* Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Crawley Family, David Crawley, Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys, Desere Barnard, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena Agulhas, Assistant Master of High Court George, Yolanda van Milligen
* 08 Jun: 4968/2020: GM Elliott; CCMA: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: 08 Jun LJ Tel Call CCMA.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GME / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:02:44 +0200
Subject: 4968/2020: GM Elliott; CCMA: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: 08 Jun LJ Tel Call CCMA
To: Marais Lamprecht Attorneys <email@example.com>, Francois Lamprecht <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Sonja Corker <email@example.com>, “Crawley Family: David Crawley” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies” <email@example.com>, “The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Marlise Steenekamp <email@example.com>, Garden Route SPCA <firstname.lastname@example.org>, SPCA George <email@example.com>, Bruno MacDonald <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Master of the High Court Capetown: Zureena Agulhas” <ZAgulhas@justice.gov.za>, Mbewana Sizakele Lallie Vuyani <MasterCapetown@justice.gov.za>, Yolanda van Milligen <YVanMilligen@justice.gov.za>
TO: The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer & Marlise Steenekamp
TO: Crawley Family: Gerda and David Crawley
TO: Garden Route SPCA: Bruno MacDonald
TO: Dawn Meyer: Per Isobel Rohwer and/or Bruno MacDonald
TO: Master of the High Court – Capetown: Zureena Agulhas:
Master of High Court, Estate of Gill Elliott et al:
4968/2020: GM Elliott; CCMA: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: 08 Jun LJ Tel Call CCMA
Telephone call from 044-805 7700
A woman from CCMA calling herself Valencia.
Paraphrased transcript of discussion:
Valencia: Who is the main respondent in your referral.
Lara: I have two referrals to the CCMA, which case are you referring to.
Valencia: The one about the Estate of Gill Elliott. Who is the main respondent.
Lara: The Estate of Gill Elliott is the main respondent. All of the respondents except for the Master of the High Court are Estate of Gill Elliott respondents. I don’t know who the main ‘Estate of Gill Elliott’ respondent is. I imagine generally it would be the Executor; however the Master of the High Court has not yet authorized anyone as the Executor of the Estate of Gill Elliott; and some respondents are claiming to be the Executor and making legal hiring and firing decisions as to Elliott Estate property; as if they are the Executor. However the Master of the High Court says that they have not authorized anyone as the Executor of the Estate of Gill Elliott. If or when the Master of the High Court appoints an Executor of the Estate of Gill Elliott, then the matter can be referred to such authorized Master of the High Court Executor, for such authorized Executor’s resolution of the issues in dispute.
Valencia: This is an unlawful dismissal?
Lara: Yes. One of those Executor of Gill Elliott Estate decisions made by the respondents, was unlawful termination of my labour/barter exchange agreement. My barter exchange agreement was a labour employment in exchange for garden property rental barter exchange. Gill was my employer and my landlord for my SQWorms property. Does that make sense?
Lara: Do you have a case number for the referral?
Valencia: Not yet, its in the process of being processed for a case number.
EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529