05 Feb: EoP Re: FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China / EoP Re: 60 Minutes: George Soros 1998

* Conn Hallinan, Dispatches from the Edge, Foreign Policy in Focus, George Soros, CN: Pres Xi Jinping, CN-NL Amb Xu Hong, CN-UN Amb Yao Shaojun
* 05 Feb: EoP Re: FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China / EoP Re: 60 Minutes: George Soros 1998.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, EoP v US Oligarchs, EoP v ME Oligarchs, LJ v LS / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA: | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: McVeigh 2020 Exp Comm [mailto:mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:01 AM
To: ‘Conn Hallinan: Dispatches from the Edge’; ‘Foreign Policy in Focus: Domenica Ghanem’
Cc: ‘President Xi Jinping: China Min of Foreign Affairs: Dept of Treaty & Law’; ‘CN-ZA Emb: Chen Xiaodong’; ‘CN-US Emb: Cui Tiankai’; ‘Media’; ‘CN-NL Emb: XU Hong’; ‘CN-RU Emb: Li Hui’; ‘CN-BY Emb: Cui Qiming’; ‘CN-BE Emb: Zhongming Cao’; ‘CN-EU Emb: Zhang Ming’; ‘CN-UN Amb Yao Shaojun’
Subject: EoP Re: FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:02 AM
To: ‘George Soros’
Subject: EoP Re: 60 Minutes: George Soros 1998
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:06 AM
To: ‘Conn Hallinan: Dispatches from the Edge’; ‘Foreign Policy in Focus: Domenica Ghanem’
Cc: ‘President Xi Jinping: China Min of Foreign Affairs: Dept of Treaty & Law’; ‘CN-ZA Emb: Chen Xiaodong’; ‘CN-US Emb: Cui Tiankai’; ‘Media’; ‘CN-NL Emb: XU Hong’; ‘CN-RU Emb: Li Hui’; ‘CN-BY Emb: Cui Qiming’; ‘CN-BE Emb: Zhongming Cao’; ‘CN-EU Emb: Zhang Ming’; ‘CN-UN Amb Yao Shaojun’
Subject: EoP Re: FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China
Attachment: 21-02-03_McVvUS_GWOT-PN-Metrics_EoPUNRes.pdf
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:07 AM
To: ‘George Soros’
Subject: EoP Re: FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China
Attachment: 21-02-03_McVvUS_GWOT-PN-Metrics_EoPUNRes.pdf

.

FY – EoP v WiP [mcv-v-us] Law [F: IACHR] Elections EndgameJourney negs – Info:
TO: Conn Hallinan: Dispatches from the Edge
Re: FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China.
CC: George Soros
Re: 60 Minutes: George Soros 1998
CC: CN: Pres Xi Jinping, CN-NL Amb Xu Hong, CN-UN Amb Yao Shaojun:
Re: NATO: Climate Change; Global Observatory: Climate Change is Urgent Food Water Wars Refugee Mass Migration Global Security Threat; Reuters: Two is enough, Pres Al-Sisi tells poor families as population booms; Express Tribune: Justice Nisar: population control is Pakistans top priority after water conservation; Supreme Court recommends national task force for population control; Energy Skeptic: Wilkin: Zero to One Child per woman; the only possible solution at this late date; Fossil-fueled industrial heat hard to impossible to replace with renewables; 328 Million Americans use 3.2 million pounds of minerals, metals, and fuels in their lifetime; SQ-WA: Clugston: NNR Scarcity End of Industrial Civilization; SQ-PM: Every Child Increases a Parents Carbon Footprint by a Factor of 20; SQ-JB: A Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce.
Ref: 31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations.

Conn Hallinan

EoP Re: FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China.

Very interesting article [FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China].

My only McVeigh2020 [mcveigh2020]  EoP media [eop-v-wip-media: 14 Jan: Draft: Joint McV20, TP20, BH20 & CADC FCC EoP RH FR Ethics Control of Media Executive Order] comment was related to your use of ‘want’ in the phrase ‘China does want to be the dominant power in the region’ and ‘China wants to sell a lot of stuff’.

Conn Hallinan: China doesn’t want to rule the world, but it does want to be the dominant power in its region, and it wants to sell a lot of stuff, from electric cars to solar panels. That poses no military threat to the United States, unless Washington chooses to challenge China in its home waters, something Americans neither want nor can afford. [FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China]

Its possible that existentially some Chinese ‘want’ to be the dominant power in the region; and that some Chinese entrepreneurs ‘want’ to sell a lot of stuff. Its also possible that existentially some, maybe the majority of Chinese – in order to avoid ending up at the bottom end of the WiP law [eop-v-wip-law] food chain – ‘have’ decided that their only option to avoid being cannibalized by the WiP law system; is that they ‘have to’ compete to be the dominant power in the region; and to do so they ‘have to’ sell a lot of stuff. Given a UNGA global referendum – breaktout exit from WiP law – option of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract [27 Jan: McV Filing: IACHR: McV v USA: EoP PoW Voter Petition: McV 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Prisoners of WiP Law and WiP Law Only Jurists and Lawyers Petition]; requiring all citizens of all nations, races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements [04 Feb: EoP Law Voter – Scientific Sincere Peacenik Metrics – Answer to Donald Rumsfeld Scientific GWOT Metrics Q: PDF: pp.03; Encl: EoP UN Resolution: pp.42] – they would vote for their Heads of State to breakout-cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) international law social contract.

Dennis Hassabis: We let the system playing for another 200 games, and it did this amazing thing. It found the optimal strategy was to dig a tunnel around the side and put the ball around the back of the wall. The researchers working on this, the amazing AI developers, well, they’re not so good at Breakout and they didn’t know about that strategy. So they learned something from their own system, which is, uh, you know pretty funny and quite instructive; I think, about the potential for general AI. So whats next for us. Go is the most complex game, pretty much, ever devised by man. Beating a professional player at Go is a long standing grand challenge of AI research [DeepMind: AlphaGo]. …. Wikipedia: Go is an abstract strategy board game for two players, in which the aim is to surround more territory than the opponent. The playing pieces are called stones. One player uses the white stones and the other, black. The players take turns placing the stones on the vacant intersections (“points”) of a board. Once placed on the board, stones may not be moved, but stones are removed from the board if the stone (or group of stones) is surrounded by opposing stones on all orthogonally-adjacent points, in which case the stone is “captured”. The game proceeds until neither player wishes to make another move. When a game concludes, the winner is determined by counting each player’s surrounded territory along with captured stones and komi (points added to the score of the player with the white stones as compensation for playing second). Games may also be terminated by resignation. [WP: Go (Game)].
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Aug: EoP Re: IGM tygae.org.za Q’s / EoP Law Re AlphaGo.

Big Short: I met my wife on match.com. My profile said that I’m a medical student with only one eye an awkward social manner, and 145 thousand dollars in student loans. She wrote back: You’re just what I’ve been looking for! She meant honest. So let me be honest making money is not what I thought it would be. This business kills the part of life that is essential! The part, that has nothing to do with business. For the past two years, my insides have felt, like they’re eating themselves. All the people I respected, won’t talk to me anymore, except through lawyers. People want an authority to tell them how to value things, but they chose this authority not based on facts or results; they chose it because it seems authoritative. Or familiar! And I’m not, and never have been familiar. Guys I don’t know how to be sarcastic. I don’t know how to be funny. I don’t know how to work people. I just know how to read numbers. …….. Would I buy a car from him? No! Is he right about the mortgage market? Let’s find out. Let’s find out! Look, it’s two very simple questions: Is there a housing bubble? And if there is: how exposed are the banks? Whoo ho ho, let’s go to the press man! This is a massive story! Who wouldn’t publish it? I got it, I got it! I got it, I got it. And what am I supposed to do? Want me to write a piece called: “We’re all fucked!” Yes! That’s a perfect title! [The Big Short: Trailer: Prologue: Burry: Met My Wife on Match.com: Burry: Just Know how to read numbers; Shorts turn the tables on Wall Street: Burry analyzes Subprime MBS, The Jenga Blocks BBB Dogshit Housing Market: Ratings Agencies: Financial World: Ali v Foreman]
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 Nov: BP-XR Req for EoP TRC 0ºC or No EoP TRC 4ºC Economy Info; 20 Dec: McVeigh2020: Rep Dingell & Sen Graham: EoP Axis – If Hitler Invaded Hell – Q.

Ariel Sharon is a farmer, and that is a very important side of his personality. He tells about how he has watched the cow bellowing as it is moved from the large corral to the smaller corral, and finally into the chute where it is taken to the slaughter and he sees himself in some respects as the cow or the bull being cornered and his job is basically to shut the gates, so that it becomes impossible to move him from the larger corral to the smaller corral to the chute. If you look at the way that he deals with the efforts of outside powers to move the process forward, he is always putting gates, shut gates infront of them. He is prepared to have those gates opened, but he will extract a price for them.  That is his tactic and its quite effective. But just as he imagines himself as the cow and the bull, so he understands that it is very effective to treat others in the same way as the cow and the bull, and to move them from the corral, until he’s got them in the chute where he wants them. [Biography: Israels Generals: Ariel Sharon]

Thomas Szasz: Animal kingdom, rule is: eat or be eaten; Human kingdom: define or be defined
Formerly, Americans charged with murder were considered innocent until proven guilty; now they are considered insane until proven sane. To concepts like suicide, homicide, and genocide, we should add semanticide – the murder of language. The deliberate (or quasi-deliberate) misuse of language through hidden metaphor and professional mystification breaks the basic contract between people, namely the tactic agreement on the proper use of words. In the animal kingdom, the rule is: eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom: define or be defined.  Man is the animal that speaks. Understanding language is thus the key to understanding man; and the control of language, to the control of man. Hence it is that men struggle not only over territory, food, and raw materials, but today perhaps most of all over language. For to control the Word is to be the Definer: God, king, pope, president, legislator, scientist, psychiatrist, madman – you and me. God defines everything and everyone. The totalitarian leader aspires to similar grandeur. The ordinary person defines some aspects of himself and of a few others. But even the most modest and powerless of men defines something no one else can: his own dreams. And we are all defined, as well: by our genes which shape us; our parents who name us; our society which classifies us; and so on. It has long seemed to me that some of the fundamental problems of psychiatry are really quiet simple: they center around a struggle for definition between the so-called mental patient on the one side and his family, society, and psychiatrist on the other. each party to this contest speaks a different language, whose content and consequences he tries to impose on his adversary. Although the context sometimes looks like a debate, it is actually a bitter fight for survival, and, like all such struggles, it is decided not by logic, but by power. If, as the Old Testament tells us, the First or Original Sin was the knowledge of good and evil, then the knowledge of clear speech was the ‘Second Sin.” At Babel, God punished man for this transgression with the Divine Confusion, and we have been misleading each other ever since. Dr. Thomas Szasz believes that it is this confusion of language that has produced much of the inhumanity, intolerance, and outright stupidity which today affect everything from our politics to our sex lives. [Amazon: Thomas Szasz: The Second Sin]

Put differently, your interpretation of Chinese ‘wants’ as ‘wants’ instead of ‘have to’ is similar to your interpretation of Chinese decision to modernize the Chinese navy, which was a reaction to actions by the US military; whose ‘regional dominance’ and ‘motivations to sell among others mafiocracy [mafiocracy] duhmockery capitalism stuff’ actions are also domination and competition behavioural symptoms of WiP – scorpions in a bottle [Jah Tzu: Thomas Lewis: A General Theory of Love] – international law.

Conn Hallinan: The tensions in the South China sea go back to the Chinese civil war between the communists and nationalists, in which the Americans backed the losing side. When the defeated nationalists retreated to Taiwan in 1949, the U.S. guaranteed the island’s defense, recognized Taiwan as China, and blocked the People’s Republic from UN membership. After U.S. President Nixon’s trip to China in 1972, the two countries worked out some agreements on Taiwan. Washington would accept that Taiwan was part of China, but Beijing would refrain from using force to reunite the island with the mainland. The Americans also agreed not to have formal relations with Taipei or supply Taiwan with “significant” military weapons. Over the years, however, those agreements have frayed, particularly during the administration of Bill Clinton. In 1996 tensions between Taiwan and the mainland led to some saber rattling by Beijing, but the PRC did not have the capacity to invade the island, and all the parties involved knew that. But Clinton was trying to divert attention from his dalliance with Monica Lewinsky and a foreign crisis fit the bill, so the U.S. sent an aircraft carrier battle group through the Taiwan Straits. While the Straits are international waters, it was still a provocative move and one that convinced the PRC that it had to modernize its military if it was to defend its coasts. There is a certain irony here. While the Americans claim that the modernization of the Chinese navy poses a threat, it was U.S. actions in the Taiwan Straits crisis that frightened the PRC into a crash program to construct that modern navy and adopt the strategy of Area Denial.  [FPIF: Biden’s Top Foreign Policy Challenge: Avoiding a Cold War with China]

Its possible that a significant number of Americans, Africans, Europeans, Indians, maybe even oligarchs – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; and deception relating behaviours [04 Feb: EoP Law Voter – Scientific Sincere Peacenik Metrics – Answer to Donald Rumsfeld Scientific GWOT Metrics Q] – are a negligent or intentional symptom of them living in a nation and on a planet whose intra-&-inter cultural, racial, religious and media [ 14 Jan: Draft: Joint McV20, TP20, BH20 & CADC FCC EoP RH FR Ethics Control of Media Executive Order] legal – procreation, consumption and relating – relations are ruled in terms of a Kane War is Peace Babylon international law social contract.

Jim Grant: George Soros is worried. He thinks the global economy is coming apart at the seams and that the world needs to be protected from people like George Soros.       George Soros: We may now think that everything is fine, but the fact is that the system is broke, and it needs fixing.        Jim Grant: What you are doing is asking for some form of regulation to protect the world from people like you.       George Soros: Well, I am a player, and I think all players should be regulated. There have to be rules of the game. … Its easier for [the Prime Minister of Malaysia] to blame an outside force, than to admit that they were mismanaging their economy and currency. The French Finance Minister talked about hanging currency speculators from lamp posts. … I am basically there to make money. I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do.        Jim Grant: George Soros is a carnivore of the first order. Whats it like to have a statement that you make have such grievious consequences. It looks to me like in a number of different situations you can take a position against a currency, or make a statement and the whole country falls apart.        George Soros: Its a tremendous sense of responsibility, actually; and its also a humbling experience because I am actually trying to do the right thing, and sometimes something that I do has an unitended negative consequence, as it did in Russia.        Jim Grant: At the center of George Soros there is an inherent contradiction.        George Soros: Which is..        Jim Grant: On the one hand you are the capitalist who does not care about the social consequences of his act; and on the other hand you are a philanthropist who cares only about social consequences. How do you resolve the two?               George Soros: Recognizing that as a competitor I have got to compete to win, as a human being I am concerned about the society in which I live.        Jim Grant: Which George Soros am I talking to now? The amoral George Soros, or the moral George Soros?        George Soros: It is one person who at one time engages in amoral activities and the rest of the time tries to be moral.        Jim Grant: You watched as jews had their property confiscated and were sent to concentration camps and this did not bother you with guilt?        George Soros: Well in a funny way its just like in markets, of course I wasn’t doing it, someone else was doing it, and if they weren’t doing it, somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not. I was only a spectator. Their property was being taken away. I had no role in taking away their property, so I had no sense of guilt.        Jim Grant: President Mandela requested his advice.        George Soros: I told President Mandela, I wrote him a memo on how he could protect South Africa from speculative attack.        Jim Grant Thats the old ‘stop me before I kill again approach right’. You are telling him, this is what you can do to stop me.        George Soros: Whether I or somebody else does whatever is happening in the markets, it really doesn’t make any difference to the outcome. I don’t feel guilty because I am engaged in an amoral activity, which is not meant to have anything to do with guilt.        Jim Grant: Part of the reason he is so rich is because the Soros Hedge Funds operate offshore to avoid scrutiny by the Securities Exchange Commission. So even while Soros tells Congress that Hedge Funds must be regulated to stop the global economic crisis, he’s avoiding the rules. Why is it that Americans can’t invest in the Quantum fund, its an offshore fund.        George Soros: Because the fund is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. So we are not licensed to do business in the United States, because we find it more convenient to operate without it.        Jim Greant: So in some ways its to escape regulation.        George Soros: Thats right.        Jim Grant: But you have been sitting here talking about the need for regulation.        George Soros: Yes, and whatever regulations are imposed we will obey.        Jim Grant: One of your money managers really told us that George really does think he is God.        George Soros: If you think that you are God and you go into the financial markets, you are bound to come out broke, so the fact that I am not broke, shows that I don’t believe that I am God. [60 Minutes: George Soros 1998].
» IG: 17-04-15 G Soros: EoP v WiP Wealth Transfer.

Mahatma Gandhi wanted an [EoP Steppe Aryan law: sustainable procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits] self sufficient villages agrarian economy. Nehru wanted a [WiP law] industrial economy.  [Daniel Yergin: Commanding Heights: Battle for World Economy 01. Battle of Ideas; 02. Agony of Reform; 03. New Rules of the Game]
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 Aug: McV20: EoP Re: DNC & GOP objections to Trump postponing 2020 elections.

Our Ecological Footprint, by William Rees & Mathis Wackernagil: The good news is that—also unlike the woodland wasp which overbreeds and overconsumes his habitat’s resources and befouls it with his shit—humans are gifted by the potential for self-awareness and intelligent choice, and knowing our circumstances is an invitation to change. The first step toward reducing our ecological impact is to recognize that the environmental crisis” is less an environmental and technical problem than it is a behavioral and social one. It can therefore be resolved only with the help of behavioral and social solutions. On a finite planet, at human carrying capacity, a society driven mainly by selfish [procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits greed] individualism has all the potential for sustainability of a collection of angry scorpions in a bottle. [Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle; Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Al Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy]
» SQ: Jay Hanson et al: Social Contract Evolution: Ecology of Peace or War is Peace Maximum Power Principle social contract evolution?; EoP Leg Sub: 03 Dec: EoP Ethics Enwokenment Control of Yellow Jacket Protests.

Robert Oppenheimer: We may be likened to two scorpions in a bottle, each capable of killing the other, but only at the risk of his own life. [Amazon: Scott Ritter: Scorpion King: America’s Suicidal Embrace of Nuclear Weapons from FDR to Trump] ……….. Max Lerner: An eye-opening look by a renowned expert at one of the most important institutions in American democracy. To many Americans, the United States Supreme Court continues to loom large as an unimpeachable symbol of the rule of law and the triumph of justice. But behind that towering façade there has been so much infighting, intrigue, and backstabbing that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. reportedly once described the court as “nine scorpions in a bottle.” Nobody appreciated this more than Max Lerner, the acknowledged dean of Supreme Court observers. From the seminal articles he wrote for the Yale Law Journal in the 1930s to the New York Post columns that ran almost until his death in 1992, Lerner demystified the court and strove to uncover the historical, social, and psychological underpinnings of its landmark decisions. He believed in the majesty and the mystique it holds, but was clear-eyed about its human dimensions and moments of shame. [Amazon: Nine Scorpions in a Bottle: Great Judges and Cases of the Supreme Court]

How Property Developers Enable [WiP] Media to Censor the Root Causes of Resource Conflict
The Ehrlichs and Howell seem to assume that education is the chief factor driving public opinion about environmental causality. But in Tradeoffs: Imperatives of Choice in a High-Tech World, Wenk (1986) offered a more media-centric view of how the public learns: “Whatever literacy in science and technology the general public has reached is not from formal education. Rather, it is from the mass media. That responsibility of the press has been almost completely ignored” (p. 162).       This study will examine press responsibility for the public’s indifference to population growth by exploring two questions: * To what extent do press reports about population-driven environmental problems link those problems to population growth? * What reasons do reporters give for ignoring population growth in stories about environmental problems?        While it is well known that environmental experts connect environmental degradation to population growth, it is less well known that land developers are equally straightforward in implicating population growth as a causal agent for turning wildlife habitat and farmland into subdivisions. The how-to manuals for real estate development are very explicit about the critical role of population growth. Naturally, they frame the results with different language: what land developers might call conversion of raw land to happy communities is often the same phenomenon that environmentalists would call loss of critical wildlife habitat. But both environmentalists and developers agree that population growth is a chief force driving the process of land conversion. Land conversion, in turn, is frequently associated with species decline and urban sprawl.            As we have seen, both land development economists and environmental experts acknowledge population growth as a key source of environmental change. But journalists frame environmental causality differently.      Why? Communication theory offers several possibilities. First is the hegemony-theory interpretation: reports omit any implication that population growth might produce negative effects, in order to purvey the ideology of elites who make money from population growth. As Molotch and Lester (1974) put it, media content can be viewed as reflecting “the practices of those having the power to determine the experience of others” (p. 120). Since real estate, construction and banking interests directly support the media through advertising purchases, this interpretation seems plausible. A number of media critics (e.g., Gandy, 1982; Altschull, 1984; Bennett, 1988) have suggested that media messages reflect the values of powerful political and commercial interests. Burd (1972), Kaniss (1991) and others have pointed out that newspapers have traditionally promoted population growth in their cities through civic boosterism. Molotch (1976) even suggested that cities can best be understood as entities competing for population growth, with the city newspaper as chief cheerleader. [SQ-MN4S: T Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population – Environment Connection]

.

Summary: EoP v WiP Law:

Globally there are two potential international law legal systems, requiring two different forms of agriculture and freedom; and leading to two different international and/or national economic and peace and war systems; with two different types of peacenik / military warriors [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]. Abel Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) international law will require citizens to practice – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits, and fully informed consent honest relating  – responsible freedom, and will lead to sustainable steady state – no population and economic growth – low tech sustainable subsistence agriculture agrarian economies [Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy; NBC: Eustace Conway’s Turtle Island; RN: Russia’s Rural Villagers are Unphased by Economic Collapse; NH: Russian Family Gardens Produce 40% of Russian Food; TB: In 1999, 35 million small family plots produced 90% of Russia’s potatoes, 77% of vegetables, 87% of fruits, 59% of meat, 49% of milk]. Kane Babylon Masonic War is Peace (“WiP”) law allows cattle-citizens [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] the freedom to procreate and consume as much as they want, and practice certain forms of relating deception [IG: 15-07-31]; and leads to totalitarian agriculture [TSWabbit: Daniel Quinn on Totalitarian Agriculture: Excerpt: What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire] boom – slaughterhouse cattle feast – bust economic systems. In a global WiP international law system, everyone is consciously or unconsciously – lab rats on a treadmill – trapped in the growth-boom-bust [OKC: The Boom the Bust and the Bomb; FactXTract: Flatten Weimar Curve?; Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Al Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy] econo-legal system. The growth-boom-bust system can only be reformed – prior to bust collapsing – if a sufficient number of elite are willing to cooperate to abolish it and replace it with a legal system enabling orderly and humane degrowth return to a sustainable steady state system. Some are consciously – prisoners – trapped, others are unconsciously – prison guards – trapped [My Dinner with Andre: Guard/Prisoner Reality]. All Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) Yum Yum Cannibal Boom Bust economy’s are economic systems where the Babylon elite unconsciously or consciously – some more honest and others with a preference for flattery deception – profiteer off race, religious, class and gender Yum Yum boom-bust resource conflict misery. One of the ways in which citizens are encouraged to increase consumption at even faster levels are through banking lending practices. It is not for nothing that usury [DC: Usury: Mathematical Fraud Explained; Bill Maher: Elizabeth Warren: Usury] – a financial growth symptom of Babylon WiP procreation/consumption growth law – was made illegal by some nations and religions, but those nations and religions failed to address the root – Babylon WiP procreation, consumption and deception law – causes of – among others – financial boom bust economic symptom of usury.
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Jul: McV20: EoP Law A: WiP Law. Vusi Mohadi Q: Who Killed the Economy?; 16 Aug: EoP Law Peaceful Protestor Defn; TN: McVeigh EoP law Cons & Wiki Pedia Edit.

Its worth repeating that Mother Natures laws do set a single – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits – standard [eop-footprint: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.40-43/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.39-42/70] for resource abundance prosperity; for the inhabitants of any ecological system. Its also worth noting that in the absence of the beings calling themselves citizen voters cooperating to legislate international laws that obey Mother Natures single procreation and consumption standard of procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-un-res: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70]; enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation return to Mother Natures single responsible freedom prosperity standard; Mother Natures armies can and will Bon Voyage Motherfuckers all of the citizen voters armies – Pentagon [Global Observatory: Climate Change is Urgent Global Security Threat], Red Army [Reds: Trailer], NATO [NATO: Climate Change], People’s Army [ASPO: Al Bartlett: China’s One Child Policy]; Muslim Brotherhood [Reuters: Two is enough, Egypt tells poor families as population booms; Express Tribune: Justice Nisar: population control is Pakistans top priority after water conservation; Supreme Court recommends national task force for population control] – combined back to the stone age; as she has done many times before [Military Gospel: 11 Feb: NASA: Human & nature dynamics: Modeling inequality resource use in the collapse or sustainability of societies]..
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: TAC: Here Come the Bourgeoisie Bolsheviks; 13 Jul: McV20: McV20 Q 4 Kudrin, Gref & Chubais: Putin mandate for EoP Woke Therapy?

EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; has been submitted electronically or formally served to parties and courts in the following political and legal proceedings – as of date no respondent has exposed any scientific or cultural law error – [A] US Presidential Campaign: (i) McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020: 07 Feb: IA SoS: Pro Se Filing Ntc: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [B] IACHR: McVeigh 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Pro Se Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Authorization; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War [mcv-v-usa: PDF: pp.17; Encl: E: PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [C] US Courts: (i) US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland [mcv-v-djtjrb: .NoM: PDF: Annex: D: pp.70; E PDF: pp.31-100/350]; (ii) District Court for the Western District of Texas: El Paso Division: Criminal No EP-20-U4: US v Patrick Crusius [us-v-pwc: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [D] South Africa Courts: (a) George High Court: (i) H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56]; (ii) H 213/19 LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others [lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83]; (b) CCMA: Comm for Conciliation Mediation & Arbitration: 1063-20: LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Two Others [lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137]; [E] UK Courts: (i) UK Supreme Court: LJ v Speaker House of Commons and Ten Others [lj-v-shoc: PDF: pp.43-84/88]; (ii) Westminster Magistrates Court: UK Extradition Proceedings: US v Julian Assange [us-v-jpa: PDF: pp.59-100/143]; [F] New Zealand Courts: High Court of New Zealand, Christchurch Registry  / I Te Koti Matua O Aotearoa Ōtautahi Rohe: CRI-2019-009-2468: New Zealand v Brenton Tarrant [nz-v-bt: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [G] Intnl Court of Justice: Treaty of Amity Proceedings: Iran v USA [ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143].

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Foreign Policy in Focus: Conn Hallinan:
Conn Hallinan: Dispatches from the Edge (dispatchesedgeblog@gmail.com); Foreign Policy in Focus: Domenica Ghanem (press@ips-dc.org)

George Soros:
George Soros (gsoros@sorosny.org);

CN: Pres Xi Jinping, CN-NL Amb Xu Hong, CN-UN Amb Yao Shaojun:
President Xi Jinping: China Min of Foreign Affairs: Dept of Treaty & Law (tfs3@mfa.gov.cn); CN-ZA Emb: Chen Xiaodong (chineseembassysa@gmail.com); CN-US Emb: Cui Tiankai (chinaembpress_us@mfa.gov.cn); Media (chineseembassyspokesperson@gmail.com); CN-NL Emb: XU Hong (chinaemb_nl@mfa.gov.cn); CN-RU Emb: Li Hui (chinaemb_ru@mfa.gov.cn); CN-BY Emb: Cui Qiming (chinaemb_by@mfa.gov.cn); CN-BE Emb: Zhongming Cao (chinaemb_bel@mfa.gov.cn); CN-EU Emb: Zhang Ming (chinamission_eu@mfa.gov.cn); CN-UN Amb Yao Shaojun (chinamission_gva@mfa.gov.cn);

.

Leave a Comment