* Jason Brent
* 25 Sep: McV20 Re JGB Re McVeigh EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament
» 25 Sep: JGB Re McV20: EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament
» 25 Sep: McV20: EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, EoP v J Brent / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: McVeigh 2020 Exp Comm [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 6:43 PM
To: ‘Jason Brent’
Subject: EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament
JGB: I will be than happy to respond to all intelligent questions relating to the essays I have written. In fact I look forward to intelligent questions.
EoP-LJ: What is your definition for intelligent?
Once you have provided your definition for intelligent; if I am capable of asking questions within the four corners of your intelligent definition; and ask intelligent questions; how do you intend to hold yourself accountable to answering those intelligent questions?
A summary of my thoughts on intelligence:
What is your definition for intelligence and intellectually honest?
Ecology of Peace definition for intellectually honest is ego and ecological literacy.
As for intelligence: Any enquiry into a clear and succinct definition of ‘intelligence’ would require individuals who are buck stops here intellectually honest, to arrive at an accurate definition of ‘intelligence’.
What most people refer to as ‘intelligence’ appears to be a result of them following their Masonic War is Peace cultural scripting; not a result of their honest existential enquiry into what they as individuals want, from the experience of being alive, on this planet, at this time.
If an individual is incapable of intellectual honesty, to buck stops here honestly evaluate any of his hypothesis as to what could be an accurate definition of ‘intelligence’; then such individuals belief in his or her superior intelligence, or even in the concept of ‘superior intelligence’ in one or another skill or endeavour, are equivalent to children’s beliefs in fairy tales.
A child who believes a fairy tale that it is intelligent to walk off a cliff and a simple prayer to Jesus, will keep their body from crashing down the cliff, is in for a rude awakening.
Put differently: Ecology of Peace off the cuff working hypothesis definition of ‘intelligence’ would be:
What do you want from life? If you don’t know what you want: it would be intelligent for you to find someone who can help you decide for you what you want from life? If you do know what you want: Find others who are willing to be honest with you, to help you to be honest with yourself, to get what you want. Be honest with yourself and others about what you want. Some people may not be willing to help you get one thing you want, but may be willing to help you get something else you may want or need. Deceiving people to get what you want, means they will be less willing to help you to get what you want next time you ask. Put differently: If you are so ashamed of what you want, that you are not willing to ask for help to get what you want honestly and sincerely; what does that say about your intelligence about honest communication and relationships? If you want others to cooperate with you to get what you want, be honest with them. If you have been honest with others about what you want, and you cannot find others who want what you want, or are willing to help you to get what you want. Confront that reality. The more fair-minded, sincere and honest people, you sincerely and honestly and fairly help to get what they want, the more they may be willing to help you get what you want. The more you deceive, lie and manipulate others to get what you want, the more you will need to rely on bribery and deception to get what you want, and the more enemies you will make with your fuck honour tactics, to get what you want. If you think what someone wants is unreasonable and/or unfair. Be honest with them about why you don’t want to help them, so they can evaluate whether what they want is reasonable and justified and fair. At the end of your life, you may not have gotten all you wanted, but you can know you were honest about what you wanted, help others when you could and lived a sincere and honourable inner peace life, which is not something 99.99% of the lonely, petrified, paranoid, backstabbing, self hating oligarchs could say for themselves, for the past ten thousand years.
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Jan: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict.