08 Jun: LJ Costs Orders A’s: [A] EoP Law Culture Pro Se: Executive Summary: Reply – via Magistrate Henderson – to Respondents Request for Final Relief Certainty (i) Merits and (ii) Costs Order Ruling

* 08 Jun: LJ Filing: EoP Law Pro Se Applicant Reply to Respondents Costs Order Question [PDF].
» LJ Costs Orders A’s Filing [PDF: pp.139]: [A] EoP Law Culture Pro Se: Executive Summary: Reply – via Magistrate Henderson – to Respondents Request for Final Relief Certainty (i) Merits and (ii) Costs Order Ruling [pp.06]; [B1] Notice of Case Withdrawal in terms of Law of Evidence Act [pp.02]; [B2] Judicial Notice of EoP Law Culture Declined by WiP Law Only Respondents [pp.02]; [C1] Respondents Consent to Choice of Law Certainty Order in Terms of Law of Evidence Amendment Act. [pp.02]; [C2] Choice of Law Certainty Order in Terms of Law of Evidence Act [pp.02]; [C3] Conflict of EoP Law and WiP Law Cultures Authorities [pp.15]; [C4] Supplementary: EoP Summary of EoP v WiP Law [pp.05]; [D1] EoP Law Pro Se Summary Answer to Respondents Costs Order Question [pp.04]; [E1] EoP Law Voter Culture Community Council voter juror magistrate [pp.02]; [E2] Ecology of Peace Crimes of Aggression Merits Ruling [pp.03]; [E3] EoP Law Bona Fide Disputes of Fact Test: Marlise Steenekamp [pp.03]; [E4] EoP Law Bona Fide Disputes of Fact Test: Dawn Meyer [pp.03]; [E5] Documents Evidentiary Quality Analysis [pp.09]; [F1] Testifying Under Oath about what I know vs Arguing about WiP Law voters Court Rules [pp.30].
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GME / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

IN THE CIVIL MAGISTRATES COURT

DISTRICT OF GEORGE, HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA

Case: 542/21

In the matter between:

Lara Johnson Applicant
And
Executor: Estate Gill Elliott: Marlise Steenekamp 1st Respondent
Heir Elliott Estate: Dawn Meyer 2nd Respondent
Master of High Court: George Service Point
Ref: Master of the High Court File: 4968/2020
3rd Respondent
CCMA Director: Cameron Morajane
Ref: CCMA 1279-20: LJ v Estate GM Elliott
4th Respondent

EoP Law Culture Pro Se: Executive Summary:

Reply – via Magistrate Henderson – to Respondents Request for Final Relief Certainty (i) Merits and (ii) Costs Order Ruling.

 

 .

Parties Choice of Law Certainty Cultural Law:

EoP Summary of EoP v WiP Law {LJ Index: E5}: [2.5] A conscious EoP and WiP court accepts applications from all individuals irrespective of whether they are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace or Babylon WiP cultures; requires applicants, counsel and jury members to unambiguously clarify whether they are EoP or WiP culture accused / defendants, applicants / respondents, counsel and jury.

[1] Magistrate:

[1.1] Magistrate Henderson

[1.1A] Unknown: Presumably negligent or intentional dominant WiP law culture; or one or other minority WiP Law Culture. Juridical Ethics definition unknown.

[2] Respondent/s:

[2.1] Marlise Steenekamp, Dawn Meyer

[2.1A] Unknown: Presumably negligent or intentional dominant WiP law culture; or one or other minority WiP Law Culture.

[3] Respondents Counsel:

[3.1] Formerly: Francois Lamprecht, Currently: Charl Marais.

[3.1A] Unknown: Presumably negligent or intentional dominant WiP law culture; or one or other minority WiP Law Culture.

[4] Applicant:

[4.1] Lara Johnson

[4.1A] Known: Minority Ecology of Peace Law Culture:

[4.1Aa] EoP Law Voter – EoP culture laws – ballot registration {LJ Index: E6}

 .

Response to Applicant Classified Ad for Standby Counsel:

As of 08 June 2021: 08:00 hrs: applicant has not received any correspondence from any George lawfirm, in response to George Herald advertisement for standby counsel {25 May Setdown Statement to Magistrate: pp.17-19; 24-27}.

 .

[B] Case Withdrawal Offer.

Case Withdrawal Offer in terms of Laws of Evidence Amendment Act.

SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76: A conflict of laws arises whenever rules of evidence derived from two or more different legal systems are potentially applicable to the same set of facts. Choice of law rules are then needed to determine (a) which rules to apply; or (b) which combination of rules to apply.

Notice to Respondents:

[1] Notice of Case Withdrawal in terms of Law of Evidence Act [pp.02]

Magistrate Draft Order:

[2] Judicial Notice of EoP Law Culture Declined by WiP Law Only Respondents. [pp.02].

 .

[C] Choice of Law Certainty Offer.

SASOP: SA Society of Psychiatrists Re: Ethical trust building between cultures: Position Statement 9 on culture, mental health and psychiatry[1], recommends a 50/50 balance: i.e. no preference for dominant or minority culture values.

SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76: The Harmonization of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law: Parties may select the law to be applied; based upon objective and subjective reasonableness tests.

Duhaime: The reasonableness test: Every religion has a God.   In law, this is the reasonable person, a mystical, esoteric ethereal being, revered by our high priest and priestess, the judges of our courts of law; the ultimate legal fiction.  Meet the reasonable man, kid! In order to justify the occupation of such a large expanse of written word, authority in the law, it has been necessary for the priests of law to speak to the characteristics of the reasonable man.[2]

Respondents Draft Consent:

[1] Respondents Consent to Choice of Law Certainty Order in Terms of Law of Evidence Amendment Act. [pp.02]

Magistrate Draft Order:

[2] Choice of Law Certainty Order in Terms of Law of Evidence Act [pp.02]

Annexure:

[3] Conflict of EoP Law and WiP Law Cultures Authorities [pp.15]

[4] Supplementary: EoP Summary of EoP v WiP Law [pp.05]

 .

[D] Answer to Respondents Costs Order Question:

SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76:   (c) Nature and form of a prior transaction              [1.10.1] If the defendant contests the plaintiff’s choice of law, as it appears in the pleadings, the court may determine whether the parties had considered application of a particular law at an earlier stage of their dealings. This inquiry will entail an assessment of the words and deeds out of which the claim arose.           [10.2.4] The third method of coping with customary law has been to stipulate procedures for adducing new or contested rules in court. Botswana, for instance, enacted a detailed procedure which allows customary law to be ascertained both from texts and witnesses.                …… `If any court entertains any doubt as to the existence or content of a rule of customary law relevant to any proceedings, after having considered such submission thereon as may be made by or on behalf of the parties, it may consult reported cases, textbooks and other sources, and may receive opinions either orally or in writing to enable it to arrive at a decision in the matter ….’              Subsequent provisions have two main objectives: to specify the court as the ultimate authority – an issue often forgotten, because in the tactics of litigation the parties may seem to usurp its function – and to stipulate basic principles of procedural fairness. If any rule is in doubt, the parties must be invited to make their own submissions, after which the court may consult an open list of written sources (`reported cases, text-books and other sources’) or call for oral evidence.

Gore Vidal: The Bad News. Ronald Reagan’s library just burned down: both books were destroyed.  The United States, we have never developed a civilization, or anything like one, so there are no agreed upon set of values. This is why everybody is so crooked. We are a nation of shoplifters. Burr was the realist and realists are always hated in a sanctimonious society of hustlers, which is always what the United States has been since the beginning. The first law is I won’t blow your scam, you don’t blow mine. Why become a senator when you can buy one. The founding fathers feared democracy and they feared monarchy, so they got a republic, where it was safe for white men to do business.[3]

[1] EoP Law Pro Se Summary Answer to Respondents Costs Order Question [pp.04]:

Annexure:

[2] (a) 19 March 2020 [pp.10]; (b) 13 May 2020 [pp.10]; (c) 13 April 2021 [pp.02]

 .

[E] Draft Example: EoP Law Merits Ruling:

Authority without – Ballot Deception & Bullet Coercion – Domination
Shibumi in the personality of a man, it is … how does one say it? Authority without domination? Something like that. How does one achieve this shibumi, sir?  One does not achieve it, one . . . discovers it. And only a few men of infinite refinement ever do that. Men like my friend Otake-san. Meaning that one must learn a great deal to arrive at shibumi? Meaning, rather, that one must pass through knowledge and arrive at simplicity.[4]

Polly Higgins: In law we draw a line: you can’t cross here. …. Now we are also looking at ecological law, it is a far more holistic approach. It is an understanding, not just about it being a rights issue but, about it being a duties and responsibilities issue individually and collectively, at state level, at corporate level. Where do we draw the line? Where do we say enough, no more? That is where we create the crime. That is where we criminalise that dangerous industrial activity, the decisions, the individuals who make the decisions.[5]

Cicero once said that all men need to decide whether they get their laws from God or Nature, or from other men.[6]

“Define your terms, you will permit me again to say,” wrote Voltaire, “or we shall never understand one another.”  From our laws and proposals for laws, we deserve specificity. We’re expected to abide by those laws. Letting the cops, prosecutors, judges, and bureaucrats who implement and enforce them write post-passage “nuance” into them is letting them make the law up as they go and leaving ourselves at their “nuanced” mercy. Regardless of one’s position on any given issue, it’s important to define our terms and then either stick to them or admit that we’ve abandoned them. In politics and public policy, “nuance” is where truth goes to die.[7]

Christine La Garde: If you can’t measure something, you can’t improve things because you have no basis of evaluation.[8].

[1] EoP Law Voter Culture Community Council voter juror magistrate [pp.02]

[2] Ecology of Peace Crimes of Aggression Merits Ruling [pp.03]

Annexure:

[3] EoP Law Bona Fide Disputes of Fact Test: Marlise Steenekamp [pp.03].

[4] EoP Law Bona Fide Disputes of Fact Test: Dawn Meyer [pp.03].

[5] Documents Evidentiary Quality Analysis [pp.09].

.

[F] EoP Law Voter Juror Amicus Affidavit:

EoP Law Voter: I made the mistake of voting Yes to give De Klerk an end Apartheid negotiations mandate in 1992 Whites only referendum ‘For’ or ‘Against’ a negotiated constitution; without demanding that ending apartheid be based on a scientific – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior {LJ Index: E16} end racial and economic apartheid {LJ Index: E8-E22} – peace legal definition.[9]

EoP Law voter culture ballot registration[10] {LJ Index: E6[11]}.

Klerotarians: As far as I could see, neither the Dunning and Kruger paper nor followup discussions comment on the implications of these findings on elections. If voters, do not recognize the fact that they are uninformed then they are easy prey for manipulation. Not only will the voters be unable to make informed decisions, they would be unable to make rational uninformed decisions since they are uninformed about their uninformed state.[12]

EoP Law Voter Juror Fool for a Client Affidavit:

[1] Testifying Under Oath about what I know vs Arguing about WiP Law voters Court Rules [pp.30].

Annexures:

[2] Affidavit of Brad Blanton: Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness, Revolution of Consciousness; and Civil Disobedience to perceived Illegitimate Authority Reasonableness Test. [pp.15].

[3] 572/02 Contempt of Court Charges: Offensive brevity [pp.09]

[4] Affidavit of T Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue [pp.04]

.

EoP Axis Oath signed on 08 June 2021; at George, South Africa, Pale Blue Dot.


Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se
EoP Axis Oath[13]: 23 Sep 2017[14]: LJ[15]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, 6529

.

.

—– Footnotes —–

[1] A Journal of Psychiatry: The South African Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) and SASOP State Employed Special Interest Group (SESIG) Position Statements on Psychiatric Care in the Public Sector: https://sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/374/340  | SciELO: South African Society of Psychiatrists guidelines for the integration of spirituality in the approach to psychiatric practice  http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2078-67862014000500002    PDF: http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/sajp/v20n4/02.pdf

[2] Duhaime: The Reasonable Man – Law’s Ghost God    http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/TortPersonalInjury/LawArticle-1378/The-Reasonable-Man–Laws-Ghost-God.aspx     http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/TortPersonalInjury/LawArticle-1379/The-Reasonable-Man–Laws-Ghost-God-Part-2.aspx  Man on the Clapham Omnibus Definition http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/M/ManontheClaphamOmnibus.aspx

[3] Gore Vidal: The United States of Amnesia:  https://youtu.be/zli2VHO4p1I  | The Education of Gore Vidal https://youtu.be/RL5Tb4eoTtA    |    History: Gore Vidal: American Presidency https://youtu.be/DbOQcHZSY_Q

[4] GoodReads: Shibumi: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1059.Shibumi

[5] Polly Higgins: Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and governance to prevent the destruction of our planet

https://www.shepheard-walwyn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Eradicating_Ecocide.pdf  |  Deep Green Resistance: Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Polly Higgins – May 6, 2018  https://youtu.be/WNCmyQeVBwY  | Conscious Lawyer: Polly Higgins, Earth lawyer, Stop Ecocide. https://www.theconsciouslawyer.co.uk/heart-to-heart-polly-higgins/

[6] Sovereign to Serf: You Volunteered Yourself Into This Mess —Now Learn How to Volunteer Yourself Out  https://sovereign2serf.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/you-volunteered-into-this-mess/

[7] Counterpunch: “Nuance” in Politics and Public Policy? No Thanks.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/08/23/nuance-in-politics-and-public-policy-no-thanks/

[8] Al Jazeera: Global Financial Meltdown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQzEWeGJLP0

[9] 23 Jun: EoP Law Re: GSI Inv to FWdK Re: Nuclear Shutdown Lessons
http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/06/23_13-54_lj-gsi-aba-fwdk/

[10] 26 Oct: EoP Law Voter Ntc Re: Me Too Voters  http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/26_16-07_lj-mtmvmnt/  | 28 Oct: EoP Ntc: ACLJ & IPPFEN: EoP law veto-swamp-womb-war-elections voter registration  http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/28_11-43_lj-aclj-jsekulow/

[11] Responsible Freedom Oath (dated 19-04-2017)

[12] The Dunning-Kruger effect and its implications for voting
https://equalitybylot.com/2015/11/28/the-dunning-kruger-effect-and-its-implications-for-voting/

[13] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/              archive.is/Yv2t3

[14] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/          archive.fo/NrdRC

[15] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

IN THE CIVIL MAGISTRATES COURT

DISTRICT OF GEORGE, HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA

Case: 542/21

In the matter between:

Lara Johnson Applicant
And
Executor: Estate Gill Elliott: Marlise Steenekamp 1st Respondent
Heir Elliott Estate: Dawn Meyer 2nd Respondent
Master of High Court: George Service Point
Ref: Master of the High Court File: 4968/2020
3rd Respondent
CCMA Director: Cameron Morajane
Ref: CCMA 1279-20: LJ v Estate GM Elliott
4th Respondent

EoP Law Culture Pro Se: Executive Summary:

Reply – via Magistrate Henderson – to Respondents Request for Final Relief Certainty (i) Merits and (ii) Costs Order Ruling.

 

 

Parties Choice of Law Certainty Cultural Law:

EoP Summary of EoP v WiP Law {LJ Index: E5}: [2.5] A conscious EoP and WiP court accepts applications from all individuals irrespective of whether they are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace or Babylon WiP cultures; requires applicants, counsel and jury members to unambiguously clarify whether they are EoP or WiP culture accused / defendants, applicants / respondents, counsel and jury.

  • Magistrate:
    • Magistrate Henderson
      • Unknown: Presumably negligent or intentional dominant WiP law culture; or one or other minority WiP Law Culture. Juridical Ethics definition unknown.
    • Respondent/s:
      • Marlise Steenekamp, Dawn Meyer
        • Unknown: Presumably negligent or intentional dominant WiP law culture; or one or other minority WiP Law Culture.
      • Respondents Counsel:
        • Formerly: Francois Lamprecht, Currently: Charl Marais.
          • Unknown: Presumably negligent or intentional dominant WiP law culture; or one or other minority WiP Law Culture.
        • Applicant:
          • Lara Johnson
            • Known: Minority Ecology of Peace Law Culture:
              1. EoP Law Voter – EoP culture laws – ballot registration {LJ Index: E6}

 

Response to Applicant Classified Ad for Standby Counsel:

As of 08 June 2021: 08:00 hrs: applicant has not received any correspondence from any George lawfirm, in response to George Herald advertisement for standby counsel {25 May Setdown Statement to Magistrate: pp.17-19; 24-27}.

 

[B] Case Withdrawal Offer.

Case Withdrawal Offer in terms of Laws of Evidence Amendment Act.

SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76: A conflict of laws arises whenever rules of evidence derived from two or more different legal systems are potentially applicable to the same set of facts. Choice of law rules are then needed to determine (a) which rules to apply; or (b) which combination of rules to apply.

Notice to Respondents:

  • Notice of Case Withdrawal in terms of Law of Evidence Act [pp.02]

Magistrate Draft Order:

  • Judicial Notice of EoP Law Culture Declined by WiP Law Only Respondents. [pp.02].

 

[C] Choice of Law Certainty Offer.

SASOP: SA Society of Psychiatrists Re: Ethical trust building between cultures: Position Statement 9 on culture, mental health and psychiatry[1], recommends a 50/50 balance: i.e. no preference for dominant or minority culture values.

SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76: The Harmonization of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law: Parties may select the law to be applied; based upon objective and subjective reasonableness tests.

Duhaime: The reasonableness test: Every religion has a God.   In law, this is the reasonable person, a mystical, esoteric ethereal being, revered by our high priest and priestess, the judges of our courts of law; the ultimate legal fiction.  Meet the reasonable man, kid! In order to justify the occupation of such a large expanse of written word, authority in the law, it has been necessary for the priests of law to speak to the characteristics of the reasonable man.[2]

Respondents Draft Consent:

  • Respondents Consent to Choice of Law Certainty Order in Terms of Law of Evidence Amendment Act. [pp.02]

Magistrate Draft Order:

  • Choice of Law Certainty Order in Terms of Law of Evidence Act [pp.02]

Annexure:

  • Conflict of EoP Law and WiP Law Cultures Authorities [pp.15]
  • Supplementary: EoP Summary of EoP v WiP Law [pp.05]

 

[D] Answer to Respondents Costs Order Question:

SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76:   (c) Nature and form of a prior transaction              [1.10.1] If the defendant contests the plaintiff’s choice of law, as it appears in the pleadings, the court may determine whether the parties had considered application of a particular law at an earlier stage of their dealings. This inquiry will entail an assessment of the words and deeds out of which the claim arose.           [10.2.4] The third method of coping with customary law has been to stipulate procedures for adducing new or contested rules in court. Botswana, for instance, enacted a detailed procedure which allows customary law to be ascertained both from texts and witnesses.                …… `If any court entertains any doubt as to the existence or content of a rule of customary law relevant to any proceedings, after having considered such submission thereon as may be made by or on behalf of the parties, it may consult reported cases, textbooks and other sources, and may receive opinions either orally or in writing to enable it to arrive at a decision in the matter ….’              Subsequent provisions have two main objectives: to specify the court as the ultimate authority – an issue often forgotten, because in the tactics of litigation the parties may seem to usurp its function – and to stipulate basic principles of procedural fairness. If any rule is in doubt, the parties must be invited to make their own submissions, after which the court may consult an open list of written sources (`reported cases, text-books and other sources’) or call for oral evidence.

Gore Vidal: The Bad News. Ronald Reagan’s library just burned down: both books were destroyed.  The United States, we have never developed a civilization, or anything like one, so there are no agreed upon set of values. This is why everybody is so crooked. We are a nation of shoplifters. Burr was the realist and realists are always hated in a sanctimonious society of hustlers, which is always what the United States has been since the beginning. The first law is I won’t blow your scam, you don’t blow mine. Why become a senator when you can buy one. The founding fathers feared democracy and they feared monarchy, so they got a republic, where it was safe for white men to do business.[3]

  • EoP Law Pro Se Summary Answer to Respondents Costs Order Question [pp.04]:

Annexure:

  • (a) 19 March 2020 [pp.10]; (b) 13 May 2020 [pp.10]; (c) 13 April 2021 [pp.02]

 

[E] Draft Example: EoP Law Merits Ruling:

Authority without – Ballot Deception & Bullet Coercion – Domination
Shibumi in the personality of a man, it is … how does one say it? Authority without domination? Something like that. How does one achieve this shibumi, sir?  One does not achieve it, one . . . discovers it. And only a few men of infinite refinement ever do that. Men like my friend Otake-san. Meaning that one must learn a great deal to arrive at shibumi? Meaning, rather, that one must pass through knowledge and arrive at simplicity.[4]

Polly Higgins: In law we draw a line: you can’t cross here. …. Now we are also looking at ecological law, it is a far more holistic approach. It is an understanding, not just about it being a rights issue but, about it being a duties and responsibilities issue individually and collectively, at state level, at corporate level. Where do we draw the line? Where do we say enough, no more? That is where we create the crime. That is where we criminalise that dangerous industrial activity, the decisions, the individuals who make the decisions.[5]

Cicero once said that all men need to decide whether they get their laws from God or Nature, or from other men.[6]

“Define your terms, you will permit me again to say,” wrote Voltaire, “or we shall never understand one another.”  From our laws and proposals for laws, we deserve specificity. We’re expected to abide by those laws. Letting the cops, prosecutors, judges, and bureaucrats who implement and enforce them write post-passage “nuance” into them is letting them make the law up as they go and leaving ourselves at their “nuanced” mercy. Regardless of one’s position on any given issue, it’s important to define our terms and then either stick to them or admit that we’ve abandoned them. In politics and public policy, “nuance” is where truth goes to die.[7]

Christine La Garde: If you can’t measure something, you can’t improve things because you have no basis of evaluation.[8].

  • EoP Law Voter Culture Community Council voter juror magistrate [pp.02]
  • Ecology of Peace Crimes of Aggression Merits Ruling [pp.03]

Annexure:

  • EoP Law Bona Fide Disputes of Fact Test: Marlise Steenekamp [pp.03].
  • EoP Law Bona Fide Disputes of Fact Test: Dawn Meyer [pp.03].
  • Documents Evidentiary Quality Analysis [pp.09].

[F] EoP Law Voter Juror Amicus Affidavit:

EoP Law Voter: I made the mistake of voting Yes to give De Klerk an end Apartheid negotiations mandate in 1992 Whites only referendum ‘For’ or ‘Against’ a negotiated constitution; without demanding that ending apartheid be based on a scientific – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior {LJ Index: E16} end racial and economic apartheid {LJ Index: E8-E22} – peace legal definition.[9]

EoP Law voter culture ballot registration[10] {LJ Index: E6[11]}.

Klerotarians: As far as I could see, neither the Dunning and Kruger paper nor followup discussions comment on the implications of these findings on elections. If voters, do not recognize the fact that they are uninformed then they are easy prey for manipulation. Not only will the voters be unable to make informed decisions, they would be unable to make rational uninformed decisions since they are uninformed about their uninformed state.[12]

EoP Law Voter Juror Fool for a Client Affidavit:

  • Testifying Under Oath about what I know vs Arguing about WiP Law voters Court Rules [pp.30].

Annexures:

  • Affidavit of Brad Blanton: Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness, Revolution of Consciousness; and Civil Disobedience to perceived Illegitimate Authority Reasonableness Test. [pp.15].
  • 572/02 Contempt of Court Charges: Offensive brevity [pp.09]
  • Affidavit of T Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue [pp.04]

EoP Axis Oath signed on 08 June 2021; at George, South Africa, Pale Blue Dot.


Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se

EoP Axis Oath[13]: 23 Sep 2017[14]: LJ[15]

16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, 6529

[1] A Journal of Psychiatry: The South African Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) and SASOP State Employed Special Interest Group (SESIG) Position Statements on Psychiatric Care in the Public Sector: https://sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/374/340  | SciELO: South African Society of Psychiatrists guidelines for the integration of spirituality in the approach to psychiatric practice  http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2078-67862014000500002    PDF: http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/sajp/v20n4/02.pdf

[2] Duhaime: The Reasonable Man – Law’s Ghost God    http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/TortPersonalInjury/LawArticle-1378/The-Reasonable-Man–Laws-Ghost-God.aspx     http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/TortPersonalInjury/LawArticle-1379/The-Reasonable-Man–Laws-Ghost-God-Part-2.aspx  Man on the Clapham Omnibus Definition http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/M/ManontheClaphamOmnibus.aspx

[3] Gore Vidal: The United States of Amnesia:  https://youtu.be/zli2VHO4p1I  | The Education of Gore Vidal https://youtu.be/RL5Tb4eoTtA    |    History: Gore Vidal: American Presidency https://youtu.be/DbOQcHZSY_Q

[4] GoodReads: Shibumi: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1059.Shibumi

[5] Polly Higgins: Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and governance to prevent the destruction of our planet

https://www.shepheard-walwyn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Eradicating_Ecocide.pdf  |  Deep Green Resistance: Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Polly Higgins – May 6, 2018  https://youtu.be/WNCmyQeVBwY  | Conscious Lawyer: Polly Higgins, Earth lawyer, Stop Ecocide. https://www.theconsciouslawyer.co.uk/heart-to-heart-polly-higgins/

[6] Sovereign to Serf: You Volunteered Yourself Into This Mess —Now Learn How to Volunteer Yourself Out  https://sovereign2serf.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/you-volunteered-into-this-mess/

[7] Counterpunch: “Nuance” in Politics and Public Policy? No Thanks.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/08/23/nuance-in-politics-and-public-policy-no-thanks/

[8] Al Jazeera: Global Financial Meltdown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQzEWeGJLP0

[9] 23 Jun: EoP Law Re: GSI Inv to FWdK Re: Nuclear Shutdown Lessons
http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/06/23_13-54_lj-gsi-aba-fwdk/

[10] 26 Oct: EoP Law Voter Ntc Re: Me Too Voters  http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/26_16-07_lj-mtmvmnt/  | 28 Oct: EoP Ntc: ACLJ & IPPFEN: EoP law veto-swamp-womb-war-elections voter registration  http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2020/10/28_11-43_lj-aclj-jsekulow/

[11] Responsible Freedom Oath (dated 19-04-2017)

[12] The Dunning-Kruger effect and its implications for voting
https://equalitybylot.com/2015/11/28/the-dunning-kruger-effect-and-its-implications-for-voting/

[13] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/              archive.is/Yv2t3

[14] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/          archive.fo/NrdRC

[15] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

.

Leave a Comment