19 Apr: EoP Law Voter Background Information

* Communications Workers of America, Christopher Shelton, Jared Goyette, Fredrikson Byron PA, Apollo Law, ACLU-MN, Minneapolis Police Dept, Medaria Arradondo, MN Dept of Public Safety Commissioner, John Harrington, Derek Chauvin, Eric Nelson, Kelly Chauvin, Amanda Mason-Sekula, Maxine Waters D-CA, Cedric Richmond D-LA, Floyd Family, Benjamin Crump, Cup Foods, Black Lives Matter, Deray McKesson, Alex Vitale, Ron Sims, Matt Gaetz R-FL, Marjorie Taylor Greene R-GA, Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, David Duke, Richard Spencer, Evan McLaren, Greg Johnson, Occidental Dissent, Hunter Wallace, Bristow Law PLLC, Kyle Bristow, DC AG: Karl Racine, US Capital Police: Acting Chief Yogananda Pittman, Cedric Alexander, Ntnl Org of Black Law Enforcement Executives: NOBLE, US Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit, Mark Langer, Seth Moulton D-MA, Liz Cheney R-WY, Judge Stephanos Bibas
* 19 Apr: McV20 Filing: 20-1302: JG v MNPD: EoP Law Voter Mediation Jury Offer: Ecology of Peace Law Voter – Make America Honest / Honest Lives Matter – Mediation Jury Offer [PDF: pp.11]:  Enclosures: EoP Axis Alliance Org of American States Treaty [EoP OAS: PDF: pp.01-16/58; EoP UN Res: pp.17-58/58]; EoP Law Voter Background Information [PDF: pp.19]
» 21 Apr: Added: Added: MN Police and Peace Officers Assoc: Angie Itschert
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, McV v USA, EoP USPD, EoP v US Congress, EoP v BLM, EoP v Alt Right, EoP v USPP, EoP v USPR, EoP v RSpencer, McV v JRBDJT  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

 Court File No. 20-1302

EoP Law Voter – Make America Honest / Honest Lives Matter – Mediation:

.

In the application of:

Lara Johnson
Ecology of Peace Law voter

ELV Mediator

In the matter between:

Jared Goyette, Communications Workers of America, Craig Lassig, Stephen Maturen, Tannen Maury, Katie Nelson, Michael Shum, et al

Plaintiffs

v.
City of Minneapolis; Minneapolis Chief of Police Medaria Arradondo; Minneapolis Police Lieutenant Robert Kroll; Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner John Harrington, Minnesota State Patrol Colonel Matthew Langer; and John Does 1-2

Defendants

.

EOP LAW VOTER (“ELV”) BACKGROUND INFORMATION

 .

[A] EoP Abel Eden v WiP Kane Babylon Law:

EoP v WiP Law: Concepts between {brackets} refer to EoP UN Resolution [EoP AU: PDF[1]: pp.13-54/54] sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal definitions.

[1] EoP v WiP Law:

[1.1] EoP Scientific and Cultural {eop-scicultlaw} – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally requires citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint]; and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements [ego-eco-literacy]; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[1.2] The Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality {eop-rh-fr} conscious strategic goal for implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law is an egalitarian responsible freedom [responsible-freedom] stable – no population & economic consumption growth above ecological carrying capacity limits – sustainable low tech family farm agrarian village and primitivist nomad society living in peace; with no palaces, prisons, mental institutions, homeless and unemployed, where rape and murder are so rare, they don’t have words for it.[2]

[A] In Martin Luther / Sayyid Qutb terminology: EoP Law prohibits innocence for – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – sale indulgences Kufr juridical rulings.

[1.3] Babylon WiP law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[1.4] The conscious or unconscious strategic goal of WiP law is a hierarchical slavery freedumb society where the military, legal, political, religious and legal elite profiteer of cheap – economic sexual and/or military – cannon fodder labour and homeless and unemployed misery of the masses; with plenty of racial, religious, class or gender resource conflict for the elite to parasitically profiteer from to build themselves military, religious, corporate and polegal palaces, cheap labour prisons and mental institutions slavery plantations, where rape and murder are so plentiful, WiP Only BDSM addicted to misery judges don’t need to subscribe to porn channels, because they have reality rape and murder porn tv channels in their courts.[3]

[A] In Martin Luther / Sayyid Qutb terminology: Babylonian Kufr WiP Law socio-polegally and economically profit from innocence for – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – sale indulgences Kufr juridical rulings.

[2] EoP v WiP Courts:

[2.1] An ‘EoP Only’ Court – generally in a national polegal system dominated by WiP law whose juridical transformation goals are to transform the judiciary into an EoP legal system – only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously – unconditional or conditional cooperator – members of the Ecology of Peace culture.

[2.2] An unconscious Babylon ‘WiP Only’ court unconsciously accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of EoP and Babylon WiP cultures.

[2.3] A conscious Babylon ‘WiP Only’ court consciously only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of Babylon WiP cultures.

[2.4] An unconscious EoP and WiP court accepts applications from all individuals irrespective of whether they are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace or Babylon WiP cultures.

[2.5] A conscious EoP and WiP court accepts applications from all individuals irrespective of whether they are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace or Babylon WiP cultures; requires applicants, counsel and jury members to unambiguously clarify whether they are EoP or WiP culture accused / defendants, applicants / respondents, counsel and jury.

.

[3] EoP v WiP Activists:

[3.1] EoP Civil Disobedience – unconditional or conditional co-operator – Activist engages in non-violent or violent activism – generally in a national polegal system dominated by WiP law – that violates one or more national or international Babylon WiP legal statute; on behalf of implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as national or international law.

[A] If tried in a Babylon WiP court, they are denied EoP necessity defence exposing difference between EoP and WiP law, tried in accordance to WiP law, and if convicted, sentenced according to WiP law.

[B] If tried in EoP and WiP court; they are allowed EoP necessity defence, tried in accordance with EoP and WiP conflict of cultural laws principles[4]; if their EoP evidence exposes scientific and/or cultural law errors in WiP law, the judge’s ruling amends such scientific or cultural WiP law errors; if convicted they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression {crimes-of-aggression} sentencing guidelines.

[C] If tried in EoP Court, they are allowed EoP necessity defence, if their EoP evidence exposes scientific and/or cultural law errors in EoP scientific and cultural law, the judge’s ruling amends such EoP law errors; if convicted they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression sentencing guidelines.

[3.2] Babylon WiP Civil Disobedience Activist engages in non-violent or violent activism presumably as a result of lack of ego/eco literacy character – generally in a national polegal system dominated by EoP law – that violates one or more national or international Ecology of Peace legal statute; on behalf of implementing Babylon WiP law as national or international law.

[A] If tried in EoP Scientific law court, they are allowed WiP scientific necessity defence, if (a) their WiP evidence exposes scientific law errors in EoP scientific law, the judge’s ruling amends such EoP law errors; if (b) convicted for lack of ego/eco literacy character; they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression sentencing guidelines.

[B] If tried in EoP Cultural law court, they are allowed WiP cultural necessity defence, (i) if their WiP evidence exposes cultural law errors in EoP cultural law, the judge’s ruling amends such EoP law errors; (ii) if convicted for lack of ego/eco literacy character; they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression sentencing guidelines.

[4] EoP v WiP Legal Applications:

[4.1] EoP culture legal applications advocate on behalf of [A] implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing EoP Scientific and Cultural law.

[4.2] Babylon WiP culture legal applications consciously or unconsciously, advocate on behalf of [A] implementing Babylon WiP law as national or international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing Babylon WiP law.

[5] EoP v WiP Elections or Referendums:

[5.1] An EoP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon EoP national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in EoP elections and referendums are legally prohibited from covertly and/or overtly bribing each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.

[5.2] A Babylon WiP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon Babylon WiP clauses of national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in Babylon WiP elections and referendums consciously or unconsciously covertly and/or overtly bribe each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.

.

[B] Ecology of Peace Responsible Freedom Amici Mediator:

[6] As of date ELV Amici is the only unconditional cooperator EoP Axis Oath member of the Ecology of Peace law culture. Amici is the [A] Pro Se applicant in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others (“LJ v LS”) and [B] administrative clerk on behalf of Timothy McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020[5]] EoP Law Write In Candidate US Presidential campaign; and as such EoP Law Voter Pro Se Applicant on behalf of McVeigh2020 campaign in [a] US Court of Appeals DC Circuit: McVeigh 2020 v Donald Trump 2020 & Joe Biden 2020 [mcv-v-djtjrb[6]] and [b] Inter-American Court of Human Rights Petition: McVeigh v USA [mcv-v-usa[7]]

[7] ELV Amici Pro Se Applications are effectively all Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation to End the Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations applications:

[7.1] The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from Ngcobo SA Concourt Justices [PDF[8]] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm[9]] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.

[7.2] The EoP TRC Amcius was supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Michael Maher on media censorship of overpopulation causes of resource conflict [Written Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue: PDF[10]].

[8] ELV Amici is a former legal US resident: Dept of Homeland Security: Immigration and Naturalization Case: INS # A77 177 28.

[9] Ecology of Peace culture advocacy recognizes that generally speaking conventional politicians ignore the hell out of voters who have (a) no campaign finance funding; (b) no lawyers; (c) no big fanclub; (d) no media attention. The focus of EoP culture is sincerity: sincere republicans, sincere democrats, sincere Nazis, sincere black panthers; sincere oligarchs, sincere janitors. The EoP law culture’s definition of sincerity is called ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy[11]: EoP AU: pp.24-25/54]. Without lawyers, fanclubs or WiP law media attention; EoP law culture have managed to get on the record written responses on very controversial issues; in some cases they are the only such publicly available written responses on the particular issue; from the following individuals / organizations:

[9.1] On 06 Sep 2001, Nicholas E. Calio, Assistant to the President and Director of Legislative Affairs, in the George W Bush administration, responded to my hungerstrike on behalf of UFO Disclosure Projects whistleblowers [National Press Club: May 2001[12]: Witnesses: 01[13].02[14]], on behalf of President George W Bush, via US Representative Barbara Lee’s office; a transcript of which is available at: The President’s UFO Website: George W Bush’s UFO Mail[15]]. Allegedly Mr. Calio’s response letter to UFO disclosure issues, is the only formal White House response on the UFO issue ever authored. All other White House responses to UFO Disclosure issues were referred to NASA for a form letter official response.

[A] On 28 July 2001, I went on a hunger strike in support of President George W Bush to support the US Disclosure Project[16] witnesses[17]. Among others I wrote to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, requesting him to support President George W Bush and the Disclosure Project witnesses. He responded declining to support President Bush and the Disclosure Project, stating among others, to my recollection, that the first world ‘did not have the will to make the Sahara blossom’. On 09 September 2001, unaware of the White House letter, I notified individuals following the UFO Disclosure hunger strike that I would be ending the hunger strike, and would issue a press release on 11 September 2001 at 09:00 hrs PST. The press release was never sent. The World Trade Center attacks started at 08:46 EST. 11 September is the anniversary of 11 September 1830, the Anti-Masonic Party’s First National Convention, the four-year anniversary of the abduction of William Morgan, who was planning to print an exposé on Masonic rituals, and was believed to have been kidnapped and murdered by Freemasons supposedly intent on making sure that Morgan did not reveal any Masonic secrets[18].

[9.2] On 02 July 2012, Anders Breivik responded [02 Jul: Anders Breivik’s Thank you letter[19]] to Amici’s Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation legal applications to Norwegian courts on his behalf: “I received your letter and have followed your blog (indirectly) for quite some time now. I am also familiar with all your hard work and efforts to assist me. I first heard about you when you offered to stand trial and go out in flames with me. Thank you for this moral support. It was perhaps the most spectacular and also quite romantic way to show support, that’s for sure, and I truly do appreciate it. If it came down to it, it would be an honour to have you at my side”. As far as I am aware I was the only individual making Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation submissions to Breivik’s court proceedings.

[A] From July 2011 to 2014: I filed EoP TRC complaints against Anders Breivik’s appointed psychiatrists, and applications to among others Oslo District, Norway Supreme Court, and the European Court of Human Rights, requesting Norwegian authorities to provide Anders Breivik a free and fair terrorist treason trial equivalent to the free and fair terrorist treason trial provided to Nelson Mandela by the Apartheid government . In accordance with EoP law Braveheart-SS[20] honour lawfare advocacy: If they were willing to provide Anders a free and fair treason trial, and Anders was convicted and sentenced to death, they would also sentence me to death.

[9.3] On 28 May 2011: Netherlands Ambassador in Pretoria: Ambassador Rob de Vos [PDF[21]]; and on 11 January 2012: Embassy of Switzerland in South Africa: Charge D’Affairs: Claudia Thomas; Switzerland Federal Assembly: President of National council: Foreign Affairs Committee: Andreas Aebi and President of the Council of States: Foreign Affairs Committee: Hannes Germann [PDF[22]] formally responded to Amici’s Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation – Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return for African White Refugees petition [PDF[23]] – application as a descendant of progenitor settlers[24] from Norway[25], French[26], German[27], Netherlands[28] and United Kingdom[29]. Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw[30]: EoP AU: pp.36-39/54] secession advocates on behalf of Racial, Religious, Class and Gender Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [cult-law-self-rule[31]: EoP AU: pp.22-23/54] secession.

[9.4] On 17 February 2017, FSB Public Relations Officer AM Kalganov, responded [17 Feb: FSB: AM Kalganov[32]] to Amici’s Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation correspondence on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants[33]]. As far as I am aware the FSB letter is the only such letter to any peacenik on the planet from the FSB: Federal Security Service. The FSB is the Russian Federations version of the Soviet Unions KGB. The KGB or Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti, translated in English as Committee for State Security, was the main security agency for the Soviet Union from 1954 until its break-up in 1991. Formed in 1954, as a direct successor of the Cheka, NKGB, and MGB, the committee was attached to the Council of Ministers. The KGB was a military service and was governed by army laws and regulations, similar to the Soviet Army or MVD Internal Troops. While most of the KGB archives remain classified, two online documentary sources are available. Its main functions were foreign intelligence, counterintelligence, operative-investigatory activities, guarding the State Border of the USSR, guarding the leadership of the Central Committee of the Communist Party and the Soviet Government, organization and ensuring of government communications as well as combating nationalism, dissent, and anti-Soviet activities. After the dissolution of the USSR, the KGB was split into the FSB: Federal Security Service and the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation. It is headquartered in Lubyanka Square, Moscow’s centre, in the main building of the former KGB. The current Director of the FSB since 2008 is Army General Aleksandr Bortnikov.

.

[C] Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Legal Definition:

EoP Law Sincere Peacenik Truth and Reconciliation:

[10] H 111/19: LJ v LS[34]: Affidavit[35]:

[29.1] In 1999 I filed a Submission to President Nelson Mandela’s post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), chaired by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, promising to donate my inheritance to the TRC; in support of sincere – racial, religious, class and gender – land and/or economic inequality reform reconciliation in South Africa. The TRC responded in a brief form letter thanking me for my submission. If it is confirmed that there is no interest in sincere – Ecology of Peace – peacenik reconciliation between South Africans, I shall withdraw my submission to the TRC and use my inheritance funds for my Dignitas assisted suicide departure plans.

[11] H 111/19: LJ v LS[36]: Affidavit[37]: EoP TRC correspondence to Peace Organizations:

[43] If the following facts are confirmed as objective facts:

[43.1] Fact: If all the beings who call themselves humans and publicly represent themselves as a sincere peacenik and/or honourable warrior agreed on (a) a single Keep it Simple Stupid language scientifically based clear definition of a sincere peacenik / honourable warrior that a layperson could understand; and (b) signed a pledge or policy statement confirming their commitment to abide by those sincere peacenik / honourable warrior values; (c) there would be enough people to provide a mandate for sincere peacenik / honourable warrior leaders to implement sincere peacenik / honourable warrior international law.

[43.2] Fact: If many or most of the beings who call themselves humans and publicly represent themselves as some form of sincere peacenik and/or honourable warrior are fake peaceniks and/or dishonourable warriors: i.e. refuse to (a) agree on a single Keep it Simple Stupid language scientifically based clear definition of a sincere peacenik / honourable warrior that a layperson could understand; and (b) sign a pledge or policy statement confirming their commitment to abide by those sincere peacenik / honourable warrior values; it is unknown whether there would be enough people to provide a mandate for sincere peacenik / honourable warrior leaders to implement sincere peacenik / honourable warrior international law.

[44] As of date I have not found any individuals or organizations who publicly legally represent themselves as interested in peaceful nonviolent problem solving of race, religious, class, age or gender resource conflict disputes; who are interested in (a) a single Keep it Simple Stupid language scientifically based clear definition of a sincere peacenik / honourable warrior that a layperson could understand; and (b) signing a pledge or policy statement confirming their commitment to abide by those sincere peacenik / honourable warrior values. Among others I have contacted: [44.1] Norwegian Nobel Committee & Laureates [eop-v-nobel[38]]; [44.2] Klaus Schwab & World Economic Forum [eop-v-bgwef[39]]; [44.3] Alt Right [eop-v-altright[40]]: Donald Trump [eop-v-djt[41]]; [44.4] US Peace Candidates [eop-v-uspr[42]]; [44.5] IWW Labour Organizations [eop-v-iww[43]]; [44.6] Veterans for Peace [eop-v-v4p[44]]; [44.7] Commanders for Israel Security [eop-v-cis[45]]; [44.8] Indigenous Groups [eop-v-indig[46]]; [44.9] Wikileaks [eop-v-wl[47]]: Bradley/Chelsea Manning [us-v-bcm[48]]; [44.10] Alliance for World Scientists [eop-v-aws[49]]; [44.11] End Ecocide Lawyers [eop-v-ecocide-law[50]]; [44.12] Extinction Rebellion [eop-v-xr[51]]; [44.13] Fridays for Future School Strike [eop-v-gteet[52]]; [44.14] Gilet Jaunes / Yellow vests [eop-v-gjyv[53]]; [44.15] Black Lives Matter [eop-v-blm[54]]; [44.16] Duty to Warn Psychologists & Psychiatrists [eop-v-d2wpsych[55]]; [44.17] Me Too Movement [eop-v-mtm[56]]; [44.18] Women Across the DMZ [eop-v-wadmz[57]]; [44.19] Radical Honesty [lj-v-rhet[58]]; [44.20] Larry Flynt [eop-v-lcf[59]]
.

[12] A sincere peacenik / honourable warrior is someone committed to unconditional or conditional cooperator (a) ego literate (i) scientific truthseeking enquiry; and (ii) advocacy on behalf of; (b) eliminating the root causes of all national and international racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[13] Ecology of Peace culture sincere peacenik: truthseeking enquiry and advocacy consists of:

[13.1] EoP RH FR: EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality {eop-rh-fr} is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law.

[13.2] EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} – based on EoP Footprint {eop-footprint} – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown[60] – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint?

[13.3] Ego Literacy {ego-eco-literacy}: Ecology of Peace culture’s honourable truthseeking enquiry and advocacy communication policy.

.

[D] EoP law: Veto WiP Law Swamp elections voter registration.

[14] Currently – in the absence of a State authorized EoP Axis Oath office; or philanthropist funded civil court monitored civil society EoP Axis Oath office – any Ecology of Peace law [eop-v-wip-law[61]] Veto – WiP Law Breeding Womb War and Ego Consumption War – Swamp Elections [veto-swamp-elec[62]] voters [eop-axis-oath[63]]; can join the EoP Axis Alliance voter block by submitting their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oathIbid] to EoP MILED Clerk for filing into SA George High Court: H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [lj-v-ls[64]: PDF[65]: pp.70] court proceedings; to provide one or more LJ v LS Heads of State with an EoP Axis Alliance UNGA / ICJ mandate.

[15] EoP Law voter / Axis Alliance Oaths:

[15.1] The purpose of an EoP Law Voter / Axis Oath is as follows:

[A] An EoP Axis oath [eop-axis-oath[66]] is a promise – a form of labour or information barter exchange reciprocity [Dmitry Orlov Twilight of the Antipodes[67]] – purchase of labour or information sharing cooperation with very clear unambiguous honest communication as to what the collective strategic goal is. If or when there is a mutual overlap agreement on strategic goal between two or more individuals, they can sign an unconditional or conditional cooperator oath, to clarify the level of their unconditional or conditional cooperator commitment to the strategic goal. The oath is a process to learn to practice in decision-making, communication and relating responsible freedom self government 24/7/365: If or when my ego gets in the way of me cooperating, towards our strategic goal; I will not run away or play some passive aggressive egomindfuck games. I will be my own or your Sgt Major and bitch slap my own or your fragile ego Private through the face with clear sincere verbal feedback, to help quick resolution of our misunderstanding, disagreement with you my fellow Oath co-operator; to enable us to uphold our cooperation agreement towards our shared strategic goal, through potentially difficult times. It’s a statement of: our strategic goal is our cooperative master, not our individual ego’s.

[16] There are two types of EoP Law Voter / Axis Oaths:

[16.1] Unconditional co-operator; and

[16.2] Conditional co-operator.

.

[17] Unconditional Co-operator Oath:

[17.1] An unconditional co-operator {responsible-freedom} oath confirms the oath takers commitment to unconditional ego-eco literacy {ego-eco literacy} EoP TRC strategic and tactical negotiations cooperation; towards the EoP UN Resolution strategic global and national security goal.

[17.2] Responsible Freedom {responsible-freedom} oath provide a draft template of the responsible freedom oath, that all citizens will be required to sign, subsequent to implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural Law as international law.

.

[18] Conditional Co-operator Oath Statement:

[18.1] A conditional co-operator oath provides EoP Axis Alliance Heads of State, with a fully informed consent written oath EoP Axis Alliance mandate to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law, via UN General Assembly vote and/or Intnl Court of Justice Declaratory Order.

[18.2] Draft Text of a Conditional Co-operator Oaths:

[A] I hereby declare my conditional co-operator mandate consent for the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law; to [A] enable orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release {prisoner-pardon}, land reform {eop-landreform} and denuclearization {eop-denuke-defn} – economic degrowth shut down of the Babylon War is Peace Ponzi Swamp economy {eop-sdwipecon} transition to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy; by [B] requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed {one-child-law} and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits {eop-footprint}; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool {crimes-of-aggression}; [C] nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath {responsible-freedom} citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule territorial homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities {cult-law-self-rule}; and (ii) guaranteed for life property ration (property-ration} land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] I further understand that if or when EoP SciCult law is implemented as international law, I shall – like all global citizens – legally be required to cooperate sign my unconditional cooperator responsible freedom {responsible-freedom} oath; and should I refuse; I shall be convicted of negligent and/or intentional crimes of aggression {crimes-of-aggression}.

.

[19] EoP v WiP Law Referendum:

[20] An EoP v WiP law referendum is also referred to as:

[20.1] Exit Babylon WiP law referendum

[20.2] EoP Oklahoma City Truth and Reconciliation Referendum.

[21] Referendum Questions:

[21.1] [EoP OKC TRC Vote:

[A] I understand that my EoP international law / Exit Babylon WiP law / EoP OKC TRC vote will provide a political and legal mandate for President, Senate and Congress; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law; via UN General Assembly vote or International Court of Justice Declaratory Order; to [A] enable orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release {prisoner-pardon}, land reform {eop-landreform} and denuclearization {eop-denuke-defn} – economic degrowth shut down of the Babylon War is Peace Ponzi Swamp economy {eop-sdwipecon} transition to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy; by [B] requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed {one-child-law} and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits {eop-footprint}; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool {crimes-of-aggression}; [C] nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath {responsible-freedom} citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule territorial homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities {cult-law-self-rule}; and (ii) guaranteed for life property ration (property-ration} land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] I further understand that if or when EoP SciCult law is implemented as international law, I shall – like all global citizens – legally be required to cooperate and sign my unconditional cooperator responsible freedom oath; and should I refuse; I shall be convicted of negligent and/or intentional crimes of aggression {crimes-of-aggression}.

[21.2] No EoP OKC TRC Vote:

[A] I understand that my No WiP international law / No EoP OKC TRC vote provides my citizen consent to living in a WiP law mafiocracy slaughterhouse; a hierarchical slavery freedumb society where the military, legal, political, religious and legal elite profiteer of cheap – economic sexual and/or military – cannon fodder labour and homeless and unemployed misery of the masses; with plenty of racial, religious, class or gender resource conflict for the elite to parasitically profiteer from to build themselves military, religious, corporate and polegal palaces, cheap labour prisons and mental institutions slavery plantations, where rape and murder are so plentiful, WiP Only BDSM addicted to misery judges don’t need to subscribe to porn channels, because they have reality rape and murder porn tv channels in their courts.

.

[E] EoP law: Veto WiP Law Swamp elections voter mandate.

[22] EoP Axis Oaths provide a mandate for Heads of State to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural Law: EoP – John Brown: Exit Babylon; Return to Eden – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls[68]: PDF[69]25-66/70] orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation. EoP law culture advocacy on behalf of governments establishing official responsible freedom voter EoP Axis Oath offices:

[22.1] South Africa: CRL Rights Commission [Commission for Promotion & Protection of Rights of Cultural, Religious & Linguistic Communities] have made a Recognition of EoP Community Council Offer. CRLRC have not yet consented to EoP and WiP law judge to adjudicate disputes between EoP and WiP law cultures [lj-v-crlrc[70]]

[22.2] France: Suggestion to President Macron and Yellow Vests [03 Dec: EoP Ethics Enwokenment Control of Yellow Jacket Protests[71]]

[22.3] USA: Request to Congress via Rep Tulsi Gabbard and Thomas Massie [04 Oct: McV20: Draft House Res for USvJPA/IRvUS EoP TRC peace wedding[72]: Draft: House EoP Axis Oath DB Coop Resolution[73]: PDF[74]. pp.150].

[22.4] USA: Request to US Navy JAG via General Mattis [04 Jun: EoP Law Re: Gen Mattis: Floyd Protestors need to unite around a common purpose[75]]

[22.5] Russia & Belarus: Request to Russian Duma and Belarussian House of Representatives [17 Oct: McVeigh2020 Q’s for Duma via Speaker Matviyenko; BY House of Rep via President Pavlovich; BY Opposition via Speaker Tsikhanouskaya[76]: Duma EoP Resolution: Answers to EoP OKC TRC questions[77] [PDF[78]: pp.09].

[22.6] UK & Intnl: Suggestion to Intnl Court of Justice via Iran v USA, US v Julian Assange [20 Sep: EoP Amicus: US v JP Assange, IR v USA[79]: EoP Law Amicus Affidavit in Support of Parties Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation Settlement Agreement Resolution[80]: PDF[81]: pp.143]

[22.7] Myanmar: EoP Law Voter Mediation[82]: 08 Mar: Draft: USDP v NLD: EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Office Resolution Settlement Agreement Offer to resolve 2020 election irregularities resulting in declaration of One Year State of Emergency on 01 February 2021 [PDF[83]:pp.14]

.

[F] EoP Axis Alliance Voter Block Policy:

[23] EoP MILED Clerk [eop-axis-oath[84]: LJ[85]] votes on behalf of all national / global EoP law voters for the EoP law candidate.

[24] If more than one EoP Law candidate in any election; EoP MILED Clerk votes on behalf of EoP voters; for the EoP law candidate with the greatest EoP law advocacy commitment track record.

[25] If no EoP Law candidate in any election; EoP MILED Clerk votes on behalf of the EoP and WiP law candidate willing to cooperate to become an EoP law candidate, if provided an EoP law mandate. If none: EoP MILED Clerk abstains from voting in the particular election.

[26] Election Commission Accepts Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[26.1] Pending UNGA/ICJ EoP v WiP law vote/ruling: If a nations election commission potentially accepts Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[A] EoP MILED Clerk votes on behalf of potential EoP law voters; and notifies the Election Commission of the EoP Axis Alliance voter blocks vote; providing the Election Commission officials with the opportunity to make a formal enquiry into the EoP v WiP law voter issues; with the purpose of recommending [a] a formal State EoP Axis Oath office for officials and citizens to register as unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP law voters; by filing their EoP Axis Alliances Oaths; or [b] an EoP v WiP law referendum to enable formal EoP v WiP law voting resolution on the EoP v WiP law voter issues in dispute.

[B] If such a formal EoP Axis Oath / EoP Law voter registration Office is established for officials and citizens to file their EoP Axis Alliances Oaths; or an EoP v WiP law referendum to enable formal EoP v WiP law voting resolution on the EoP v WiP law voter issues in dispute; is held; and no citizens or officials register themselves as EoP Axis Alliance citizens; the EoP vote is withdrawn and rendered null and void.

.

[27] Election Commission Does Not Accept Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[27.1] Pending UNGA/ICJ EoP v WiP law vote/ruling: If the Election Commission formally does not accept Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[A] EoP MILED Clerk advocacy actions in response to such Election Commission ruling is dependent on the likelihood of potential EoP law candidates or voters in such nation; willing to – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior – cooperatively legally enquire into reasonableness of the Election Commissions evidentiary decision-making.

.

[28] Election is Contested by Candidates or Voters:

[28.1] Pending UNGA/ICJ EoP v WiP law vote/ruling: If the election is contested by candidates or voters.

[28.2] EoP MILED Clerk advocacy actions in response to the election being contested by candidates or voters; depends on whether the candidate or voters contesting the election are potential EoP law voters or candidates.

[A] If the election is being contested by intentional WiP Law Only candidates and/or voters; EoP MILED Clerk does not get involved in the WiP Law Only v WiP Law Only candidate / voters contesting the WiP law Only election dispute.

[B] If the election is being contested by a potential EoP Law candidate/s or Saperstein voter/s; EoP MILED Clerk will – subject to time and resource availability – inform them of EoP v WiP Law election negotiations information, for their personal EoP v WiP law candidate / voter decision making. If there is potential Saperstein minded EoP law voter interest: EoP MILED Clerk cooperates with such potential EoP law candidates and/or voters.

[a] Moshe Saperstein: You realize I am a religious fanatic; but there is small degree of rationality in me. If someone – the government, the United Nations, the United States, you name it – had come to me & said [voting to support EoP scientific sincere peacenik / honourable warrior international law] to give up [overbreeding & overconsumption], would benefit the safety of Israel. … We will [EoP Axis Oath Alliance cooperate & ration; or ] pack our bags & go. [EoP Amended: Highway 51: Withdrawal from Gaza[86].]

.

Dated at George on this 19th day of April 2021

 [Signed]

____________________________
Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se
On behalf of Timothy McVeigh 2020[87]
EoP Law Voter US President Elect
16 Taaibos Ave, George, 6529, RSA
EoP Axis Oath[88]: 23 Sep 2017[89]: LJ[90]

.

.

———— Footnotes ———–

[1] http://mcv-v-usa.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-03-28_McVvUSA_AU-EoPAxis_EUNR_McVSgd.pdf

[2] Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – Day Brown: Proto Indo-European

[3] ”Any EoP paralegal can tell you that in any Babylon WiP Only court room, Media publication or Citizen Assembly charity; all the Babylon WiP Only lawyers or editors do, before their – busdriver from Basingstoke – citizen jury/readers; is control the information flow the – caterer from Clapham – jurors/readers receive from their designated Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future – aka pretend we give a fuck about racial, religious, class, gender, intergenerational resource conflict justice; while doing fuck all to cooperate to abolish the root procreation / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limit clauses of international law causes of all resource conflict – experts and stakeholders. Then Basingstoke / Clapham jurors/readers can provide the Babylon WiP Only lawyers, charities, and environmentalists with a ‘democratic credibility rubber stamp’ endorsement of their Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future law solutions. [07 Oct 2019: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons: Affidavit: para.40, Afd: pp.15/18; LJvSHoC pp.26/88].

[4] * Paul Meerts: Culture and International Law: “Although not often explicitly mentioned, culture is always at the centre of law and politics.”
* Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In re Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A); at 397 the Appellate Division held that neither common nor customary law was prima facie applicable. Courts had to consider all the circumstances of a case, and, without any preconceived view about the applicability of one or other legal system, select the appropriate law on the basis of its inquiry. Schreiner J.A. said lifestyle of is a choice of law factor: “Aside from an express choice of laws all connecting factors with conflict of personal laws are designed to determine, in an objective manner, the cultural orientation of the parties. Because the laws involved are conceived in terms of culture …. the connecting factors must be conceived in like terms. The most direct access to a person’s cultural leanings would clearly be his or her lifestyle”.

* SALC, Sept 1999: Report on Conflicts of law: P.22: 1.58. The Constitution now provides an entitlement for invoking customary law in legal suits. Because ss 30 and 31 specifically guarantee an individual and a group’s right to pursue a culture of choice, it could be argued that application of customary law has become a constitutional right. Previously, the state had assumed complete discretion in deciding whether and to what extent customary law should be recognized, an attitude typical of colonial thinking, for Africans were subject to whatever policies the conquering state chose to impose on them. Now, however, the state has a duty to allow people to participate in the culture they choose, implicit in this duty is a responsibility to uphold the institutions on which that culture is based.’
* SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76: The Harmonization of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law states: “Differences in culture are always likely to generate differences in law with consequent conflicts of law … The purpose of choice of law rules is to select the law that will do justice in the case. It is the court’s power (and responsibility) to decide which law to apply, paying due regard to the parties’ interests and their choice of legal system.” It also provides for the following principles governing choice of law disputes: (a) The nature of the conflict: where it is assumed that an individuals personal law is a matter of their cultural affiliation; (b) Parties may select the law to be applied; based upon objective and subjective reasonableness tests; (c) Nature and form of a prior transaction; if parties disagree on each others choice of applicable cultural law; (d) Subject matter and environment of a transaction; if deeper clarification about cultural orientation is required; (e) The litigants’ cultural orientation; which can include the court taking notice of details as diverse as the parties’ place of residence, occupation, religion, education, style of dress, eating and sleeping habits, use of bank accounts, preparation of wills and consultation with attorneys, communication style, etc; (f) Exemption from customary or common law; as justified by the principle that every person should be free to pursue a culture of choice, which implies that people may not be involuntarily bound by a system of personal law; and legal certainty: where an individual can unequivocally declare in advance of any litigation their personal law; (g) Unifying choice of law.

[5] http://mcveigh2020.com           http://mcveigh2020.tygae.org.za

[6] http://mcv-v-djtjrb.tygae.org.za

[7] http://mcv-v-usa.tygae.org.za

[8] http://tc-v-rm.tygae.org.za/pdf/10-05-06__CCT23-10_Concourt_RadicalHonestyAmicusOrder.pdf

[9] http://tc-v-rm.tygae.org.za

[10] http://tc-v-rm.tygae.org.za/pdf/10-05-22_CCT23-10_Dr-Michael-Maher_Affid-Signed.pdf

[11] http://ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za

[12] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DrcG7VGgQU

[13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqxPqFuaEYw

[14] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYuzEEprjbo

[15] http://www.presidentialufo.com/george-w-bush/182-george-w-bushs-ufo-mail                    archive.is/0yNRI

[16] https://www.disclosureproject.org/access/     archive.fo/Tj0rm

[17] https://www.disclosureproject.org/access/aboutexecsumm.shtml     archive.fo/UX7AL

[18] https://nationalheritagemuseum.typepad.com/library_and_archives/2008/09/the-anti-masoni.html    archive.is/EZVNu   http://ss-defcon.tygae.org.za/2008/09/11-sep-antimasonicparty/  archive.fo/nHTtG

[19] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2012/07/02-jul-anders-brevik/

[20] http://braveheart-ss.tygae.org.za

[21] http://js-ror.tygae.org.za/pdf/nl/11-05-18_JS-RoR_NL-AmbDeVos-Response.pdf

[22] http://js-ror.tygae.org.za/pdf/ch/12-01-11_JS-RoR_SwissEmb-FedCncl-Response.pdf

[23] http://js-ror.tygae.org.za/pdf/11-03-31_BoerVolkstaat10-31-16BriefingPaper.pdf

[24] All South Africans are settlers, regardless of their skin colour, and their DNA carries the proof. So says Dr Wilmot James, head of the African Genome Project, a distinguished academic, sociologist and, more recently, honorary professor of human genetics at the University of Cape Town. And he says South Africans will soon have a public genetic database which will show how the country became populated over thousands of years. The African Genome project is supported by local genealogy website Ancestry24.com. James aims to trace the origins of South Africans “no matter what their language, ethnic origins, or skin colour. No one group can lay claim to South Africa. Everyone is a settler, and we will show how people came here in waves of migration. [IOL: ‘We are all settlers in SA’, Lynnette Johns, August 18 2007 at 03:37pm: http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/we-are-all-settlers-in-sa-1.366860 ]

[25] NO: FURSTENBERG, Johan Pieter: Johan Pieter FÜRSTENBERG was born about 1760 in Bergen, Norway. He was an officer in the artillery and is referred to by some sources as: Johan Petrus. On 04 July 1784 he married Anna Elizabeth HAMMES (01.03.1767) in Capetown; daughter of Pieter Casper HAMMES (~1752, Drakenstein) and Maria Magdalena DELPORT (1753, Sergauts River, Swellendam).

[26] * FR: DELPORTE, Jacques & VITOUT, Sara: Jacques DELPORTE was born about 1680 near Rijswijk (Lille) in Flandre, France. Sara VITOUT was born about 1681 in Guines, Picardie, France . They married in January 1698 in Veere, Europa. His name is also spelt as La Porte. He is from Ryssel (Lille) and he marries Sara VITOUT in October 1698 and three months later, on 10 Dec. 1698 they leave the Netherlands on the ship Cattendyk, as French Huguenots. They arrive in Capetown on 13 April 1699.

* FR: DE VILLIERS, Abraham & GARDIOL, Susanne: DE VILLIERS, Abraham was born in Bar-sur-Seine, Bourgogne, France in 1659, and married Susanne GARDIOL (1668), daughter of Antoine GARDIOL and Margueritte PERROTETTE, from La Coste, Provence on 05 October 1689 in the Cape. Abraham and his two brothers Jacques (Jacob) DE VILLIERS (1661) and Pierre DE VILLIERS were from La Rochelle – although it has been argued they were originally from Bourgogne and fled to La Rochelle – were French Huguenots who left France in 1689 on the Zion. Jacob married Marguerite GARDIOL and Abraham her sister Susanna GARDIOL. Abraham and Susanne lived at Meerust, Drakenstein. Susanne GARDIOL arrived at the Cape in January 1689, with her mother and sister Margueritte and brother Jean on the Wapen van Alkmaar, having left Amsterdam on 18 July 1688. Susanne GARDIOL is a descendant of the GARDIOL families from Luberon; who settled in Luberon at the end of the 15th century; of the Vaud clan, who came from the alpine valleys of Piedmont (Theses of Gabriel AUDISIO, published in 1984 : “The of Vaud ones of Luberon – a minority in Provence”).

* FR: DE VILLIERS, Jacques (Jacob) & GARDIOL, Marguerite: DE VILLIERS Jacques (Jacob) was born approximately 1661 at La Rochelle, where they had fled to from Burgundy. In 1689 he and his brothers Abraham and Pierre arrived in the Cape on Zion. Jacob married Marguerite GARDIOL, from Provence. He established himself at La Brie, Franschoek, and later Boschendal.

* FR: JACOBS, Pierre & DE VOS, Susanna: JACOBS, Pierre from Calais was a French Huguenot who arrived in the Cape in 1688 on De Schelde wit his wife Suzanna DE VOS, and three children, Daniel, Sara & Suzanne. They settled on De Goede Hoop (1688), Groot Drakenstein. He died in 1693.

* FR: MARE, Ignace & VAN VUUREN, Susanna: Ignace Mare was born about 1684 in Calabria France; although some sources allege otherwise. It is alleged he was christened in Ardennes, Montherme, France in 1686; and that he was the second son of Paul Mare, some also consider him a possible Huguenot. On 07 February 1706, in Drakenstein, he married Susanna van Vuuren (born 1691) in Calais, France. Susanna was the daughter of Gerrit J. van Vuuren (1660, Netherlands – 1700, Cape) and Susanna Jacobs (1671, Calais France – 1696, Cape).

[27] * DE: HAMMES, Pieter Caspar: HAMMES, Pieter Caspar — son of Friedrich HAMMES and Anna Margaretha FALKENRATH — was born in Remsheid, North Rhinde-Westphalia and arrived in the Cape in 1753 as a soldier. He married Maria Magdalena DELPORT on 31 July 1763 in the Cape. She was the daughter of Pieter DELPORT and Anna Elizabeth MARE (b: 04.01.1710, Drakenstein). He died on 20 May 1772 in the Cape.

* DE: ROOS, Johannes (Hans): ROOS Johannes (Hans) was born 10 May 1677 in Leipzig, Germany and came to South Africa from Leipzig, East Germany. He was the son of Johannes ROSE, a linen merchant and Anna BLUMEN. Johannes was a mason 1713-1715. In 1715 he became a burger and a black smith. On 19 May 1715 (some say 1714) he married Johanna VISSER who was baptised on 5 March 1690 – the daughter of Johannes VISSERr and Catharine VAN DER ZEE – an orphan from the Netherlands. Johannes and Johanna had 10 children. On 9 December 1746 Johanna married Lucas VISAGIE. She died about 1755. (de Villiers and Pama, Genealogies of old S A Families 1981)

[28] * NL: BOSMAN Hermanus: Hermanus BOSMAN was born on 19 April 1682 in Amsterdam, and left Holland, from Texel on 20 January 1706 destined for Batavia. He did not like the Far East, so returned on the De Overryp, arriving in the Cape on 19 April 1707, where he as appointed Pastor of Drakenstein. He married Elizabeth DE VILLIERS (daughter of Abraham DE VILLIERS & Suzane GARDIOL) on 04 March 1708. They established themselves on De Nieuwe Plantatie.

* NL: KOLVER, Andreas Lutgerus: KOLVER, Andreas (Andries) Lutgerus, was born in Zwolle in 1743, studied at Leiden and Jena and was ordained in 1766. He preached in Dordrecth, until 1780 when he was despatched to the Cape on the Krooswyik. In 1742, the German community in the Cape requested permission from the Dutch East Indian Company to establish their own church. The German farmer Martin Melck, from Elsenburg, donated one of his “sheds” in Strand Street as the first Lutheran Church. It was the first new denominational church allowed by the Dutch, but they were instructed to only preach in Dutch. The first service was led by Andreas on 10 December 1780. Their were 441 members, 300 Germans, the rest Dutch and Scandinavians. He married Antonia Adriana HEZELER. They had two children: Wilhelmus (1769) and Johanna Elizabeth (1786) [married Andries CRONJE in 1805]

* NL: VAN VUUREN, Gerrit (Janse): Gerrit J. VAN VUUREN was born about 1660 in Vuren, Netherlands; and died in June 1700 in the Cape. He was the son of UNKNOWN, Johannes born about 1647 in Gelderland; died about 1667 in Vuren. In circa 1689, Gerrit married Susanna JACOBS (born in 1671 in Calais, France, and died in 1696 in the Cape). Susanna was the daughter of Pierre JACOBS (1643, Calais, Artois, France) and Suzanna DE VOS (1645, France). She died in October 1696.

[29] * UK: JOHNSTONE James Augustus: James Augustus JOHNSTONE was born circa 1810 in Edinburgh (Dumpfries), Scotland, and was an 1820 settler to Port Elizabeth. On 20 September 1837 he married Elizabeth Cornelia ROOS in Port Elizabeth, from Laings Nek in Natal (daughter of Francois ROOS, born 13/05/1791; and Maria  Elisabeth FURSTENBURG, born 03/11/1805); and in 1840’s after the birth of their first son, they moved to Natal.

* UK: KOLBE George Augustus & DOWNING Margaret: George Augusts KOLBE was born on 7 December 1802 in London, travelled to South Africa as an English settler, employed as a missionary doctor, settling on the farm Wurtenburg, Knopdaar, near Burgersdorp, where he died on 01 December 1844. He married Margaret Downing  (descendant of Sir George Downing), born in London on 23 February 1805, who died in Burgersdorp on 25 November 1861. They had 15 children.

[30] http://eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za/

[31] http://cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za

[32] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/02/17-feb-fsb-am-kalganov/

[33] http://eop-applicants.tygae.org.za/

[34] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/05/16-may-ghc-filing/

[35] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_Afd-TRC_CrtSvc_Encl.pdf

[36] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/05/16-may-ghc-filing/

[37] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_Afd-TRC_CrtSvc_Encl.pdf

[38] http://eop-v-nobel.tygae.org.za/

[39] http://eop-v-bgwef.tygae.org.za/

[40] http://eop-v-altright.tygae.org.za/

[41] http://eop-v-djt.tygae.org.za/

[42] http://eop-v-uspr.tygae.org.za/

[43] http://eop-v-iww.tygae.org.za/

[44] http://eop-v-v4p.tygae.org.za/

[45] http://eop-v-cis.tygae.org.za/

[46] http://eop-v-indig.tygae.org.za/

[47] http://eop-v-wl.tygae.org.za

[48] http://us-v-bcm.tygae.org.za/

[49] http://eop-v-aws.tygae.org.za/

[50] http://eop-v-ecocide-law.tygae.org.za/

[51] http://eop-v-xr.tygae.org.za/

[52] http://eop-v-gteet.tygae.org.za/

[53] http://eop-v-gjyv.tygae.org.za/

[54] http://eop-v-blm.tygae.org.za/

[55] http://eop-v-d2wpsych.tygae.org.za/

[56] http://eop-v-mtm.tygae.org.za/

[57] http://eop-v-wadmz.tygae.org.za/

[58] http://lj-v-rhet.tygae.org.za/

[59] http://eop-v-lcf.tygae.org.za/

[60] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown_(abolitionist)          archive.fo/xBUOH

[61] http://eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za/

[62] http://veto-swamp-elect.tygae.org.za/

[63] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za

[64] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za

[65] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_NoM-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf

[66] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za

[67] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecfxl1wZDpE

[68] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za

[69] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_NoM-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf

[70] http://lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za/

[71] https://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2018/12/03-dec-en-marche/

[72] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/04_17-50_lj-tgabbard/

[73] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/04_17-50_draft-heoaodbres/

[74] http://eop-v-uscongress.tygae.org.za/pdf/20-10-04_McV20_GM-EoPAxisOathOfc_Encl.pdf

[75] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/06/04_12-53_lj-cg-jmattis/

[76] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/17_14-45_dvmatviyenko/

[77] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/17_14-45_dvmatviyenko/

[78] http://mcveigh2020.tygae.org.za/pdf/vote/20-10-15_McV20_SAgr_DumaQA.pdf

[79] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/09/20_23-20_lj-us-ir-jpa/

[80] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/09/20_23-20_lj-eop-amicus/

[81] http://ir-v-us.tygae.org.za/pdf/20-09-20_USvJPA_IRvUS_EoPTRCAmiciAfd_Encl.pdf

[82] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2021/03/08_14-34_lj-gmvmm/

[83] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2021/03/08_14-34_usdp-nld/

[84] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/

[85] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

[86] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB42YjUNCZU

[87] http://mcveigh2020.com

[88] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/              archive.is/Yv2t3

[89] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/       http://archive.fo/NrdRC

[90] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

.

2 Comments

    1. […] Axis Alliance Org of American States Treaty [EoP OAS: PDF: pp.01-16/58; EoP UN Res: pp.17-58/58]; EoP Law Voter Background Information [PDF: […]

Leave a Comment