* Cape Independence Advocacy Group, Phil Craig
* 06 Mar: EoP Re: TL: Cape Independence: A Call for Counter Arguments
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2021 9:04 PM
To: ‘Cape Independence Advocacy Group: Phil Craig’
Subject: EoP Re: TL: Cape Independence: A Call for Counter Arguments
Attachment: 21-03-06_LJvSGMC-PNM_EoPUNRes.pdf; 21-03-05_LJvSGMC_Grg-PollV.pdf
Cape Independence Advocacy Group: Phil Craig
Re: TL: Cape Independence: A Call for Counter Arguments.
EoP Re: TL: Cape Independence: A Call for Counter Arguments.
Phil Craig: Surely both those for and against secession can recognise that its merits are at least worthy of discussion? Is there someone willing to advance a reasoned argument why the people of the Cape would be better off by remaining in a union with South Africa? [TL: Cape Independence: A Call for Counter Arguments.]
If you are looking for someone to provide you with EoP law [eop-v-wip-law] reasoned arguments against Cape WiP law secession: I’d be happy to provide you with the EoP law perspective.
If you are looking for someone to provide you with WiP law reasoned arguments against Cape WiP law secession. I ain’t a WiP law practitioner, but there are many WiP law practitioners who could provide you with their WiP law reasoned arguments against Cape WiP law secession; although few – currently – are willing to openly declare themselves as WiP law practitioners.
LPC-CL: …. as you are aware, [the LPC] is the regulatory body for the legal profession.
EoP-LJ: LPC officials should make up their minds as to whether the LPC is an EoP and WiP law, or WiP Law Only legal profession regulatory body. Until it does so: EoP MILED Clerk is the legal regulatory body for the EoP law legal profession [EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]. The supreme national and global national security priority for EoP law culture is building an EoP Axis Alliance to submit EoP UN Resolution to UN General Assembly; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71; lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation to a global low tech organic family farm agrarian economy.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 May: LJ Re LPC-CL Re: LJ v NMN: Draft Settlement Agreement.
I have been advocating on behalf of Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End the Abel and Kane Cold War, for twenty years.
The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from Sandile Ngcobo [WP: Sandile Ngcobo] SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict. …. The EoP TRC Amicus was supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Michael Maher on media censorship of overpopulation causes of resource conflict: Written Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 May: 03 May: Ngcobo Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae.
I am currently the only EoP law culture unconditional cooperator [eop-axis-oath: LJ] member in South Africa, and globally; and consequently the only individual in South Africa or globally advocating on behalf of Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw: lj-v-sgmc: pp.19-22/56] Racial, Religious, Class and Gender Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [cult-law-self-rule: lj-v-sgmc: pp.39-40/56] secession.
 Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, ideological, sexual or gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP Scientific [eop-scicultlaw: PDF: pp.48-51/70] – procreation and/or consumption below ecological carrying capacity [eop-footprint: PDF: pp.39-42/70] – laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals.
 Individuals Rights and Duties under Cultural Law include: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities.
 Violations of Cultural Law would fall under Deception Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
 Conflict of Cultural Law Violations: Violations of Cultural Law between two individuals or groups of individuals with different Cultural Laws, would be adjudicated in terms of Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression: PDF: pp.31-33/70]]: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious & Gender Culture-Conflict Identities:
 Any group of individuals who have signed their Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom:PDF: pp.60-61/70]] Oaths to abide by Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law who share similar racial, religious, socio-ideological, sexual or gender identity, may agree to form a Cultural Law Self Rule community homeland, which can be as small as an agreement between two people, a family or village within a nation; or as large as a continental territory including a few nations; where the individuals within that territory have provided their fully informed consent to practicing a particular group shared ‘Cultural Law’.
 As long as the particular ‘cultural law’ is based on the fully informed consent of all individuals within the particular ‘cultural law’ homeland community; and the ‘cultural law’ is practiced within the confines of the particular cultural law homeland community’s territory; it is lawful; irrespective of how offensive it may be to the cultural values of a neighbouring homeland with different racial, religious, class, gender groups cultural law agreement values.
 Any groups cultural law is lawful within that cultural law homeland community’s territory; and cannot be legally restricted or punished by a different group of individuals who have different subjective racial, religious or gender cultural laws, within their cultural law homeland territory.
 There is no restriction whatsoever on the choice of any groups fully informed consenting ‘cultural law’; as long as it (a) does not violate EoP Scientific procreation and consumption laws; and (b) is based upon fully informed consent of all individuals within the privacy territory of the individuals ‘self rule cultural law homeland’. For example: Armin Meiwes and Bernd Brandes fully informed consent cannibalism [The Guardian: Victim of cannibal agreed to be eaten], etc.
Cultural Law Homeland Rights and Duties:
 Cultural law homeland rights will only apply to individuals or groups of individuals objectively and subjectively abiding by EoP Scientific laws:
 If or where a homeland agrees on a cultural law that restricts travel across their property ration homeland to individuals who are not members of their cultural law homeland agreement; they should clearly and simply notify neighbour property ration territories, and include a ‘Whites / Blacks / Sharia Muslims / Jews Only Homeland’ public notice at roads entering their homeland; where clear and simple definitions of ‘whites, blacks, sharia muslims, jews’ are provided.
 Ultimately as property swaps enable individuals with similar ‘cultural law homeland’ values to find property rations on the outskirts of existing homelands; enabling them to join a particular homeland, different homelands can create nature corridors between their homelands to protect their cultural values and minimize relating friction with homeland neighbours who have conflicting racial, religious, gender etc cultural law values.
EoP Axis Alliance cultural law self rule has application for many different groups; creating a larger potential supporting alliance, between groups who generally speaking oppose each other. For example: under Cultural Law Self Rule, groups supporting assisted suicide would be entitled to their homeland and groups opposing assisted suicide would be entitled to their homeland.
EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] is Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Law voter [eop-axis-oath] – Truth and Reconciliation to End the Abel and Kane Cold War – draft legislation to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw:: PDF: pp.48-51/70] as international law; which – among others – will effectively legalize euthenasia in all nations globally; where citizens in any nation will be able to invoke EoP Cultural law rights to setup an Assisted Suicide Cultural Law Self Rule Homeland [cult-law-self-rule: PDF: pp.34-35/70]; making assisted suicide legal for the members of that Assisted Suicide Cultural law Self Rule Homeland.
» EoP Leg Sub: 28 Feb: EoP Re: Walter v Min of Health Assisted Suicide Application
In the age of pandemics; the same principle applies to vaxxer addicts and anti-vaxxers, etc.
I have drafted some EoP v WiP Law Land Reform / Secession Referendum poll questionnaire documents; if you or any of your Cape Independence Advocacy Group members want to provide your – EoP v WiP Law Land Reform / Secession Referendum – poll answers:
If so: I am looking for a few local voters interested in the land reform and/or secession [TL: ‘Free the Cape!’: Independence march hits Stellenbosch despite sweltering temperature] issue, to hold an an EoP v WiP Law Landreform / Secession poll.
Put simply: I want the poll voters to (a) read the EoP UN Resolution [Annexure: PDF: pp.45], which includes the how, why, where, when and who process of Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End the Abel and Kane Cold War landreform and secession; and (b) then ask questions if they have any questions, to make sure they accurately understand the EoP UN Resolution landreform and cultural law self rule policies; and (c) then provide me with their answer [Annexure: PDF: pp.03] as to whether they would vote for the EoP UN Resolution landreform and cultural law self rule homelands policy; if a candidate or party was available on the election ballot advocating for such policy.
Among other EoP UN Resolution legal applications in various courts; one is in the George High Court: H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: EoP UN Resolution: pp.17-54/56]
The final poll votes may be submitted into LJ v SGMC and/or any other EoP UN Resolution court proceeding court record; for the respondents EoP v WiP law landreform consideration.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Mar: EoP TN Info to HPNW Chair & Committee
EoP v WiP Law:
Mahatma Gandhi wanted an [EoP Steppe Aryan law: sustainable procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits] self sufficient villages agrarian economy. Nehru wanted a [WiP law] industrial economy. [Daniel Yergin: Commanding Heights: Battle for World Economy 01. Battle of Ideas; 02. Agony of Reform; 03. New Rules of the Game; DW: Mahatma Gandhi: Dying for freedom]
McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020]: A handshake is a very low cost way of making contracts, but is worthless in a community with lotsa liars. Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. [SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017]
[SQ-DS: The Mosou Matriarch Men Live Better where Women are in Charge].
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution.
Globally there are two potential international law legal systems, requiring two different forms of agriculture and freedom; and leading to two different international and/or national economic and peace and war systems; with two different types of peacenik / military warriors [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]. Abel Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) international law will require citizens to practice – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits, and fully informed consent honest relating – responsible freedom, and will lead to sustainable steady state – no population and economic growth – low tech sustainable subsistence agriculture agrarian economies [Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy; NBC: Eustace Conway’s Turtle Island; RN: Russia’s Rural Villagers are Unphased by Economic Collapse; NH: Russian Family Gardens Produce 40% of Russian Food; TB: In 1999, 35 million small family plots produced 90% of Russia’s potatoes, 77% of vegetables, 87% of fruits, 59% of meat, 49% of milk]. Kane Babylon Masonic War is Peace (“WiP”) law allows cattle-citizens [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] the freedom to procreate and consume as much as they want, and practice certain forms of relating deception [IG: 15-07-31]; and leads to totalitarian agriculture [TSWabbit: Daniel Quinn on Totalitarian Agriculture: Excerpt: What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire] boom – slaughterhouse cattle feast – bust economic systems. In a global WiP international law system, everyone is consciously or unconsciously – lab rats on a treadmill – trapped in the growth-boom-bust [OKC: The Boom the Bust and the Bomb; FactXTract: Flatten Weimar Curve?; Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Al Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy] econo-legal system. The growth-boom-bust system can only be reformed – prior to bust collapsing – if a sufficient number of elite are willing to cooperate to abolish it and replace it with a legal system enabling orderly and humane degrowth return to a sustainable steady state system. Some are consciously – prisoners – trapped, others are unconsciously – prison guards – trapped [My Dinner with Andre: Guard/Prisoner Reality]. All Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) Yum Yum Cannibal Boom Bust economy’s are economic systems where the Babylon elite unconsciously or consciously – some more honest and others with a preference for flattery deception – profiteer off race, religious, class and gender Yum Yum boom-bust resource conflict misery. One of the ways in which citizens are encouraged to increase consumption at even faster levels are through banking lending practices. It is not for nothing that usury [DC: Usury: Mathematical Fraud Explained; Bill Maher: Elizabeth Warren: Usury] – a financial growth symptom of Babylon WiP procreation/consumption growth law – was made illegal by some nations and religions, but those nations and religions failed to address the root – Babylon WiP procreation, consumption and deception law – causes of – among others – financial boom bust economic symptom of usury.
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Jul: McV20: EoP Law A: WiP Law. Vusi Mohadi Q: Who Killed the Economy?; 16 Aug: EoP Law Peaceful Protestor Defn; TN: McVeigh EoP law Cons & Wiki Pedia Edit.
Its worth repeating that Mother Natures laws do set a single – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits – standard [eop-footprint: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.40-43/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.39-42/70] for resource abundance prosperity; for the inhabitants of any ecological system. Its also worth noting that in the absence of the beings calling themselves citizen voters cooperating to legislate international laws that obey Mother Natures single procreation and consumption standard of procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-un-res: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70]; enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation return to Mother Natures single responsible freedom prosperity standard; Mother Natures armies can and will Bon Voyage Motherfuckers all of the citizen voters armies – Pentagon [Global Observatory: Climate Change is Urgent Global Security Threat], Red Army [Reds: Trailer], NATO [NATO: Climate Change], People’s Army [ASPO: Al Bartlett: China’s One Child Policy]; Muslim Brotherhood [Reuters: Two is enough, Egypt tells poor families as population booms; Express Tribune: Justice Nisar: population control is Pakistans top priority after water conservation; Supreme Court recommends national task force for population control] – combined back to the stone age; as she has done many times before [Military Gospel: 11 Feb: NASA: Human & nature dynamics: Modeling inequality resource use in the collapse or sustainability of societies].
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: TAC: Here Come the Bourgeoisie Bolsheviks; 13 Jul: McV20: McV20 Q 4 Kudrin, Gref & Chubais: Putin mandate for EoP Woke Therapy?
EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; has been submitted electronically or formally served to parties and courts in the following political and legal proceedings – as of date no respondent has exposed any scientific or cultural law error – [A] US Presidential Campaign: (i) McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020: 07 Feb: IA SoS: Pro Se Filing Ntc: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [B] IACHR: McVeigh 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Pro Se Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Authorization; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War [mcv-v-usa: PDF: pp.17; Encl: E: PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [C] US Courts: (i) US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland [mcv-v-djtjrb: .NoM: PDF: Annex: D: pp.70; E PDF: pp.31-100/350]; (ii) District Court for the Western District of Texas: El Paso Division: Criminal No EP-20-U4: US v Patrick Crusius [us-v-pwc: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [D] South Africa Courts: (a) George High Court: (i) H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56]; (ii) H 213/19 LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others [lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83]; (b) CCMA: Comm for Conciliation Mediation & Arbitration: 1063-20: LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Two Others [lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137]; [E] UK Courts: (i) UK Supreme Court: LJ v Speaker House of Commons and Ten Others [lj-v-shoc: PDF: pp.43-84/88]; (ii) Westminster Magistrates Court: UK Extradition Proceedings: US v Julian Assange [us-v-jpa: PDF: pp.59-100/143]; [F] New Zealand Courts: High Court of New Zealand, Christchurch Registry / I Te Koti Matua O Aotearoa Ōtautahi Rohe: CRI-2019-009-2468: New Zealand v Brenton Tarrant [nz-v-bt: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [G] Intnl Court of Justice: Treaty of Amity Proceedings: Iran v USA [ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143].
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Cape Independence Advocacy Group: Phil Craig:
Cape Independence Advocacy Group: Phil Craig (firstname.lastname@example.org)