* Donald Trump, Rudolph Giuliani, Giuliani Partners, Robert Costello, Jon Sale, Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz, Doug Collins R-GA, Mike Johnson R-LA, Jim Jordan R-OH, Debbie Lesko R-AZ, Mark Meadows R-NC, John Ratcliffe R-TX, Elise Stefanik R-NY, Lee Zeldin R-NY, Mike Johnson R-LA, Duty to Warn: John Gartner, Edwin Fisher, Michael Bader, Simon Wessely, Steve Reicher, Adrian Owen, James Gilligan, Harry Segal, Dana Pittard, Bo Gritz, Ron Paul, Cynthia McKinney, William Black, Mimi Silbert, William Ayers, Richard Heinberg, Catherine Austin Fitts, Sibel Edmunds, Cele Castillo, Joel Salatin, Ron Finley, Vladimir Putin, Timothy McVeigh, Dennis McGinn, Stan McChrystal, Steven Anderson, Anthony Charles Zinni, Bobby R. Inman, Nanette DeRenzi, John Mulholland, Daniel William Christman, Joseph W. Ralston, Robert Tyrer, James M Bodner, James Cartwright, Steve Abbot, Robert L. Grenier, Andrew Holland, Judith A. Jami Miscik, Jonathan Allen, Daniel J Smith, Francis A Branch, Wilma J Atkins, Lawrence Fowler, Thomas Moorman, Thomas Brown, Peter F. Olsen
* 22 Jan: D2W Psych v DJT: Summary of EoP Radical Honoursty Psych Info
» 22 Jan: EoP Apps: Draft: Withdrawal Notice Re: Duty to Warn Psych v Donald Trump.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Donald Trump, EoP v Rudy Giuliani, EoP v Alt Right, EoP v Duty to Warn Psych, EoP v US Congress, EoP v US Political Parties, EoP v US Peace Rep, US v TJ McVeigh, LJ v L Sisulu / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: Cabinet, EoP NTE GMRU | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT; HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA
Grg High Crt: H 111/2019
|In the matter between:
Duty To Warn Psych
Request for Peacenik Info Respondents
And, in the matter between
Lindiwe Sisulu, Min of Intnl Relations & Cooperation, Hasso Plattner, RSA Rep. of Giving Pledge; Helene Budliger Artieda, Ambassador Swiss Embassy; Masimba Tafirenyika, Head: UN Info Center; Lin Songtian, Ambassador China Embassy; Marcus Cornaro, Head of EU Delegation; Didier Vanderhasselt, Ambassador Belgium Embassy; Jessye Lapenn, Ch D’Affairs US Embassy; Mikhail Ivanovich Petrakov, Amb. Russia Fed. Embassy
|Summary of Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Radical Honoursty Culture Psych Info
Questions: [A] Is a mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; based upon scientific or cultural law? [B] If cultural law: what are cultural ethics values to avoid negligent and/or malicious cross-cultural ‘mental disorder’ allegations.
Applicant Ecology of Peace Culture Answers: [A] Any mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-1, DSM-2, DSM-3, DSM-4 or DSM-5 – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; is based upon cultural law. [B] Cultural ethics should require cultures with cultural law mental disorder definitions to educate their cultural members, that such definitions are not based on scientific law, but cultural conformity law, and in a fully informed consent multi-cultural community, society or nation, cultural laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups cultural values.
This is because mental illness is always diagnosed on the basis of some sort of social conflict. When people do something that others find objectionable, they can be diagnosed as mentally ill. If the person doing the diagnosing is more powerful than the person diagnosed, then there is trouble. In this sense, the diagnosis of mental illness is always a weapon. – Jeffrey Schaler: American University: Prof of Law and Psychology.
Formerly, Americans charged with murder were considered innocent until proven guilty; now they are considered insane until proven sane. To concepts like suicide, homicide, and genocide, we should add semanticide – the murder of language. The deliberate (or quasi-deliberate) misuse of language through hidden metaphor and professional mystification breaks the basic contract between people, namely the tactic agreement on the proper use of words. In the animal kingdom, the rule is: eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom: define or be defined.
Man is the animal that speaks. Understanding language is thus the key to understanding man; and the control of language, to the control of man. Hence it is that men struggle not only over territory, food, and raw materials, but today perhaps most of all over language. For to control the Word is to be the Definer: God, king, pope, president, legislator, scientist, psychiatrist, madman – you and me. God defines everything and everyone. The totalitarian leader aspires to similar grandeur. The ordinary person defines some aspects of himself and of a few others. But even the most modest and powerless of men defines something no one else can: his own dreams. And we are all defined, as well: by our genes which shape us; our parents who name us; our society which classifies us; and so on. It has long seemed to me that some of the fundamental problems of psychiatry are really quiet simple: they center around a struggle for definition between the so-called mental patient on the one side and his family, society, and psychiatrist on the other. each party to this contest speaks a different language, whose content and consequences he tries to impose on his adversary. Although the context sometimes looks like a debate, it is actually a bitter fight for survival, and, like all such struggles, it is decided not by logic, but by power.
If, as the Old Testament tells us, the First or Original Sin was the knowledge of good and evil, then the knowledge of clear speech was the ‘Second Sin.” At Babel, God punished man for this transgression with the Divine Confusion, and we have been misleading each other ever since. Dr. Thomas Szasz believes that it is this confusion of language that has produced much of the inhumanity, intolerance, and outright stupidity which today affect everything from our politics to our sex lives. – Thomas Szasz: The Second Sin.
Psych Doctrine Membership Organization:
 I am not a member or former member of any psychiatric or psychology membership organization in South Africa or any other nation. I have no qualifications as a psychologist or psychiatrist. I do have thousands of hours of psychotherapy experience as an employee and group therapy colleague of ‘anti-conformity’ psychologists, predominantly: Richard Korn and Brad Blanton.
EoP ‘Psych Doctrine’ Summary:
 I have never legally accused anyone I disagreed with, whether a member of my own culture or another culture; of having a mental disorder.
 The Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty culture working hypothesis is that most of what people in – racial, religious, academic – Babylonian cultures call ‘mental disorders’, ‘witchcraft’, ‘demon possessed’, etc; are objective/subjective conscious/unconscious honesty/deception psycho-social relational behavioural resource conflicts, resulting from national and international laws that allow procreation and/or consumption to exceed ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and consequently racial, religious, class, gender resource conflict.
 EoP Summary: EoP Garden of Eden v WiP Babylon Law.
[4.1] Indigenous tribes living in their Garden of Eden’s around the world were obeying EoP [breed & consume below Mother Nature/God’s ecological resource carrying capacity] law, while they consciously or unconsciously required their tribes to breed and consume – in terms of their hunting, nomadic herding, hunter gathering and/or sustainable subsistence agriculture – below ecological carrying capacity limits.
[4.2] Once one or more Cain tribes adopted totalitarian agriculture; they changed their breeding / consumption to obey WiP cultural / religious and/or national law. Practicing totalitarian agriculture involves intensive cultivation of the land for surplus food production; which then results in growth of population of the tribe, and extension of territory – for growing population / consumption greed – into a neighbouring Cain or Abel tribe’s territory.
[4.3] Many Cain tribes / religions living in accordance to totalitarian agriculture WiP law; results in resource conflict as tribes demands for expanding territory comes into conflict with neighbouring tribes territory. All tribes can cooperate & return to harmony with EoP Return to Eden law for all; or develop their ‘war’ – alienation from honesty – deception skills on their WiP Tower of Babel Four Horses Armageddon journey.
[4.4] The ‘knowledge of good and evil’ – flattery / spin / public relations – deception resource thieving war skills; are then used to deceive: (a) self: in order to better deceive others, it helps if you believe your own ego ‘its my God given right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity’ bullshit; (b) tribal followers: to convince them to be economic brood sow and/or sperm donor or military cannon fodder for your political resource thieving campaigns; and (c) other tribes: to deceive their political leaders and/or followers; so as to more easily steal their land and/or cheap labour capital.
Erich Fromm Definition of Culture / Religion:
 A Culture / Religion is a Group-Shared System of Thought and Action that Offers the Individual a Frame of Orientation and an Object of Devotion:
[5.1] To clarify, “religion” as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols or even to a system perceived as religion, but to any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not having religion. This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it. A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct.
Summary Applicant Psychotherapy Experience:
 My reference to psychotherapy experience, discussions with psychologists, are based upon thousands of hours of psychotherapy experience as an employee and colleague of Fritz Perls Gestalt trained psychologist: Dr. Brad Blanton and Jacob Moreno psychodrama trained psychologist Dr Richard Korn.
[6.1] Friedrich Salomon Perls (July 8, 1893 – March 14, 1970), better known as Fritz Perls, was a noted German-born psychiatrist and psychotherapist. Perls coined the term ‘Gestalt therapy’ to identify the form of psychotherapy that he developed with his wife, Laura Perls, in the 1940s and 1950s. Perls became associated with the Esalen Institute in 1964, and he lived there until 1969. The core of the Gestalt Therapy process is enhanced awareness of sensation, perception, bodily feelings, emotion, and behavior, in the present moment. Relationship is emphasized, along with contact between the self, its environment, and the other. Perls has been widely cited outside the realm of psychotherapy for a quotation often described as the Gestalt prayer: “I do my thing and you do your thing. I am not in this world to live up to your expectations, and you are not in this world to live up to mine. You are you, and I am I, and if by chance we find each other, it’s beautiful. If not, it can’t be helped.”
 Brad Blanton is a psychotherapist, author, workshop leader, speaker, and the founder of Radical Honesty Enterprises, where he leads ‘Radical Honesty’ residential workshops, such as Course in Honesty; A Year of Therapy in Eight Days, Course in Forgiveness, and Thought leaders. Brad Blanton describes himself as “white trash with a Ph.D.” He is the author of (a) Radical Honesty: How To Transform Your Life By Telling The Truth, (b) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Live in the Present and Build a Future with A Little Help From Your Friends, (c) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that Can Change the World, with Neale Donald Walsch; (d) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World. Shot video documentaries: Radical Honesty: 01:02:03; SHO: And Nothing but the Truth: Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty Channel: The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth.
 Jacob Levy Moreno, born Jacob Levy (May 18, 1889 – May 14, 1974) was a Romanian-American psychiatrist, psycho-sociologist, and educator, the founder of psychodrama, and the foremost pioneer of group psychotherapy. In 1932, Moreno first introduced group psychotherapy to the American Psychiatric Association, and co-authored the monograph Group Method and Group Pschotherapy with Helen Hall Jennings. For the next 40 years he developed and introduced his Theory of Interpersonal Relations and tools for social sciences he called ‘sociodrama’, ‘psychodrama’, ‘sociometry’, and ‘sociatry’. In his monograph entitled, “The Future of Man’s World”, he describes how he developed these inter-cultural therapuetic relating sciences to counteract “the economic materialism of Marx, the psychological materialism of Freud, and the technological materialism” of our modern industrial age. Moreno died in New York City in 1974, aged 84. He chose to die by abstaining from all food and water after a long illness. His epitaph, at his request, reads “the man who brought laughter to psychiatry.”
 Richard Korn taught criminology and psychology at of California, Berkeley and John Jay College of Criminology, New York, and the Director of Treatment at Trenton Maximum Security Prison, New Jersey. He directed an experimental counseling program at UC Berkeley, created a career counseling program in Santa Clara County, and developed a unique youth therapy program using a form of role-playing called psychodrama. He worked as an expert witness prison investigator for Amnesty International, testifying in among others the controversial Soledad Brothers, and San Quentin Aryan Brotherhood Political Prisoner trials. He was one of the three members of the Berkeley Associates, who conceived and administered the penal reform psychodrama conferences, resulting in criminal reforms in eight states. The other two being Dr. David Fogel, former head of a juvenile hall and chairman of the sociology department, Laney College, Oakland; and attorney Douglas C. Rigg, former warden of the Minnesota State Prison and associate warden of San Quentin . The WNEW-TV documentary On Trial: Criminal Justice, was taped at one of the psychodrama conferences at St. John’s College in Annapolis, under the auspices of the Maryland Governor’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. Berkeley Associates workshops, using psychodrama, and brutal honesty truth-telling techniques, brought together victims of crime, prisoners, legislators, judges, prosecutors, prison guards, and police, for ten day intensive in-your-face psychodrama workshops, from which many criminal justice reforms emanated. Dr. Korn believed it was not enough to understand the other intellectually; psychodrama sessions helped the participants to get to the emotional pressure-cooker burning zone, the level of cooperative commitment. He was invited by the Swedish government to work in mental institutions in Sweden. He founded and directed the Berkeley Institute for Training in Psychodrama, where he trained students in psychodrama methods. He also founded the Pacific Institute for Criminal Justice. Dr. Korn published many articles and books on crime and criminal justice, with a particular interest in penal reform. In 1998, I contacted the South African government, on his behalf, offering his psychodrama services to hold such psychodrama workshops in South Africa, possibly at Robben Island, to support it to be a Living University Museum, rather than simply a museum. There was no response from the South African government. Dr. Korn died in July, 2002. Articles: Time: Prisons; NY Times: ‘What Hits You Is the Total Human Waste’.
 In Images of Criminality and Models of the Criminal and/or psychotherapy correctional process, he describes the three different guard / prisoner or therapist / patient models, with expert as (a) Operator: Slave dominator: Skills are magical incommunicable and forbidden to patient, (b) Prescriber: Superior leader: skills are translated into directives; and (c) Co-Learner: colleague, brother / friend: skills are fully shared and transparent. “We are dealing at bottom with the fateful consequences of three different attitudes toward the Other. We can do things to him, in which case he becomes an Object. We can do things for him, in which case he becomes a Dependent. We can do things with him, in which case he has the opportunity to become an Agent. Whatever the content or intent of the action, it is the relationship between the actors that is crucial – and that defines the difference between domination (to him), dependency (for him) and self-realization (with him) in the political, economic and social realms, as well as in the interpersonal. It is at least an arguable proposition that many of our social problems are exacerbated by the decrease of situations enabling reciprocity on a give-and-get equal basis with our fellow men.”
 John Maher, the founder of Delancey Street Foundation [John Maher of Delancey Street: A Guide for Peaceful Revolution in America] was a patient student of Richard Korn. Delancey Street Foundations group therapy known as Games, are partially based upon psychodrama techniques. Three times a week, for three to four hours all Delancey Street residents participate in Games: basic leaderless, attack encounter group therapy sessions. Where on the outside, a waitor might harbour murderous thoughts about the maitre d’ for weeks on end, about a small slight, with no outlet for his feelings; in Delancey Street, he can release his emotional pressure cooker and vomit out all his animosities and frustrations in the Game, and find non-violent emotional orgasm freedom from them. Additionally he can get brutally honest feedback and ideas related to his thoughts and gain valuable insight into his feelings of helplessness and rage. He learns communication skills to confront his problem, verbally, face-to-face and nonviolently. The Game is what makes Delancey Street run, where it conducts its business, where its residents are re-educated; what’s kept it’s drug-addicts clean, and what keeps physical violence out of their lives.
 Totalling approximately ten years, I worked with Dr. Korn on prison reform cases and with Dr. Blanton on administering and running Radical Honesty workshops, and as a Radical Honesty culture member activist. I was officially employed by Dr. Blanton, and barter exchange cooperative employed by Dr. Korn.
Definitions of Scientific and Cultural Law:
 Scientific laws are based on objective scientific empirical facts.
[13.1] Scientific laws summarize and explain a large collection of facts determined by experiment, and are tested based on their ability to predict the results of future experiments. They are developed either from facts or through mathematics, and are strongly supported by empirical evidence. It is generally understood that they reflect causal relationships fundamental to reality, and are discovered rather than invented. Scientific laws apply to individuals equally across cultures, races, religions, classes, genders, ages and ideologies.
 Cultural laws are based on subjective cultural norms and values.
[14.1] Cultural laws refer to shared cultural or sub-cultural values, attitudes, standards, and beliefs that characterize members of a particular racial, religious, class, gender or professional culture and define their cultural frame of orientation and object of devotion. In a human mental disorder context, cultural laws refer to the idea, values, attitudes and opinions people in a racial, religious, class, gender or ideological cultural group hold with regard to ‘normal’ vs ‘abnormal’ conformity to their cultural or sub-cultural law values. In a fully informed consent multi-cultural community, society or nation, a cultural groups laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups cultural values.
Answer on Question of Law: DSM is Not Scientific Law:
 Based upon aforementioned scientific and cultural law definitions; I can say with about 90% beyond reasonable doubt working hypothesis conviction that any mental disorder diagnosis made by a psychiatrist which is based upon an APA: American Psychiatric Association’s bible – Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-1, DSM-2, DSM-3, DSM-4, DSM-5 – mental disorder legal definition; is not based upon scientific law, and consequently not applicable to individuals equally across cultures, races, religions, classes, genders, ages and ideologies.
 My working hypothesis conviction that the DSM mental disorder legal definition is not based upon scientific law; is based upon (a) my psychotherapy experience, discussions with psychologists, etc; and (b) reading of – DSM is not scientific law – critical psychiatrists and psychologists expert witness – written and verbal criticism in laypersons language – allegations that mental disorder diagnosis using the American Psychiatric Association’s bible – DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – is not based on scientific law, but cultural law, (c) my lack of knowledge of any – DSM is not scientific law – critical psychiatrist or psychologist or mental health activist, who has been sued by the APA, for DSM libel or defamation, let alone convicted in a court of law of libel or defamation for their – DSM is not scientific law – verbal and written statements.
 My working hypothesis conviction – for a person who subjectively considers themselves ethical – is that using the DSM to make legal mental disorder allegations is not lawful in terms of ethical scientific and/or cultural law national or international legal requirements. My working hypothesis conviction is based upon the absence of any courtcase where a judge has made a clear and explicit unequivocal – DSM mental disorder legal definition is lawful scientific/cultural law – ruling, confirming the DSM as a lawful scientific or cultural law legal definition based policy.
Answer on Question of Law: DSM is Cultural Law:
 Based upon aforementioned scientific and cultural law definitions; I can say with about 99% beyond reasonable doubt working hypothesis conviction that any mental disorder diagnosis made by a psychiatrist which is based upon an APA: American Psychiatric Association’s bible – Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-1, DSM-2, DSM-3, DSM-4, DSM-5 – mental disorder legal definition; is based upon cultural law, and consequently in a fully informed consent multi-cultural community, society or nation, a cultural groups laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups cultural values.
 My working hypothesis conviction that the DSM mental disorder legal definition is based upon cultural law; is based upon (a) my psychotherapy experience, discussions with psychologists, etc; and (b) reading of – DSM is not scientific law – critical psychiatrists and psychologists expert witness – written and verbal criticism in laypersons language – allegations that mental disorder diagnosis using the American Psychiatric Association’s bible – DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – is not based on scientific law, but cultural law, (c) my lack of knowledge of any – DSM is not scientific law – critical psychiatrist or psychologist or mental health activist, who has been sued by the APA for DSM libel or defamation, let alone convicted in a court of law of libel or defamation for their – DSM is not scientific law – verbal and written statements.
 My working hypothesis conviction – for subjectively ethical person – is that using the DSM to make legal mental disorder allegations is not lawful in terms of ethical scientific and/or cultural law national or international legal requirements. My working hypothesis conviction is based upon the absence of any courtcase where a judge has made a clear and explicit unequivocal – DSM mental disorder legal definition is lawful scientific/cultural law – ruling, confirming the DSM as a lawful scientific or cultural law legal definition based policy.
Summary of Critical Psychiatry: APA’s DSM is not scientific law:
 A summary of my reading and/or awareness of – DSM is not scientific law – critical psychiatrists and psychologists expert witness – written and verbal criticism in laypersons language – allegations that mental disorder diagnosis using the American Psychiatric Association’s bible – DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – is not based on scientific law, but cultural law.
Psych Expert Critics: No Scientific Based ‘Mental Disorder’ Definition:
 Psychiatrists, psychologists and neurologists quotes, books and documentaries documenting their allegations – as experts – that psychiatry and psychology – more particularly psychiatrists and/or psychologists pretending to their clients, journalists and/or to courts, that their ‘mental disorder’ definitions are based upon scientific factual reality evidence – are engaged in fraudulent practices.
 Thomas Szasz: State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse Psychiatrist & Psychoanalyst: “There is no such thing as mental illness. Psychiatric diagnosis of “mental disorders” is just a way of stigmatising behaviour that society does not want to live with. Psychiatry thrives on coercion and is replacing religion as a form of social control.”
[23.1] Books: 1974: The Second Sin. 1974: The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. 1974: Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Addicts, and Pushers. 1975: The Age of Madness: A History of Involuntary Mental Hospitalization Presented in Selected Texts. 1976: Heresies. 1977: Psychiatric Slavery. 1980: Psychology of Freedom. 1984: The Therapeutic State: Psychiatry in the Mirror of Current Events. 1988: Psychiatric Justice. 1988: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis: The Theory and Method of Autonomous Psychotherapy. 1988: Schizophrenia: The Sacred Symbol of Psychiatry. 1988: The Theology of Medicine: The Political-Philosophical Foundations of Medical Ethics. 1988: The Myth of Psychotherapy: Mental Healing as Religion, Rhetoric, and Repression. 1989: Law, Liberty, and Psychiatry: An Inquiry into the Social Uses of Mental Health Practices. 1990: The Untamed Tongue: A Dissenting Dictionary. 1990: Anti-Freud: Karl Kraus and His Criticism of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry. 1990: Sex by Prescription: The Startling Truth about Today’s Sex Therapy. 1991: Ideology and Insanity: Essays on the Psychiatric Dehumanization of Man. 1996: The Meaning of Mind: Language, Morality, and Neuroscience. 1997: The Manufacture of Madness: A Comparative Study of the Inquisition and the Mental Health Movement. 1997: Insanity: The Idea and Its Consequences. 1998: Cruel Compassion: Psychiatric Control of Society’s Unwanted. 1999: Fatal Freedom: The Ethics and Politics of Suicide. 2001: Pharmacracy: Medicine and Politics in America. 2002: Liberation by Oppression: A Comparative Study of Slavery and Psychiatry. 2003: A Lexicon of Lunacy: Metaphoric Malady, Moral Responsibility, and Psychiatry. 2004: Faith in Freedom: Libertarian Principles and Psychiatric Practices. 2004: Words to the Wise: A Medical-Philosophical Dictionary. 2006: My Madness Saved Me: The Madness and Marriage of Virginia Woolf. 2007: Coercion as Cure: A Critical History of Psychiatry. 2007: The Medicalization of Everyday Life. 2008: Psychiatry: The Science of Lies. 2009: Antipsychiatry: Quackery Squared. 2011: Suicide Prohibition: The Shame of Medicine.
[24.1] Books: 2006: The ADHD Fraud: How Psychiatry Makes “Patients” of Normal Children.
[25.1] Books: 1979: Electroshock: Its Brain-Disabling Effects. 1983: Psychiatric Drugs: Hazards to the Brain. 1991: Toxic Psychiatry: Why Therapy, Empathy and Love Must Replace the Drugs, Electroshock, and Biochemical Theories of the “New Psychiatry”. 1992: Beyond Conflict: From Self-Help and Psychotherapy to Peacemaking. 1997: Brain-Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry: Drugs, Electroshock and the Role of the FDA. 1997: The Heart of Being Helpful: Empathy and the Creation of a Healing Presence. 2000: Reclaiming Our Children: A Healing Solution for a Nation in Crisis. 2001: The Anti-Depressant Fact Book: What Your Doctor Won’t Tell You About Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Celexa, and Luvox. 2001: Talking Back to Ritalin: What Doctors Aren’t Telling You About Stimulants and ADHD. 2001: Dimensions of Empathetic Therapy. 2002: The Ritalin Fact Book: What Your Doctor Won’t Tell You. 2002: The War Against Children of Color: Psychiatry Targets Inner City Youth. 2007: Your Drug May Be Your Problem: How and Why to Stop Taking Psychiatric Medications. 2008: Medication Madness: A Psychiatrist Exposes the Dangers of Mood-Altering Medications. 2008: Brain-Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry: Drugs, Electroshock and the Psychopharmaceutical Complex. 2009: The Conscience of Psychiatry: The Reform Work of Peter R. Breggin. 2012: Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Guide for Prescribers, Therapists, Patients and their Families. 2014: Talking Back to Prozac: What Doctors Aren’t Telling You About Prozac and the Newer Antidepressants. 2015: Guilt, Shame, and Anxiety: Understanding and Overcoming Negative Emotions.
 Paula Caplan: Harvard University Clinical and Research Psychologist: “There is no such thing as a mental disorder. A mental disorder is whatever someone says it is, and if the person saying “This is a mental disorder”, has enough power and influence, then people believe ‘Oh, that is a mental disorder’.”
[26.1] Books: 1990: Don’t Blame Mother: Mending the Mother-Daughter Relationship. 1994: You’re Smarter Than They Make You Feel: How the Experts Intimidate Us and What We Can Do About It. 1996: They Say You’re Crazy: How the Worlds Most Powerful Psychiatrists Decide Who’s Normal. 2004: Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis. 2011: 2011: When Johnny and Jane Come Marching Home: How All of Us Can Help Veterans:
 Mary Boyle: UK University of East London Clinical Psychologist: “The entire enterprise of defining mental disorder is pointless, at least in so far as the goal is to allow us to recognize “genuine” or “true” disorders”.
[27.1] Books: 2002: Schizophrenia: A Scientific Delusion.
 Herb Kutchins & Stuart Kirk: Social Workerer Authors: “DSM is a book of tentatively assembled agreements. Agreements don’t always make sense, nor do they always reflect reality. You can have agreements among experts without validity. Even if you could find four people who agreed that the earth is flat, that the moon is made of green cheese, that smoking cigarettes poses no health risks, or that politicians are never corrupt, such agreements do not establish truth.”
[28.1] Books: Herb Kutchins: 1992: The Selling of DSM: The Rhetoric of Science in Psychiatry; 2003: Making us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders. Stuart Kirk: 2013: Mad Science: Psychiatric Coercion, Diagnosis and Drugs.
 Lucy Johnstone: Clincial Psychologist: “To admit the central role of value judgments and cultural norms [in the creation of the DSM] is to give the whole game away. The DSM has to be seen as reliable and valid, or the whole enterprise of medical psychiatry collapses.”
[29.1] Books: 2000: Users and Abusers of Psychiatry: A Critical Look at Traditional Psychiatric Practice. 2006: Formulation in Psychology and Psychotherapy: Making Sense of People’s Problems. 2014: Straight Talking Introduction to Psychiatric Diagnosis.
 Margaret Hagen: Professor of Psychology, Boston University: “[Alleged Mental Disorders] are based on a grab-bag of checklists for disorders that are published in a book called the DSM; which is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. There are no statistics in this book, by the way. That just makes it sound more scientific.”
[30.1] Books: 2016: Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice.
 Jeffrey Schaler: American University: Prof of Law and Psychology: The controversy regarding the myth of mental illness and psychiatry is not about science or medicine. It is about power. What do we know that is true that the cult of psychiatry keeps telling us is false? First, the idea that there is a known brain lesion causing mental illness. The truth is that we cannot tell who is mentally ill and who is not by looking at pictures of their brains or analyzing their blood. Psychiatrists had to invent their own book of diseases because pathologists would have nothing to do with them. Its called the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, the DSM. A great work of fiction. What’s the difference between the DSM and a scientific book of disease. Every disorder in the DSM is invented. Every disease listed in a pathology textbook is discovered. Real disease is found in a cadaver at autopsy. Mental illness is not. Mental illness refers to something that a person does. Real disease refers to something that a person has. Consider this yet another way. It takes one person to have a real disease. It takes two people to have a mental illness. If you are alone on an island, you could develop a real disease like cancer or a heart disease, but you cannot develop a mental illness, such as hyperactivity or schizophrenia. This is because mental illness is always diagnosed on the basis of some sort of social conflict. When people do something that others find objectionable, they can be diagnosed as mentally ill. If the person doing the diagnosing is more powerful than the person diagnosed, then there is trouble. In this sense, the diagnosis of mental illness is always a weapon. Not so when it comes to diagnosing a real disease. Think of how when people get angry with one another they inevitably resort to some sort of diagnosis. They say ‘you are crazy’. ‘You are mentally ill’. ‘You are paranoid.’ Can you imagine someone getting angry with someone and saying ‘You have diabetes’. ‘You have Parkinson disease’. Social conflict has nothing to do with developing a real disease. You don’t develop diabetes because someone doesn’t like the way you think, speak or behave. You have to have someone else present to judge that your behaviour is morally good or bad in order to have a mental illness. So diagnosis is a weapon, a tool people use against one another especially when there is some kind of power conflict present. And what of treatment? Treatment for mental illness is punishment. Look at our criminal justice system. When someone commits a crime and a psychiatrist is in the courtroom a defendant may go to a mental institution instead of a prison. Can you imagine a judge saying ‘I sentence you to treatment for your cancer’? I submit to you that psychiatric treatment is worse than prison. For in prison they don’t judge how long people should be deprived of liberty on the basis of what they think of themselves and the world. In a mental institution, of course, this is the case. If you don’t think about yourself and the world correctly, you will be punished longer. Psychiatrists love to say that mental illness is a real disease just like cancer. The analogy between mental illness is not reciprocal. It doesn’t hold both ways. Having cancer is not like being depressed. We don’t shock people that have cancer to make them better, especially if they don’t want to be shocked. Consider how melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer, is a disease here, as well as in Northern India. If you have melanoma does it cease to exist if you move to another country or another culture? Of course not. If you are wandering the foothills of the Himalayas and meditating for fifteen hours a day, you may very well be called a holy man in India. Take that same person having him walk across the grounds of the Washington monument in Washington DC and he is diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic and committed to a mental hospital. What do you think psychiatrists would do if Jesus were alive today, or Buddha, or Mohammed? Barrabing. Right into a mental hospital, injected with drugs to stop their crazy beliefs and speech. Psychiatrists today are the true grand inquisitors. They would crucify the holy men and women of yesterday in an instant.
 Presentation / Speech:
[32.1] John Breeding: Political Psychiatry, Social Control and Big Pharma.
[32.2] Prof Mary Boyle: Is psychology fearful of social resource conflict context?
[33.1] CCHR: The Marketing of Madness: Are we all Insane?: “The definitive documentary on psychotropic drugging—this is the story of the high-income partnership between drug companies and psychiatry which has created an $80 billion profit from the peddling of psychotropic drugs to an unsuspecting public. But appearances are deceiving. How valid are psychiatrist’s diagnoses—and how safe are their drugs? Digging deep beneath the corporate veneer, this three-part documentary exposes the truth behind the slick marketing schemes and scientific deceit that conceal a dangerous and often deadly sales campaign.” Youtube: Marketing of Madness.
[33.2] CCHR: Diagnostics and Statistical Manual: Psychiatry’s Deadliest Scam: “It’s 943 pages long and lists out 374 mental “disorders.” It is the basis for the listing of mental disorders in the International Classification of Diseases that is used throughout the world. And though it weighs less than five pounds, its influence pervades all aspects of modern society: our governments, our courts, our military, our media and our schools. Using it, psychiatrists can enforce psychiatric drugging, seize your children and even take away your most precious personal freedoms. It is psychiatry’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and it is the engine that drives a $330 billion psychiatric industry. But is there any proof behind the DSM? Or is it nothing more than an elaborate pseudoscientific sham?” – Youtube: The DSM: Psychiatry’s Deadliest Scam.
[33.3] CCHR: Psychiatry: An Industry of Death: “Through rare historical and contemporary footage and interviews with more than 160 doctors, attorneys, educators, survivors and experts on the mental health industry and its abuses, this riveting documentary blazes the bright light of truth on the brutal pseudoscience and multi-billion dollar fraud that is psychiatry. We think you have the right to know the cold, hard facts about psychiatry, its practitioners and the threat they pose to our children. Governments, insurance companies and private individuals pay billions of dollars each year to psychiatrists in pursuit of cures that psychiatrists admit do not exist. Psychiatry’s “therapies” have caused millions of deaths.” Youtube: Psychiatry: An Industry of Death.
[33.4] CCHR: The Hidden Enemy: Inside Psychiatry’s Covert Agenda: “Today, with militaries of the world awash in psychiatry and psychiatric drugs, 23 soldiers and veterans are committing suicide every day. Psychiatrists say we need more psychiatry. But should we trust them? Or is psychiatry the hidden enemy? Featuring interviews with over 80 soldiers and experts, this penetrating documentary shatters the façade to reveal the real culprits who are destroying our world’s militaries from within. The most dangerous enemy is the one you never suspect.” Youtube: Psychiatry in the Military: The Hidden Enemy.
[33.5] CCHR: The Age of Fear: Psychiatry’s Reign of Terror: “Filmed in Germany and Austria, The Age of Fear: Psychiatry’s Reign of Terror, draws from over 80 interviews of psychiatric experts, historians and survivors. Containing shocking personal testimonies and stark inside footage, the documentary tells the true story of psychiatry’s sordid history and current practices, revealing how its reliance on brutality and coercion has not changed since the moment it was born.” Youtube: Age of Fear: Psychiatry’s Reign of Terror.
EoP Culture Honesty Test v Luten Conservation Sanity Test:
 Daniel Luten’s conservation policy sanity test:
[34.1] “… an organization cannot have a conservation policy without having a population policy. … the sanity test—in which the candidate, confronted with an overflowing sink, is classified according to whether he reaches for the mop or the faucet.” – Daniel Benjamin Luten; Chemist & Resource Assistant to General Douglas McArthur; The Sierra Club Bulletin; Paul Ehlrich: The Population Bomb: Population Control or Race to Oblivion?; William Cooper: Behold a Pale Horse. A different Daniel B Luten was the ‘Luten Arch’ Bridge Builder Engineer.
 In the context of Alfred Lotka and Vitto Volterra: Human and Nature Dynamics (HANDY) predator-prey model [mg-nasa.tygae.org.za]:
[35.1] Humans who engage in totalitarian agriculture, engage in Predator-Prey Growth and Collapse of Civilization/Empire cycles: Greco-Rome, Minoan, Mycenaean, Sumerians, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Achaemenid, Seleucid, Zhou, Han, Tang, Song, Parthian, Sassanid, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mauryan, Gupta, Maya, Hittite, Harrapan and Teotihuacan. Collapses result from (1) Ecological Strain and (2) Economic Stratification and include the disappearance of between 90-99% of the populations (from famine, disease and organized violence resource wars) including their kings, Gods, calendars and other complex political and cultural institutions. Economic Stratification Collapse occurs due to unequal consumption of resources generating Elites vs Commoners. As Elites become sizable and keep growing, they consume more; their over-exploitation results in collapse of resources to the Commoners; who experience famine and collapse. Elites — due to their wealth — do not suffer the detrimental effects of environmental collapse until much later than Commoners, which allows them to continue ‘business as usual’, despite the impending catastrophe; explaining how historical collapses were allowed to occur by seemingly oblivious elites (eg Roman & Mayan cases).
 Luten’s conservation policy sanity test appears to equate: sanity as the conscious strategic decision-making of the individual or organization towards sustainable resource use survival; and insanity as the conscious strategic decision-making of the individual or organization towards ecological overshoot suicide.
 If or when it is proven to be scientifically true that ‘sanity is defined as conscious strategic decision-making of the individual or organization towards survival by sustainable management of the procreation and consumption faucet; whereas insanity is defined as conscious or unconscious strategic decision-making of the individual or organization towards suicide by ignoring the procreation and consumption faucet to profit from resource conflict misery mopping: Luten’s ‘sanity test’ could be scientific if edited as follows:
[37.1] “… an organization cannot have a conservation policy without having an advocacy for sustainable – below ecological carrying capacity limits – population and consumption footprint faucet international law policy … the sanity test—in which the candidate, confronted with an overflowing sink, is classified according to whether he reaches for the Return to Eden sustainable procreation and consumption international law mop or the Babylonian factory farming slaughterhouse faucet.”
 In EoP culture an unconditional cooperator ‘advocacy for sustainable population and consumption footprint faucet international law policy’ is referred to as an EoP Peace Policy statement [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za]
[38.1] Organizational EoP Policy Statement:
We hereby confirm that we shall voluntarily sign our responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za ] oaths [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za]; if or when EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za ] is implemented as international law. We understand that if or when EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] is implemented as international law; and we refuse to sign our responsible freedom oath; we will be charged with deception crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za ]. If convicted: If negligent we will be required to attend Ego/Eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za ] responsible freedom education classes. If intentional we will be able to choose our preferred method of state assisted suicide; by a date as decided by the sentencing judge, and if we fail to honourably depart by our preferred method of state assisted suicide by such date; we shall be humanely and orderly assassinated.
 EoP culture’s objective reality honesty test [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] – Request for Cultural Information – is similar to Lutens ‘sanity test’, with the focus on objective and subjective honesty v deception, instead of Luten’s sanity vs insanity; which can be summarized as follows:
[39.1] A sincere peacenik – aka Luten resource conservationist – is someone committed to (a) ego literate (i) scientific truthseeking enquiry; and (ii) advocacy on behalf of; (b) eliminating the – i.e. turning off the procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits tap/faucet – root causes of ecological overshoot resource depletion and consequently all local, national and international racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[39.2] EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint?
[39.3] EoP RH FR: EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.
Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Individuals, Organizations, Races, Religions, Classes, Genders, Ideologies:
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.
Objective Factual Reality:
 Earth is not flat.  Resources are finite.  When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.  Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.  The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits are the clauses of international law allowing citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits.
Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality:
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; to [A] enable responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za], prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za], land reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] and denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za]; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed [one-child-law.tygae.org.za] and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za] homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
 The concepts of objective and subjective honesty and deception are – to me at least – far more clear than objective and subjective vague and abstract sanity / insanity; in the same way that Lee Atwater’s ‘nigger, spick, cracker, kike, etc’ ; is far more Malcolm X ‘growling wolf’ honest and clear than ‘smiling fox’ ‘states / sanity rights’, etc.
[40.1] Harvey LeRoy “Lee” Atwater; GOP strategist and consultant:
You start out in 1954 by saying “Nigger, Nigger, Nigger.” By 1986 you can’t say ‘nigger’ that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states rights, and all that stuff. And you’re getting so abstract. Now you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you are talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites. ‘You want to cut this,’ is much more abstract than the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nigger, Nigger.”
[40.2] Malcolm X: 04 Dec 1963 Speech: God’s Judgement of White America:
The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives…. Once the Negro learns to think for himself, he will no longer allow the white liberal to use him as a helpless football in the white man’s crooked game of “power politics.” The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox.
 Measuring where does the does procreation / consumption crime begin?:
[41.1] Christine Le Gard: Managing Director: IMF: Intnl Monetary Fund:
“If you can’t measure something, you can’t improve things, because you have no basis of evaluation.”
[41.2] Donald Rumsfeld: Sec of Defence: 16 Oct 2003: Global War on Terrorism:
The questions I posed to combatant commanders this week were: Are we winning or losing the Global War on Terror? Today we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror.
 Ultimately the clarity of any scientific or cultural legal definition is can it be easily understood and measured, so that those who violate it can be held accountable.
[42.1] Polly Higgins: In law we draw a line: you can’t cross here. …. Now we are also looking at ecological law, it is a far more holistic approach. It is an understanding, not just about it being a rights issue but, about it being a duties and responsibilities issue individually and collectively, at state level, at corporate level. Where do we draw the line? Where do we say enough, no more? That is where we create the crime. That is where we criminalise that dangerous industrial activity, the decisions, the individuals who make the decisions. – Deep Green Resistance: Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Polly Higgins – May 6, 2018; Conscious Lawyer: Polly Higgins, Earth lawyer, Stop Ecocide.
[42.2] Luis Moreno Ocampo: When you have a law that says you cannot go ahead when there is a red light. You can move when there is a green light. Then if these rules are respected; you move to enforcement. How many people cross the red light? How many of them are prosecuted. How fast you go? In this case this convention; of you stop when there is a red light and you move when there is a green light; was not existing in International Relations. Leaders can commit crimes and nothing happens to them. Nothing. And this was the first time; hey guys; leaders: Red Light. If you commit atrocities; that will be a problem for you. That is a concept. The enforcement we can discuss. But for the first time we changed the world; we put up Red Lights for leaders who commit massive atrocities. – IBA Global Insight: Luis Moreno Ocampo ICC War Crimes Traffic Light.
 Measuring Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law:
[43.1] EoP Scientific Law refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured.
[43.2] EoP Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement.
 APA Global Leadership Luten Conservation Sanity Test:
 If EoP SciCult law is not implemented as international law, by latest 2020, APA global leadership will have failed their Luten Conservation Sanity Test; as they lead 9 billion over the climate and ecological emergency extinction cliff.
[45.1] Alliance for World Scientists: 23 Oct 2017: Second Warning:
Humanity is now being given a second notice. We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense but geographically and demographically uneven material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological and even societal threats.
[45.2] Robert Burrowes: The ecological evidence now indicates that human extinction may occur sometime during the period between 2025 and 2050. Or, if extinction does not occur, some scattered remnant human populations will eke out a miserable existence on a devastated Earth. Moreover, we have a very narrow timeframe (until about 2020) to achieve dramatic changes in the way that we live if we are to avoid the tipping points that will make this catastrophe inevitable. – Dave Keenan: The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth.
[45.3] Guy McPherson: If we follow Paris Agreement / Green New Deal; NTE – near term extinction – is locked in by 2026. We are fucked:
If my interpretation of Guy McPherson’s ‘climate change conclusions’ are accurate he concludes that if we have breached the tipping points and feedback loops, or once we breach the tipping points and feedback loops: we are fucked. If or once we breach the tipping points; McPherson’s estimate is that by 2026: 7 years from now, Climate change has killed us all. [Neils van der Wolk: 25 Nov 2016: Guy McPherson: Human Extinction by 2026; Nature Bats Last: Climate Change Summary and Update; Truth: Somewhere in New Mexico Before the End of Time. Guy McPherson; Walking Away from Empire: Going Dark].
Ecology of Peace Hypothesis: If we implement EoP SciCult intnl-law; we might have 2 years  to do so:
EoP hypothesis: we maybe have 2 years – till 2020 – to change the world, if by change the world we mean implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation, denuclearization and land reform.[16 Mar: EoP Re: Greta Thunberg: We have 11 years left to save the world].
19 January 2020
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Schaler archive.is/mWUvV
 Speech upon receipt of the 2006 Thomas Szasz Award: https://youtu.be/_-iYngr6N60
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Perls archive.is/demZC
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_L._Moreno archive.is/udOZ0
 https://www.blatner.com/adam/pdntbk/criminology.html archive.fo/yrAgE
 https://www.nytimes.com/1971/01/10/archives/-what-hits-you-is-the-total-human-waste-what-hits-you-is-the-waste.html http://ss-defcon.tygae.org.za/1971/01/10-jan-rkorn-nyt/ archive.is/IJqZk
 http://ss-defcon.tygae.org.za/1976/01/john-maher-of-delancey-street/ archive.is/i09Ix
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Szasz archive.is/MIJ8G
 http://ahrp.org/fred-a-baughman-jr-md/ archive.is/07fjg
 The ADHD Fraud: How Psychiatry Makes “Patients” of Normal Children, Fred Bauchmann, Jr
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Breggin archive.fo/6dE8B
 Toxic Psychiatry, Peter Breggin, MD
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Caplan archive.fo/d4ojz
 CCHR: The Marketing of Madness: Are we all Insane? http://www.cchr.org/videos/marketing-of-madness.html
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Boyle_(psychologist) archive.fo/7vHa3
 Schizophrenia: A Scientific Delusion, Mary Boyle
 https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/kutchins-herb archive.fo/XwhV6
 Making us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders, Herb Kutchins & Stuart A Kirk
 http://www.adisorder4everyone.com/bio/lucy-johnstone/ archive.fo/qDain
 Users and Abusers of Psychiatry: A Critical Look at Traditional Psychiatric Practice
 https://www.bu.edu/psych/profile/margaret-a-hagen-phd/ archive.is/dbhtT
 Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Schaler archive.is/mWUvV
 Speech upon receipt of the 2006 Thomas Szasz Award: https://youtu.be/_-iYngr6N60
 In the early and mid-1960’s, the population issue came up frequently at Sierra Club annual meetings. One frequent advocate of population control was Daniel Luten, a chemist who spent two years in Japan as a resources advisor to General Douglas MacArthur. “Does a wilderness program, a wilderness policy, without a population policy make any sense? he asked at the 1961 meetings. Luten also specifically attacked America’s growth fetish: ‘If we believe, with Lord Keynes, that a capitalist economy must grow to survive, then we will perhaps seek a society with an ever-growing population.” – Thomas Robertson: The Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism.
 http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/ archive.is/QneCw
 http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/eop-footprint/ archive.is/Guli3
 http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/eop-rh-fr/ archive.is/BSOAb
 Reich-Wing Watch: The Party of David Duke: The Rise of the Alt-Right. https://youtu.be/iZ-Mspv0TYY
 Al Jazeera: Global Financial Meltdown https://youtu.be/VQzEWeGJLP0
 Donald Rumsfeld: http://library.rumsfeld.com/doclib/sp/426/2003-10-16%20to%20Myers%20et%20al%20re%20Global%20War%20on%20Terrorism.pdf
 http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/eop-footprint/ archive.is/Guli3
 http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/eop-rh-cult-info/ego-eco-literacy/ archive.fo/q4sMD
 http://military-gospel.tygae.org.za/2017/10/23-oct-aws/ archive.fo/DZol4
 https://guymcpherson.com/climate-chaos/climate-change-summary-and-update/ archive.is/ranHg
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/03/16-mar-crosin/ archive.fo/oh2vR
 http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/ archive.is/Yv2t3
 http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/ archive.fo/NrdRC