* Amerika, Brett Stevens
* 30 Jul: ELV Re AR-BS Re ELV Re: Amerika: Why do White people hate themselves?
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Alt Right / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 12:28 PM
To: ‘Amerika: Brett Stevens’
Subject: ELV Re: Amerika: Why do White people hate themselves?
TO: Amerika: Brett Stevens
ELV Re: Amerika: Why do White people hate themselves?
I received your 29 July 2021 email [29 Jul: AR-BS Re ELV Re: Amerika: Why do White people hate themselves?]; in response to my email [29 Jul: ELV Re: Amerika: Why do White people hate themselves?]; in response to your Amerika article [Amerika: Why do White people hate themselves?.]
EoP law voter active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle] reply.
AR-BS: Alt Right: Brett Stevens
EoP-LJ: Ecology of Peace: Lara Johnson
AR-BS 01: Thanks for writing and spreading the word.
EoP-LJ 01: If polite politically correct answer to EoP law voter info.
Not necessary: A simple ‘fuck off: not interested’ is not offensive to EoP MILED Clerk.
If EoP law voter info was not of interest: apologies for bothering.
AR-BS 02: In my view the task right now is to subvert the pillar upon which the modern world is based: equality.
EoP-LJ 02: An individuals goals are a symptom of their cultural values.
If EoP law goals are not of interest to you; no offence taken. Apologies for bothering.
AR-BS 03: What we see now is all typical Late Stage Democracy. They set up a “meritocracy” that promotes egalitarians, and soon everyone in power is incompetent.
EoP-LJ 03: Noted: What your WiP law voter Alt Right culture sees is typical late stage democracy. I don’t know what your definitions are for late stage democracy, meritocracy, egalitarians, incompetency.
EoP law voters do not get involved in disputes between WiP law voters interpretations of the – racial, religious, class and gender – resource conflict symptoms of WiP law.
Brad Blanton: I did allot of work with couples, in the Radical Honesty workshops. I guarantee you that 99% of all conflict between couples has nothing to do with reality. It has to do with other people’s interpretation of reality. You have to buy my interpretation of reality, and we’ll be okay. I’ll love you as long as you meet the conditions of my interpretations of reality. Usually one of the couples comes in and gives me their story and tries to be as convincing as they can; then the other member comes in and tries to be as convincing as they can. And they say: ‘Well okay, what do you think?’ Like I am the judge who is supposed to know which one is right. And I say I think you are both full of shit. Then basically they unify against me and they are together again. [Radical Honesty Channel: Radical Honesty 01.02.03; SHO: Brad Blanton: And Nothing But the Truth; The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth; SQ-Esquire: I Think You’re Fat; The Most Honest Conversation in the World.
Paul Kingsnorth: The modern toilet, the flush toilet is a good metaphor for the civilization we are living in. You crap into a pipe, you flush it away and you never see it, and you never have to deal with your own shit; and then you end up deep in it. But I just think its the notion that you just press a button and all of your waste dissapears and somebody else deals with it somewhere and its probably going to be okay; is exactly how we grow up and live our lives like that. [VPRO: The battle against climate change.]
Jordan Peterson: So although there are a very large number of interpretations of the world; there are unbelievably severe constraints; on the number of functional interpretations there are in the world. [SQ-JP: Severe Constraints on Functional Interpretations of Reality.
Important Notice for Voters: Re: Root cause of all Resource Conflict:
Earth is not flat. Resources are finite. When voters vote for politicians – left or right, white or black, man or woman, religious or secular, oligarch or comedienne, freedom fighter or terrorist, etc – who legislate laws allowing for breeding and/or consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource depletion, ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict. All local, national and international military, political, and economic racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict are symptoms of clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits. [mcveigh2020]
AR-BS 04: The voters slept through it all. On both continents, of course.
EoP-LJ 04: Noted: Your WiP law voter Alt Right culture thinks voters slept through it all.
EoP law voters have different voter registration [eop-axis-oath] definitions to WiP law voters.
EoP law voters wonder if WiP law voters are too stupid [Equality by Lot: The Dunning-Kruger effect and its implications for voting] to become stupid consciousness [Simon Sinek: The Truth About being the Stupidest in the Room] active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle] literate.
AR-BS 05: So what now? We retake our lands, kick out the compromised, and cut off China. We end immigration and subsidies for the diverse, and it slowly goes away.
EoP-LJ 05: If those are your WiP law cultures goals. Good luck.
EoP law voters definitions of ‘our lands’ property-ration [property-ration] land reform [eop-landreform] and crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression] penalties are well documented. EoP law voters have no disagreement with ninety nine million potential EoP law voter CCCP Chinese; and honourable – Anders Breivik, Tarrant, Crusius [26 Jun: EoP Law Voter: Anders Breivik Parole Application Submission Offer] – green nationalists.
Only subsidy under EoP international law will be a property ration for life for any and all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom] voters.
AR-BS 06: Then, we get rid of this dysfunctional system (democracy).
EoP-LJ 06: Noted: Your WiP law voter goal is to get rid of your dysfunctional democracy.
EoP law voter observation: WiP law voters are constantly replacing one WiP law mafiocracy [mafiocracy] with a new WiP law mafiocracy. Sometimes they call their mafiocracy, a democracy, sometimes a theocracy, other are more overt honest and call their mafiocracy a dictatorship. The common theme appears to be that they are all mafiocracies.
AR-BS 07: The battle for now involves words, symbols, images, and ideas, in my view.
EoP-LJ 07: Your battle for now involves WiP law words, symbols, images and ideas.
If there is no active listening, no information sharing contact occuring, just verbal diarhea.
Some people join social movements to get a social contract revolution job done.
Soon as the social movement is disclosed by the WiP law media [eop-v-wip-media]: others join social movements for the same reasons that alienated young girls with fuck all fully informed consent communication skills [Sex Planations: Is it okay to hit on me?: The key is to hold safe space for dialogue]; go to rock concerts: to get their panties semen-autographed by the revolutionary rockstar [RT: Sweden seeks to arrest Assange on Rape Charges].
Norman Mailer remarked during the sixties that the problem with the sexual revolution was that it had gotten into the hands of the wrong people. He was right. It was in the hands of men. Sexual-revolution philosophy predates the sixties. It shows up in Left ideologies and movements with regularity–in most countries, in many different periods, manifest in various leftist “tendencies.” The sixties in the United States, repeated with different tonalities throughout Western Europe, had a particularly democratic character. One did not have to read Wilhelm Reich, though some did. It was simple. A bunch of nasty bastards who hated making love were making war. A bunch of boys who liked flowers were making love and refusing to make war. These boys were wonderful and beautiful. They wanted peace. They talked love, love, love, not romantic love but love of mankind (translated by women: humankind). They grew their hair long and painted their faces and wore colorful clothes and risked being treated like girls. In resisting going to war, they were cowardly and sissies and weak, like girls. No wonder the girls of the sixties thought that these boys were their special friends, their special allies, lovers each and every one. Or, as Robin Morgan wrote in 1970: “We have met the enemy and he’s our friend. And dangerous.” Acknowledging the forced sex so pervasive in the counterculture in the language of the counterculture, Morgan wrote: “It hurts to understand that at Woodstock or Altamont a woman could be declared uptight or a poor sport if she didn’t want to be raped.” These were the beginnings: recognizing that the brother-lovers were sexual exploiters as cynical as any other exploiters–they ruled and demeaned and discarded women, they used women to get and consolidate power, they used women for sex and for menial labor, they used women up; recognizing that rape was a matter of utter indifference to these brother-lovers–they took it any way they could get it; and recognizing that all the work for justice had been done on the backs of sexually exploited women within the movement. [SQ-AD: Right Wing Women: Abortion]
EoP law voter has crystal clear strategic goal [EoP UN Resolution: PDF: ELV PN Metrics pp.01-03/45; Encl: EoP UN Res: pp.04-45/45]; and strategic goal co-operator [eop-axis-oath] decision-maker participation requires fully informed consent [ego-literacy].
Joining as EoP Law Voter co-operator not currently advised:
Awaiting South Africa CRLRC and LPC – EoP Law voter culture – decision:
If CRLRC vote is: EoP Law voter community council registration denied. LJ v LS EoP Axis Alliance Heads of State [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.70], can [A] conclude whether they consider CRLRC decision response to EoP law voter community council resource conflict resolutions registration, as applicable to (a) all western and eastern nations lawyers and court clients; or (b) all african nations lawyers and court clients; or (c) all nations with predominantly western conflict resolution values lawyers and court clients; or (d) all nations based on some other socio-cultural lawyers and court client value factors; and [B] depending on their conclusions: either (a) authorize No EoP OKC TRC [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.67-70/70]; or (b) assist applicant with travel to another nation with a potentially different EoP TRC lawyer and court client voter UNGA mandate [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] result; for EoP TRC lawyer and court client voter UNGA mandate [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] negotiations to be conducted from such nation.
» EoP Leg Sub: 17 Jul: LJ Info Req Re: H45/19: EoP Law voter culture CRLRC Comm Cncl Registration.
EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Amerika: Brett Stevens:
Amerika: Brett Stevens (email@example.com)