EoP Answers to Egyptian President Al Sisi — re: Pres Al-Sisi’s ‘We Must Revolutionize Our Religion’ statement to Islamic Scholars at Al-Azhar — is one of the EoP Legal Submission cases involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
EoP Ansa to Egyptian Pres Al-Fattah Al-Sisi at Al-Azhar: We Must Revolutionize Our Religion:
Francis Al Sisi: Is it conceivable that 1.6 billion [ Muslims / masons / Christians / Catholics / Europeans / Africans ] could kill the worlds remaining population of 7 billion, so that they could live (on their own)?
We spoke earlier about the importance of the religious discourse, and I would like to reiterate that we are not doing enough with regard to true religious discourse. The problem has never been with our faith. Perhaps the problem lies in ideology, and this ideology is sanctified among us. I am talking about religious discourse that is in keeping with its times.
I am addressing the religious scholars and clerics. We must take a long, hard look at the current situation. I have talked about this several times in the past. We must take a long, hard look at the situation we are in.
It is inconceivable that the ideology we sanctify should make our entire nation a source of concern, danger, killing, and destruction all over the world. It is inconceivable that this ideology. I am referring not to “religion,” but to “ideology” – the body of ideas and texts that we have sanctified in the course of centuries, to the point that challenging them has become very difficult.
It has reached the point that (this ideology) is hostile to the entire world. It is conceivable that 1.6 billion (muslims) would kill the worlds population of 7 billion, so that they could live (on their own)? This is inconceivable.
I say these things here, at Al-Azhar, before religious clerics and scholars. May Allah bear witness on Judgment Day to the truth of your intentions, regarding what I say to you today.
You cannot see things clearly when you are locked (in this ideology). You must emerge from it and look from outside, in order to get closer to a truly enlightened ideology. You must oppose it with resolve.
Let me say it again: We need to revolutionize our religion. [applause]
Honorable Imam (the Grand Sheik of Al-Azhar), you bear responsibility before Allah. The world in its entirety awaits your words, because the Islamic nation is being torn apart, destroyed, and is heading to perdition. We ourselves are bringing it to perdition.
EoP A: It is conceivable that 1.6 billion [ Muslims / masons / Christians / Catholics / Europeans / Africans ] could kill the worlds remaining population of 7 billion, so that they could live (on their own).
As far as I am aware it is quite possible for less than 1 million military officials with access to psychotronic technology to kill the remaining worlds population of 6 plus billion. See psychotronic technology referred to in EoP Axis.
NB Caveat: I could be wrong; and even if I am right; just because such military officials have access to the technology; does not necessarily mean they shall use it; or that if they choose to use it; that they shall follow my recommendations for whom to kill.
If the technology exists as described; and if those with the technology intend to use it; they are faced with the question: whom should live and whom should be evacuated from the planetary genepool?
It would depend on the primary existential values of those with access to the mass killing technology’s: whom they would prefer to get rid of; whether such decision is based upon some form of objectively reasonable standard based upon merit and merit alone; excluding questions of race, class, culture or religion; or whether such decision is made by one group based on their particular religion: Masonic elite; Muslim; Christian; Capitalist, Communist, or racial factors; etc.
I personally don’t have any problems with any group of individuals making the decision for an orderly and humane depopulation of the planet; to return to ecological carrying capacity limits.
As such I am quite in agreement with Stalin’s: The death of one eco-innocent is a tragedy; the death of 6 billion scarcity combatants a statistic.
My thoughts on the issue are that if you are an honourable person; you give the person/s you consider to be behaving in a manner that justifies their death; the In Your Face legal notice —EoP ICC Complaint — opportunity to be informed that their behaviour is unlawful and considered worthy of extermination from the genepool; should they refuse to alter it. If they don’t amend their ways; or provide a reasonable justification for their refusal; then you have made your honourable efforts to inform them in crystal clear terms they understand; what the consequences shall be if they refuse to alter their ways or provide justification for their behaviour. Essentially it is a fully informed consent assisted suicide; no different than that of Armin Meiwes and Bernd Brandes fully informed consenting cannibalism.
If I can help the ultimate decision-makers to make the process more fair, honourable; orderly and humane; between racial, class or religious warring parties; I do what I can; while I think they are sincere.
Personally I think the decision should be based upon Ecology of Peace co-operator merit; anyone from any class, race, culture or religion who is willing to take responsibility for cooperating to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; by signing an EoP Axis oath; but if others decide on a racial or class or some other factors that exclude me; I am okay with that.
All I ask is: I’d like to spend a few months / years physically with Timothy; somewhere off-grid remote with my honey; before we choose to depart together..
— EoP Leg Sub: 01 Nov: Stephen Filipiak: Aloha Gambia Natural Farming & Knock Knock Uganda PC Mortal Kombat; Ernesto Sirolli: Want to help someone? Shut up and listen.
— Excerpt: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: City Lotto Notices: Uganda [PDF]: Peace Corps Volunteers: Stephen Filipiak Aloha Gambia; CC: Jenny Everett: Knock Knock Uganda [PDF].
EoP Legal Submissions EoP AlSisi correspondence.