LJ v DE Johnson

Divorce Application in the matter of L Johnstone v Demian Johnson is one of the EoP Legal Submission cases involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

.

Summary: 

Mosselbay attorneys Malan Mohale Beyers were appointed by the High Court Registrar [PDF]; to provide Lara Johnstone with EoP and/or EoP and WiP cultural issue In Forma Pauperis ‘Assistance of Counsel’ legal representation; to help Lara resolve an Amicable Divorce with her African American husband: Demian Emile Johnson, in prison in California.

Malan Mohale Beyers engaged in repeated efforts to find out from South African courts to provide the court with a court approved summons that the opposing party: Demian Johnson had been served with the divorce documentation.

Once Malan Mohale Beyers found the correct court approved method for service of a divorce notice to an individual in prison in a foreign country; they requested Millers Inc Attorneys to draft the Affidavit documentation. Arno Crous requested Lara to draft a divorce affidavit providing the court with her reasons for her request for a divorce from Demian.

Lara drew up an affidavit, wherein she stated what she considered her subjective truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, regarding her request for a divorce from Demian. The affidavit included references to Lara objection to Masonic War is Peace culture of using marriage licensing; not as a legal bond to encourage procreation and consumption responsibility; but as a license to breed and consume as ‘self righteous’ brood sows and sperm donors; without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits natural law.

Malan Mohale Beyers telephoned Lara to inform her that someone – either at Millers Inc or Malan Mohale Beyers  –  objected to the content of Lara’s affidavit, and its reference to Masonic War is Peace legal system issues. He asked Lara if she would be willing to edit it and remove the reference to Masonic War is Peace legal system statements. Lara stated she was willing to edit the affidavit for clarity; but she was not willing to deceive the court by withholding information from the court; about reasons and/or background to her divorce application. He stated that the lawyers would refuse to file the affidavit if she did not remove the offensive statements in the affidavit. Lara stated that any lawyer that asked her to lie to the court about reasons for her divorce; could fuck off; she was not going to engage in perjury to a court.

Fact: Malan Mohale Beyers subsequently notified [PDF] Lara that Malan Mohale Beyers were terminating their In Forma Pauperis divorce legal representation of Lara and withdrawing the divorce application; because Lara had used “quite unsophisticated language” in response to Malan Mohale Beyers request that she engage in perjury to the court.

.

Correspondence:

EoP Leg Sub LJ v DE Johnson correspondence.

,.