* Christine Riddick, Neville Riddick, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Brand and van der Berth Attorneys, Desere Barnard, Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Millers Inc, Arno Crous.
* 10 Jan: LJvGHJ: NCLR Not Involved: LJ Withdrawal & Apology.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GHJ, LJ v CHJ, LJ v FTM / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA, EoP NTE GMUK, EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Religion,
EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 22:28:51 +0200
Subject: LJvGHJ: NCLR Not Involved: LJ Withdrawal & Apology
To: Christine Riddick <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Neville Riddick <email@example.com>
Cc: Graeme Johnstone <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Hilary Johnstone <email@example.com>, “Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Frode Moe <email@example.com>, Talitha Moe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Millers Inc: Arno Crous” <email@example.com>
TO: Neville & Christine Riddick
CC: Frode & Talitha Moe, Graeme and Hilary Johnstone:
Neville and Christine:
LJvGHJ: NCLR Not Involved: LJ Withdrawal & Apology
Thank you for your visit today, and for answering my questions:
Herewith a paraphrased summary of our discussion, related to my correspondence informing you of the LJvGHJ Equality Court application [07 Jan: Notice to CN Riddick: H 51/19: LJ v GHJ EQ Crt Action Proceeding filing].
You confirmed that you were aware of Frode and Graeme’s mental disorder allegations against me, but that you had not been involved in any discussions with one or more family members where they expressed opinions about the mental disorder allegations; and consequently you consider yourselves effectively ‘not involved’ in the ‘mental disorder’ allegations issues in dispute.
You also confirmed that as far as you were: Lisa was aware of Frode and Graeme’s mental disorder allegations against me, but that Lisa, also had not been involved in any discussions with one or more family members where they expressed opinions about the mental disorder allegations; and consequently you also consider Lisa effectively ‘not involved’ in the ‘mental disorder’ allegations issues in dispute.
I thanked you for clarifying your and Lisa’s ‘not involved’ role in the mental disorder allegations dispute; and apologized for the inconvenience of the misunderstanding.
I informed you I would remove you as respondents and Lisa as a witness, in the Equality Court application, since our ‘issue in dispute’ was effectively resolved by means of your denial and my apology.
EoP TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Christine and Neville Riddick:
Christine Riddick (firstname.lastname@example.org); Neville Riddick (email@example.com)
Graeme and Hilary Johnstone:
Graeme Johnstone (firstname.lastname@example.org); Hilary Johnstone (email@example.com); Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Frode & Talitha Moe:
Frode Moe (email@example.com); Talitha Moe (firstname.lastname@example.org); Millers Inc: Arno Crous (email@example.com)