16 Feb: LJ Re Dignitas Re Filing: Dignitas: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid.

* Dignitas, Ludwig Minelli
* 16 Feb: LJ Re Dignitas Re Filing: Dignitas: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid.
» 22 Feb: Edit: Added Q&A paragraph numbers to D-LM; EoP-LJ.
» 09 Feb: Filing: Dignitas: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid: Membership Card Notice Address Details Updated [PDF: pp.04]; Patients Instructions / Advance Directive [PDF: pp.04]; Request for Dignitas Assisted Suicide Statement Affidavit [PDF: pp.07]; Annex A: Ecology of Peace culture [PDF: pp.54]; Annex B: No EoP OKC TRC [PDF: pp.71]; Annex C: EoP PoW [PDF: pp.53]; Annex D: Medical Report [PDF: pp.03]; Annex E: Psych Report [PDF: pp.16]; Annex F: Marriage Certificate [PDF: pp.03]; Annex G: Family & Friend Notices [PDF: pp.21]; Annex H: Member Dignitas Will & Magistrate and Parents Dignitas Written Consent [PDF: pp.17]; Last Will & Testament [PDF: pp.04].
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Dignitas / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson [mailto:eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 10:16 PM
To: ‘Dignitas’; ‘Ludwig A Minelli’
Subject: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid

.

Ludwig A Minelli
Dignitas
PO Box 17, 8127 Forch
Switzerland
Tel: +41 43 366 10 70 | Fax: +41 43 366 10 79
Per email: dignitas@dignitas.ch

Mr Minelli:

DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid

I received the Dignitas 15 Feb email [15 Feb: Dignitas Re: LJ Filing: Dignitas: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid] with “Mental illnesses – How to do a request.pdf” PDF attachment. I could not find the attachment listed on Dignitas [Dignitas: Documentation] pages to link to; so uploaded it to EoP v Dignitas PDF documents [Mental illnesses – How to do a request PDF: pp.03]

Thread:
* 13 Feb: LJ Re Dignitas Re Filing: Dignitas: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid.
* 12 Feb: Dignitas Re: LJ Filing: Dignitas: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid
* 09 Feb: Filing: Dignitas: DM 515.66.866: LJ: Adv Dir & Dignitas Req Affid.

EoP culture active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle] response.
D-LM: Dignitas: Ludwig Minelli
EoP-LJ: Ecology of Peace: Lara Johnson

**

D-LM 01: In order to be able to evaluate a request of an assisted suicide, we do need, once again, a medical documentaion (such as medical reports from physicians, psychiatrists, hospitals etc.). We kindly ask you to read again our detailed information, which we have already sent to you. Without a medical file/documentation we are not able to help.

EoP-LJ 01: I read [Dignitas: Mental illnesses – How to do a request: PDF: pp.03], not once, not twice, about four times.

In my culture clarity of understanding as to what exactly is in agreement and/or disagreement is important. Put more clearly: [a] what are the scientific law or cultural law facts not in dispute; and [b] what are the scientific law or cultural law facts in dispute; and if so: whether there are potential mutual win-win settlement agreement option resolutions between disputing parties to resolve the facts in dispute.

Clarifying the facts not in dispute and facts in dispute asap, helps to avoid misunderstandings that waste allot of goodwill and resources; and helps to focus all attention on options for resolving the facts in dispute.

**

D-LM 02: [Mental illnesses – How to do a request PDF: pp.03] “Therefore, it is advisable to look for an independent, open-minded psychiatrist with a forensic/analytic approach. Such independent psychiatrist is more likely to assess your case without prejudice.”

EoP-LJ 02: The chances of me finding an independent, open-minded psychiatrist with a forensic / analytical approach to Ecology of Peace cultural values, particularly towards psychiatry [eop-v-wip-psych]; is very low. Ecology of Peace culture’s perspective on psychiatry is the same as many psychologists like Jeffrey Schaler; who consider psychiatry to be a fraud. Most psychiatrists are very offended by such views critical of their ‘sanity innocence for sale indulgences’ practices; similarly to the offence taken by Pope Leo X to Martin Luther; and Pope Urban VIII to Galileo.

Jeffrey Schaler: A disease refers to a histological (tissue) lesion, wound, or cellular abnormality. Mental illness is not included in standard textbooks on pathology because it refers to behavior, not cellular pathology. This distinction between behavior and disease is important because people tend to confuse the one with the other. Behaviors can be influenced by disease, and vice versa, however behaviors are not diseases, and vice versa. Smoking is a behavior. Lung cancer is a disease. Drinking alcohol is a behavior. Cirrhosis of the liver is a disease. Diseases are found in a cadaver upon autopsy. Behaviors cannot be found in a cadaver during autopsy for obvious reasons. Disease is something that a person has. Behavior is something that a person does. When I say there is no such thing as mental illness, I mean the following: The mind, consciousness, and thinking is not susceptible to disease. “It” cannot get sick or diseased. That represented by the pronoun “I” cannot get sick or diseased. The mind cannot be diseased because it is not a biological entity. Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as the mind. Since there is no such thing as the mind, it cannot be ill or diseased. Put another way, the mind can be sick or diseased in a metaphorical sense only. Since the mind cannot be sick or diseased, it also cannot be healthy. We will never discover a cause for mental illness because there is no illness, no disease called mental illness. There is no “it.” “It” does not exist. “It” is not a discrete variable. The term and diagnosis of mental illness – and obviously there can be no accurate diagnosis of mental illness since there is no disease to diagnose – is a rhetorical device, a political and behavioral strategy that certain people, as we shall see, benefit from. While this perspective on mental illness is considered controversial and a minority opinion, it is in many ways simply the application of scientific rules for disease identification and classification. Pathologists do not include mental illness in standard textbooks on pathology. Behavior is not a tissue. Behavior is not a disease. There is nothing particularly controversial about pathology and nosology, the classification of diseases.  [Cato Unbound: Strategies of Psychiatric Coercion; CCHRInt: Jeffrey Schaler: Professor of Psychology: Fraud of Psychiatry]

If the psychiatrist interpreted his/her relationship to me; in terms of coercive psychiatry relational values; it could be very dangerous:

Jeffrey Schaler: I am not an anti-psychiatrist. I do not object to people who want to believe or go to a psychiatrist who believes in mental illness. In contractual or consensual psychiatry, the psychiatrist is an agent of the patient. The patient can fire the psychiatrist any time he wants to do so. In institutional or coercive psychiatry, the psychiatrist pretends to be an agent of the patient, but is really an agent of a state institution. The patient cannot fire his psychiatrist. In my opinion, when an adult refuses treatment his refusal must be respected. Otherwise, coercion occurs in the name of helping him. I differentiate here between contractual or consensual psychiatry and institutional or coercive psychiatry. There are, in my opinion, as many different schools of personality theory as there are religions, and as my colleague and friend Thomas Szasz points out in his book entitled The Myth of Psychotherapy: Mental Healing as Religion, Rhetoric and Repression (1978), treatment approaches to mental illness have more to do with religion and ethics than medicine and science. [Cato Unbound: Strategies of Psychiatric Coercion]

**

D-LM 03: Some time ago the Swiss Federal Supreme Court has acknowledged that basically every mentally competent person has the right to determine the moment and the manner of his or her own end of life; a court ruling which was confirmed by the European Court on Human Rights [Dignitas: Mental illnesses – How to do a request: PDF: pp.03].

EoP-LJ 03: What is the European Court of Human rights case where they define ‘mental competency’ ECHR: 46043/14: Lambert and Others v France; or some other case?

In Radical Honoursty energy return on energy invested [sq-eroei] conceptual terms; [ECHR] may have higher returns on energy invested for me than [SASOP].

[ECHR] Filing an application for direct access to the European Court of Human Rights; to request them to clarify whether my Ecology of Peace culture legal – [a] Ecology of Peace culture member; [b] No EoP OKC TRC; [c] EoP PoW – reasons for my submission to Dignitas; falls within the confines of their interpretation of the European Convention of Human Rights scientific law and/or cultural law ‘mental competency’ definition.

[SASOP] Trying to find a SASOP: SA Society of Psychiatrists independent, open-minded psychiatrist with a forensic / analytical approach to Ecology of Peace cultural values which effectively accuses all psychiatrists of negligent or intentional fraud.

**

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Dignitas:
Dignitas (dignitas@dignitas.ch); Ludwig A Minelli (ludwig.a.minelli@dignitas.ch)

.

Leave a Comment