* State Attorney, Gwen Selowa, Braam Swart & Partners, Andre van Niekerk, WCPP, Masizole Mnqasela, Beverly Schafer, Alan Winde, Cameron Dugmore, Romeo Adams, National Assembly, Thandi Modise, Parliament
* 27 Jan: LJ Re: BSP–AvN: S-GMC Re: H 225/19: LJ v S-GMC and Four Others.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v S-GMC, LJ v FW de Klerk, LJ v SA Political Parties / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 01:45:13 +0200
Subject: Re: BSP–AvN: S-GMC Re: H 225/19: LJ v S-GMC and Four Others
To: “Braam Swart and Partners: Andre van Niekerk” <Prok2@braamswart.co.za>, Winnie <email@example.com>
Cc: “Speaker: Masizole Mnqasela” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Dep:Beverly Schafer” <email@example.com>, Shamiela Osman <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Premier: Alan Winde” <email@example.com>, “Leader Opposition: Cameron Dugmore” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WCPP <email@example.com>, “Secretary to Legislature: Romeo Adams” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “National Assembly: Speaker: Thandi Modise” <email@example.com>, Thandi Ruth Modise <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Assistant: Zodwa Ngoma” <email@example.com>, Parliament <firstname.lastname@example.org>
TO: State Attorney: Gwen Selowa / Braam Swart & Partners: Andre van Niekerk.
CC: Speaker: WC Prov Parliament: Masizole Mnqasela
CC: Speaker: National Assembly: Thandi Modise
Re: H 225/19: LJ v Speaker GMC & Four Others [PDF: lj-v-sgmc]
State Attorney: Gwen Selowa:
Re: BSP–AvN: S-GMC Re: H 225/19: LJ v S-GMC and Four Others.
I received Braam Swart and Partners letter – DOC013.pdf [renamed: 20-01-27_S-GMC_BSP-AvN-Letter.pdf] – dated 23 January 2020, mailed per email by Andre van Niekerk’s secretary Winnie Barnard; on 27 Jan 2020 at 12:07 hrs [27 Jan: BSP–AvN: S-GMC Re: H 225/19: LJ v S-GMC and Four Others], which states.
Upon perusing your Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit in this matter (and subsequent correspondence sent) the following is evident:
 Your Founding Affidavit in support of your Notice of Motion does not set out any sufficient and certain facts upon which you rely for relief. The averments made in your Founding Affidavit is extremely vague and unclear in regards to the cause of the action as well as to the precise relief that is sought against our client.
 Furthermore, the supposed EoP UN Resolution documentation referred to is not attached to the Founding Affidavit and is unclear what is expected from our client in this regard;
 This leads to the situation that our client cannot effectively answer to your “claim” as your papers and “claim” are extreme vague, muddled, confusing and defective, specifically in regards to what is required by the Uniform Rules of Court. To effectively answer your “claim” would be impossible on your papers as they currently stand.
We therefore request and demand that you clarify your “claim”, provide sufficient and certain facts upon which you rely for your relief and clarify your papers so that it conforms to the legal requirements set out in the Rules.
If we do not receive same within the next 15 days, our client will deal with this matter as it deems proper in terms to the Rules of the Honourable Court.
Correspondence on behalf of which Respondent?:
Please clarify which respondent – 03: Speaker: WCPP: Masizole Mnqasela; or 04: Speaker: National Assembly: Thandi Modise [07 Nov: BSP-AvN: H 225/19: LJ v SGMC: Speaker: WCPP & NA: Notice to Oppose; 13 Dec: SWCPP: Withdrawal of Notice to Oppose: PDF] – the correspondence is on behalf.
Request for Info vs Claim Order Application:
The application is a ‘Request Info: Please Confirm Speaker Respondents were notified of EoP TRC negotiations, and Requested to hold EoP TRC legislative vote’ application. It is not a ‘Claim Order: Please Order Respondent to hold EoP TRC legislative vote’ application.
Cases that request the Judge to issue an order that confirms that respondents were provided with a written formal request, via a legal application, to voluntarily do something, and that the respondents declined the request. The judge does not have jurisidictional and/or legal authority to order the respondents to do what I am requesting them to voluntarily do, but the judge does have jurisdictional and/or legal authority to confirm in writing that I did provide the respondents with information and request the respondents to voluntarily do something, and that the respondents declined.
* LJ v LS: EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC
* LJ v NMN: Notice of EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC
* LJ v SGMC: EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC declaration
» EoP Leg Sub: 01 Dec: LJ Re: Upd: LJ v GH Johnstone & 5 Others.
Even if the judge refuses to confirm the respondents responses, the LS respondents have the proof that the Request application was submitted to the respondents by the Sheriff [1st to 4th; Postnet: 5th].
Request for Info Relief Requested:
Request for Respondents EoP TRC or No EoP TRC Vote Information:
An Order confirming:
[I] All Respondents Receipt of Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Truth and Reconciliation (“TRC”) UN Resolution negotiations documentation; submitted to H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu Respondents requesting EoP UN Resolution to be submitted to UN General Assembly to authorize EoP Scientific and Cultural law be implemented as binding international law.
[II] Applicants Request to “Speaker” Respondents to submit EoP UN Resolution documentation to their local, municipal, provincial, national and/or Pan African legislative council members requesting their AYE: Consent or NAY: Object vote with regard to Ecology of Peace – Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution Declaration. EoP UN Resolution Declarations to be filed in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu proceedings.
 An Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) climate emergency declaration is based on EoP law. A Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) climate emergency declaration consciously or unconsciously is based on Babylon WiP law.
[11.1] Ecology of Peace – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally enforces existing – and/or advocates on behalf of implementing – EoP international law requiring citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[11.2] Babylon War is Peace law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally enforces existing Babylon WiP international law allowing citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[Council Name] Ecology of Peace UN Resolution Declaration
Motion: This house declares its [consent/objection] to Applicants H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu Ecology of Peace UN Resolution draft text and definitions [pp.42]; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law based on EoP Footprint as binding international law; to enable Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War to [A] enable responsible freedom orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release, land reform and denuclearization – shut down of the Babylon War is Peace Ponzi Swamp economy; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
Please clarify what exactly is vague about applicants request. If you clarify what exactly is vague, I can focus on clarifying that particular issue.
Subsequent to receiving the SGMC [lj-v-sgmc] respondents – EoP TRC: Consent / No EoP TRC: Notice to Oppose – responses, those responses were provided to the LS [lj-v-ls] respondents [15 Dec: LJvLS: EoP TRC & No EoP TRC Votes: Deadline Ext: 16 Feb 2020].
EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution Votes:
No EoP TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide Votes:
LJ v Speaker House of Commons [PDF: PoS: 25 Nov]:
» Speaker: House of Commons, Speaker: Scottish Parliament, Speaker: National Assembly for Wales, Speaker: Northern Ireland Assembly, Speaker: London Assembly, Leaders: UK Political Parties, Leader: Extinction Rebellion, Sec Gen: Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc, President: Law Society of United Kingdom, Gen Sec: British Assoc & National Union of Journalists, Chief of Defence: Ministry of Defence, UK Prime Minister
H 225/19: LJ v Speaker: George Municipal Council & Four Others [PDF: PoS: 13 Dec]:
» Speaker: George Municipal Council, Speaker: Eden / Garden Route District Council, Speaker: National Assembly, Speaker: Pan African Parliament
H 111/19: Peaceniks [PDF: PoS: 08 Dec].
» Norwegian Nobel Committee & Laureates; Klaus Schwab & World Economic Forum; Alt Right; US Peace Candidates; IWW Labour Organizations; Veterans for Peace; Commanders for Israel Security; Indigenous Groups; Wikileaks; Bradley/Chelsea Manning; Alliance for World Scientists; End Ecocide Lawyers; Extinction Rebellion; Fridays for Future; Gilet Jaunes – Yellow vests; Black Lives Matter; Duty to Warn Psychologists & Psychiatrists; Me Too Movement; Women Across the DMZ; Radical Honesty; Larry Flynt.
H 111/19: Giving Pledge Oligarchs [PDF: PoS: 14 Dec]:
» Bill Ackman, Warren Buffet, Patrice & Precious Motsepe, Laura and John Arnold, Alwaleed bin Talal, Ted Turner, Pierre Omidyar, Michael & Lori Milken, Mo Ibrahim, Mo Dewji, Michael Bloomberg, Mackenzie Bezos, Tom Steyer & Kat Taylor, Mark Zuckerberg & Priscilla Chan, Vladimir Potanin, Ray and Barbara Dalio.
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Dec: LJvLS: EoP TRC & No EoP TRC Votes: Deadline Ext: 16 Feb 2020
If there had been no ‘EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution’ vote respondents, then the LJ dispute would have moved over to No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide’ negotiations.
If Correspondence is on behalf of WCPP Speaker: Mnqasela:
If WCPP Speaker: Mnqasela wants to withdraw his ‘Withdrawal of Notice to Oppose’ and revert back to ‘Notice to Oppose’ status; that’s okay. His ‘EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution’ vote can be changed back to a ‘No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide’ vote.
If WCPP Speaker: Mnqasela has not scheduled a WCPP Cllrs EoP UN Resolution vote by 10 Feb 2020, and has not notified me of by when he intends to schedule a WCPP Cllrs EoP UN Resolution vote by 10 Feb 2020, I shall conclude that he has changed his mind about his Notice of Withdrawal of Notice to Oppose, and reverted back to No EoP TRC: Notice to Oppose status.
If there are no other EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution votes, then the LS respondents can make their EoP TRC or No EoP TRC vote decisions, consulting with their military advisors [10 Aug: EoP Applicants: Draft: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law], if they want to or not.
If there are any LS respondents and/or military advisor EoP TRC votes, then EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants shall continue to engage in EoP TRC vote outreach on behalf of such EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution voters. If not, then EoP TRC negotiations can be terminated; and EoP TRC negotiations can focus exclusively on No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide logistics negotiations.
If No EoP TRC Siberia Assisted Suicide negotiations fail:
If US and/or South African officials do not cooperate re [lj-v-ls] No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide. If so: I shall have to implement my alternative departure option: Provide President Putin and the FSB with a written affidavit request and authorization to psychotronically terminate my life, my parents can provide the ashes to the Russian Ambassador, for the FSB to scatter in the Siberian wilderness.
» EoP Leg Sub: 19 Nov: LJ Notice to EoP Applicants: Status of EoP TRC Negotiations.; 20 Nov: LJ Re: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC: Req for Info: JSC & Judge NC Erasmus.
If Correspondence is on behalf of National Assembly Speaker: Modise:
National Assembly Speaker: Modise has already filed her Notice to Oppose: No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide’ vote. It has already been submitted to LS respondents [15 Dec: LJvLS: EoP TRC & No EoP TRC Votes: Deadline Ext: 16 Feb 2020]. If she is unsure about her vote, and wants any issue she is vague about clarified, to enable her to make a more fully informed EoP TRC vote decision; she should clarify what exactly she considers vague; so that I can clarify it for her as much as I am able to do so.
EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Braam Swart and Partners: Andre van Niekerk:
Braam Swart and Partners: Andre van Niekerk (Prok2@braamswart.co.za); Winnie (email@example.com);
Speaker: WCPP: Masizole Mnqasela:
Speaker: Masizole Mnqasela (firstname.lastname@example.org); Dep: Beverly Schafer (email@example.com); Shamiela Osman (firstname.lastname@example.org); Premier: Alan Winde (email@example.com); Leader Opposition: Cameron Dugmore (firstname.lastname@example.org); WCPP (email@example.com); Secretary to Legislature: Romeo Adams (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Speaker: National Assembly: Thandi Modise:
National Assembly: Speaker: Thandi Modise (email@example.com); Thandi Ruth Modise (firstname.lastname@example.org); Assistant: Zodwa Ngoma (email@example.com); Parliament (firstname.lastname@example.org)