Norway v Anders Breivik

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

EoP Applications to Norway Courts in Norway v Anders Breivik are some of the EoP Legal Submission cases involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

.

NO v AB Case Summary:

EoP Applications to Norway v Anders Breivik cases in Oslo District Court and Norway Supreme Court, et al.

.

Documents

LJ & AB Correspondence:

  • 12-08-13: LJ Letter to AB: Request Clarification: RE: Habeus Mentem, Amicus Curiae and Review Applications Filed [PDF]
  • 14-01-16: Inter-Cultural ‘Peace Negotiations’ Notice from Non-Masonic Radical Honoursty culture to Nordic Freemason culture: Anders Breivik: Swedish foundation Expo Diag published an article about an alleged Breivik ‘Peace negotiations’ Letter to International Media; but provided no scientific journalism source to the alleged original letter from Breivik. Request confirmation: Did you – Anders Breivik – write such a letter, and if so: Radical Honoursty culture response to such Freemason culture ‘peace negotiation’ letter. [PDF]

LJ Report:

  • 22 April 2012: Earth Day: Acquittal or Firing Squad: If it Bleads, It Leads: Media’s Population Terrorism Connection: Encl: Whores of the Court by Margaret Hagen PhD [PDF]

European Court of Human Rights: Johnstone v Norway

  • 13-01-10: Application under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights
    and Rules 45 and 47 of the Rules of Court: Violations of Right to an Effective Remedy, by Supreme Court Secretary General and Parliamentary Ombudsman: ‘Norway’s Politically Correct Discrimination & Censorship of Cultural Conservatives, by Feminists and Multiculturalists justified the Violent ‘Necessity’ of 22 July 2011 Attacks’ – Anders Breivik [PDF]
  • 14-04-30: ECHR: JvN: JK Wojtyczek Ruling: Inadmissible [PDF]

Oslo District Court Applications & Correspondence

  • To be sorted and uploaded

Oslo Supreme Court Applications & Correspondence

  • To be sorted and uploaded

Environmental Appeals Board

  • To be sorted and uploaded

KRIPOS Complaint & Correspondence

  • To be sorted and uploaded

Parliamentary Ombudsman Complaint & Correspondence

  • To be sorted and uploaded

Supervisory Committee of Judges Complaint & Correspondence

  • To be sorted and uploaded

Norway and International Press Councils Complaint & Correspondence

  • To be sorted and uploaded

Bar Council Complaint & Correspondence

  • To be sorted and uploaded

.

Correspondence:

EoP Leg Sub NO v Breivik, LJ v Norway correspondence.

.

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34