* Keertan Dheda, eNCA, Jeremy Maggs, Denis Rancourt, Dissident Voice, Angie Tibbs, Margaret Harris, Andrew Kaufman, Judy Mikovitz, Mikki Willis, Elevate
* 10 May: McVeigh 2020: EoP re: KDheda: in/accuracy of mask wearing research.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, LJ v SANEF / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: McVeigh 2020 Exp Comm <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 20:48:23 +0200
Subject: EoP re: KDheda: in/accuracy of mask wearing research
To: Keertan Dheda <email@example.com>, Laurene Viljoen <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “eNCA: Jeremy Maggs” <email@example.com>, Newsroom <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: “Denis Rancourt: via Dissident Voice: Angie Tibbs” <email@example.com>, Margaret Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Judy Mikovitz via Mikki Willis: Elevate” <email@example.com>
Sent: 10 May 2020: 21:44 hrs: Andrew Kaufman Contact Form.
TO: Keertan Dheda:
CC: eNCA: Editor in Chief: Jeremy Maggs:
CC: Denis Rancourt, Margaret Harris, Andrew Kaufman, Judy Mikovitz:
CC: eNCA: Impact of wearing a mask.
EoP re: Keertan Dheda: in/accuracy of mask wearing research.
 Is it fair to say you are a WiP law academic. EoP academics advocate on behalf of tactical research to accomplish and/or enforce the strategic goal of EoP International law. WiP academics consciously or unconsciously advocate on behalf of research to accomplish and/or enforce the strategic goal of WiP international law [EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF].
 If so: Generally speaking the rule of thumb is that only those willing to sell their souls for 30 pieces of bullshit the public relations silver [IG: 17-09-04; 20-04-03]; reach the heights of getting their academic research funded by WiP oligarchy philanthropy [Corbett Report: How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health; Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World]. Have you been an obedient WiP law oligarch philanthropy academic; or not? What is your Milgram 35% [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] credibility history of risking your academic capital and standing up to and voicing criticism of WiP law oligarchy philanthropy’s role in academia and academic research?
On the issue of wearing masks:
 What would you say is the level of academic research certainty with regard to mask wearing?
 What is your personal academic level of belief or hypothesis enquiry conclusions certainty as to your academic conclusions as to the negative / positive benefits of wearing masks?
 If you summarize the unvarnished truthseeking quality of your research: what percentage of your research included academic truthseeking into academics research conclusions for and against wearing masks? 50/50; 10/90; 01/99?
 When you engage in unvarnished truthseeking; are you willing to consider the research conclusions of critics of the oligarchy philanthropy medical industrial complex medical healthcare model?
 Why do you think that the eNCA newsreporter only interviewed a pro-mask-wearing academic; without giving any platform to an anti-mask-wearing academic? As a truthseeking scientist who sincerely values constructive criticism as means of finding the truth; did you object to such blatant pro-mask wearing academic conclusions media bias? Did you recommend that eNCA provide a platform for an anti-mask-wearing academic, so that viewers could hear both sides; prior to consenting to be interviewed? If not, why not?
 Are you aware of the anti-mask-wearing conclusions; some of them from credible ‘modern medicine is the leading cause of death’ critics of the oligarchy philanthropy medical industrial complex critics:
* WHO: Dr Margaret Harris [LBC: Why face masks don’t protect you]
* Denis Rancourt [Denis Rancourt: Masks Don’t Work against COVID-19; RG: Masks Don’t Work: A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy]
* Andrew Kaufman [Andre Levy: Masks can make you sick]
* Judy Mikovitz [Dunamisk: Judy Mikovitz; Thrivetime Show: Judy Mikovitz: Why you should not wear a mask; Buzz Pelermon: Judy Mikovitz: Mask Hoax; Childrens Health Defense: Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science]
Diclosure: McVeigh 2020 EoP Law Policy Re: Industrial Medicine / Agriculture etc:
McVeigh2020 [mcveigh2020] / EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] recommend abolition of the Babylon WiP Law Slaughterhouse for Profit industrial healthcare model [CCHR: Psychiatry in the Military: The Hidden Enemy; Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging; Psychiatry: An Industry of Death; Vaxxed TV: Vaxxed; Vaxxed II; Len Horowitz: Manmade Origins of Aids and Ebola] in favour of responsible freedom [PDF: pp.61-62/71] organic healthcare model [NBC: Eustace Conway’s Turtle Island; EoP v WiP Healthcare] economy.
» EoP Leg Sub: 29 Dec: McVeigh2020 Re: Seth Moulton: Bipartisan Bills Waiting on US Senate.
McVeigh campaign is willing to consider any academics research conclusions. An academic’s credibility is not determined as to their race, religion, ideology or class; but as to the quality of their ego literacy [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.37-38, 44-48/71; lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.36-37, 43-47/70] character: their willingness to answer questions about their objective [eop-rh-fr] and subjective [eop-rh-iqo] reality strategic and tactical academic and research goals and conclusions.
Pub: 10 May: McVeigh 2020: EoP Law Re: Iqbal Surve: A healthy dose of mask reality is needed in SA.
TO: Igbal Surve
CC: Embassy of Finland in Pretoria: Ambassador Petri Salo:
Re: IOL: Iqbal Surve: A healthy dose of reality is what is needed in SA.
Added: CC: Legal Practice Council: Kathleen Dlepu:
Ref: 07 May: LJ Re LPC-CL Re: LJ v NMN/LPC/SANEF: Draft Settlement Agreement.
EoP Law Re: Iqbal Surve: A healthy dose of mask reality is needed in SA.
Iqbal Surve: in all my interactions with my colleagues in the business world, I have found new heroes and heroines who have risen to the challenge of digging deep, innovating under pressure and generally speaking, demonstrating great leadership even while facing their own personal concerns and worries about what the future holds for them and their families. No, I am disappointed, because after having penned several articles over several weeks of lockdown that espoused the possibilities this pause could bring to the betterment of society and economies, I have landed back in reality with a bump. As discouraging as this is, it is also a good thing. ….. I am referring here to the thousands of people who selfishly threw caution to the wind, and thronged the roads, parks and public spaces across the land. Images show countless numbers ignoring the regulations for masks or social distancing, thus recklessly endangering those around them. They clearly missed the requirement to adjust their attitudes and approach to life, brought about by the history making and future changing event that has enveloped the world. It was a sad reflection of just how entrenched in self, the human race has become. South Africa is still at the beginning of its Covid-19 journey, another fact that seems to have escaped those who continue to permeate the frosty morning air around them as they run without their masks. I’ve heard that some refuse to wear masks while exercising because they find it difficult to breathe. They should ask someone who has contracted Covid-19 how it feels to breathe while drowning in their own body to understand just why it is that governments around the world are enforcing the use of masks. The wearing of masks is all the more important considering that scientists have now discovered that Covid-19 has been detected on particles of air pollution. As a further appeal to encourage people to wear masks, remember that when the aircraft is going down you are asked to put on your own mask before helping others? Then put on your own mask now, so that you can help yourself and those around you. – IOL: Iqbal Surve: A healthy dose of reality is what is needed in SA.
The other [Babylonian] character is not presented the truth, but is instead presented with a mask, or to put it more simply: a lie. In the show House, the maverick doctor Gregory House often finds his diagnostic work is challenged not so much by the mysterious nature of the illness, but by the one simple fact that everybody lies. The only variable is about what. So what are the [sincere peacenik / honourable warrior] things [Babylonians] lie about. – EoP Amended: LSOO: Radical Honesty – What if We all Told the Truth? .
» EoP Leg Sub: 21 Apr: EoP Obs: LSOO: Radical Honesty – What If We All Told The Truth?.
SQWorms [sqworms] mask policy is the same as its Corona tobacco, etc policy [04 May: McVeigh2020: WHO Covid-19 Lockdown & Tobacco Ban illegal under EoP Law].
SQWorms EoP law [EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF] leadership policy [05 May: McVeigh2020: EoP v WiP Lawship As to SAFE Inst of Coaching Leadership Qs]
Enclosed you can find a conscious WiP Law Corona Cattle Mask Reality identification [20-05-10] for your Heil Adolf Ramaphosa WiP Law Corona Command Council [02 May: McVeigh2020: EoP or WiP Law SA Command Council Q for SAPS Police Chief Cele; 07 May: LJ Re LPC-CL Re: LJ v NMN/LPC/SANEF: Draft Settlement Agreement] fragile ego jogging and WiP law corona cattle – fuck objective reality [eop-rh-fr] honesty – business relating activities.
* EoP Covid 19 Obs [08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?]
* Judy Mikovits: Individuals who want to keep their immune systems strong, whether they already have strong immune systems or have low immunity systems should not wear masks, except when indoors and in very close proximity to others; and if so they should limit their time doing that activity as much as possible. If outdoors and/or indoors and not in close proximity to others: do not wear a mask. The quality of air – even outdoor polluted air – has less viral load, than the quality of air exhaled from a compromised immune system; into a mask. Wearing a mask forces you to inhale your exhaled viruses being excreted by your lungs; from your low immune system. Inhaling those exhaled viruses will increase the viral load of those viruses in your lungs / low or even healthy immune system. When your lungs / immune systems viral load is increased by your inhaling of your exhaled viruses; to the point that your lungs / immune system cannot fight the viruses, then you will succumb from those virus attacks, whether they be coronavirus or any other virus attacking your immune system [Dunamisk: Judy Mikovitz; Thrivetime Show: Judy Mikovitz: Why you should not wear a mask; Buzz Pelermon: Judy Mikovitz: Mask Hoax; Childrens Health Defense: Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science].
* Eric Peters: The Corona Cattle Herd Grows [Straight Line Logic: The Herd Grows by Eric Peters]
SQWorms is an Ecology of Peace law advocacy company. Ecology of Peace definition of human: someone who has signed their EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oath].
An individuals subjective reality is a symptom of the information that they included in their – what is truth about this or that hypothesis issue / person / event question – truthseeking enquiry.
On controversial subjective reality interpretation issues, the quality of their truthseeking information will be based on the persons they consider believable in terms of their culture, profession, race, religion, class etc.
Brad Blanton: I did allot of work with couples, in the Radical Honesty workshops. I guarantee you that 99% of all conflict between couples has nothing to do with [global eop-rh-fr objective] reality. It has to do with other people’s [subjective] interpretation of [local objective/subjective] reality. You have to buy my interpretation of reality, and we’ll be okay. I’ll love you as long as you meet the conditions of my interpretations of reality. Usually one of the couples comes in and gives me their story and tries to be as convincing as they can; then the other member comes in and tries to be as convincing as they can. And they say: ‘Well okay, what do you think?’ Like I am the judge who is supposed to know which one is right. And I say I think you are both full of shit. Then basically they unify against me and they are together again. – [EoP Amended] Radical Honesty Channel: Radical Honesty 01.02.03; SHO: Brad Blanton: And Nothing But the Truth; The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth; LSOO: Radical Honesty – What If We All Told The Truth?; SQ-Esquire: I Think You’re Fat; The Most Honest Conversation in the World.
» EoP Leg Sub: 29 Oct: EoP Re: WiP Near Term Extinction Statements about Guy McPherson.
Ray Dalio: The greatest tragedy of mankind — or one of them — is that people needlessly hold wrong opinions in their minds. All opinions are not equal. Peter Blanken: I have been in a few situations recently where people I respect and love have given me their opinion on certain matters. I have also had the dubious pleasure of listening to less-than-credible “specialists” mouth-fart about subjects they in actually did not know a lot about. ….. The greatest tragedy of mankind — or one of them — is that people needlessly hold wrong opinions in their minds. All opinions are not equal. And it is not the person we love or respect who necessarily has an opinion which really counts, at least not if they lack believability. Ray Dalio defines believability as follows: “Believable people as those who have repeatedly and successfully accomplished the thing in question — who have a strong track record with at least three successes — and have great explanations of their approach when probed”. From this he extracts another very valuable thought which many people who argue for the sake of arguing would do better to consider: “If both parties are peers, it’s appropriate to argue. But if one person is clearly more knowledgable than the other, it is preferable for the less knowledgeable person to approach the more knowledgable one as a student and for the more knowledgable one to act as a teacher”. Now, in Bridgewater’s organization they have figured this out to the most granular level, because they actually assign a believability score to each participant in a discussion, in real time. This means that when the organisation needs to make important investment decisions, they will take each person’s input and put that through the filter. This may lead to a decision being voted for by a majority, but actually rejected, because the believability score of that majority was lower than the assigned knowledge, experience or background of the minority. That’s pretty powerful stuff. ………. When two people believe opposing things, chances are that one of them is wrong. It pays to find out if that someone is you. …. holding wrong opinions in one’s head and making bad decisions based on them instead of having thoughtful disagreements is one of the greatest tragedies of mankind. ….. That quote is from Ray Dalio, the founder and Grand Poobah at Bridgewater Associates, the largest hedge fund in the world and a successful billionaire entrepreneur. Dalio likes to develop the idea of thoughtful disagreement, in which the goal is not to convince the opposite party that you are right, but simply to find out which view is true and then what to do about it. Both parties must be motivated by a genuine fear of missing important perspectives. In such a situation it is about exploring the truth and not simply arguing. Or “winning” the argument. In reality, the winners of an argument, if there is such a thing, are those who leave the discussion having learned something. Whereas the losers are those who stubbornly cling to their thoughts, beliefs and reasoning without having given any consideration to the others’ point of view. What is interesting is that, being from a multi-cultural European background, I very frequently see how this plays out depending on the origins of the parties involved. Often, discussions get more heated with people from the south of Europe, considered more “hot-blooded”, than people from the North, more “cold-blooded”. The next time you find yourself in a discussion seemingly not leading towards agreement or resolution, consider this notion of thoughtful disagreement. Try to stand apart from the discussion. Hold you tongue and go through these 3 steps: * Listen with intent, meaning that you seek to understand the other person’s viewpoint first and foremost. * Take into consideration how believable the other person is. Find points of agreement and build on those. Determine points of disagreement and focus on clarifying them. * Stay open to the notion that if the 2 ideas are opposing, and one of them could be wrong, there is actually a possibility the person having it wrong is you. You might also consider sharing this methodology with the ”opposing” party and see if that improves the quality of the exchange. The goal should not be to bludgeon the other into accepting your views, but to leave the disagreement smarter that when you started and that this leads to improved decision making and a harmonious conclusion. – CNBC: Ray Dalio says ‘greatest tragedy of mankind’ is people clinging to wrong opinions; The Startup: How to have better discussions — the art of thoughtful disagreement; How to make better decisions: consider Believability.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Aug: LJ v LS CEO Req for Invest Info: Peter Blanken & Michael Burry; 23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report:.
Ecology of Peace objective and/or subjective honest / negligent or intentional deception media [eop-v-wip-media] / academic [eop-v-wip-academia] believability factors includes the individuals Milgram decision-maker [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] capability.
John D’Agostino, former head of strategy of the New York Mercantile Exchange: If John Arnold decided he wanted to beat hunger. I wouldn’t want to bet on hunger. “You don’t shift a culture overnight,” Nosek says. But as many Wall Street veterans can testify, betting against John Arnold is usually a bad idea. Brian Nosek had pretty much given up on finding a funder. For two years he had sent out grant proposals for his software project. And for two years they had been rejected again and again—which was, by 2011, discouraging but not all that surprising to the 38-year-old scientist. An associate professor at the University of Virginia, Nosek had made a name for himself in a hot subfield of social psychology, studying people’s unconscious biases. But that’s not what this project was about. At least, not exactly. Like a number of up-and-coming researchers in his generation, Nosek was troubled by mounting evidence that science itself—through its systems of publication, funding, and advancement—had become biased toward generating a certain kind of finding: novel, attention grabbing, but ultimately unreliable. The incentives to produce positive results were so great, Nosek and others worried, that some scientists were simply locking their inconvenient data away. The problem even had a name: the file drawer effect. And Nosek’s project was an attempt to head it off at the pass. He and a graduate student were developing an online system that would allow researchers to keep a public log of the experiments they were running, where they could register their hypotheses, methods, workflows, and data as they worked. That way, it would be harder for them to go back and cherry-pick their sexiest data after the fact—and easier for other researchers to come in and replicate the experiment later. Nosek was so taken with the importance of redoing old experiments that he had also rallied more than 50 like-minded researchers across the country to participate in something he called the Reproducibility Project. The aim was to redo about 50 studies from three prominent psychology journals, to establish an estimate of how often modern psychology turns up false positive results. It was little wonder, then, that funders didn’t come running to support Nosek: He wasn’t promising novel findings, he was promising to question them. So he ran his projects on a shoestring budget, self-financing them with his own earnings from corporate speaking engagements on his research about bias. The Reproducibility Project, meanwhile, swelled to include more than 270 researchers working to reproduce 100 psychology experiments—and in August 2015, Nosek revealed its results. Ultimately his army of volunteers could verify the findings of only about 40 percent of the studies. Media reports declared the field of psychology, if not all of science, to be in a state of crisis. It became one of the biggest science stories of the year. But as it happens, Nosek is just one of many researchers who have received unsolicited emails from the Arnold Foundation in the past few years—researchers involved in similar rounds of soul-searching and critique in their own fields, who have loosely amounted to a movement to fix science.John Ioannidis was put in touch with the Arnolds in 2013. A childhood math prodigy turned medical researcher, Ioannidis became a kind of godfather to the science reform crowd in 2005, when he published two devastating papers—one of them titled simply “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” Now, with a $6 million initial grant from the Arnold Foundation, Ioannidis and his colleague Steven Goodman are setting out to turn the study of scientific practice—known as meta-research—into a full-fledged field in its own right, with a new research center at Stanford. British doctor Ben Goldacre also got an email from the Arnold Foundation in 2013. Famous in England as a sharp-witted scourge of “bad science,” Goldacre spent years building up a case that pharmaceutical companies, by refusing to reveal all their data, have essentially deceived the public into paying for worthless therapies. Now, with multiple grants from the Arnolds, he is leading an effort to build an open, searchable database that will link all publicly available information on every clinical trial in the world. And those are just a few of the people who are calling out iffy science with Arnold funding. Laura and John Arnold didn’t start the movement to reform science, but they have done more than anyone else to amplify its capabilities—typically by approaching researchers out of the blue and asking whether they might be able to do more with more money. “The Arnold Foundation has been the Medici of meta-research,” Ioannidis says. All told, the foundation’s Research Integrity initiative has given more than $80 million to science critics and reformers in the past five years alone. … Arnold had always been ready to make huge bets, but it was ultimately his hunger for reliable data that made him a brilliant trader. That same hunger would make large-scale philanthropy far more challenging than he had anticipated. In a glass conference room at the Arnold Foundation’s offices—which occupy the same space as the old Centaurus trading floor, a 15-minute drive from the glass tower whose entrance was once adorned with Enron’s famous E—Arnold explains that his and Laura’s initial plan had been to simply locate the most effective organizations and write them checks. But figuring out which organizations were most effective turned out to be vexing. Nonprofits are very good at reporting their success rates and citing the science behind their interventions, but dig into their claims—as the Arnolds would try to do—and you find that they often omit relevant context or confuse correlation with causation. “The more you read the research, the less you know,” Arnold says. “It became extraordinarily frustrating.” – Wired: John Arnold Made a Fortune at Enron. Now he’s declared a war on bad science.
» EoP Leg Sub: 28 Jun: EoP Re: John Arnold’s Doing Good Giving Pledge War on Bad [WiP?] Science [password].
Ecology of Peace cultures definition of objective truth / reality:
Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.
* Objective Factual Reality:
 Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
* Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality:
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: NoM Afd & EoP UN Res [PDF] EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]
Ecology of Peace cultures definition of subjective truth / reality:
 Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Subjective Reality:
 In a Babylon WiP international and national constitutional law polegal system, most subjective reality resource conflict disputes, are symptoms of living in a Babylon WiP international law legal system, that allows procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, ecological overshoot and resource conflict.
[11.1] Judges, lawyers, editors, academics, politicians, religious leaders, etc can encourage citizens to focus only on their individual or group racial, religious, class or gender subjective reality resource conflict dispute, totally ignoring the root WiP international law causes of their subjective resource conflict reality; or
[11.2] Judges, lawyers, editors, academics, politicians, religious leaders etc can encourage the individuals to focus on their subjective reality resource conflict dispute, within the context of recognizing their resource conflict dispute, is a symptom of living in a Babylon WiP international law legal system; and cooperatively legally, politically, religiously, academically, etc advocate on behalf of abolishing the root WiP international law cause of all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict disputes.
 Subjective Reality Summary:
[12.1] Factual Reality is founded upon Facts: what happened, who said what, who did what to whom, how, when and where. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch.
[12.2] Our motives for who we choose to be, and what we choose to do and say — covertly and/or overtly — are a reflection of our cultural subjective – ethnicity, religion and class identity – reality.
[12.3] In any objective and/or subjective reality event or circumstance, interpretive Reality is founded upon the interpretation of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts.
[12.4] Different interpretations of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts can be quickly resolved with no wasting of time or resources; with ego literacy sincere honest listening and confirming of accuracy or inaccuracy of interpretations [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.36-37/70].
[12.5] Different interpretations of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts can take forever to resolve with massive wasting of time and resources where individuals lack ego literacy character communication skills; and refuse to answer questions and/or confirm the accuracy or inaccuracy of an interpretation; resulting in negligent and/or malicious misrepresentations and/or misunderstandings, where such misrepresentations and/or misunderstandings then become fodder for more disagreements, and more Babylonian confusion and conflict.
[12.6] Objective and Subjective reality interpretations can be functional or dysfunctional. Cooperative resource sharing interpretations will be considered functional amongst individuals who identify as cooperative resource sharing individuals and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who identify as competitors. Village idiot interpretations will be considered functional amongst individuals who identify as village idiots, and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who identify as expert deceivers. Objective and subjective interpretations of reality will be considered functional amongst individuals who value brutal honest sharing of objective and subjective interpretations to reach a collective consciousness truth conclusion; and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who have do not value brutal honest sharing of objective and subjective interpretations to reach a collective consciousness truth conclusion.
 An individuals subjective reality can either be honestly transparent, or covertly hidden behind a false public relations image management subjective reality.
 Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural international law solution for avoiding subjective reality conflicts with individuals who have strong attachments to a particular racial, religious or cultural value system, is to provide such groups of individuals with Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [cult-law-self-rule: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.34-35/70]..
» EoP Leg Sub: 09 Nov: LJ Re: Notice: Judicial Service Commission and Judge NC Erasmus: EoP Applicant Statement to Judge Erasmus: Request Written Reasons for Case Dismissal: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge: Case Dismissal Merit Issues in Dispute.
McVeigh 2020 EoP Law: UN, IMF, WB & NATO Defunding Notices.
Re: USHR Comm on Foreign Affairs inquiry [USHCFA: Engel Launches Inquiry into Trump Decision to Halt WHO Funding] into Trump 15 Apr 2020: 01:00 + 0200| 14 Apr 18:00 EST [CD: PT] decision to halt WHO Funding [STAT: Trump announces a formal freeze on WHO funding, pending an investigation]
McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020] 14 & 20 Apr 2020 Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO Notices provided to USHCFA [27 Apr: McVeigh2020: McV20 Info Re USHCFA Enq into Trump Defund WHO Decision]:
» 14 Apr 2020: 01:34 + 0200: McVeigh 2020: Notice: Defund UN; WHO Appointment: Robert Kennedy; US Surg General: Leonard Horowitz; 10:46 + 0200: McVeigh2020: TN to US Pres Candidates: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO.
» 20 Apr 2020: 16:30 + 0200: McVeigh 2020: TN to WB & IMF: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO; 19:40 + 0200: McVeigh 2020: TN to NATO: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO.
McVeigh 2020 EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations.
The supreme priority for EoP culture – including during any national or global resource conflict crisis symptom of WiP international law – is building an EoP Axis Alliance to submit EoP UN Resolution to UN General Assembly; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71; lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization to a global low tech organic family farm agrarian economy.
McVeigh2020 / EoP MILED Clerk would – similar to Sweden and Belarus [08 Apr: McVeigh 2020: EoP Re Lukashenko Weimar Herd Culling Q re Gates WHO Covid-19 Lockdown] – not have recommended a tactical lockdown in response to Covid-19 pandemic. Caveat: unless one of the tactical goals of the Covid Lockdown was a global dimming experiment: [25 Mar: EoP Re Covid 19 – measure Global Dimming / educate exponential function – experiment?; 30 Dec: EoP A to McPherson – GHardin Climate Emergency – Paradox Question].
Either way if a – Covid19 or Covid-Global-Dimming-experiment – tactical lockdown was implemented in any nation; to accomplish EoP Axis Alliance strategic goals; then such tactical lockdown should be an EoP Law lockdown. EoP Law Covid-19 lockdown rules submitted to NIAID: Anthony Fauci, WHO: Tedros Adhanom [30 Mar: McVeigh2020: EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations] for Milgram 2% or 35% WHO, Head of State, military, juridical, political and civil society decision makers, who want to include their nation in EoP Axis Alliance.
McVeigh 2020 EoP Axis [eop-axis] Alliance [30 Nov: EoP Re: National Comm on Military, National and Public Service Enquiry; McVeigh 2020: TN to NATO: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO] advocates on behalf of authorizing EoP UN Resolution: EoP Scientific and Cutlural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70| lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56 | lj-v-shoc: PDF: 43-84/88 | lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83| lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137] as international law, to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation economic degrowth path to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy.
An EoP Axis Alliance nation is a nation whose Head of State – on their own Milgram 2% decision making [Invictus: Dictator; Iron Lady; A Woman Named Golda; The Upright Man; John Brown; Bram Fischer]; or with a Milgram 35% EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oath] mandate from cabinet, parliament, judiciary, military and/or civil society [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] – has instructed their UN Ambassador to (a) authorize EoP UN Resolution for submission to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020; and/or if already submitted to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020 [09 Mar: FilingLetter to Judge Nathan Erasmus: PDF; 16 Apr: CCMA 1063-20: LJ v TRC: Draft Settlement Agreement]; (b) to vote Aye authorizing EoP UN Resolution: EoP Scientific and Cultural law to become international law; at the time of the UN General Assembly – EoP UN Resolution – vote.
EoP Axis Alliance Head of State Legal and Military EoP UN Resolution Mandate Alternatives:
» Judiciary [eop-legcertenq: 21 Apr: DRAFT: Presidents of Russia, China; USA & EU: Joint letter to their Constitutional / Supreme Court Chief Justices. Subject: Re: EoP Axis Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel & Kane Cold War Negotiations; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law];
» Military [10 Aug: EoP Applicants: Draft: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law].
Summary: EoP Law – TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War – Axis Alliance negotiations:
The question is whether EoP SciCult law [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] or WiP Babylon law should be master intnl law; that’s all. [EoP Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jan: EoP v WiP Law Relevance Defns A: Re JManchin: If its relevant I want to hear it.
Lawrence Wilkerson: We need some sort of relationship like that between Washington and Beijing today, I think. And I do not mean in any way that we should rule the world together. What I mean is the [ecological & economic collapse consequences of WiP ‘right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ intnl law] challenges like we’re going to confront in the 21st century, challenges that could be [species ending] existential, challenges like climate change, challenges like enough water to drink, enough food to eat, and so forth — I’ve seen some projections that say — by climatologists whose views I respect, that say we could have only arable land and water enough for some half-billion people. What do we do with the other 9 billion? Where do we bury them? How do we deal with that kind of massive change in human relationships with this planet? So these are huge challenges. So what I’m saying is you need this kind of great-power relationship, this great-state relationship to begin to lead the [EoP truth and reconciliation responsible freedom] way for others to follow. – [EoP Amended] The Real News: Reality Asserts Itself with Paul Jay: Lawrence Wilkerson: Who Makes Foreign Policy: If We Remain Predators; the Planet Will Cast us off [SQ Copy].
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Mar: Req for EoP TRC Info: Timberland: J Swartz; Chiquita: C Flores: Nobel Peace Prize Nomination: Abel TRC Reason Freelancer.
EoP MILED Clerk – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] – Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End the Abel and Kane Cold War strategic and tactical – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] – recommendations to Commanders in Chief of NATO, Red Army and People’s Liberation Army [lj-v-ls] is to form an EoP Axis [eop-axis] alliance to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law, via EoP UN Resolution [PDF pp.25-66/70: eop-un-res]; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation by (a) requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. With regard to military/national/public service: The implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law would allow for orderly and humane abolition of tax funded standing armies and political representatives to be replaced by responsible freedom citizen militia and political representatives. Sincere peacenik / honourable warrior citizens can sign their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath] to provide their Heads of State with an EoP Axis Alliance: EoP UN Resolution mandate.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate [PDF.pp.24]: Annexure: E1ac [PDF: pp.16] E1c: 03 Dec: McVeigh2020 TN to US Pres Cand. EoP Re: Nat Comm on Mil, Natl & Pub Svc Enq.
FSB Director General Alexander Bortnikov’s EoP Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel and Kane Cold War [Clarkson or Exactly–TN: Endgame: Journey] negotiations preliminary offer on behalf of President Vladimir Putin and Russian Supreme Court: Chief Justice: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Lebedev; to President Donald Trump, US Senate and Congress; via SCOTUS: Chief Justice: John Roberts: FSB Message: If Donald Trump and Jared Kushner sincerely want an End Abel and Kane Cold War Peace Deal of Century: FSB / GRU / Kremlin preliminary offer: Consent to EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] Denuclearization Definition [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.38/70].
» EoP Leg Sub: 02 Feb: EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer.
Transparency Notification of EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer – which occurred on the 30th anniversary of Apartheid SA President FW de Klerk’s 02 Feb 1990 End of Apartheid speech to Parliament; which resulted in Post-Apartheid South Africa shutting down its Nuclear Weapons program.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer; 02 Feb: TN: LJvFWdK/SGMC: EoP Int: Kremlin – Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Defn – Offer.
 The Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others; 09 Nov: EoP Re: eNCA: Springbok support questioned.
Occidental Hotel: Aleksandr Semyonovich Feklisov aka Aleksandr Fomin: How can my government know that this is a serious and valid proposal?. John Scali: You may say that if Ambassador Stevenson pursues this approach in the United Nations, our Ambassador Soren will be most receptive. – Peter Jennings: The Missiles of October (1992).
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 May: EoP Answer to David Q: Masonic War is Peace Question; 31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP UN Resolution negotiations.
McVeigh 2020 / EoP culture re Questions:
Grab an Able Reason Ego Ready Room Death Panel Rock: Draw a Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Ecocide Footprint Line
Marcus Luttrell: I was in bad shape, I was dying and I didn’t know what to do. I was lying against this tree and looking at the moon and feeling sorry for myself. I lay there and said you are being a bitch, get up, lets go. What was I going to do, lay down there and die? I was thinking I am still alive, so the mission is still on, lets go. So I reached out and I grabbed a rock, and I reached out as far as I could and I drew a line with it in infront of me. I said I am going to crawl to that line, if my feet hit it, and I am still alive, I am going to do it again. I did that for seven miles. ………. Gen James Cartwright: The speed of informing someone, of bringing key relevant information was so much quicker in a brutal no rank ready room, the downside that we have found is extremely small, the upsides are the intellectual capital, the speed to which you gain information; and context for decisions, and planning and execution. I have not found anything that comes even close. If you decide to enter into a conversation as a senior person, in at least rank, you can be globally stupid, and you can do it very quickly and if that bothers you, then you are going to have to toughen up the hide. In the military structure, that is something that is a paradigm shift. But if you can’t stand being globally stupid once in a while, this is not the space for you. – Lone Survivor: Trailer: Marcus Luttrell: Draw a Line; BizofGov: US Strategic Command: Gen James Cartwright 01.02.03.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Dec: McVeigh2020: Rep Dingell & Sen Graham: EoP Axis – If Hitler Invaded Hell – Q; 22 Mar: McVeigh 2020: EoP v WiP Law Re: Covid-19 Death Panels; IG: 17-08-05_genjcartwright-perfectinformation.
EoP MILED Clerk does not require a formal – service by a sheriff – legal process for any request for information. An email with questions, or for a request for particular information or evidence is sufficient. All emails with a request for information – irrespective of the race, class, religion, gender of the author, or the size of their country, or whether they have zero police wo/men, or nuclear weapons – are given the benefit of the doubt that they are an honourable request for information and responded to in accordance with EoP Ego/Eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy] communication policy. No lawyers or Sheriffs or Judges required to get a buck stops here [eop-rh-cult-info.tygae.org.za] answer to any question. EoP Responsible Freedom represents ‘walk our sincere peacenik talk’ path towards smallest government in the world. When every citizen in a nation is a responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizen aka volunteer citizen militia / sheriff: Babylon Masonic War is Peace factory farm slaughterhouse [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms; ELS Ref] government is effectively abolished.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Mar: EoP Re NZ Police Req to Kiwifarms re 15 Mar Christchurch Mosque attack
EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529