EoP applications to Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee: ACCC/C/2013/82 (Norway) in terms of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters – is one of the EoP Legal Submission cases involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
Requests for Environmental Information submitted to:
- Norway: Norway Media: Adresseavisen; Aftenposten; Bergens Tidende; Dagbladet; NRK; TV2; VG; Norway Bar Associations: Advokat Foreningen / Bar Association.
- Germany: Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources / Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR): Federal Minister of Economics and Technology.
- United Kingdom: The Guardian: Editor: Alan Rusbridge & Journalist: Glenn Greenwald.
They ignored the request. A Request for Environmental Information to Norway Media and Norway Bar Association, was then submitted via Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee; Case: ACCC/C/2013/82 (Re: Norway); who ruled it was ‘inadmissible’.
A Request for Environmental Information from Norway, Germany and United Kingdom, was then submitted in an application – LJ v ACCC – filed to the Curia General Court in Luxembourg: Re: Requests for Environmental Information to Norway, Germany & UK. The Curia Court Registrar stated that they Curia Court did not have jurisdiction over the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee and that the application should be filed with the European Court of Human Rights.
Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee: ACCC/C/2013/82 (Norway):
- 11 Mar 2013: Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee – Alleged Non-Compliance by Kingdom of Norway with the obligations under the Aarhus Convention: Denial of Request for Access to Environmental Information from (a) Newspaper Editors, and (b) Bar Association; by Norwegian Environment Appeals Committee and Parliamentary Ombudsman [PDF].
- 23 April 2013: Economic Commission for Europe Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters Compliance Committee Fortieth meeting Geneva, 25–28 March 2013 Report of the Compliance Committee on its fortieth meeting [PDF]: Paragraph 38: Re: 38. Communication ACCC/C/2013/82 (Norway).
- 26 Apr 2013: Secretary to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee: Aphrodite Smagadi: Re: Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee concerning compliance by Norway with provisions of the Convention in connection to access to information and access to justice (ref: ACCC/C/2013/82) [PDF]
- 9 Jul 2013: Secretary to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee: Aphrodite Smagadi: Re: Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee concerning compliance by Norway with provisions of the Convention in connection to access to information and access to justice (ref: ACCC/C/2013/82)[PDF]
EoP Leg Sub ACCC 13-82 Norway correspondence.