* Judge Fabricius, North Gauteng High Court, Registrar SD Mniki
* 26 May: Filing: EoP Applic to Jdg Fabricius Re: MKhoza & Min of Def et al: Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Law Necessity Application: If EoP and WiP Law Court: EoP Law Orders Requested [PDF]: Proof of Service [PDF: 26 May: Ntc of EoP Applic to Jdg Fabricius Re: MKhoza & Min of Def et al]
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v NMN, LJ v TRC, LJ v LS, US v TJM / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP v WiP Neg.
IN THE CCMA: COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION and HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION PRETORIA & WESTERN CAPE EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION GEORGE; and US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO and US COURT OF APPEALS: TENTH CIRCUIT and WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY
In the matters between:
|Khosa, Mphephu; Monthsha, Nomsa; Muvhango, Thabiso
01st – 03rd Applicantand
Minister of Defence and Military Veterans; Secretary for Defence; Chief of South African National Defence Force; Minister of Police; National Commissioner of the South African Police Service; Acting Chief of the Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department; Chief of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police Department; Office of the Military Ombud; Independent Police Investigative Directorate; Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
GD-P: Case 21512/2020
If EoP & WiP Law Court:
Re: 15 May 2020
Judge J Fabricius
—– AND —–
Truth and Reconciliation Commission Chairperson: Desmond Tutu; Institute for Justice and Reconciliation: Brian McConnell; Dept of Justice TRC Unit: Mochubela Seekoe
CCMA: WEGE 1063-20
Transparency Notice of H 111/19: LJ v LS et al; Request Respondents EoP TRC or WiP TRC vote. If WiP TRC: Notice of withdrawal of inheritance TRC offer.
—– AND —–
Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence; Constand Viljoen: SADF General; Mogoeng Mogoeng: Chief Justice SA ConCourt; Daniel Thulare: Chairman Judicial Officers Assoc of SA; Mahlatse Mahlase: Chair SA National Editors Forum; Kathleen Dlepu: Chair Legal Practice Council; Thandi Modise: Speaker of National Assembly; FW de Klerk: Former SA President; Cyril Ramaphosa: SA President
Grg High Crt: H 213/19
Transparency Notice of H 111/19: LJ v LS et al and EoP Applicants Draft: Military Democracy EoP UN Resolution Martial Law. If authorized by 8th, 9th &/or 3rd Respondent; 2nd / 1st & 4th Respondents Requested to provide Applicant and court the outcome of their military / juridical officials EoP Law TRC or WiP Law TRC vote.
—– AND —–
Lindiwe Sisulu: Min of Intnl Relations & Cooperation, Hasso Plattner: RSA Rep. of Giving Pledge, Helene Budliger Artieda: Amb Swiss Embassy, Masimba Tafirenyika: Head: UN Info Center, Lin Songtian: Amb China Embassy. Marcus Cornaro: Head of EU Delegation, Didier Vanderhasselt: Amb Belgium Embassy, Jessye Lapenn: Ch D’Affairs US Embassy, Mikhail Ivanovich Petrakov: Amb. Russia Fed. Embassy
Grg High Crt: H 111/19
Notice of McVeigh Faked Execution;
Request Respondents [A] Authorize EoP OKC TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Negotiations. [B] If EoP OKC TRC: Submit EoP UN Resolution to UN General Assembly to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; or [C] If No EoP OKC TRC: Authorize US v McVeigh Siberia PoW Suicide:.
RU-Kremlin EoP/OKC TRC Offer:
—– AND —-
Timothy James McVeigh
10th Crt: 119 F.3d 806
CO: No. 96-CR-68-M
Conviction and Sentence of McVeigh for 19 Apr 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing
—– AND —-
18 May 2020 Draft resolution proposed by among others Australia, the African Group and its Member States, the European Union and its Member States.
Initiate, an impartial, independent and comprehensive evaluation of WHO-coordinated international health response to COVID-19.
Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Law Necessity Application: If EoP and WiP Law Court: EoP Law Orders Requested
 I agree with the applicants counsel that it was appropriate to refer to the decision by the Constitutional Court in Mahomed and Another v The Republic of South Africa and Others 2001 (3) SA 893 (CC) paragraph 69 where Chaskalson P referred to the United States decision in Olmstead et al v United States and quoted the words of Justice Brandeis as follows: “In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperilled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously .. Government is the potent, omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole body by its example … If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” – Judge J Fabricius: 15 May 2020: ‘Social Contract’ Declaratory Order Judgement; Khosa and Others v Minister of Defence and Military Defence and Military Veterans and Others (21512/2020)  ZAGPPHC 147 (15 May 2020)
Timothy McVeigh remained silent throughout his trial. Finally, as he was about to be sentenced, the court asked him if he would like to speak. He did. He rose and said, “I wish to use the words of Justice Brandeis dissenting in Olmstead to speak for me. He wrote, ‘Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teaches the whole people by its example.’” Then McVeigh was sentenced to death by the government. – Gore Vidal: The Meaning of Timothy McVeigh.
McVeigh2020 [mcveigh2020] does not pretend to know whether Covid-19 (a) actually exists or is just another Iraq-WMD military medical media industrial complex WiP Law slaughterhouse culling hoax; (b) some cases attributed to Covid are the result of one or more military agency’s use of psychotronic technology [03 Apr: EoP Covid Cold War Obs: Crozier v NavSec; US v Moreno]; (c) is the result of natural zoonotic disease jumping from animals to humans; (d) caused and/or aggravated by 5G and pollution; or (e) negligent or intentional iatrogenic biological warfare [08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?]. McVeigh 2020 does know that the root cause of all these Covid-19 – WMD hoax, natural, 5G laboratory or biowarfare negligent or intentional – symptoms are a direct and indirect result of overpopulation and overconsumption resulting from governments and the United Nations negligent or intentional failure to abolish Babylon War is Peace international law [EoP v WiP Law], and implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation. .. If SA courts object to EoP law citizens on SA national territory; EoP law citizen has no problem departing to another nation where EoP law court applications are welcome in such nations courts to reach a legal certainty UN General Assembly and/or Intnl Court of Justice EoP v WiP international law conflict of cultures ruling. If no such nations; to requesting President Putin and Trump to authorize [lj-v-ls] No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted suicide negotiations. – 18 May: McVeigh 2020: EoP Re: AU-EU Covid origins WHO Resolution » EoP Leg Sub: 24 May: EoP Re: JDuarte: BAT Back Off: Dlamini Zuma democratically elected.
While many in the world are completely dependent on large scale agriculture, the Russian people feed themselves. Their agricultural economy is small scale, predominantly organic and in the capable hands of the nation’s people. Russians have something built into their DNA that creates the desire to grow their own food. It’s a habit that has fed the Russian nation for centuries. It’s not just a hobby but a massive contribution to Russia’s agriculture. In 2011, 51% of Russia’s food was grown either by dacha communities (40%), or peasant farmers (11%) leaving the rest (49%) of production to the large agricultural enterprises; dacha gardens produced over 80% of the countries fruit and berries, over 66% of the vegetables, almost 80% of the potatoes and nearly 50% of the nations milk, much of it consumed raw. In a myriad of villages nestled deep in the Russian countryside, the monetary turmoil roiling the nation’s large cities still seems a largely distant threat. “This crisis is for the rich, for people who have dollars. We never had money here,” said Tamara Boychenko. Food sovereignty puts the people who produce, distribute and eat food at the centre of decisions about food production and policy rather than corporations and market institutions that have come to dominate the global food system. In Havana, Cuba 90% of the city’s fresh produce comes from local urban farms and gardens. … In 2003 the Russian President signed into law the “Private Garden Plot Act” enabling Russian citizens to receive free of charge from the state, plots of land in private inheritable ownership. Sizes of the plots differ by region but are between one and three hectares each [1 hectare = 2.2 acres]. Produce grown on these plots is not subject to taxation. A further subsequent law to facilitate the acquisition of land for gardening was passed in June 2006. – SQ-RN: Russia’s Rural Villagers are Unphased by Economic Collapse; SQ-NH: Russian Family Gardens Produce 40% of Russian Food; SQ-TB: In 1999, 35 million small family plots produced 90% of Russia’s potatoes, 77% of vegetables, 87% of fruits, 59% of meat, 49% of milk.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Mar: McVeigh2020: EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations..
Rural America is mad. We’re hearing from people in places like West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania who are fed up with the government, the economy, the “establishment,” and taking out their anger at Trump rallies. Support for Trump is strongest in places where “white identity mixes with long-simmering economic dysfunctions” —and the anger it has caused—goes back to the dissolution of the family farm. Yes, the farm. Rural America produces food as well as anger. From the 1940s to the 1970s, the farmers who produced that food, even on small parcels of land, could make a reasonably good living, with prices reflecting their costs of production. It was hard work, but they could support their families, and the money they spent at feed stores and coffee shops built thriving local communities. That ended in the 1980s, when hundreds of thousands of farms went out of business and rural communities withered across the country—while the federal government did nothing. The foreclosures slowed in the late ’80s, but it turns out there are consequences to removing an entire way of life. In his 1997 book, Harvest of Rage, journalist Joel Dyer draws a line from the planned devastation of the farm crisis to the rise of the 1990s antigovernment movement, including the 1995 bombing of an Oklahoma City federal building that killed 168 people. – Civil Eats: Want to Understand Trump’s Rise? Head to the Farm. For many angry rural voters, Donald Trump is fueling a fire that started with the farm crisis of the 1980s;
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 May: McV20: EoP Law Re: AgrTrust: A New Model for Community Owned Farmland.
How many Germans would have signed up to be Hitler’s Lebensraum SS storm troopers and Concentration Camp prison guards, if they had a property ration to enable their low tech agrarian self sufficient survival? – 20 Dec: McVeigh2020: Rep Dingell & Sen Graham: EoP Axis – If Hitler Invaded Hell – Q; 29 Apr: EoP Law Re: US Federal & County Justices: EoP Law Q: Post Covid Lockdown Courts: EoP or WiP Law?.
A handshake is a very low cost way of making contracts, but is worthless in a community with lotsa liars. Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017; SQ-DS: The Mosou Matriarchy: Men Live Better where Women are in Charge.
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution.
[A] If EoP & WiP Law Court: EoP Law Order Request.
[B] Apologies/Condonation for Pro Se Errors in Formal Legal Procedure.
[C] Purpose of Necessity Court Record Access Notice Filing
[A] If EoP & WiP Law Court: EoP Law Order Request.
 Court Record Filing:
The purpose of this application is to place into the Mphephu Khosa v Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Nine Others court record proceedings; a copy of the following documents [A-C.pp.130; A-83; B-05, C-42]:
[1.1] Re: Request Dept of Defence & Police EoP OKC TRC vote:
[A.pp.83] George High Court Application Case H 213/19: LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence and Eight Others [pp.83] served by EoP law applicant on Min of Defence Nqakula by Postnet Courier Service Tracking No: PNA44315185348; delivered to Getlou Mokwena on 15 November 2019 at 11:01:00 AM; at Ministry of Defence, Cnr Delmas Ave and Nossob Str, Armscor Building, Block 5, Level 4, Erasmuskloof, Gauteng. [pp.01/83: Filing Notice; pp.2-6/83: Notice of Motion; pp.7-10/83: EoP TRC Affidavit; pp.11-80/83: copy of H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu et al [pp.70]; pp.82-83/83: copy of DRAFT: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law; pp.83/83: Filing Notice/Correction]
[1.2] Re: EoP TRC v WiP TRC Law:
[B.pp.05] EoP Summary of EoP v WiP Law [pp.05]
[1.3] Re: Request EoP and WiP Law Conflict of Cultures Judge:
[C.pp.42] Excerpts [pp 01-06, 11-12, 55-88/88] of 09 March 2020: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC et al Filing Letter to Judge Nathan Erasmus & Judicial Service Commission [pp.04]: Encl: A [pp.50]; C [C1. pp.24; C2. pp.10]
 EoP v WiP Law Court Referendum Orders Requested:
If Judge Fabricius (a) is an EoP and WiP Law Judge, (b) does not legally dispute the EoP TRC law v WiP TRC law necessity of this necessity court record access filing; (c) agrees President Ramaphosa and Chief Justice Mogoeng’s EoP TRC law mandate decision-making; will be enhanced by Min of Defence and Police officials EoP Axis Alliance Oaths; (d) please request/order:
[2.1] Respondent (a) Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and (b) Bheki Cele, Minister of Police, to provide Judge Fabricius, EoP Law Applicant and LJ v NMN Respondents President Cyril Ramaphosa and Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng; with the EoP Axis Alliance vote outcome of South African Dept of Defence and SA Police, Generals and Admirals, as detailed in LJ v NMN application: Annexure: Draft: EoP Military Democracy Martial Law [A:pp.81-82/83]; within seven days.
[A] All Min of Defence and Min of Police Generals and Admirals – currently serving or retired – read Annexure A [A:pp.83] and decide on your EoP or WiP Law vote [A. pp.81-82/83]: EoP TRC [EoP Axis Alliance] or No EoP TRC [Cold War].
[a] EoP TRC law voters:
Sign your EoP Axis NatSec Oath [A:pp.82-82/83], submit your signed oath to Min of Defence / Police, to submit them into this court record.
[b] WiP TRC Law aka No EoP TRC voters:
Inform Min of Defence / Police in writing you decline to sign any EoP Axis Oath: You thereby provide President Ramaphosa and Chief Justice Mogoeng with an authorize McVeigh & Johnson Siberia Assisted Suicide mandate [A:pp.77-80/83]. If MoD/SAPS Generals final vote is EoP TRC Law, and EoP UN Resolution [A:pp.35-76/83] is submitted to UN General Assembly and becomes international law; all SA and global citizens will be ordered to sign their EoP Responsible Freedom Oath; or be convicted of Crimes of Aggression [A:pp.41-43/88].
[2.2] If Min of Defence and Police Generals / Admirals vote outcome is:
[A] EoP TRC law:
If so there is a potential for a South African submission to UN General Assembly in support of EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution vote. If so:
[a] President Ramaphosa and/or Chief Justice Mogoeng can proceed in accordance to aforementioned Min of Defence / Police EoP Axis Alliance Oath information, acquired by Judge Fabricius. For example: President Ramaphosa can ask his cabinet and all Medical Advisory Council officials to clarify their EoP TRC law or WiP TRC law votes, to be submitted into this court record, etc.
[B] No EoP TRC Law aka WiP TRC law:
If so there is no potential for a South African submission to UN General Assembly in support of EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution vote. If so:
[a] No offence taken by Lara or Tim.
[b] President Ramaphosa and/or Chief Justice Mogoeng can authorize any executive and/or juridical assistance they can provide to LJ v LS Respondents President Putin and Trump to assist with No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted suicide logistics.
[c] All EoP MILED advocacy will focus 100% on No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted suicide logistics.
[B] Apologies/Condonation for Pro Se Errors in Formal Legal Procedure:
 EoP applicant apologizes for any errors of formal legal procedure in filing this If EoP & WiP Law Court: EoP Law Order Request application to Judge Farbricius.and Mphephu Khosa and Minister of Defence and Military Veterans et al parties.
 As noted in Applicant EoP TRC Affidavit to LJ v LS Application Annexure EoP law culture citizens have been denied legal representation by Legal Practice Council lawyers for twenty years.
EoP Culture Denied Legal Representation:
 As noted in LJ v CRL Rights Commission; the CRL Rights Commission and Legal Practice Council – High Court H 45/19 – I have been unable to find legal representation in South Africa willing to represent me in accordance to my cultural values, and/or to provide me with Standby Assistance of Counsel, to enable me to represent myself in accordance to my cultural values.
 Objected to Culture of Honesty:
[21.1] They demanded that I engage in behaviour that I objectively and/or subjectively considered to be legal strategic and/or tactical advice that I should engage in conscious deception of the court – in legal terms fraud or perjury – that violated my honesty cultural values – and I refused.
 Objected to Culture of Honest Race Relations:
[22.1] They object to my cultural values of buck stops here honest race relations: honesty with black people about procreation above ecological carrying capacity limits causes of resource conflict; honesty with white people about consumption above ecological carrying capacity causes of resource conflict.
 Objected to Cultural Advocacy Exposing Masonic War is Peace Law as root cause of all resource conflict [eop-v-wip-law]:
[23.1] They refused my legal strategic and/or tactical orders to inform the court of information and/or evidence in support of my cultural values to advocate on behalf of the strategic goal of exposing Masonic War is Peace law as root cause of all resource conflict, and implementing Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law.
[23.2] The respondents consciously or unconsciously practice Masonic War is Peace law; and don’t want to take responsibility for their choice of legal services practice; by honestly advertising themselves as ‘Masonic War is Peace lawyers’: lawyers who consciously or unconsciously ignore or avoid educating their clients of the — clauses of international law allowing and/or enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc parasitically profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from ecological overshoot – overpopulation & consumption colliding with finite resources – and failed state collapse.
 On 09 March 2019 I submitted a request to Western Cape Legislature and the South African Parliament via WC MPP Cameron Dugmore and SA Parliament MP Bongani Michael Mkongi: “I, Lara Johnson hereby request WCPP Cameron Dugmore and/or SA MP Bongani Michael Mkongi to consent to drafting a temporary bill to submit to Western Cape Provincial Parliament and/or South African Parliament to temporarily authorize Ecology of Peace culture South African citizens – i.e. individuals who have signed their Ecology of Peace culture oaths – to be allowed to represent themselves in any legal proceedings, with the assistance of a Standby / Assistance Counsel; if or when any respondent in such legal proceeding; is legally represented by a Masonic War is Peace legal representative.” The request [09 Mar: EoP Req to WCPL / SA Parl via WC MPP Dugmore / MP Mkongi ] included an example of Primitivist based Statutory Exemption to Industrial Civilization Statutes in the case of Eustace Conway [eop-ncb774 ]. As of date there has been no response.
 The lack of legal representation has and continues to deny applicant (a) equal recognition of her cultural membership; (b) her constitutional cultural rights; and (c) equal access to courts; to defend her cultural membership, cultural values, rights to practice her cultural rights, and cultural rights.
[C] Purpose of Necessity Court Record Access Notice Filing:
 Where clerks and/or registrars are instructed by their secular innocence for sale indulgences juridical Pope Gregory XV / Leo X employers; to obstruct controversial Galileo / Luther legal applications from being provided a fair impartial juridical enquiry hearing; in the absence of the safe conduct hearing intervention by a Frederick III counsel or judges; the chances of an EoP culture civil application or criminal appeal being placed on Judge Gregory XV / Leo X court roll are close to zero.
 Summary of Necessity Authority:
[6.1] S v Pretorius 1975 (2) SA 85 (SWA) “There can be no doubt that our law recognises the defence of necessity”: In S v Pretorius, an important case in South African criminal law, the accused had exceeded the speed limit when taking his child, whom he sincerely subjectively believed to be in mortal danger, to hospital for treatment.
[6.2] The accused who had no legal representation, referred, despite his plea of guilty, to circumstances which materially gave rise to the defence of necessity. This defence made it necessary for the magistrate to decide in the first instance not what the accused’s frame of mind had been, but whether necessity was present and whether it justified the accused’s conduct. ..
[6.3] The court held that the onus of proof in a defence of necessity, as in self-defence, rests on the State, which must rule out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity. It is not for the accused to satisfy the court that he acted from necessity. If the State fails to rule out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity; then conviction must be set aside. The conviction of Pretorius was accordingly set aside.
[6.4] The onus of proof in a defence of necessity as in self-defence rests on the State to rule out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity. It is not for the accused to satisfy the court that she acted from necessity (p 293).
[6.5] [The judgement illustrates a case in which the accused’s act, committed in a situation of necessity, was not directed at somebody else’s or that person’s interests, but merely amounted to an infringement of a legal provision.]
26 May 2020
Date Filed; Per Email.
HIGH COURT REGISTRAR
Registrar of the High Court: SD Mniki
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Postal Address: Private Bag X67, Pretoria, 0001
Street Address: Cnr Paul Kruger & Madiba Streets, Pretoria, 0002
Phone: 012 315 7711 | Fax: 012 326 1995. E-mail: SMniki@justice.gov.za
Applicant: Lara Johnson:
Individual: Lara Johnson
Address: 16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, RSA
Cell / Email: Cell: (071) 170 1954 / Email: email@example.com
Respondents Email Contact Details as per Proof of Electronic Service.
Khosa v NMN / Min of Def Applicants and Respondents:
Applicants: 01: Mphephu Khosa, 02: Nomsa Monthsha, 03: Thabiso Muvhango. Respondents: 01: Minister of Defence and Military Veterans; 02: Secretary for Defence; 03: Chief of South African National Defence Force; 04: Minister of Police; 05: National Commissioner of the South African Police Service; 06: Acting Chief of the Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department; 07: Chief of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police Department; 08: Office of the Military Ombud; 09: Independent Police Investigative Directorate; 10: Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission Respondents:
01: Truth and Reconciliation Commission Chairperson: Desmond Tutu; 02: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation: Brian McConnell; 03: Dept of Justice TRC Unit: Mochubela Seekoe
LJ v NMN Respondents:
01: Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence; 02: Constand Viljoen: SADF General; 03: Mogoeng Mogoeng: Chief Justice SA Constitutional Court; 04: Daniel Thulare: Chairman Judicial Officers Assoc of SA; 05: Mahlatse Mahlase: Chairperson SA National Editors Forum; 06: Kathleen Dlepu: Chairperson Legal Practice Council; 07: Thandi Modise: Speaker of National Assembly; 08: FW de Klerk: Former SA President; 09: Cyril Ramaphosa: SA President.
LJ v LS Respondents:
01: Lindiwe Sisulu / Naledi Pandor; Cyril Ramaphosa; 02: Hasso Plattner, The Giving Pledge: Bill Gates; 03: Helene Budliger Artieda, Ueli Maurer; 04: Masimba Tafirenyika, Antonio Guterrez; 05: Lin Songtian, Xi Jinping; 06: Marcus Cornaro, Ursula von der Leyen; 07: Didier Vanderhasselt, Stuart Peach; 08: Jessye Lapenn; Donald Trump; 09: Ilya Rogachev, Vladimir Putin.
US v TJ McVeigh Applicants and Respondents:
United States of America; Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols.
AU & EU v World Health Org Applicants and Respondents:
AU Foreign Minister Marise Payne; EU Foreign Minister Josep Borrell; WHO: Tedros Adhanom.
———- Footnotes ———–
 IW: Hall Psychotronic technology https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m7Gdx70sF4
 lj-v-ls: pp.25-66/70: http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_NoM-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf
 lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/ http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_NoM-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf
 20 Apr: McVeigh 2020: TN to NATO: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO.
 Vladimir Putin: Is it possible to argue with Putin? Of course, but only if you [are sincere – aka ego literate – and] have ironclad counterarguments. – [EoP Amended] Vesti: Putin: 01.02.
Stan McChrystal: What you can do to create a strategic shared consciousness culture is tell people how to think about things and the broader strategic or tactical mission. There’s a great line we used to use in Afghanistan: “If, when you get on the ground, the order that we gave you is wrong, execute the order that we should have given you.” Think about the responsibility you’re giving your subordinates when you issue that instruction. You’re looking for them to use their best judgment. So here’s my view on dissent. Dissent is important. The problem with dissent is that there’s a time and place for it, and there’s a time and place not to have it. I tell people, “When the landing-craft ramp drops and hits the beach, that’s not the time to discuss the plan.” Unhealthy dissent goes away when you show your team respect, engage them in the process and pass information along to them. Give them as much transparency into decision making as is possible and practical to do. But everybody needs to understand that there’s a point–once a decision has been made or a line has been crossed–at which dissent is no longer appropriate, unless it is very carefully and very maturely provided in the right time, place and way. And that takes a deft hand. What I’m saying is that it’s not okay to bitch about everything all the time and fight things. There’s a time to shut up and execute, and the organization should be schooled in that. In reality, I’m not that black and white, because there might be things emerging after the fact that people should know. But if you didn’t speak during those first two phases, I think it’s inappropriate to raise things that aren’t of an emergency nature. – Forbes: Combat Consultant: Q&A With Retired General Stanley McChrystal.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/richkarlgaard/2017/10/03/combat-consultant-qa-with-retired-general-stanley-mcchrystal/#4c48219c2f44 » EoP Leg Sub: 21 Nov: EoP: Re: Combat Consultant: Q&A With Retired General Stanley McChrystal http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/11/21-nov-stan-mcchrystal/
 Excerpts of EoP Applicant TRC Affidavit in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu et al pp.70; included in Annexure: H 213/19: LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence and Eight Others [pp.83; of which pages 11-80; are a copy of H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu et al pp.70]
 http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/ archive.is/Yv2t3
 http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/ archive.fo/NrdRC