Chernaik v Brown

EoP Submission to Chernaik v Brown is one of the EoP Legal Submission cases involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

.

Summary

EoP culture summary interpretation of Chernaik application and supporting Amicus arguments: The Chernaik complaint [PDF] seeks a declaration from the Oregon court – or ultimately United States Supreme Court – that Oregon’s Governor and State officials have violated their duties to uphold the public trust and protect the State’s atmosphere as well as the water, land, fishery, and wildlife resources from the impacts of climate change; by establishing and enforcing adequate limitations on the levels of greenhouse gas emissions that will reduce the level of carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere to provide a livable future for the plaintiffs and all youth in Oregon.

The Chernaik application and supporting Amicus arguments – however well intended – (a) fail to clearly in simple language any village idiot citizen can understand; clarify that the root cause of any and all secular or theocratic State’s failure to protect the atmosphere as well as the water, land, fishery, and wildlife resources from the impacts of climate change; are the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’; (b) ignore Tragedy of the Commons principles; namely that the ultimate outcome of ‘Environmental law’ that does not clearly and explicitly restrict procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits; enabling breeding and/or consumption loophole for one cheater; is nuclear war.

“The difficult part of this is at least until now, certainly we have had a sufficient reservoir of natural resources, intellectual capacity to adapt, you name it, so we have stayed on the front side of that curve, for the most part, as a planet. But what happens when you put a financial crisis with a climate problem; with a weapon of mass destruction? Do you get to the point where you are at the so-called Tipping Point? Where is that tipping point? How close are we today versus our ability to adapt? ….. So for me, in my career, we’ve gone from worrying about the potential of losing a nation state to a war; to the so-called cold war of Mutual Assured Destruction; to a world today, where unfortunately today in forums like these we hear the words ‘species ending’.” — General James Cartwright, Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff: Leading Organizational Changes to Meet New Challenges; John Hopkins: Carey Business School: Leaders and Legends; 16 October 2008. Infographic: 16-09-08_jcartwrighttippingpts.

Consequently, even if the United States Supreme Court overdose on LSD overnight; and issue the Chernaik requested declaratory order, tomorrow; the declaratory order may as well be printed on toilet paper, for – in a socio-cultural, religious and legal environment that considers non-Europeans as cognitively incapable of a sincere and honest conversation about responsible freedom procreation, as detailed extensively in among others: EoP v Van Jones & Jeffrey Lord, EoP PoW: Anti-War, Disclosure & Race Relations Experts [PDF] – it will not provide on the ground State officials with the ability to do what needs to be done; to lawfully implement humane, transparent and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation; which is what is required for the protection of the planets remaining natural resources; and healing of the destroyed natural resources.

If or when the Chernaik Applicants amend their application to request the Court to issue a declaratory order that (a) clearly in simple language any village idiot citizen can understand; clarifies that the root cause of all Nation States failure to protect the atmosphere as well as the water, land, fishery, and wildlife resources from the impacts of climate change; are the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’; (b) grants declaratory legal and community support to State Governors and the President to officially and publicly begin International negotiations – by adopting any of the Ecology of Peace New World Order Negotiations social contract options used individually or in select combination or collectively; or other more suitable options – to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that shall (i) abolish the root ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’ causes of planetary resource depletion in all nations; affecting the future of all youths of all races, classes, religions in all nations; and (ii) replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that require all of the worlds citizens from all races, classes and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; and anyone convicted of breeding and/or consumption violations shall be eliminated from the planetary genepool; (c) then Chernaik Applicants shall sincerely demonstrate their willingness to cooperate with their Nation State Officials to implement an international law social contract enabling State Officials to embark upon honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; thereby enabling the protection of planetary resources for all species, including those who call themselves ‘humans’.
– EoP Leg Sub: 14 Sep: EoP Neg: Chernaik v Brown; CC: UNFCCC; GMACCC; EoP App: J Cartwright, P Olsen.

.

Correspondence:

EoP Leg Sub Chernaik v Brown correspondence.

.