USCAAF: CCR v USA

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

EoP Amicus Request to USCAAF: CCR v USA et al is one of the EoP Legal Submission cases, involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that requires all the worlds citizens of all races and religions to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; enabling humane and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation return to ecological carrying capacity limits.

.

Summary.

CCR v USA arose as an appeal/review of issues in dispute in US Army First Judicial Court: US v Bradley Manning.

The EoP Amicus requested the Court to support Pfc Manning to receive a Truthseeker trial, by providing primary access to controversial court submissions or transcripts to journalists or publications who practice scientific journalism, who are not preferential about publicly exposing any and all abuse of power.

Arguments: (i) EcoFeminist Radical Honoursty Transparency culture Wild Law Sustainable Security perspective to parties Anthropocentric Masculine Insecurity PR War of Pretend Transparency to profit from the ‘Control of Reproduction’ Human Farming War Economy Racket (ii) Pfc Manning cannot receive free and fair trial, if Media Abuse their Publicity Power.

USCAAF Judges and Clerk’s Refused to accept the EoP Amicus due to ‘indecent language, profanity and intemperate language’. USCAAF Judges and Clerk’s refusal appealed to US Supreme Court for Review in Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Documents

  • 24 Sep 2012: EoP Amicus Brief [PDF]
  • 16 Oct 2012: Petition for Reconsideration [PDF]
  • 09, 16 & 22 Oct 2012: USCAAF Judges and Clerk Orders & Correspondence [PDF]

..

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34