* Faadiah Davids, Judge Nathan Erasmus, Judicial Service Commission, Sello Chiloane, Tebogo Phaahlamohlaka, Judges Matter.
* 09 Nov: LJ v CRLRC: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge.
» 09 Nov: LJ Re: Notice: Judicial Service Commission and Judge NC Erasmus.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v CRLRC, LJ v Legal Practice Council / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT; HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: H 45/19
Case No Circuit Court: 18912/19
In the matter between:
|CRL Rights Commission||1st Respondent|
|Legal Practice Council||2nd Respondent|
EOP APPLICANT STATEMENT TO JUDICIAL SERVICE COMM:
REQUEST EOP AND WIP CONFLICT OF CULTURES JUDGE
Reference to bundles is to 08 Nov 2019: Practice Note, Heads of Argument & Order [PDF]; A: Primary Docs [PDF]; Negotiation Correspondence: B1: 13 Feb – 16 Apr 2019 [PDF]; B2: 27 Jun – 15 Jul 2019 [PDF]; B3: 12 Aug – 18 Oct 2019 [PDF]
 Transparency Notice re: Applicants enclosed Statement to Judge Nathan Erasmus: Request Written Reasons for Case Dismissal.
 If Judge Erasmus decision is to (a) recuse himself from the case, and/or (b) recommends referral of the case to another Judge. Applicant requests Judge Erasmus refer the case to an ‘EoP and WiP Judge’ Judge:
 Potential EoP and WiP Judges: South African Judges who have allowed EoP applications into their Babylon WiP court disputes, indicating that their juridical – ethnic, racial, religious, class or gender – identities (a) welcomed the village idiot sincere peacenik truthseeking; and/or (b) were not triggered into censoring; the merits of EoP application arguments and evidence, in their court record enquiry:
[3.1] 03 May 2010: CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride: Order by Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo: “The Chief Justice has issued the following directions: Ms Lara Johnstone, Member of the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion, is admitted as an amicus curiae.”
[3.2] 09 Dec 2011: EQ 20968/2010: Judge J Lamont: Equality Court Johannesburg: Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others: Although neither the applicants nor respondents consented to the EoP Amicus submission; Judge Lamont accepted the EoP application to be filed into the court record; as noted in his ruling: “ Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record.”
[4.1] EoP Applicant Statement to Judge Erasmus: Request Written Reasons for Case Dismissal:
[A] A: 01 Nov 2019: LJ v CRL Hearing Transcript [pp.14]
[B] B: Military Democracy EoP UN Resolution Martial Law [pp.02].
[C] C: Case Dismissal Merit Issues in Dispute [pp.11]
[D] D: Case Dismissal Process Issues in Dispute [pp.06]
Applicant: Lara Johnson, Pro Se.
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539
 http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAEQC/2011/2.html archive.is/zJ7mB
 http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/ archive.is/Yv2t3
 http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/ archive.fo/NrdRC