definition of sanity. There are many cultural law mental disorder definitions; some of them are direct contradictions of each other. According to some of those cultural law mental disorder definitions, I am insane, and so are you. Which cultural law definition are we talking about?

If your cultural law definition is a WiP law cultural ideological capitalist / communist definition; then I am not a good WiP law cultural ideological capitalist / communist, and if evaluated in accordance with that WiP law cultural ideological capitalist / communist mental disorder definition; a psychiatrist or psychologist will conclude that I have a mental disorder.

If your cultural law definition is a WiP law cultural religious Kane Christian / Muslim / Buddhist / Futilitarian definition; then I am not a good Kane Christian / Muslim / Buddhist / Futilitarian; and if evaluated in accordance any WiP Kane Christian or Kane Muslim or Kane Buddhist or Kane Futilitarian cultural law cultural conformity mental disorder definition; a psychiatrist or psychologist will conclude I have a mental disorder.

However I have never claimed to be a Kane capitalist, Kane communist [eop-v-wip-ism], Kane Muslim, Kane Christian, Kane Buddhist, or Kane Futlitarian [eop-v-wip-religion]. I have never claimed to be a member of any Kane racial or religious or ideological or gender culture. I have never accused any of the people who are conscious and intentional members of any Kane religious or ideological culture, of mental disorders. I have cooperated with people who are potential EoP Abel Christians and EoP Abel Muslims and EoP Abel capitalists and EoP Abel communists, and informed them of the legal – EoP v WiP law [eop-v-wip-law] – differences between EoP Abel Christians Muslims capitalists and communists and WiP Kane Christians, Muslims, capitalists and communists; and informed them of EoP Abel Christians Muslims, capitalists and communists strategic goals to implement EoP Abel international law.

If Dr Korn asked me: What do you want? I’d say, strategically speaking what I want is documented in H 111/19: LJ v LSisulu & Eight Others [lj-v-ls: PDF]. All other legal applications are tactical applications to acquire information for the issues in dispute in LJ v LS. If there is something about what I want anyone doesn’t understand, please ask questions, and I will answer them. All answers are published at eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za correspondence. If you understand what I want. Can you help or not? If yes, how can I labour barter exchange pay you for your help; so our helping is mutually beneficial. If you don’t want to help, no big deal. Please don’t waste my time and resources pretending you want to help. If you know someone who may want to help, please refer me to them; so I can ask them if they can help.

EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; has been submitted electronically or formally served to parties and courts in the following political and legal proceedings – as of date no respondent has exposed any scientific or cultural law error – [A] US Presidential Campaign: (i) McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020: 07 Feb: IA SoS: Pro Se Filing Ntc: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [B] IACHR: McVeigh 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Pro Se Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Authorization; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War [mcv-v-usa: PDF: pp.17; Encl: E: PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [C] US Courts: (i) US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland [mcv-v-djtjrb: .NoM: PDF: Annex: D: pp.70; E PDF: pp.31-100/350]; (ii) District Court for the Western District of Texas: El Paso Division: Criminal No EP-20-U4: US v Patrick Crusius [us-v-pwc: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [D] South Africa Courts: (a) George High Court: (i) H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56]; (ii) H 213/19 LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others [lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83]; (b) CCMA: Comm for Conciliation Mediation & Arbitration: 1063-20: LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Two Others [lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137]; [E] UK Courts: (i) UK Supreme Court: LJ v Speaker House of Commons and Ten Others [lj-v-shoc: PDF: pp.43-84/88]; (ii) Westminster Magistrates Court: UK Extradition Proceedings: US v Julian Assange [us-v-jpa: PDF: pp.59-100/143]; [F] New Zealand Courts: High Court of New Zealand, Christchurch Registry  / I Te Koti Matua O Aotearoa Ōtautahi Rohe: CRI-2019-009-2468: New Zealand v Brenton Tarrant [nz-v-bt: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [G] Intnl Court of Justice: Treaty of Amity Proceedings: Iran v USA [ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143].

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]


Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Robert Grenier:
Robert L. Grenier (rgrenier7@gmail.com);

NYT: OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury:
NYT OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury (katie.kingsbury@nytimes.com)

David Hoffman, Louis Freeh, Stephen Behnke:
Sidley: David Hoffman (david.hoffman@sidley.com); Alix Partners: Louis Freeh (lfreeh@alixpartners.com); Simon Freakley (sfreakley@alixpartners.com); Louis Dudney (ldudney@alixpartners.com); APA: Ethics Dir: Stephen Behnke (sbehnke@apa.org); APA Ethics Dir: Stephen Behnke: APA: Maureen OBrien (mobrien@apa.org); Jennifer Kelly (jkelly@apaboard.org); Frank Worrell (fworrell@apaboard.org); Sandra Shullman (sshullman@apaboard.org); Arthur Evans (Aevans@apa.org); Lynne Cooper (mlcooper@apaboard.org); Randall White (rwhite@apaboard.org); Candice Hargons (chargons@apaboard.org); Eric Butter (ebutter@apaboard.org); Anthony Chambers (achambers@apaboard.org); Pamela Scott-Johnson (PScott-Johnson@apaboard.org); Susan Clayton (sclayton@apaboard.org); Robin Mockenhaupt (rmockenhaupt@apaboard.org); Shannon Wiltsey (SWiltseyStirman@apaboard.org); Blanka Angyal (bangyal@apaboard.org)

Dianne Feinstein D-CA; Josh Hawley R-MO:
Dianne Feinstein D-CA: John Watts (John_Watts@feinstein.senate.gov); Eric Oginsky (Eric_Oginsky@feinstein.senate.gov); Chesna Foord (scheduling@feinstein.senate.gov); Andrew Fuentes (andrew_fuentes@feinstein.senate.gov); Josh Hawley R-MO: Ellen James (ellen_james@hawley.senate.gov)

CHFC Simonetta Sommaruga, CH-EG Emb: Paul Garnier; CH-PK Emb: Thomas Kolly:
Simonetta Sommaruga: President Swiss Confederation: Federal Chancellery (info@bk.admin.ch); CH-EG Emb: Paul Garnier (cai.vertretung@eda.admin.ch); CH-DZ Emb: Muriel Berset Kohen (alg.vertretung@eda.admin.ch); CH-AZ Emb: Philipp Stalder (baku.vertretung@eda.admin.ch); CH-PK Emb: Thomas Kolly (isl.vertretung@eda.admin.ch); CH-SA Emb: André Schaller (riyadh@eda.admin.ch); CH-IL Emb: Jean-Daniel Ruch (tel.vertretung@eda.admin.ch); CH-PK Emb: Thomas Kolly (isl.vertretung@eda.admin.ch);


Leave a Comment