* Robert L. Grenier, New York Times, Kathleen Kingsbury.
* 05 Feb: Upd: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 4:40 PM
To: ‘Robert L. Grenier’
Cc: ‘NYT OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury’
Subject: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency
TO: Robert Grenier
CC: NYT: OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury.
Re: NYT: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency
Ref: 30 Jan: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency.
EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency.
It is 05 February 2021: As of date (a) you have not indicated an interest in a sincere conversation with EoP MILED Clerk to clarify errors in EoP Applicants legal enemy definition; enabling me to amend such errors to enable EoP Applicants to have a clear KISS Keep it Simple Stupid joint enemy definition; (b) New York Times OpEd editor has not included an “Important Notice for Voters: Re Root Cause of All Resource Conflict” paragraph to your story, or in the footer of your article.
You are quite entitled to define your enemies however you want to. Your definitions can be scientific or – racial, religious, national, gender, ideological – cultural.
However if your enemy definition – presuming you have a scientific or cultural law definition – is not the same as EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] scientific and cultural law enemy definitions; then the sooner such reality is exposed, and you can be removed from EoP Applicants; to enable you to clearly articulate your enemy definition, without being associated EoP Applicants with a different enemy definition; the less confusion there is to EoP Applicants and your different enemy conversation messages.
If or when you wish to discuss EoP Applicants enemy definition, let me know. If not; no offence taken.
If you want to look for individuals whose behaviour is – scientifically – a root cause of resource depletion and consequently resource conflict violence; Ray Dalio [ELS: Footprint: Ray Dalio: Ego: 24493 gha / 1632 earths] and Gamestonk Elon Musk’s footprints are probably more footprint resource thievery violent; than probably all of the arrested Capital rioters combined.
If you lack clear footprint peacenik metrics [04 Feb: McV Mediation: EoP Peacenik Metrics A to SecDef Rumsfeld GWOT Metrics Q / EoP Re: Raytheon: Solid Growth in Middle East: Peace Not Going to Break Out Soon: EoP Law Voter – Scientific Sincere Peacenik Metrics – Answer to Donald Rumsfeld Scientific GWOT Metrics Q: PDF: pp.03; Encl: EoP UN Resolution: pp.42], you will find yourself fighting on the side of a social contract elite and/or insurgents who have negligently and/or intentionally fuck all sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal social contract goals.
EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; has been submitted electronically or formally served to parties and courts in the following political and legal proceedings – as of date no respondent has exposed any scientific or cultural law error – [A] US Presidential Campaign: (i) McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020: 07 Feb: IA SoS: Pro Se Filing Ntc: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [B] IACHR: McVeigh 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Pro Se Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Authorization; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War [mcv-v-usa: PDF: pp.17; Encl: E: PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [C] US Courts: (i) US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland [mcv-v-djtjrb: .NoM: PDF: Annex: D: pp.70; E PDF: pp.31-100/350]; (ii) District Court for the Western District of Texas: El Paso Division: Criminal No EP-20-U4: US v Patrick Crusius [us-v-pwc: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [D] South Africa Courts: (a) George High Court: (i) H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56]; (ii) H 213/19 LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others [lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83]; (b) CCMA: Comm for Conciliation Mediation & Arbitration: 1063-20: LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Two Others [lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137]; [E] UK Courts: (i) UK Supreme Court: LJ v Speaker House of Commons and Ten Others [lj-v-shoc: PDF: pp.43-84/88]; (ii) Westminster Magistrates Court: UK Extradition Proceedings: US v Julian Assange [us-v-jpa: PDF: pp.59-100/143]; [F] New Zealand Courts: High Court of New Zealand, Christchurch Registry / I Te Koti Matua O Aotearoa Ōtautahi Rohe: CRI-2019-009-2468: New Zealand v Brenton Tarrant [nz-v-bt: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [G] Intnl Court of Justice: Treaty of Amity Proceedings: Iran v USA [ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143].
EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Robert L. Grenier (email@example.com);
NYT: OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury:
NYT OpEd Editor: Kathleen Kingsbury (firstname.lastname@example.org)