* CRL Rights Commission, Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza, Legal Practice Council, Craig Lucas:
* 17 Jul: LJ Info Req Re: H45/19: EoP Law voter culture CRLRC Comm Cncl Registration
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v CRLRC, LJ v LPC / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2021 12:15 PM
To: ‘CRL Rights Commission’; ‘Edward Mafadza’; ‘Maureen Chauke’; ‘Kgositoi Sedupane’; ‘Kgaogelo Makgoba’; ‘Vinolia Mashwayi’; ‘Khulisiwe Sithole’
Cc: ‘Craig Lucas’; ‘Legal Practice Council’; ‘Director: Kathleen Dlepu’; ‘Provincial Director: Gauteng: JS Grobler’; ‘Engela Pienaar’; ‘Western Cape: Frank Dorey’; ‘KZN: P Arnold-Mfusi’; ‘Free State: Tumelo Leope’
Subject: Info Req Re: H45/19: EoP Law voter culture CRLRC Comm Cncl Registration
Attachment: 21-07-15_McVvUSA_HLawRegAct.pdf; 19-05-10_LJvLS_NoM-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf
TO: CRL Rights Commission: Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza:
Ref: 20 May: H45/19: EoP Law Culture CRLRC Comm Cncl Registration
CC: Legal Practice Council: Craig Lucas:
Ref: 15 Jul: EoP Law Voter Zondo v Zuma Mediation: Draft: Honest Lawyers Registration Act [PDF: Honest Lawyers Act: pp.01-10/13; Encl: Forms: EoP TRC Mandate: pp.11-11/13; EoP or WiP law voter client consent form: pp.12-13/13].
Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza
Info Req Re: H45/19: EoP Law voter culture CRLRC Comm Cncl Registration.
Could CRLRC acknowledge receipt and/or confirm that CRLRC are in the process of evaluation of EoP Law voter culture community council registration, and shall issue its ruling within 90 days of the 20 May 2021 filing; on our about 20 August 2021.
I have not enclosed the Annexures [PDF: pp.173], as the file is large.
The download links for all are below.
EoP Law Voter Culture CRLRC Community Council Registration [pp.03]
Annexure Table of Contents [pp.01]:
EoP Law Voter Culture CRLRC Community Council Registration Annexures [pp.173]
I understand – from CRL Commissions Community Guidelines [PDF: pp.03] – that:
The Commission will, within 90 days of receipt, acknowledge and evaluate the applications for recognition. The Commission will issue a recognition certificate valid for the terms of office of the commission (5 years), however subject to evaluation and renewal on a financial year basis. The Commission must within 60 days of having received an application for the recognition of a community council in terms of subregulation (1), inform the community council in writing of the Commission’s decision regarding the recognition of the Community Council.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 May: H45/19: EoP Law Culture CRLRC Comm Cncl Registration
If CRLRC vote is: EoP Law voter community council registration denied.
LJ v LS EoP Axis Alliance Heads of State [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.70], can [A] conclude whether they consider CRLRC decision response to EoP law voter community council resource conflict resolutions registration, as applicable to (a) all western and eastern nations lawyers and court clients; or (b) all african nations lawyers and court clients; or (c) all nations with predominantly western conflict resolution values lawyers and court clients; or (d) all nations based on some other socio-cultural lawyers and court client value factors; and [B] depending on their conclusions: either (a) authorize No EoP OKC TRC [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.67-70/70]; or (b) assist applicant with travel to another nation with a potentially different EoP TRC lawyer and court client voter UNGA mandate [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] result; for EoP TRC lawyer and court client voter UNGA mandate [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] negotiations to be conducted from such nation.
If CRLRC vote is: EoP Law voter community council registration approved.
Notice to Magistrates Commission:
Precautionary Transparency Notice: For Your Records
EoP Law Voter Culture Community Council voter juror magistrate [PDF: pp.06].
» EoP Leg Sub: 04 Jun: Ntc to Mag Commission: EoP Law Voter culture CC voter juror magistrate.
If the Magistrates Commission do not accept EoP law voter community council voter juror magistrate: See: If CRLRC vote is: EoP Law voter community council registration denied.
If the Magistrates Commission accept EoP law voter community council voter juror magistrate: See Legal Practice Council: Lawyers and Clients EoP v WiP Law Referendum:
Legal Practice Council: Lawyers and Clients EoP v WiP Law Referendum:
EoP Law Voter: Zondo v Zuma mediation:
EoP Law Voter Mediation:
Please find enclosed: Draft: EoP Ethics Control of Lawyers aka Honest Lawyers Registration Act [PDF: Act: pp.01-10/13; Encl: Forms: EoP TRC Mandate: pp.11-11/13; EoP or WiP law voter client consent form: pp.12-13/13]
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Jul: EoP Law Voter Zondo v Zuma Mediation: Draft: Honest Lawyers Registration Act.
The Legal Practice Council can of its own volition implement EoP Ethics Control of Lawyers / Honest Lawyer Registration Act; and/or request a ruling from the Magistrates Commission and/or the Office of Chief Justice, as they consider appropriate.
Depending on – Honest Lawyers Registration Act – lawyers and their civil and criminal court client voters – EoP or WiP law conflict resolution – decision making.
EoP and WiP Law Legal Services Court Rules:
All – EoP and WiP – lawfirms must require their lawyers to request (a) any client to complete the “EoP or WiP law voter client consent form [pp.12-13/13 of this Honest Lawyers Act]”. If their client requests EoP/WiP law voter legal services, they are not registered to provide, they should refer such client to a lawfirm that does provide the requested EoP/WiP law voter legal services. If they don’t know which lawyers provide EoP/WiP law voter legal services, they should refer such client to the Legal Practice Council to refer such client to a lawfirm that does provide the requested EoP/WiP law voter legal services.
All lawyers must submit their clients “EoP or WiP law voter client consent form” [pp.12-13/13 of this Honest Lawyers Act]; (a) to the opposing parties and/or their legal representatives; within two days of the law firm being hired to represent the client; if prior to formal legal proceedings; and (b) to opposing parties and the court record; at the time of the law firm being hired to represent the client; subsequent to formal legal proceedings.
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Jul: EoP Law Voter Zondo v Zuma Mediation: Draft: Honest Lawyers Registration Act [PDF: Honest Lawyers Act: pp.01-10/13; Encl: Forms: EoP TRC Mandate: pp.11-11/13; EoP or WiP law voter client consent form: pp.12-13/13].
Parliament, the Magistrates Commision and Office of Chief Justice [A] can designate one or more magistrates and Judges / courts to deal with disputes between (a) EoP law voters only and/or (b) EoP v WiP law Conflict of Cultures cases; and [B] make any other related ego-literacy, etc legal services and parole pardon, training decisions. WiP law voter lawyers and their fully informed consent WiP law voter clients will continue with current WiP Law voter courts.
If EoP law voter community council registrant is the only legal services / client voter in South Africa, with EoP law voter conflict resolution values, then LJ v LS EoP Axis Alliance Heads of State [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.70], can [A] conclude whether they consider South African civil and criminal court client voters response to EoP law voter community council resource conflict resolutions registration, and related Honest Lawyers Registration Act; test case, as applicable to (a) all western and eastern nations lawyers and court clients; or (b) all african nations lawyers and court clients; or (c) nations with predominantly western conflict resolution values lawyers and court clients; or (d) based on some other socio-cultural lawyers and court client value factors; and [B] depending on their conclusions: either (a) authorize No EoP OKC TRC [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.67-70/70]; or (b) assist applicant with travel to another nation with a potentially different EoP TRC lawyer and court client voter UNGA mandate [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] result; for EoP TRC lawyer and court client voter UNGA mandate [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] negotiations to be conducted from such nation.
EoP v WiP Law:
Mahatma Gandhi wanted an [EoP Steppe Aryan law: sustainable procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits] self sufficient villages agrarian economy. Nehru wanted a [WiP law] industrial economy. [Daniel Yergin: Commanding Heights: Battle for World Economy 01. Battle of Ideas; 02. Agony of Reform; 03. New Rules of the Game; DW: Mahatma Gandhi: Dying for freedom]
McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020]: A handshake is a very low cost way of making contracts, but is worthless in a community with lotsa liars. Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. [SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017]
[SQ-DS: The Mosou Matriarch Men Live Better where Women are in Charge].
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution.
Globally there are two potential international law legal systems, requiring two different forms of agriculture and freedom; and leading to two different international and/or national economic and peace and war systems; with two different types of peacenik / military warriors [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]. Abel Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) international law will require citizens to practice – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits, and fully informed consent honest relating – responsible freedom, and will lead to sustainable steady state – no population and economic growth – low tech sustainable subsistence agriculture agrarian economies [Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy; NBC: Eustace Conway’s Turtle Island; RN: Russia’s Rural Villagers are Unphased by Economic Collapse; NH: Russian Family Gardens Produce 40% of Russian Food; TB: In 1999, 35 million small family plots produced 90% of Russia’s potatoes, 77% of vegetables, 87% of fruits, 59% of meat, 49% of milk]. Kane Babylon Masonic War is Peace (“WiP”) law allows cattle-citizens [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement: 01:02; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] the freedom to procreate and consume as much as they want, and practice certain forms of relating deception [IG: 15-07-31]; and leads to totalitarian agriculture [TSWabbit: Daniel Quinn on Totalitarian Agriculture: Excerpt: What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire] boom – slaughterhouse cattle feast – bust economic systems. In a global WiP international law system, everyone is consciously or unconsciously – lab rats on a treadmill – trapped in the growth-boom-bust [OKC: The Boom the Bust and the Bomb; FactXTract: Flatten Weimar Curve?; Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Al Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy] econo-legal system. The growth-boom-bust system can only be reformed – prior to bust collapsing – if a sufficient number of elite are willing to cooperate to abolish it and replace it with a legal system enabling orderly and humane degrowth return to a sustainable steady state system. Some are consciously – prisoners – trapped, others are unconsciously – prison guards – trapped [My Dinner with Andre: Guard/Prisoner Reality]. All Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) Yum Yum Cannibal Boom Bust economy’s are economic systems where the Babylon elite unconsciously or consciously – some more honest and others with a preference for flattery deception – profiteer off race, religious, class and gender Yum Yum boom-bust resource conflict misery. One of the ways in which citizens are encouraged to increase consumption at even faster levels are through banking lending practices. It is not for nothing that usury [DC: Usury: Mathematical Fraud Explained; Bill Maher: Elizabeth Warren: Usury] – a financial growth symptom of Babylon WiP procreation/consumption growth law – was made illegal by some nations and religions, but those nations and religions failed to address the root – Babylon WiP procreation, consumption and deception law – causes of – among others – financial boom bust economic symptom of usury.
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Jul: McV20: EoP Law A: WiP Law. Vusi Mohadi Q: Who Killed the Economy?; 16 Aug: EoP Law Peaceful Protestor Defn; TN: McVeigh EoP law Cons & Wiki Pedia Edit.
Its worth repeating that Mother Natures laws do set a single – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits – standard [eop-footprint: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.40-43/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.39-42/70] for resource abundance prosperity; for the inhabitants of any ecological system. Its also worth noting that in the absence of the beings calling themselves citizen voters cooperating to legislate international laws that obey Mother Natures single procreation and consumption standard of procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-un-res: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70]; enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation return to Mother Natures single responsible freedom prosperity standard; Mother Natures armies can and will Bon Voyage Motherfuckers all of the citizen voters armies – Pentagon [Global Observatory: Climate Change is Urgent Global Security Threat], Red Army [Reds: Trailer], NATO [NATO: Climate Change], People’s Army [ASPO: Al Bartlett: China’s One Child Policy]; Muslim Brotherhood [Reuters: Two is enough, Egypt tells poor families as population booms; Express Tribune: Justice Nisar: population control is Pakistans top priority after water conservation; Supreme Court recommends national task force for population control] – combined back to the stone age; as she has done many times before [Military Gospel: 11 Feb: NASA: Human & nature dynamics: Modeling inequality resource use in the collapse or sustainability of societies].
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: TAC: Here Come the Bourgeoisie Bolsheviks; 13 Jul: McV20: McV20 Q 4 Kudrin, Gref & Chubais: Putin mandate for EoP Woke Therapy?
EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; has been submitted electronically or formally served to parties and courts in the following political and legal proceedings – as of date no respondent has exposed any scientific or cultural law error – [A] US Presidential Campaign: (i) McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020: 07 Feb: IA SoS: Pro Se Filing Ntc: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [B] IACHR: McVeigh 2020 v USA: EoP Law Voter Pro Se Application for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Authorization; in terms of Art 4, 5 and 128 of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War [mcv-v-usa: PDF: pp.17; Encl: E: PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [C] US Courts: (i) US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland: EoP Law Voter Prisoner of WiP Law War Pro Se Application for Direct Access to US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court of Judge Merrick Garland [mcv-v-djtjrb: .NoM: PDF: Annex: D: pp.70; E PDF: pp.31-100/350]; (ii) US District Court: District of Columbia: 1:21-cr-43 et al: US v Capital Breach Accused: EoP law Voter Amicus in support of (a) EoP Law Prisoner Pardon or (b) WiP Law mitigation of sentencing of Saperstein Capital Breach Accused; subject to USG EoP Axis Oath office or EoP v WiP Law Referendum [us-v-cba: PDF: pp.81-122/122]; (iii) District Court for the Western District of Texas: El Paso Division: Criminal No EP-20-U4: US v Patrick Crusius [us-v-pwc: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [D] South Africa Courts: (a) SA Constitutional Court: CCT 52-21: Zondo v Zuma: EoP Law Voter Mediation Amicus [PDF: pp.39-80/80]; (b) George High Court: (i) H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70]; (ii) H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56]; (iii) H 213/19 LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others [lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.34-76/83]; (c) CCMA: Comm for Conciliation Mediation & Arbitration: 1063-20: LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Two Others [lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137]; [E] UK Courts: (i) UK Supreme Court: LJ v Speaker House of Commons and Ten Others [lj-v-shoc: PDF: pp.43-84/88]; (ii) Westminster Magistrates Court: UK Extradition Proceedings: US v Julian Assange [us-v-jpa: PDF: pp.59-100/143]; [F] New Zealand Courts: High Court of New Zealand, Christchurch Registry / I Te Koti Matua O Aotearoa Ōtautahi Rohe: CRI-2019-009-2468: New Zealand v Brenton Tarrant [nz-v-bt: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [G] Intnl Court of Justice: (i) Treaty of Amity Proceedings: Iran v USA [ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143]; (ii) Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: Gambia v Myanmar: [gm-v-mm: PDF: pp.11-52/52]; (iii) Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem: Palestine v United States of America [ps-v-us: PDF: pp.01-12/54; Encl: EoP UN Res: pp.13-54/54].
EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
CRL Rights Commission: Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza:
CRL Rights Commission (email@example.com); Edward Mafadza (Eddie@crlcommission.org.za); Maureen Chauke (firstname.lastname@example.org); Kgositoi Sedupane (email@example.com); Kgaogelo Makgoba (Kgaogelo@crlcommission.org.za); Vinolia Mashwayi (firstname.lastname@example.org); Khulisiwe Sithole (email@example.com)
Legal Practice Council: Craig Lucas:
Craig Lucas (firstname.lastname@example.org); Legal Practice Council (email@example.com); Director: Kathleen Dlepu (firstname.lastname@example.org); Provincial Director: Gauteng: JS Grobler (email@example.com); Engela Pienaar (firstname.lastname@example.org); Western Cape: Frank Dorey (email@example.com); KZN: P Arnold-Mfusi (firstname.lastname@example.org); Free State: Tumelo Leope (email@example.com);