* Jordan Peterson .. Our Children’s Trust
» Jordan Peterson, ETFO: Elementary Teachers Foundation of Ontario, Valerie Dugale, Izida Zorde, Waterloo Region, Canadian Race Relations Foundation, Dept of Canadian Heritage, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, Nunavut Regional Office, Univ of Ontario Students in Support of Free Speech, Mari Jang, Baruch Harari, Chad Hallman, York Univ Students in Support of Free Speech, Queens Univ Law Faculty, Bruce Pardy, Lynne Hanson, Mary-Jo Maur, Philip Osanic, Richard Chaykowski, Will Kymlicka, David Lyon, Chery Metcalfe, Gregoire Webber, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Our Children’s Trust.
* 13 Jul: EoP Re: ETFO & Jordan Peterson: Education vs Indoctrination Info for High School Students.
» Vlad Tepes: Jordan Peterson on the morals of the contemporary left.
» 15 Jul: EoP Response to: Mari Jang: ETFO & Jordan Peterson: Education vs Indoctrination Info for High School Students.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: Chernaik v Brown, Standing Rock v USACE, EoP v Jordan Peterson, EoP v Indigenous Orgs / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Academia, Eop v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP RH FR / EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:07 PM
Subject: EoP Re: ETFO & Jordan Peterson: Education vs Indoctrination Info for High School Students.
To: “ETFO: Elementary Teachers Foundation of Ontario: Valerie Dugale” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Izida Zorde <email@example.com>, Waterloo Region <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Canadian Race Relations Foundation <email@example.com>, Dept of Canadian Heritage <PCH.info-info.PCH@canada.ca>,
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada <InfoPubs@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>, Nunavut Regional Office <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Univ of Ontario Students in Support of Free Speech <email@example.com>, Mari Jang <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Baruch Harari <email@example.com>, Chad Hallman <firstname.lastname@example.org>, York Univ Students in Support of Free Speech <email@example.com>, Bruce Pardy <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Lynne Hanson <email@example.com>, Mary-Jo Maur <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Phlip Osanic <email@example.com>, Will Kymlicka <firstname.lastname@example.org>, David Lyon <email@example.com>, Chery Metcalfe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Gregoire Webber <email@example.com>
TO: Jordan Peterson
TO: Elementary Teachers Foundation of Ontario
CC: CRRF, CA Heritage, Indigenous & Northern Affairs Canada
CC: Students in Support of Free Speech
CC: Queens University Law Faculty
Jordan Peterson: @jordanbpeterson
Elementary Teachers Foundation of Ontario:
ETFO: Elementary Teachers Foundation of Ontario: Valerie Dugale (firstname.lastname@example.org); Izida Zorde (email@example.com); Waterloo Region (firstname.lastname@example.org); @ETFOnews
CRRF, CA Heritage, Indigenous & Northern Affairs Canada:
Canadian Race Relations Foundation (email@example.com); Dept of Canadian Heritage (PCH.info-info.PCH@canada.ca);
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (InfoPubs@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca); Nunavut Regional Office (firstname.lastname@example.org); @GCIndigenous
Students in Support of Free Speech:
Univ of Ontario Students in Support of Free Speech (email@example.com); Mari Jang (firstname.lastname@example.org); @literalotter; Baruch Harari (email@example.com); Chad Hallman (firstname.lastname@example.org); @ChadBHallman2; York Univ Students in Support of Free Speech (email@example.com)
Queens University: Law Faculty:
Bruce Pardy (firstname.lastname@example.org); Lynne Hanson (email@example.com); Mary-Jo Maur (firstname.lastname@example.org); Phlip Osanic (email@example.com); Richard Chaykowski (firstname.lastname@example.org); Will Kymlicka (email@example.com); David Lyon (firstname.lastname@example.org); Chery Metcalfe (email@example.com); Gregoire Webber (firstname.lastname@example.org);
ETFO & Jordan Peterson:
EoP Re: ETFO & Jordan Peterson: Education vs Indoctrination Info for High School Students.
This is a multi-tasking correspondence to provide you with information about Ecology of Peace culture values and advocacy, for your ‘promote social justice in the areas of peace, anti-poverty, non-violence, and equity’ and ‘identify corrupted and ideologically possessed university disciplines’ consideration.
I found out the following from listening to a speech Jordan Peterson gave to Toronto Students in Support of Free Speech:
The Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario’s plan – as stated on their website — is to re-organize the curriculum’s from kindergarden to grade eight, so that children are taught to be social justice warriors from the moment they step foot in the public education system.
– Jordan Peterson: Postmodern NeoMarxism: Diagnosis and Cure.
I am hoping that with concerted effort it will be possible to identify the corrupted and ideologically-possessed university disciplines across campuses world-wide and to drive down their new enrolment by 75% over the next five years. As of now a website is being designed to help students (and their parents) identify postmodern cult courses from course descriptions, so that those who would rather be educated than indoctrinated can make a choice (and, I suppose, for those who wish the opposite to make a choice as well).
– Jordan Peterson: Postmodern NeoMarxism: Diagnosis and Cure.
I checked ETFO’s website and found the following:
One of ETFO’s priorities is “…to promote social justice in the areas of peace, anti-poverty, non-violence, and equity.” ETFO recognizes that we live in a society characterized by individual and systemic discrimination against particular groups. Within this context, ETFO defines equity as fairness achieved through proactive measures that result in equality for all.
– ETFO: Building a Just Society: A Social Justice Union.
Definitions: Education, Indoctrination, Social Justice, Corruption, Bribe & Fraud:
Generally speaking the following are considered mainstream definitions:
Education: noun: * the process of receiving or giving systematic instruction, especially at a school or university; * an enlightening experience
Indoctrination: noun: * the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically.
Social Justice: noun: * justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society.
Corruption: noun: * dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery.
Bribe: verb: * dishonestly persuade (someone) to act in one’s favour by a gift of money or other inducement.
Fraud: noun: * wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain; * a person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities.
Ecology of Peace Educational Info: Re: Honesty, Factual Reality and Nonviolent Cooperative Problem Solving Communication Policy:
Ecology of Peace culture – academic, psychotherapy, legal etc – information may be of interest to individuals who are interested in information focused on (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecologically carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative problem solving focused on identifying and eliminating the root causes of problems.
Put differently, Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality is EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation:
So although there are a very large number of interpretations of the world; there are unbelievably severe constraints; on the number of functional interpretations there are in the world. – – Jordan Peterson: Postmodern NeoMarxism: Diagnosis and Cure.
Definition of Religion [Culture]: Group-Shared System of Thought and Action that Offers the Individual a Frame of Orientation and an Object of Devotion:
“To clarify, “religion” [or culture] as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols or even to a system perceived as religion, but to any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not have religion.
This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it.
.. A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct. Often however, individuals are not even aware of the real objects of their personal devotion and mistake their “official” beliefs for their real, though secret religion. If, for instance, a man worships power while professing a religion of love, the religion of power is his secret religion, while his so-called official religion, for example Christianity, is only an ideology.” – Erich Fromm, To Have or to Be, pp.135-136
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality aka Eco-Literacy:
 Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
– EoP RH FR: EoP Cooperator: Cooperating to Implement an EoP Intnl Law Social Contract.
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles are the working hypothesis conclusion ‘Objective Reality’ foundation upon which the — military gospel: science of the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits causes of resource conflict and war — Ecology of Peace conceptual home is built. Any individual with evidentiary information detailing any error of fact or logic in EoP RH FR principles is requested to provide such evidence in writing to the EoP MILED Clerk; for correction of EoP RH FR principles; if evidence so requires.
EoP RH FR aka Eco/Ego Literacy are also the foundation for EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
– EoP RH FR: Summary.
Egological Literate Honourable Discourse aka Ego Literacy:
Clarify your preferences; to enable people being communicated to, to clearly know what you want; and whether they are willing to engage you in entering into an agreement; to help you get what you want; and reciprocally whether you can help them to get what they may want.
Always respond to verbal and written correspondence: from honourable communicators, with a sincere honest response. If you don’t have time to respond; inform them by when they can expect a response.
You sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual, irrespective of their political ideology (right wing to left wing), religion, race or culture. Active listening means you verify that your interpretation of their statements is accurate; before concluding that you have ‘heard their argument’.
You focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible descriptive words; as opposed to abstract concepts. If or where you do use abstract concepts; you are willing to define your meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance.
You evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not their race, religion or political ideology; etc.
If you are not convinced by the quality of their evidence on any particular issue; you are willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and if they are wiling to engage in cooperative truthseeking to get better evidence so that you are both able to get more quality evidence; so that a stronger beyond reasonable doubt conclusion can be drawn on the particular issue in dispute.
You remain in the conversation until you find agreement; and support each other on other issues that you do agree upon; based upon more conclusive buck stops here evidence.
If conflict sincerely arises in the discussion about the issue, you are committed to remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing yourselves to get over your anger; as opposed to requiring yourself or others to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons.
If or where sincere conflict arises: if sincere about resolving the disagreement; engage each other to find a fair ‘buck stops here’ arbitrator; whose arbitration values are based upon the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, based upon the evidence, the whole evidence and nothing but the evidence. Once the emotional steam has been released through the conflict resolution process; both parties will find themselves in a more calm neutral space where the truthseeking conversation can proceed.
If at any point during discussion; or arbitration proceedings; their evidence proves any of your evidence for any of your ideological, racial or religious working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; you love reason and logic more than your ego-identity and hence you are willing to publicly change your mind, on that particular subject and amend your ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided; and if necessary to apologize.
– EoP ADR: Ego & Eco Literacy.
EoP welcome constructive criticism exposing any errors in any working hypothesis objective reality principles. If you notice any, kindly inform us of such error, so that we can correct our working hypothesis to more accurately reflect reality.
Ecology of Peace culture has made various EoP legal submissions to (i) High School Educators and University students, namely: * Chernaik v Brown, * EoP v SA High Schools; * LJ v Fees Commission; (ii) Individuals or Groups who self-identify as ‘Indigenous’: * Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v US Army Corp of Engineers; * Norway v Anders Breivik; * Germany v Beate Zschape; * United Kingdom v Thomas Mair.
State Official Responses contains a summary of the official state – juridical, legislative and executive – responses to EoP legal submissions filed to their courts; arbitration bodies; and/or State Officials.
None of the Magistrates and/or Judges who accepted EoP Legal Submissions applications and/or evidence into the court proceedings, they presided over, have made any written legal ruling, proving any EoP legal evidence submitted to the court proceedings they presided over, to be evidentiary deficient or inaccurate. I imagine, their lack of an EoP or partial EoP legal written order finding, has been the result of all the other parties in the cases, and/or their lawyers, refusal to even discuss, let alone, investigate the EoP evidence submitted into the court proceedings, to determine its legal certainty or plausible legal working hypothesis enquiry accuracy or not.
Three legal findings/rulings – by North Carolina Legislators, SA Gender Commission and the Russian FSB: Federal Security Service – could be interpreted as partial or reasonably close to full EoP findings/rulings.
Re: War of Ideas: Hundred Million Corpses & Moral Character:
This is fundamentally a war of ideas and that’s the level of analysis that it should be fought upon. Not only is it a war of ideas, I think its a war that could be won, because I think the French intellectual postmodernists are a pack of uhm, what would you call them. Start with charlatans, or pseudo-intellectual would be a good one. I would also consider them highly deceptive in their intellectual strategies because almost all of them were Marxists student intellectuals, and they knew by the time the Gulag Archipelago came out, and even before that, that the nightmares of the Soviet Union and Maoist were of such magnitude that they had completely invalidated any ethical clame to justification that the fundamental marxist manifestation had managed to manifest. So it’s a no go zone, as far as I am concerned. Intellectually the games over, we’ve already figured out that there are finite constraints on interpretations, and we also understand how and why those exist and evolved. There is absolutely no excuse whatsoever in the 21st century to put forth Marxist doctrines as if.they are the balm that is administered by the compassionate to the downtrodden. Sorry, tried that, didn’t work. We’ve got a hundred million corpses to prove it. That’s plenty for me, and if its not enough for you; well then you should do some serious thinking; either about your historical knowledge or about your moral character.
– Jordan Peterson: Postmodern NeoMarxism: Diagnosis and Cure.
EoP v WiP NWO Neg’s: How and Where to Bury Six Billion People?:
Impending Peak Resources Economic/Ecological collapse will have ~6 Billion Excess Death Rate: Peak: 100-200 million/year, for 75 years; WWII excess death rate was only 10 million for six years.
Population Decline: Paul Chefurka: The Population Elephant in the Room: includes A Simple Model of Population Decline that addresses different issues of: Parameters,When Will The Decline Start?,How Much Control Will We Have?, How Many People Will Be Left?, concluding with among others: “The final graph is the outcome of the full simulation. It starts from our current population and shows the combined effects of a declining net birth rate and the excess death rate due to falling carrying capacity as described above. The goal of the model has been met: it has achieved a sustainable world population of one billion by the year 2082. The human cost of such an involuntary population rebalancing is, of course, horrific. Based on this model we would experience an average excess death rate of 100 million per year every year for the next 75 years to achieve our target population of one billion by 2082. The peak excess death rate would happen in about 20 years, and would be about 200 million that year. To put this in perspective, WWII caused an excess death rate of only 10 million per year for only six years..” – SQSwans: Paul Cherfurka.
» IG: 17-07-11_putinnnr-scaliamilnec-tainterb52.
Russia Economic Collapse: 50-65% population dieoff: “There are places in Russia between 1995 and 2005 where we saw as high as 65% [dieoff] decline in population [due to Economic Collapse Financial Crisis]” – [EoP Amended] James Cartwright, Leading Organizational Challenges to Meet New Challenges: John Hopkins: Carey Business School: Leaders and Legends: 16 October 2008 – JHU Carey Business.
» IG: 17-07-11_putinnnr-scaliamilnec-tainterb52.
[..] Ecology of Peace culture’s simple egologically literate –– Culture Change to EoP Honour Ecofootprint Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics: ‘whom should be removed from the planetary lifeboat genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’? –– conversation suggestions to EoP Axis nations to cooperate  to implement a new Ecology of Peace social contract based economic order; to address the massive impending planetary social conflict problems resulting from climate change, peak food, peak water, peak oil, including how and where to bury 6 billion people on the path to a responsible freedom low tech agrarian sustainable future; including an ecological carrying capacity based definition of among others ‘sustainability’ can be found at: EoP NTE GMA: 05 Dec: FEC: EoP NTE GMA POTUS submission to FEC: Hamilton Electors.
 EoP ADR: Ego and Ecological Literacy.  EoP NWO SCO: 26 Jan: Tall Ships & Culture Change to EoP Honour Ecofootprint Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics?  EoP NWO SCO: 25 Jan: US Army Reserve Command Ft Bragg NC: Leaders Shrinking Lifeboat Course Activity creates biases awareness.  The Community Solution: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil.  Real News: Paul Jay’s Reality Asserts Itself: Who Makes US Foreign Policy interview of Lawrence Wilkerson; particularly the predatory capitalism part.  Tompkins Conservation: The Next Economy: Transitions from Globalization to Eco-Localism.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 07 Dec: Real Donald Trump .. The Hill.
» IG: 17-07-11_putinnnr-scaliamilnec-tainterb52.
EoP v WiP NWO Neg’s: Whom Should the Military Kill?:
One of the EoP v WiP NWO Military Negotiations strategic and tactical topics of discussion is: The Operative Question for Military Commanders: Whom Should the Military Kill?
The ‘Whom Should the Military Kill’ military strategic and tactical discussions – following on from EoP US Army Ft Bragg – are different and similar; to the Nazi Party’s Wannsee Conference, chaired by Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich, held in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee on 20 January 1942, the purpose of which was to clearly legally define ‘Who is and is not a Jew’, in order to formalize plans for the Final Solution to the Jewish Question—the deportation and genocide of all Jews in German-occupied Europe.
Similarities: To provide EoP Axis military officials with a clear legal definition of an Eco Innocent and Scarcity Combatant – whether Jew, European, African, American, South African, Christian, Muslim, Catholic, Buddhist, communist, capitalist, nationalist, liberal, conservative, lawyer, judge, psychologist, farmer, janitor, teacher, or unemployed — so that their soldiers, or any civilians they conscript into militia’s; are clear – if or when they consider EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation or some similar form of ‘Military Final Solution’ necessary; for example: if EoP Legal Truth and Reconciliation Commission Legal/Military Tribunals – as suggested in Citizen v R McBride and EoP v Nobel are obstructed or fail – as to whom should not be killed and whom should be killed.
Differences: (i) EoP culture’s Final Solution to the Scarcity Combatant Question EoP v WiP negotiations are public, published and available online. They are available in the court record – for example: SA Constitutional Court: The Citizen v Robert McBride – where the Judges and/or any other party consented to them being submitted for consideration to the issues in dispute in the proceedings. They are consequently publicly available to any individual of any race, religion or culture, whom has been informed of their existence, for them to read and incorporate into their personal and/or relating values; to discuss and share the information with their family or community; and/or if sincere about non-violent resolution to resource conflict; to do whatever they can to cooperate; to implement an EoP Intnl law social contract. The Nazi party’s Final Solution to the Jewish Question negotiations were private and secret; not even Jewish and European Germans were aware of them until many years after WWII. (ii) EoP culture’s negotiations – and EoP scientific and cultural law Truth and Reconciliation Military Tribunal recommendations regarding whom should be killed, how, by whom and when – are based upon scientific ecological carrying capacity principles; and submitted to Scarcity Combatant Respondents as part of legal proceedings, to inform them of the Scarcity Combatant War Criminal charges against them; and how and what they can do to take responsibility and make amends for their former breeding/consumption war scarcity combatant lifestyles. The Nazi Party’s ‘Final Solution to the Jewish Question’ Negotiations recommendations were based upon racial Aryan supremacist ideology.
“In order to conserve fuel, expand capacity and improve supply, certain measures were taken; [to be able to provide Commanders with the opportunity to have required resources available to change course, with speed, if or when so required, or circumstances provided such an opportunity]. First it was a court martial offence to waste fuel. …” – Military History Visualized: General Mattis’ Way of War (2001 – 2003).
» IG: 17-07-08_mattiscrashcourse-fenwayparkexpgrowth.
“Mattis stated in an interview with the author of the Mattis Way of War case study that if he could outfight the enemy commander; he wouldn’t have to fight his troops.” – Military History Visualized: General Mattis’ Way of War (2001 – 2003).
In the context of outfighting the enemy commander, which is – if you are an honourable warrior – always to find a win-win just solution to the resource conflict dispute you are engaged in: I don’t think it matters if the General or Admiral in charge of the troops has a vagina [Russian Resurrection: Battalion; The Great War: Russia’s New Offensive – The Russian Women’s Battalion of Death; Battle of the Camel: Mohammeds Wife Aisha] or a penis, or both or none, if the General or Admiral’s ego’s are capable of confronting Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles.
In that context, the only operative question for such military commander’s honourable discussion, between themselves and with their troops; is: Whom should the military kill?
The EoP Scientific & Cultural Law EoP TRC [Truth & Reconciliation] Answer is:
As part of a Legal Military Truth and Reconciliation Tribunal Process – ex: EoP v Nobel – Give the Breeding / Consumption Scarcity Combatants – of all races, religions and classes – the opportunity to take personal responsibility for their former Breeding/Consumption above Ecological Carrying Capacity limits transgressions; by cooperating to implement an EoP intn’l law social contract; that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized sustainable future.
» IG: 17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 29 Jun: Martin van Creveld; 07 Jul: Ron Jager: EoP Re: Patching it Up with Putin; Liberal Jews to Israel: Do It Our Way or Else.
Conclusion: All ‘Human’ beings on Planet Earths EoP v WiP Future Decision Making:
As noted at: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 07 Jul: Ron Jager .. Jason Greenblatt:
There are similarities between a culture or society with different tribes of individuals; and the micro-organisms in a compost heap.
In the microbial world of a compost heap, approximately 5% of the micro-organisms are defined as regenerative bacteria – those which heal, restore and enliven. On the other extreme, roughly 5% are defined as degenerative bacteria – those which break down, decompose and putrefy. Both ends of the spectrum perform important functions. The other 90% of microorganisms are generally neutral and will follow the lead of whichever alliance establishes dominance. The degenerative alliances are most predominant and essentially work on the principles of dominance, control, and suppression. Whereas the regenerative alliances work on the principles of partnership, cooperation, and empowerment. Rather than working on the principles of suppression, the regenerative alliances have the ability to enliven that broad-based 90% of neutral microbes, so that they begin performing the many functions that they were designed to perform. Adding a particular effective micro-organism to your compost heap, can tip the 90% neutral organisms either way. [EM Earth: History of Effective MicroOrganisms: Little Organisms, Big Revolution!]
“I’ll be cynical to say that society can be divided into two groups. There is the minority who are never happy with what they have, who are always searching and creating things; and there’s the majority, who work honestly and professionally. Those who lead and those who follow.” – Vladimir Guzinsky; The Rise and Fall of the Russian Oligarchs.
“I think it’s my mothers indomitable spirit. She’s World War II generation. I’ll give you a little insight. I didn’t put it in the film but while I interviewed her [Barbara Colby], we were talking about Iraq and Afghanistan; and she said ‘Where is my sacrifice? What am I being asked to do, where is my part in this war. If we are at war, give me something to do, and maybe I should ration; or maybe I should go and visit the VA hospital or wrap bandages. If I am part of this, where is my sacrifice?’. – Carl Colby; CSpan: Q & A: Carl Colby.
All racial, religious or ideological socio-culture’s composed of humans, have a small percentage of individuals focused on cooperation, partnership and empowerment, and another percentage of individuals focused on domination, control and suppression; and the other 90% of neutral humans whose life-goals are simple: With access to land, using their own labour, they are capable of being happy and satisfying their Maslow Hiearchy of Needs — Physiological, Safety, Love and Belonging, Esteem and Self Actualization – without exceeding ecological carrying capacity limits. Have you ever seen the wooden lace windows in a Russian village?; or watched the Community Solution documentary: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil?. See also: IGN: Community Self Sufficiency: Rural Off Grid Russians Unphased by Economic Collapse. These simple people can be tipped either way; towards cooperative rationing sharing and problem solving, or mass hoarding hysteria mobjustice, looting or mass murder. For example: Consider the Japanese cooperative rationing sacrifice and sharing during the Fukushima earthquake; vs their gang raping, pillaging and mass murder; during the rape of Nanking.
Similarly, a family, village, region, nation or planet confronting SS DEFCON 2: Scarcity Conflict; the neutral majority can be led by their racial, religious, class or cultural leaders towards sincere root cause problem solving rationing – including of procreation, production and consumption – and equitable sharing of available resources use below ecological carrying capacity limits; or they can be led to mass hoarding hysteria mobjustice looting and race, class and religious war; and looking the other way, while their family members, neighbors, members of their church, are carted off to concentration camp ovens; simply because they belonged to the wrong race, religion, gender, or class.
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk
Notices via Twitter:
Jordan Peterson: @jordanbpeterson, ETFO: @ETFOnews, Gov Can: Indigenous: @GCIndigenous; Mary Jang: @literalotter; Chad Hallman: @ChadBHallman2, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe: @StandingRockST, Our Children’s Trust: @youthvgov
EoP MILED Clerk: 13 Jul 2017: 22:052 hrs: @jordanbpeterson @ETFOnews @GCIndigenous @literalotter @ChadBHallman2 EoP corr 4 u http://eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za/2017/07/13-jul-jordan-peterson/ cc @StandingRockST @youthvgov
Notice to Vlad Tepes Editor, Author and Readers:
Vlad Tepes: Jordan Peterson on the Morals of the Contemporary Left:
EoP MILED Clerk Comment at 13 July 2017 at 05:00 pm:
Transcript of EoP correspondence to Jordan Peterson & Elementary Teachers Foundation of Ontario; cc: CRRF, CA Heritage, Indigenous & Northern Affairs Canada, Students in Support of Free Speech, Queens University Law Faculty, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Our Childrens Trust; RE: EoP Re: ETFO & Jordan Peterson: Education vs Indoctrination Info for High School Students; is available at: http://eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za/2017/07/13-jul-jordan-peterson/
Transcript Excerpts: Jordan Peterson Postmodern NeoMarxism Speech:
The postmodernists were actually wrestling with quite a difficult problem. The founders of postmodernism were by no means unintelligent and the actually put their finger on quite an important problem. The important problem that the put their finger on was the fact that any set of phenomena has a near infinite number of potential interpretations. That actually happens to be the case. That fact, lets say, was discovered simultaneously in a number of different disciplines … One of the disciplines was artificial intelligence … It was much more difficult to make a machine that could perceive the world, than it had originally been supposed. .. Part of the reason for the lack of artificial intelligence robots back in the 60’s was that the artificial intelligence researchers, when they were starting to instantiate perception into their machines, learned that charting your course in the world might be a trivial problem, in comparison to determining how to perceive the world, and the reason for that is that there is a very large number of ways to perceive the world. The postmodernists actually cottoned on to this, and the claims they made was that there is a near infinite number of ways to interpret any given text; and that actually also happens to be the case. Then they said, well if there is a near infinite number of ways to interpret any text, how do you know if any given interpretation should take precedence over any other interpretation, which is also a perfectly reasonable issue. …. They went off the rails shortly after coming to that realization, and thats probably why they kept their alliance with Marxism fundamentally is that if you agree to the proposition, that all interpretations of all phenomena are of equal value or lack of value, then you can’t act in the world and the problem with that, is that if you are a human being you have to act in the world; cause otherwise you suffer miserably and then you die; and that seems to be an unacceptable outcome for most people. . . . The error in postmodernism is the failure to recognize that there are a finite number of credible interpretations of phenomena; and also a refusal to engage with the intellectual problem to determine to engage to find out what the finite number may actually consist of. I will give you a brief overview of how we happened to solve this problem as human beings. We do it partly biologically because we inhabit a biological framework that’s been developed over the course of about 3.5 million years; that severally constrains the manner in which we interpret the world. It constrains it such that we only tend to spontaneously manifest interpretations of the world that don’t result in undue suffering and our demise. There is plenty of ways to be stupid enough to perish and there are plenty of ways to be stupid enough to suffer without meaning; but there aren’t very many ways to live properly and carefully for a long period of time; in a manner that doesn’t also simultaneously do harm to other people. So that is the second set of constraints. You have biological constraints on your perception and they are built in, as a consequence of the Darwinian process; and the second part is that you are forced to interact with yourself now in this week, next week, and the month after. So you have to conduct yourself in a way that doesn’t interfere with your future life as you are living now. And simultaneously you have to conduct yourself in a way that makes all the people around you want to cooperate with you and compete with you; and maintain the relationship with you and do that today, and next week and next month. So although there are a very large number of interpretations of the world; there are unbelievably severe constraints; on the number of functional interpretations there are in the world. And one of the things that the humanities was supposed to be educating the people with regards towards understanding was: what the universe of those finite functional interpretations might be; and that has been more or less abandoned by the universities; under the values of postmodernism.
The fact that the postmodernists dare to be Marxist, is something that I find not so much intellectually reprehensible as morally repugnant. One of the things that the Marxist postmodernists continually claim is that they have compassion for the downtrodden, and I would say that anybody with more than a cursory knowledge of 20th century history who dares to claim simultaneously that they have compassion for the downtrodden and that they are Marxist, are revealing either their ignorance of history that is so astounding its a miracle, or a kind of malevolence that’s almost unspeakable. We already ran the equity experiment over the 20th century and we already know what the Marxist doctrines have done for oppressed people around the world, and the answer to that mostly was imprison them, enslave them, work them to death or execute them. As far as I can tell that’s not exactly commensurate with any message of compassion. So I don’t think the postmodern Neo-Marxist have a leg to stand on ethically or intellectually or emotionally. I think they should be gone after as hard as possible, from an intellectual perspective. This is fundamentally a war of ideas and that’s the level of analysis that it should be fought upon. Not only is it a war of ideas, I think its a war that could be won, because I think the French intellectual postmodernists are a pack of uhm, what would you call them. Start with charlatans, or pseudo-intellectual would be a good one. I would also consider them highly deceptive in their intellectual strategies because almost all of them were Marxists student intellectuals, and they knew by the time the Gulag Archipelago came out, and even before that, that the nightmares of the Soviet Union and Maoist were of such magnitude that they had completely invalidated any ethical claim to justification that the fundamental Marxist manifestation had managed to manifest. So its a no go zone, as far as I am concerned. Intellectually the games over, we’ve already figured out that there are finite constraints on interpretations, and we also understand how and why those exist and evolved. There is absolutely no excuse whatsoever in the 21st century to put forth Marxist doctrines as if.they are the balm that is administered by the compassionate to the downtrodden. Sorry, tried that, didn’t work. We’ve got a hundred million corpses to prove it. That’s plenty for me, and if its not enough for you; well then you should do some serious thinking; either about your historical knowledge or about your moral character.
So the next thing is what to do about it, apart from just talking about it. ……….. [Cut university funding to Women’s studies, Ethnic and Racial Studies, etc] cause the public should not have to fund a fifth column whose fundamental aim is to disrupt the structure of western civilization. …. [the postmodernists should be starved at their source]…..freshman and second year university students coming into university from high school need to be educated about the post modern cult and they need to be encouraged to not take the courses .. humanities enrollments have been declining since the 60’s and a big part of that is why in the world would you go as a half confused into university and get whatever shreds of culture that you should cling to to keep your poor head above water; in the sea of chaos that threatens to surround you, taken away by your professor, so that you are stripped bare of everything, but some vague sense that maybe you are a horrible racist unconsciously in some manner that you cannot detect, and be left with nothing but that for your hundred thousand dollar investment, and your bloody student loan. So people have not been enrolling in that …. Postmodern Neo-Marxism is nothing but a cult .. except that its a cult that doesn’t have enough economic sense to run itself at a profit. So, not only is it a cult, its a failed cult. So, it is a cult that has to be subsidized by the public purse in order to exist at all. Thats a pretty damn pathetic cult. Because if you are a decent cult leader you can at least figure out a way to pick the pockets of your victims in a manner that enriches you. They can’t even manage to get that right, which accounts for the anti-capitalist bias; because they haven’t been able to transform their ideological doctrine into some way of making themselves spontaneously rich. . ……
One of the things I was quite curious about is the Neo-Marxists insistence that the only true human motivation is power. I think that was a sleight of hand, because the original Marxist doctrine was that western capitalist society is basically best conceptualized as a zero sum game fought to the death between the oppressors and the oppressed, who would be the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. … … and that’s where we got the transformation into identity politics; which is just the Marxist doctrine in a new guise. I just think its reprehensible for people to be conducting themselves intellectually that insists that the most important element of any student is, whatever racial, gender and sex identity happens to be flavour of the month. I think …. If you are 1/8th black, are you black or white, are you oppressor or oppressed, are you less oppressed than someone who is 1/4th black? …. Since we know the only thing they believe in is power… we can be absolutely sure they will have no hesitancy to use power in the seeking of their aims. I think the other reason the only thing postmodernists ever do is talk about power, is because they want to justify their use of power to get exactly what they want, when they want it. There is nothing but power. Alright if there is nothing but power, that means we are at war over power. If that is the claim you make, then you can justify the use of power cause there isn’t anything else to turn to, there is no logic, there is no dialogue there is no consensus, there is no discussion between well-meaning people. There is nothing but divisions between power groups and identity groups and a Hobbesian state of war between all of us. … Well then that is what I think they want, to divide us all by race and ethnicity and sexual identity and sexual preference, and sexual expression and gender identity; and all these multiplying forces of group identities; which seems to be nothing but an invitation to chaos. So I am going to set up a few websites for university students and high school students, to tell them that perhaps they don’t need to go to university to be indoctrinated to learn. And if they want to learn the difference between an educator, and someone whose mainly interested in indoctrination, and the production of the next generation of pathetic whining radicals, then they can use the website to distinguish between people who are credible and people who aren’t; and maybe we can drop the damn enrollment in those horrible courses by 75% in the next three years and just stop it in its tracks. . .
What students need to know before they take the courses is to know what it is that these course are aiming at, so that needs to be explained. Then they need to know what language the people who teach these courses are using in order to fulfill those aims. Then they need to identify the courses and to know that its in their best interests spiritually and economically to avoid those courses and those disciplines like the plague. Then maybe we can get the disciplines that have become entirely corrupt and the one’s that started that way, to put themselves back together before they run themselves out of existence completely. … the Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario’s plan – as stated on their website — is to re-organize the curriculum’s from kindergarten to grade eight, so that children are taught to be social justice warriors from the moment they step foot in the public education system. ….
– Jordan Peterson: Postmodern NeoMarxism: Diagnosis and Cure.