29 Mar: Ecology of Peace Ethical Lawful Mental Disorder Metric

* Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Millers Inc: Arno Crous
* 29 Mar: 51/19: LJvGHJ Settlement Agreement Offer: DB & GHJ: Ecology of Peace Ethical Lawful Mental Disorder Metric [PDF: pp.13]
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v FTM, LJ v GHJ  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT; HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA

                                                                                                Case: H 51/19

In the matter between:

In the matter between:

Lara Johnson

Applicant

And
Graeme & Hilary Johnstone

1st and 2nd Respondent

Frode & Talitha Moe

03rd and 4th Respondent

Clive & Ann Johnstone

05th and 6th Respondent

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Ecology of Peace Ethical Lawful Mental Disorder Metric

 .

.

If you are driving north on the N1 to Bloemfontein, and somewhere between the Three Sister Shell gas station and the Three Sisters N12 off ramp to Kimberley [Google Maps: Three Sisters] and you see a hitch-hiker next to the road. [A] If the hitchhiker has a sign hitching to Bloemfontein, then you know you can help, because you know that you are staying on the N1, going to Bloemfontein. [B] If the hitchhiker has a sign hitching to Kimberley, then you know you cannot help, because you know you are not taking the N12 off-ramp to go Kimberley. If you stop and pretend that you can help; you are negligently or intentionally deceiving the hitchhiker. [C] If the hitchhiker has no destination sign indicating where they are hitchhiking to; then you don’t know if you can help, because you know where you are going, and you don’t know where the hitchhiker wants to go. You can stop and ask the hitchhiker questions to clarify that you know whether you can help or not; or you can drive on; [D] If the hitchhiker has a sign in a language that you don’t understand; or has a sign that means one thing in your culture, and has a different meaning in the hitchhikers culture; then its best that you both define what the sign means in your different cultures, before deciding whether you can help or not.

If you are a soldier in a war, and all soldiers in the declared war, wear specific uniforms, then you know if you see someone wearing a particular military or civilian uniform that they are either your unconditional cooperator fellow soldier; or they are  a non-combatant civilian, or the enemy. You protect or you shoot to kill.

Choosing to sincerely help or not to help; to attack or not to attack someone by making a mental disorder diagnosis allegation is not too different. If you know where the person’s mental utility vehicle is driving to – what their existential cultural, racial, religious, ideological strategic goals are – and your mental utility vehicle is driving in the same direction – you know you have the same existential cultural, racial, religious, ideological strategic goals – you can help each other to clarify whose tactics are the most efficient or conducive to reaching your shared strategic destination goal.

One of Professor Richard Korn’s criminology and psychology counseling expert abilities was his research focus on what kind of counseling ‘help’ to a prisoner or medical or psychology patient ‘works’ and what kind of ‘help’ ‘does not work’. Summary: If you don’t know what the patients strategic goal is, if your help is overt coercion or covert passive aggressive do-gooder manipulation coercion help; it won’t work. If you know what a person wants, you can help them. If you don’t know what they want, because they don’t know what they want, or because they are ashamed of being political incorrect about what they want; then you can help them to create an environment more conducive to honesty than political correctness to help them learn to be more honest with themselves and others about what they want. Once they are capable of honestly clarifying what they want, you can honestly inform them whether you have the skills or resource to help them to get what they want. If you do, you can help them; if you don’t, you don’t waste their time and resources pretending that you can help them.

When psychologist and criminologist Dr Richard Korn was sent to a mental institution or prison as the resident psychologist; he would – professional ego strategic suicide – refuse to confirm any resident as ‘insane’, unless that resident could each one teach one simply and clearly explain to him why he needed to be considered insane. His path to healing, for his patients, was similar to RD Laings…. He’d say something like: Well, the Doctors tell me that you guys got something wrong with you, but I’m not too sure; what do you think? Patients were encouraged to provide their own diagnosis and analysis of their alleged mental disorder disease, and how they got there, and if they had it, and so on.

If Dr Korn came to visit and asked me: Do you have a mental disorder? I would answer; well it would depend on your scientific or cultural law definition of mental disorder. There are many cultural law mental disorder definitions; some of them are direct contradictions of each other. For example: If I am the only active listening sincere peacenik in a dormitory prison cell of very violent people, if they think I am crazy; that is my tokolosie protection. Are you an active listening sincere peacenik doctor? A sincere peacenik truthseekers can be vulnerable naked in a ‘nudist co-learners[1] truthseekers welcome’ doctors office. Truthseeker nudists cannot walk around truthseeking naked in a doctors office where the doctors prescriber[2] existential cultural values are opposed to truthseeking nudity. A sincere truthseeker will keep on his battle fatigues in a doctors office where the doctor is opposed to truthseeking nudity.

If your mental utility vehicle strategic goal is to go to Bloemfontein and the hitchhiker’s is to go to Kimberley; then your mental utility vehicles don’t share the same strategic destination goals. Some of the tactics to get to Bloemfontein or Kimberly may be similar and others will be different.

The Ecology of Peace culture’s mental utility vehicle strategic goal is to build an EoP Axis Alliance to submit EoP UN Resolution[3] to UN General Assembly to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law. The Ecology of Peace Ethical Lawful Mental Disorder Metric information provides information as to the Ecology of Peace mental utility vehicle’s tactical goals to find unconditional or conditional EoP Axis Alliance co-operators; and/or to identify who are neutral mental disorder diagnosis non-combatants and confirmed enemy combatants; amongst psychologists and psychiatrists and related professions.

[A] Ecology of Peace Ethical Lawful Mental Disorder Metric:

[1] Ecology of Peace[§[4]] Radical Honoursty ego literacy diagnosis & therapy[§[5]] policy[§[6]] for making sincere reasonable ethical mental disorder allegations is based upon (a) Applicants study of psychology, particularly the critical psychology work of Dr Thomas Szasz, Jeffery Schaler, etc; and (b) experiences as a colleague student of criminologist and psychologist Dr Richard Korn, and employee of psychologist Dr Brad Blanton, etc:

[2] Before making any mental disorder allegation, Mount Stupid[§[7]] competent know[§[8]] (a) what your mental disorder legal definition[§[9]] is; and (b) whether your mental disorder definition is based on scientific or cultural law.

[2.1] Scientific law:

[A] i.e. applicable to all citizens of all races, religions, classes, ideologies, professions and genders.

[2.2] Cultural law:

[A] i.e. applicable only to individuals who are members of the particular racial, religious, ideological, professional, class, ideological, or gender culture; who is a fully informed consenting member of that particular culture.

[2.3] If scientific: (a) provide the individual with your scientific mental disorder definition[§[10]] and working hypothesis mental disorder allegation conclusion evidence in support in writing, to their face, or inbox; not to others behind their back; (b) engage them in stupid consciousness[§[11]] active listening / reading[§[12]] to enable the individual to provide you with constructive feedback to your working hypothesis conclusion allegation and to make sure your interpretations of their motives and statements are accurate; (c) if their evidence proves your working hypothesis evidence to be insufficient for a beyond reasonable doubt conclusion; in writing: withdraw your allegation and apologize for your inaccurate mental disorder allegation.

[2.4] If cultural: (a) provide the individual with your cultural mental disorder definition[§[13]] and evidence in support; to their face, or inbox; not to others behind their back; (b) confirm in writing that the individual being diagnosed; is a fully informed consenting member of the particular racial, religious, class, ideological or gender culture, whose cultural mental disorder definition you are using in your diagnosis consultation; (c) if so: engage them in stupid consciousness[§[14]] active listening / reading[§[15]] to enable the individual to provide you with constructive feedback to your working hypothesis conclusion allegation and to make sure your interpretations of their motives and statements are accurate; (d) if their evidence proves your working hypothesis evidence to be insufficient for a beyond reasonable doubt conclusion; in writing: withdraw your allegation and apologize for your inaccurate mental disorder allegation.

.

Ecology of Peace Definitions and Clarifications:

.

[3] Active Listening / Reading:

[3.1] Active Listening / Reading means that you stupid consciousness[§[16]] confirm the in/accuracy of your interpretations; prior to your ego allowing you to draw ego-centric biased conclusions as the in/accuracy of your interpretations. For example: This is my interpretation of what you said / wrote. Is my interpretation of what you said accurate? [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle[17]].

.

[4] Stupid Consciousness:

[4.1] The Dunning–Kruger effect is a hypothetical cognitive bias stating that people with low ability at a task overestimate their ability. As described by social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, the bias results from an internal illusion in people of low ability and from an external misperception in people of high ability; that is, “the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others”. It is related to the cognitive bias of illusory superiority and comes from people’s inability to recognize their lack of ability. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, people cannot objectively evaluate their level of competence. Colloquially, people experiencing this bias are said to be “on Mount Stupid”. The psychological phenomenon of illusory superiority was identified as a form of cognitive bias in Kruger and Dunning’s 1999 study “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments”. The identification derived from the cognitive bias evident in the criminal case of McArthur Wheeler, who, on April 19, 1995, robbed two banks while his face was covered with lemon juice, which he believed would make it invisible to the surveillance cameras. This belief was based on his misunderstanding of the chemical properties of lemon juice as an invisible ink.[WP: Dunning and Kruger Effect[18]]   

[4.2] Simon Sinek: It’s likely that if you’re having trouble understanding something, then somebody else in the room is as well. Asking questions doesn’t mean you’re the stupidest person in the room; it usually means you’re the only one brave enough to speak up. I am okay being the idiot. I am not being flip. I am okay everybody in the room going ugh, because I have to ask questions until I understand it; but the reality is that once I can get to the point where I can understand it; I can get it so simple that I understand it, and I can say it in simple terms, that means other people can understand it too. [Simon Sinek: The Truth about Being the Stupidest in the Room[19]].

[4.3] Brad Blanton: The ego stuff of reputation is just nothing to who I am when I realize my full potential, which is as basically as a plug, in which I plug into all of being and all my fellow beings. The way that I think that I plug into the magnificence of being is by getting dumb, instead of getting smart [Brad Blanton: Radical Honesty chant to quickly teach your ego getting dumb competency enlightenment[20]].

.

[5] Know:

[5.1] Sun Tzu: If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. [History Channel: Sun Tzu – The Art of War[21]].

[5.2] Donald Rumsfeld: There are known knowns: there are things we know we know. There are known unknowns: we know there are some things we do not know. There are unknown knowns: there are things we don’t know that we know. There are also unknown unknowns: things we don’t know we don’t know. [Donald Rumsfeld: Unknown Unknowns[22]; The Unknown Known: Trailer[23]]

[5.3] The Johari window is a technique that helps people better understand their relationship with themselves and others. It was created by psychologists Joseph Luft (1916–2014) and Harrington Ingham (1916–1995) in 1955, and is used primarily in self-help groups and corporate settings as a heuristic exercise. Luft and Ingham named their model “Johari” using a combination of their first names. The philosopher Charles Handy calls this concept the Johari House with four rooms. Room one is the part of ourselves that we and others see. Room two contains aspects that others see but we are unaware of. Room three is the private space we know but hide from others. Room four is the unconscious part of us that neither ourselves nor others see. [WP: Johari Window]

.

[6] Thomas Szasz: Thomas Szasz: Able Simple Clear Speech; or Kane Babylon Speech:

[6.1] Formerly, Americans charged with murder were considered innocent until proven guilty; now they are considered insane until proven sane. To concepts like suicide, homicide, and genocide, we should add semanticide – the murder of language. The deliberate (or quasi-deliberate) misuse of language through hidden metaphor and professional mystification breaks the basic contract between people, namely the tactic agreement on the proper use of words. In the animal kingdom, the rule is: eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom: define or be defined. Man is the animal that speaks. Understanding language is thus the key to understanding man; and the control of language, to the control of man. Hence it is that men struggle not only over territory, food, and raw materials, but today perhaps most of all over language. For to control the Word is to be the Definer: God, king, pope, president, legislator, scientist, psychiatrist, madman – you and me. God defines everything and everyone. The totalitarian leader aspires to similar grandeur. The ordinary person defines some aspects of himself and of a few others. But even the most modest and powerless of men defines something no one else can: his own dreams. And we are all defined, as well: by our genes which shape us; our parents who name us; our society which classifies us; and so on. It has long seemed to me that some of the fundamental problems of psychiatry are really quiet simple: they center around a struggle for definition between the so-called mental patient on the one side and his family, society, and psychiatrist on the other. each party to this contest speaks a different language, whose content and consequences he tries to impose on his adversary. Although the context sometimes looks like a debate, it is actually a bitter fight for survival, and, like all such struggles, it is decided not by logic, but by power. If, as the Old Testament tells us, the First or Original Sin was the knowledge of good and evil, then the knowledge of clear speech was the ‘Second Sin.” At Babel, God punished man for this transgression with the Divine Confusion, and we have been misleading each other ever since. Dr. Thomas Szasz believes that it is this confusion of language that has produced much of the inhumanity, intolerance, and outright stupidity which today affect everything from our politics to our sex lives. [Thomas Szasz: The Second Sin].

.

Summary: Ecology of Peace Culture:

[7] The Ecology of Peace culture advocates on behalf of implementing Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law. Put differently: Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law is the EoP culture red light[24] line[25] answer to the John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint?

[8] The Ecology of Peace culture: Re: Root causes of Resource Conflict.

[8.1] The root causes of all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict are (a) clauses of Kane Babylon War is Peace international law allowing beings calling themselves citizens, to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits enabling resource depletion, ecological overshoot; and failed state collapse; and (b) the individuals in positions of international and national juridical, legislative, media, corporate etc power, consciously and intentionally – legally and politically – obstructing legal and political campaigns to abolish Kane Babylon War is Peace international law; to be replaced with Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law international law; (c) WiP Law Voters[26]: voters who consciously and intentionally vote for WiP Law Only political parties to endorse the negligent and/or intentional enforcement of Kane Babylon War is Peace international law.

.

[9] EoP v WiP Law:

[10] EoP v WiP Law:

[10.1] EoP Scientific and Cultural [eop-scicultlaw[27]] – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally requires citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint[28]]; and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements [ego-eco-literacy[29]]; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[A] The Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr[30]] conscious strategic goal for implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law is an egalitarian responsible freedom [responsible-freedom] stable – no population & economic consumption growth above ecological carrying capacity limits – sustainable low tech family farm agrarian village and primitivist nomad society living in peace; with no palaces, prisons, mental institutions, homeless and unemployed, where rape and murder are so rare, they don’t have words for it.[31]

[B] In Martin Luther / Sayyid Qutb terminology: EoP Law prohibits innocence for – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – sale indulgences Kufr juridical rulings.

[10.2] Babylon WiP law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[A] The conscious or unconscious strategic goal of WiP law is a hierarchical slavery freedumb society where the military, legal, political, religious and legal elite profiteer of cheap – economic sexual and/or military – cannon fodder labour and homeless and unemployed misery of the masses; with plenty of racial, religious, class or gender resource conflict for the elite to parasitically profiteer from to build themselves military, religious, corporate and polegal palaces, cheap labour prisons and mental institutions slavery plantations, where rape and murder are so plentiful, WiP Only BDSM addicted to misery judges don’t need to subscribe to porn channels, because they have reality rape and murder porn tv channels in their courts.[32]

[B] In Martin Luther / Sayyid Qutb terminology: Babylonian Kufr WiP Law socio-polegally and economically profit from innocence for – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – sale indulgences Kufr juridical rulings.

[11] EoP v WiP Elections or Referendums:

[A] An EoP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon EoP national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in EoP elections and referendums are legally prohibited from covertly and/or overtly bribing each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.

[B] A Babylon WiP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon Babylon WiP clauses of national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in Babylon WiP elections and referendums consciously or unconsciously covertly and/or overtly bribe each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.

 .

Ecology of Peace Culture Strategic Psych Doctrine:

[12] EoP RH FR psycho-therapy diagnosis and/or treatment:

[12.1] Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality[33]:

[A] Diagnosis[34]: WiP law – clauses of international law allowing procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – is the root cause of all resource conflict including psycho-social conflict diagnosed by industrial state educated academic psychology and psychiatry associations as mental and personality disorders;

[B] Treatment[35]: EoP RH FR psych-therapy is focussed on (i) individuals who in terms of their existential identity identify as sincere / honourable – racial, religious, class, gender relational – peaceniks / warriors; (ii) providing trim tab[36] button[37] co-learner[38] ego-eco literacy unconditional or conditional [eop-axis-oath[39]] cooperator skills to (iii) build an EoP Axis Alliance to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law via submission of EoP UN Resolution [PDF[40]: pp.04-45/45] to UNGA and/or ICJ.

.

[13] Ecology of Peace culture’s Answer to APA’s DSM & WHO’s ICD:

[13.1] Questions: [A] Is a mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [1-5] – or ICD: World Health Organizations: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [1-11] – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; based upon scientific or cultural law? [B] If cultural law: what are cultural ethics values to avoid negligent and/or malicious cross-cultural ‘mental disorder’ allegations.

[13.2] Ecology of Peace culture Answers: [A] Any mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [1-5] – or ICD: World Health Organizations: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [1-11] – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; is based upon cultural law. [B] Cultural ethics should require cultures with cultural law mental disorder definitions to educate their cultural members, that such definitions are based on cultural conformity competency, not scientific law; and that cultural conformity competency laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups ‘cultural conformity competency law’ values.

Conclusion:

I am willing to provide written answers to any written questions.

 [Signed]
____________________________
Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se
16 Taaibos Ave, George, 6529, RSA
Signed EoP Axis Oath[41]:
23 Sep 2017[42]: Lara Johnson[43]

.

.

———– Footnotes ———–

[1] Richard Korn: Reciprocity: Alternative Models of the Social Correctional Expert

[2] Richard Korn: Reciprocity: Alternative Models of the Social Correctional Expert

[3] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-02_LJvLS_EoPUNRes.pdf

[4] As per Definitions: Ecology of Peace culture

[5] As per Definitions: EoP RH FR psycho-therapy diagnosis and/or treatment:

[6] As per Definitions: Ecology of Peace Culture Strategic Psych Doctrine

[7] As per Definitions: Stupid Consciousness

[8] As per Definitions: Know

[9] As per Definitions: Thomas Szasz: Able Simple Clear Speech; or Kane Babylon Speech

[10] As per Definitions: Thomas Szasz: Able Simple Clear Speech; or Kane Babylon Speech

[11] As per Definitions: Stupid Consciousness

[12] As per Definitions: Active Listening / Reading

[13] As per Definitions: Thomas Szasz: Able Simple Clear Speech; or Kane Babylon Speech

[14] As per Definitions: Stupid Consciousness

[15] As per Definitions: Active Listening / Reading

[16] As per Definitions: Stupid Consciousness

[17] https://youtu.be/wyKW7Jebgck

[18] Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

[19] Simon Sinek: The Truth about Being the Stupidest in the Room: https://youtu.be/BkLzo_oNVho

[20] https://youtu.be/kbOAwQq3T9w

[21] https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x46wpyr

[22] https://youtu.be/GiPe1OiKQuk

[23] https://youtu.be/J-NSyMTpkYI

[24] Luis Moreno Ocampo: When you have a law that says you cannot go ahead when there is a red light. You can move when there is a green light. Then if these rules are respected; you move to enforcement. How many people cross the red light? How many of them are prosecuted. How fast you go? In this case this convention; of you stop when there is a red light and you move when there is a green light; was not existing in International Relations. Leaders can commit crimes and nothing happens to them. Nothing. And this was the first time; hey guys; leaders: Red Light. If you commit atrocities; that will be a problem for you. That is a concept. The enforcement we can discuss. But for the first time we changed the world; we put up Red Lights for leaders who commit massive atrocities. [ IBA Global Insight: Luis Moreno Ocampo ICC War Crimes Traffic Light: https://youtu.be/RKiXqS6QQl0 ].

[25] Polly Higgins: In law we draw a line: you can’t cross here. …. Now we are also looking at ecological law, it is a far more holistic approach. It is an understanding, not just about it being a rights issue but, about it being a duties and responsibilities issue individually and collectively, at state level, at corporate level. Where do we draw the line? Where do we say enough, no more? That is where we create the crime. That is where we criminalise that dangerous industrial activity, the decisions, the individuals who make the decisions. [Polly Higgins: Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and governance to prevent the destruction of our planet: https://www.shepheard-walwyn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Eradicating_Ecocide.pdf  ]

[26] http://eop-v-wip-elections.tygae.org.za

[27] http://eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za

[28] http://eop-footprint.tygae.org.za

[29] http://ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za

[30] http://eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za

[31] Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – Day Brown: Proto Indo-European

[32] ”Any EoP paralegal can tell you that in any Babylon WiP Only court room, Media publication or Citizen Assembly charity; all the Babylon WiP Only lawyers or editors do, before their – busdriver from Basingstoke – citizen jury/readers; is control the information flow the – caterer from Clapham – jurors/readers receive from their designated Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future – aka pretend we give a fuck about racial, religious, class, gender, intergenerational resource conflict justice; while doing fuck all to cooperate to abolish the root procreation / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limit clauses of international law causes of all resource conflict – experts and stakeholders. Then Basingstoke / Clapham jurors/readers can provide the Babylon WiP Only lawyers, charities, and environmentalists with a ‘democratic credibility rubber stamp’ endorsement of their Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future law solutions.
– 07 Oct 2019: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons: Affidavit: para.40, Afd: pp.15/18; LJvSHoC pp.26/88. Copy of LH v SHoC included in H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC negotiations. Filing Notice: 29 Oct 2019: 11 Sep – 18 Oct 2019: 17 Oct: EoP Re: XR v Met Police: PHain v Solicitors Reg Auth. Annex B

[33] http://eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za:         Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.           * Objective Factual Reality:          [1] Earth is not flat.          [2] Resources are finite.          [3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.          [4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.          [5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.                * Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality:           [6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

[34] Jeffery Schaler: If you are alone on an island, you could develop a real disease like cancer or a heart disease, but you cannot develop a mental illness, such as hyperactivity or schizophrenia. This is because mental illness is always diagnosed on the basis of some sort of social conflict. When people do something that others find objectionable, they can be diagnosed as mentally ill. If the person doing the diagnosing is more powerful than the person diagnosed, then there is trouble. In this sense, the diagnosis of mental illness is always a weapon. Not so when it comes to diagnosing a real disease. Think of how when people get angry with one another they inevitably resort to some sort of diagnosis. They say ‘you are crazy’. ‘You are mentally ill’. ‘You are paranoid.’ Can you imagine someone getting angry with someone and saying ‘You have diabetes’. ‘You have Parkinson disease’. Social conflict has nothing to do with developing a real disease. You don’t develop diabetes because someone doesn’t like the way you think, speak or behave. You have to have someone else present to judge that your behaviour is morally good or bad in order to have a mental illness. So diagnosis is a weapon, a tool people use against one another especially when there is some kind of power conflict present. [SQ-CCHR: Jeffery Schaler: Psychiatry is a Fraud ]

[35] Richard Korn: Reciprocity: Alternative Models of the Social Correctional Expert:
We are dealing at bottom with the fateful consequences of three different attitudes towards the Other. We can do things to him [Operator], in which case he becomes an Object. We can do things for him [Prescriber], in which case he becomes a Dependent. We can do things with him [Co-Learner], in which case he has the opportunity to become an Agent. Whatever the content or intent of the action, it is the relationship between the actors that is crucial – and that defines the difference between domination (to him), dependency (for him) and self-realization (with him) in the political, economic and social realms, as well as in the interpersonal [SQ-RK: Reciprocity: Alternative Models of the Social Correctional Expert ]

[36] Walking through Lincoln Inns Fields behind London’s Royal Courts of Justice on a spring afternoon with Victoria, I was discussing application of a law of Ecocide. “What we need are trim tabs”, she said. Not knowing what this was, she explained to me that a trim tab button is to be found on cruise liners, to be pressed when the ship needs to turn in the opposite direction very fast. While everyone else is flailing around in the water expending enormous amounts of energy trying to push the ship around manually, in the cruise liner the only energy that is expended is that which it takes for one person to press the button. The cruise liner turns without anyone else needing to push. The law of Ecocide, Victoria explained, is a trim tab. Buckminster Fuller, (1895–1983) a self-described ‘comprehensivist’ who took a long view of history, had this to say when interviewed by Playboy in 1972: “Something hit me very hard once, thinking about what one little man could do. Think of the Queen Mary – the whole ship goes by and then comes the rudder. And there’s a tiny thing at the edge of the rudder called a trim tab. It’s a miniature rudder. Just moving the little trim tab builds a low pressure that pulls the rudder around. Takes almost no effort at all. Fuller had been a naval officer in World War I and so experienced the use of a trim tab first hand. The slightest pressure on the trim tab moves the rudder, which in turn directs the ship. He applied the metaphor to our lives. We are all trim tabs, tiny pivots affecting the overall direction of humanity. As Fuller advised, it is time to take a long view. Zoom out, look at where we’ve been and where we might be going. Fuller urged leaders of government and industry to focus not on weaponry, but on what he called ‘livingry’ – the tools necessary to promote peace for the entire planet’s population. Cooperation, not competition, would signify the next step of human evolution. The law of Ecocide is a trim tab to take us to ‘livingry.’ The epitaph on Bucky’s gravestone was fitting: just ‘call me trim tab’. [Deep Green Resistance: Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Polly Higgins – May 6, 2018 ]

[37] * Catherine Austin Fitts: So I said, “Okay. Well, let’s pretend that there is a big red button up here on the lectern, and if you push that button, you can stop all hard narcotics trafficking in your community, your state, and your country tomorrow, thus offending the people who control $500 billion to $1 trillion of annual dirty money. Who here will push the button?” Out of 100 people, only one would push the button. I said to the other 99, “Why would you not push the button?” [SQ-CAF: The Big Red Button Problem]
* Draining of MIL Industrial Complex Swamp Metrics: Does your KISS peace plan shut down the global WiP law Babylon WiP perpetual war economy include landreform, criminal justice reform; that enables the people who are currently employed in the – financial, military, pharma, media, etc – perpetual unsustainable resource thieving WiP law Babylon WiP Military Industrial complex swamp economy; to transition to a militia responsible freedom self sufficient self government peace economy; where such transition provides them with shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the co-operative rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech family farm organic sustainable agrarian peace economy? [04 Feb: McV Mediation: EoP Law Voter – Scientific Sincere Peacenik Metrics – Answer to Donald Rumsfeld Scientific GWOT Metrics Q: PDF: pp.45]

[38] Ibid: Richard Korn: Reciprocity: Alternative Models of the Social Correctional Expert:

[39] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za

[40] 04 Feb: McV Mediation: EoP Law Voter – Scientific Sincere Peacenik Metrics – Answer to Donald Rumsfeld Scientific GWOT Metrics Q: PDF: pp.03; EoP UN Resolution pp.42.
http://mcv-v-usa.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-02-03_McVvUS_GWOT-PN-Metrics_EoPUNRes.pdf

[41] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/              archive.is/Yv2t3

[42] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/       http://archive.fo/NrdRC

[43] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

.

Leave a Comment