WiP definitions of National Security
The protection or the safety of a country’s secrets and its citizens – MacMillan Dictionary.
It is clear that policymakers need a sharper focus as to what is and is not national security. It cannot be all things to all people; if it were, it would be meaningless. The definition of national security must be limited not only to decide what the government should be expected to do, but also, just as important, to decide what it should not do.
– Heritage: What is National Security?
National security is a concept that a government, along with its parliaments, should protect the state and its citizens against all kind of “national” crises through a variety of power projections, such as political power, diplomacy, economic power, military might, and so on. The concept developed all in the United States after World War II. Initially focusing on military might, it now encompasses a broad range of facets, all of which impinge on the non-military or economic security of the nation and the values espoused by the national society. Accordingly, in order to possess national security, a nation needs to possess economic security, energy security, environmental security, etc. Security threats involve not only conventional foes such as other nation-states but also non-state actors such as violent non-state actors, narcotic cartels, multinational corporations and non-governmental organisations; some authorities include natural disasters and events causing severe environmental damage in this category. – Wikipedia.
EoP Perspective of WiP National Security Definition:
In the EoP culture’s experience: In the absence of US Government – or any other government – officials providing a clear definition of ‘national security’; much of what most government officials refer to as ‘national security’ can probably be concluded to be defined as ‘illegal, irregular or embarrassing information about the fuck honour statements and or resource thieving actions of some Masonic War is Peace cockroach pretending to be a government official’.
— LJ v Weebly Hackers: 11 Oct: Weebly David Rusenko, San Francisco District Attorney, San Francisco Police: Re: Hacking Deletion of EoP Tygae and SQSwans Weebly websites; withdrawal of EoP suggested FSB Alternative Dispute Resolution.
A credible honourable court should find that the constitutional and legislative Social Contractentered into between any Civilized Patriarchy Government, and its citizens, particularly its military and national security employees, is a civilized patriarchy legal matrix contract, based upon deception and fraud, which does not meet the requirements of a fully informed consenting agreement.
Civilized Patriarchy War-is-Peace jurisprudence is any Constitution or legislation that grants citizens the inalienable right to breed and consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits.
Honest Civilized Patriarchy Social Contract jurisprudence would clearly and explicitly inform its citizens that any Constitution or legislation that grants citizens the inalienable right to breed and consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits; is ‘War is Peace’ jurisprudence, which socio-economically and psycho-politically benefits the socio-political, corporate and media elite.
An honest Civilized Patriarchy War-is-Peace Enlistment Agreement would inform any citizen that they are Enlisting to become a cannon fodder soldier to be dispatched to plunder other nation’s resources, and lie to their fellow citizens, because their own country’s ecologically illiterate social contract jurisprudence does not require their fellow citizens to procreate and consume below their nation’s carrying capacity levels.
An honest Civilized Patriarchy War-is-Peace Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement would explicitly inform a Military or Intelligence Employee that they are expected to keep the thieving, plundering and mass murder culling consequences secrets of the American civilized patriarchy socio-political elite, endorsed by the legal matrix jurists, and an Ecologically Illiterate constitution; to themselves.
— EoP Amicus Submission to FUC v NSA: 22 July 2013: Notice of Motion, Amicus Brief & Proof of Service [PDF]
Ecology of Peace National Security Definition:
Prior to Ecology of Peace international law social contract:
EoP National Security is ‘the necessity of individuals sincerely [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] concerned about (a) sustainably protecting natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reducing class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enabling honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to enable the International Court of Justice to confirm the legal certainty accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] principles, thereby authorizing the implementation [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] of EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] recommended Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; enabling orderly and humane EoP Land Reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za] denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] deindustrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za] return to living in harmony with ecological carrying capacity limits. [Updated 14.07.2018]
Under an Ecology of Peace international law social contract:
EoP Intnl Law National Security Definition Draft: Planetary security and hence National security is defined as ‘the necessity of individuals, families and nation states to unconditionally co-operate to (A) protect the Ecology of Peace international law social contract so as to (i) sustainably protect and conserve natural resources in accordance to local and national carrying capacity limits and (ii) restrict national and international inter-cultural resource war conflict; by (B) requiring their citizens to (a) monitor other individuals, tribes, or nation’s procreation and consumption behaviours to verify they are breeding and/or consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits; (b) report breeding and/or consumption cheater individual, family or national scarcity combatant violators to appropriate local or international authorities; and (c) eliminate convicted breeding and/or consumption scarcity combatant cheaters from the planetary genepool. [Updated 06.05.2017: Edited for clarity]
— EoPLeg Sub: 20 Sep: Eeben Barlow’s Military and Security Blog: The Dangers of Ignoring Strategic Intelligence.
Page Setup: 01 Dec 2017
Last Updated: 14 Jul 2018 [archive.is/amMgX]