CA Prisoners v USA


EoP Amicus Request to UNGWAD: CA Prisoners v USA is one of the EoP Legal Submission cases involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.



These California Prisoner Petitioner’s, like Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, Beate Zschape, Anders Breivik, Bradley (aka Chelsea Manning) and Edward Snowden, Bernard Bey and Michael Dunn, and many millions (if we consider historically, it would be billions) of others, are simply low-level left/right, white/black, Muslim/Christian Ethnic-Conflict foot-soldiers, of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Flat Earth ‘Rule of Force’ social contract jurisprudence.

A credible Committee should find that the constitutional and legislative Social Contract entered into between the United Nations and National Governments around the world; and the social contracts entered into by National Governments around the world and their citizens, are founded on Taker Scarcity-Combatant Civilized Patriarchy AnthroCorpocentric Flat Earth ‘Rule of Force’ social contract jurisprudence; based upon deception and fraud, which does not meet the requirements of a fully informed consenting agreement.

For the purposes of this Amicus Eco-Innocent and Scarcity-Combatant have the following meanings:

  • Taker Scarcity-Combatant: an individual/ who is/are not physically or intellectually capable of (i) responsible procreation and/or consumption below carrying capacity limits and /or (ii) engaging in Voluntarist (fully informed consent) agreements.
  • Leaver Eco-Innocent: an individual who is physically and intellectually capable of (i) responsible procreation and consumption below carrying capacity limits and (ii) engaging in Voluntarist (fully informed consent) agreements.
  • Taker Scarcity-Combatant Social Contracts: is any social contract constitution that (A) provides its citizens the ‘Inalienable Right’ to Breed and Consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits; and (B) the Inalienable Right to Vote, without regard for ecological and egological literacy; but (C) demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc.
  • Leaver Eco-Innocent Social Contracts: is any social contract constitution that is founded on CommonSism Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence which requires all of its citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits and only grants ecologically and egologically literate citizens’ licences to vote.

Scarcity-Combatant International Treaty’s and Nation state constitutions – frequently fraudulently legally labelled as ‘democracies’ (which if defined for the ignorant scarcity-combatant populace means: the legal imposed tyranny of the ecological and egological illiterate majority) – fail to clearly and simply disclose that they are founded upon Civilized Patriarchy AnthroCorpocentric Flat Earth ‘Rule of Force’ principles: (a) provide their scarcity-combatants the inalienable right to breed and consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits; which socio-politically manifests as a Control of Reproduction Human Factory Farming Breeding War Economy racket and a Control of Consumption Global Corporate Cultural Imperialism racket, (b) these Breeding and Consumption War rackets consequently violate carrying capacity limits, resulting in ecological overshoot, surplus vote-cannon-fodder populations, economic hierarchical inequality, and scarcity induced local, national and international conflict and resource wars; (c) that ecological overshoot in multi-cultural/ethnic/religious communities, manifests as inter-cultural / ethnic / religious conflict; (d) inter-cultural / ethnic conflict is a great divide and conquer tool to manipulate the proletariat to perceive other cultural/ethnic proletariat as the source of their own overshoot-scarcity-conflict misery; as opposed to demanding their Duhmockery leaders implement an Eco-Innocent International and National Social Contracts in accordance with the Ecology of Peace Commandment: “Thou shalt not legislate, enforce, or obey laws which enable citizens procreation or consumption to transgress cultural carrying capacity limits.”

Speaking frankly (as opposed to the political correct bullshit the public legal PR parlance of Duhmockery): The Prisoner Petitioners and their families are (1) ignorant scarcity-combatant members of surplus fodder  (vote, cannon, or otherwise) slave (brood sow, sperm donor, debtor, etc) populations; (2) Oblivious of the reality that the foundation stones of Scarcity-Combatant International and National Social Contracts are in fact, not clarity, informed consent, fairness and justice; but in fact ambiguity, plausible deniability, coercion, arbitrariness and deception, etc; (3) Finally a plausible cause of the Petitioner’s ignorance being that a significant number of their Scarcity-Combatant leaders support the continued implementation of Scarcity-Combatant social contracts, because they subjectively believe (perhaps inaccurately) that the majority of their scarcity-combatant subjects subconsciously prefer or consciously insist on being lied to and deceived; and would not take the opportunity to prove that they appreciate being provided with constructive criticism from their leaders about how to gain their release by committing to supporting the implementation of an Eco-Innocent social contract.

Consequently Amici recommends that Petitioners should (A) engage in an investigative enquiry to determine how many of California’s prisoners (county jail, general population and solitary confinement) would commit to supporting California’s legislature to implement an Eco-Innocent social contract constitution of clarity, informed consent, fairness and justice based upon ecological resource carrying capacity reality and Voluntarist principles; for California; by (B) providing the Respondents and United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; in this matter; with said Petitioner’s signed MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Citizen Oaths (which must include a paragraph that specifies the Petitioner’s agreement to be surgically sterilized, prior to being released by CDC).



  • 25 Feb 2014: Æquilibriæx Sustainable Security Theses Brief In Propria Persona by Amici Curiae, Andrea Muhrrteyn, an Alien on Pale Blue Dot in support of CA Prisoners who sign the MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Citizen Oath, legally agreeing to (a) be sterilized prior to their release and (b) to consume below carrying capacity limits for the rest of their lives; to be released by the CDC. [PDF]



EoP Leg Sub CA Prisoners v USA correspondence.