EoP 2019 v RSA

EoP 2019 v RSA is an EoP Legal Submission that involves EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

.

Summary:

Request for Ecology of Peace Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za] – to submit to LJ v Brian Heuvel [lj-v-bh.tygae.org.za] respondents – in support of:

EoP Prisoner of Swamp Elections Ecological Overshoot Cold War TRC submission – via Official SA Representatives – to [A] High Contracting Parties of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner War, via Swiss Federal Council ITO Art 4A, 5 & 128; [B] Director-General of the Technical Secretariat of Chemical Weapons Convention ITO Art VIII, IX & XV; [C] Secretary-General of the United Nations ITO Art 5.1(d) & 9.2 & 121 of Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (“EoP PoW Cold War TRC / EoP Prisoner of Swamp Elections Ecological Overshoot Cold War TRC”).

A swamp election is any local, regional, or national political election where the nations electoral legislation is based upon Masonic War is Peace – clauses of international law that enable procreation and/or consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, which are the direct and indirect cause of resource depletion, ecological overshoot and all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict – international law. Politicians taking part in swamp elections consciously or unconsciously covertly and/or overtly bribe potential voters to vote for their candidacy by promising them individual or corporate – innocence for sale indulgences: legislative innocence for breeding/consumption crimes of aggression – welfare.

recommends among others the following amended definitions:

Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner of War:

Scarcity Combatant Parties to the Conflict:

Under WiP Intnl-law: Any individual, organisation or nation whose procreation or consumption footprint violates ecological carrying capacity limits, and/or advocacy on behalf of procreation or consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; should be designated as a conscious or unconscious ‘breeding/consumption’ scarcity combatant party to any local, regional, national or international resource scarcity related conflict.

Under EoP SciCult Intnl-Law: A Scarcity Combatant will be any man or woman who (a) refuses to sign their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za ] oath; and/or (b) who violates their responsible freedom oath; by being convicted of a breeding, consumption or deception crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za ] who shall be sentenced as follows: (a) negligent: sent to responsible freedom ego and/or eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za ] classes; (b) intentional: death penalty: they shall be given the opportunity to remove their genes from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of assisted suicide, within two weeks of sentencing and/or by a particular date as decided by the sentencing judge; and if not done by such date, will be humanely and orderly assassinated by law enforcement appointed assassination squad officials.

Chemical Weapons Convention:

Breeding/Consumption Weapons of War:

“We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis, the womb, and the ego. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population and consumption, to below carrying capacity limits; by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis, etc.; you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population; or using the ego to consume in violation of carrying capacity limits; an Act of War” – Amended version of quote by Judge Jason G. Brent, in Humans: An Endangered Species.

Biological Warfare:

Biological Warfare is a racial, religious or national tribal offensive resource thieving and/or defensive tribal resource protection military tactic.; resulting from global political, religious and religious leaders international law legislative strategy allowing for clauses of international law that enable procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits.

Chemical Warfare:

Chemical Warfare is a racial, religious or national tribal offensive resource thieving and/or defensive resource tribal protection military tactic; resulting from global political, corporate and religious leaders international law legislative strategy allowing for clauses of international law that enable procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits.

Defensive and Offensive Biological and Chemical Warfare:

All standing army state and/or guerrilla insurgency military – conventional, biological, chemical or nuclear warfare – tactics are enabled by international law that does not clearly legally define the difference between offensive – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits induced resource thieving – military tactics; and defensive – protection from other tribes procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits induced resource thieving – military tactics.

The use of biological or chemical warfare as a defensive – protection of tribal resources from another tribes procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits resource thieving economic or military warfare tactics – military tactic is very different than the use of biological or chemical warfare as an offensive  – intentional resource thieving of another tribe’s resources for own tribes growing procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits greed – military tactic.

Fraud of UN ‘Peace’ and ‘War’ Treaties:

Offensive and defensive cannon fodder standing armies and their creation and/or use of military chemical, biological, technological, electronic and other related warfare ingredients are a direct and indirect result of global political, corporate and religious leaders international law legislative strategy allowing for clauses of international law that enable procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits.

Any and all United Nations endorsed bi-national or international treaty related to ‘war’ or ‘peace’ whose treaty clauses fail to advocate on behalf of all WiP clauses of international law being replaced by EoP Scientific and Cultural [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] – requiring all citizens of all nations, races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za], and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements – clauses of law; are based upon deception and fraud; i.e. are fraudulent peace treaties.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court:

Political Party Leadership Crimes of Aggression Act of War:

The leadership of any political party, who is convicted of endorsing a political party policy platform that allows candidates to campaign in support of legislation, and/or to enact legislation enabling or advocating on behalf of citizen procreation, consumption or production of resources above ecological carrying capacity limits, shall be guilty of political party leadership ‘crime of aggression act of war’.

Prosecutors Crimes of Aggression Act of War:

Prosecutors who are convicted for consciously and/or intentionally failing to prosecute political party leaders whose political party policy platform allows candidates to campaign in support of legislation, and/or to enact legislation enabling or advocating on behalf of citizen procreation, consumption or production of resources above ecological carrying capacity limits, shall be guilty of prosecutorial ‘crime of aggression act of war’.

Citizen Scarcity Combatant Crimes of Aggression Act of War:

Any individual who is found guilty of consciously or unconsciously advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – clause of national or international law enabling or advocating on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources above ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.

Penalty for Crimes of Aggression Acts of War:

Individuals convicted of a breeding, consumption or deception crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za] shall be sentenced as follows: (a) negligent: sent to responsible freedom ego and/or eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] classes; (b) intentional: death penalty: they shall be given the opportunity to remove their genes from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of assisted suicide, within two weeks of sentencing and/or by a particular date as decided by the sentencing judge; and if not done by such date, will be humanely and orderly assassinated by law enforcement appointed assassination squad officials.

.

Related Cases:

Draft Documents:

Application for Referral to Mediation & Encl [PDF]:

  • Sheriff & Registrar:
    • Notice to Sheriff and/or Deputy [PDF]
    • Filing Sheet [PDF]
  • EoP PoW TRC Submission:
    • EoP Prisoner of Swamp Elections Ecological Overshoot Cold War TRC submission – via Official SA Representatives – to [A] High Contracting Parties of the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoner War, via Swiss Federal Council ITO Art 4A, 5 & 128; [B] Director-General of the Technical Secretariat of Chemical Weapons Convention ITO Art VIII, IX & XV; [C] Secretary-General of the United Nations ITO Art 5.1(d) & 9.2 & 121 of Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (“EoP PoW Cold War TRC / EoP Prisoner of Swamp Elections Ecological Overshoot Cold War TRC”) [PDF].
  • Statement of Claim:
    • Request for Info: Accuracy / Error of EoP RH FR Frame of Orientation [PDF]
    • Request for Info: Accuracy / Error of Ego Literacy Communication Policy [PDF]
    • Request for Info: Accuracy / Error of EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]
    • Prisoners of Swamp Elections Ecological Overshoot – racial, class, religious, gender and national – resource conflict, caused by clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits [PDF]
    • Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Culture Information Requested [PDF]
  •  Affidavit:
    • EoP TRC Info [PDF].
    • State v Lara Johnstone: 18 June 2002 Political and Military Necessity Iatrogenic origins of AIDS bomb threat to the P.W. Botha Airport trial [PDF]
  • Negotiation / Mediation Admin:
    • Notice of Motion [PDF]
    • Application for Referral to Mediation [PDF]
    • Invitation to Mediation [PDF]
    • Consent to Mediation [PDF]
    • Consent to Negotiation [PDF]
    • Decline to Negotiation and/or Mediation [PDF]
    • Printing and Filing Authorization [PDF]
    • Settlement Agreement [PDF]

.

Correspondence

EoP Leg Sub EoP 2019 v RSA correspondence

..