* Michael Rectenwald
* 23 Oct: EoP Wokeness via a viz MR Nietzsche Geneology of Morals quote
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Alt Right / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 8:17 PM
To: ‘Michael Rectenwald’; ‘Michael Rectenwald’
Subject: EoP Wokeness via a viz MR Nietzsche Geneology of Morals quote
TO: Michael Rectenwald
EoP Wokeness via a viz MR Nietzsche Geneology of Morals quote
I did not respond [21 Oct: EoP Re MR Q: What is your ecological carrying capacity definition?] to your Nietzsche quote in your 21 Oct 2020 email [[21 Oct: MR Re EoP Re: MR: Peacenik Trump wants to end endless wars], since it appeared to be included as a signature quote, used in all your email correspondence to anyone and everyone, as opposed to a quote within the body of the text of the email, for my attention. If it was for my attention, herewith my response.
EoP active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle] response
NYU-MR: New York Univ: Michael Rectenwald
EoP-LJ: Ecology of Peace: Lara Johnson
NYU-MR: “And how clever such an ambition makes people! For let’s admire the skillful counterfeiting with which people here imitate the trademarks of virtue, even its resounding tinkle, the golden sound of virtue. They’ve now taken a lease on ‘virtue’ entirely for themselves, these weak and hopeless invalids—there’s no doubt about that. ‘We alone are the good men, the just men’—that’s how they speak: ‘We alone are the homines bonae voluntatis [men of good will].’ They wander around among us like personifications of reproach, like warnings to us, as if health, success, strength, pride, and a feeling of power were inherently depraved things, for which people must atone someday, atone bitterly. How they thirst to be hangmen! Among them there are plenty of people disguised as judges seeking revenge. They always have the word ‘Justice’ in their mouths, like poisonous saliva, with their mouths always pursed, constantly ready to spit at anything which does not look discontented and goes on its way in good spirits.”
Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals.
EoP-LJ: I googled your use of this Nietzsche quote, and if I am interpreting you accurately you are using this quote in support of your criticism of what you refer to as individuals involved in social justice virtue signaling.
* AntiPCProf: 26 Aug 2017: Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals. What contemporaries do these people he refers to sound like to you?
* Michael Rectenwald: Introducing the @antipcnyuprof: Excerpt from Springtime for Snowflakes: “Social Justice” and Its Postmodern Parentage: On September 12, 2016, I established a Twitter account with the name “Deplorable NYU Prof” and the official handle @antipcnyuprof. This Twitter identity – replete with Friedrich Nietzsche avatar – represented a satirical character wielded by a self-proclaimed but anonymous NYU professor apparently gone rogue.
* New English Review: David Clemens: Woke Me When Its Over: Beyond Woke: In short, woke implies a new state of elevated, more highly evolved moral consciousness. As such, wokeness requires a new vocabulary to express its new concepts. Woke language is full of terms such as “toxic” (even “catastrophic”) masculinity, “whiteness,” “white privilege,” “white fragility,” countless new pronouns and genders, “systemic racism,” “cancel culture,” “social justice,” “gaslighting,” and “de-platforming,” most of which are casually or arbitrarily defined, if at all.
* the action or practice of publicly expressing opinions or sentiments intended to demonstrate one’s good character or the moral correctness of one’s position on a particular issue. [Google]
* an attempt to show other people that you are a good person, for example by expressing opinions that will be acceptable to them, especially on social media [Cambridge Dictionary]
* Virtue signalling is a pejorative neologism for the conspicuous and disingenuous expression of moral values with the intent to enhance one’s own image. [Wikipedia]
* To take a conspicuous but essentially useless action ostensibly to support a good cause but actually to show off how much more moral you are than everybody else. [Urban Dictionary]
Different people have different definitions for virtue and vices. One cultures virtue is another culture’s vice, and so on. Some hold their publicly represented virtue values sincerely and some have public virtue/vice values that totally contradict their privately held virtue/vice values. Others are addicted to their virtue/vice [Jeffery Schaler: Addiction is a Choice] values.
I don’t speak for any racial, religious, class or gender individual or organization that considers themselves social justice warriors.
I speak only for Ecology of Peace culture cooperator [eop-axis-oath] individuals.
In terms of Ecology of Peace – aka sincere peacenik / honourable warrior cultural identity – legal principles, virtue is synonomous with behaviour in accordance with EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw: mcv20: PDF: pp.49-52/71]; and vice is synomous with behaviour violating EoP laws [crimes-of-aggression].
 Scientific Law:
[1.1] Scientific Law refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured.
 Cultural Law:
[2.1] Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement.
 Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific & Cultural Law:
[3.1] Property Ration [property-ration] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed and abide by their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom] oaths.
 Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific & Cultural Law:
[4.1] Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression.
In terms of EoP cultural law, individuals holding totally contradictory racial, religious, ideological, or gender cultural law virtue value isms can quite easily live in peaceful coexistence with others who hold contradictory virtue values [eop-v-wip-ism]; when all cultural law self rule homelands [cult-law-self-rule: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.34-35/70] enforce EoP Scientific procreation and consumption laws, that prohibit them from overbreeding and overconsuming imperialist resource thievery.
 Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, ideological, sexual or gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP Scientific [eop-scicultlaw] – procreation and/or consumption below ecological carrying capacity [eop-footprint] – laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals.
 Individuals Rights and Duties under Cultural Law include: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities.
 Violations of Cultural Law would fall under Deception Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
 Conflict of Cultural Law Violations: Violations of Cultural Law between two individuals or groups of individuals with different Cultural Laws, would be adjudicated in terms of Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression]: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious & Gender Culture-Conflict Identities:
 Any group of individuals who have signed their Responsible Freedom Oaths to abide by Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law who share similar racial, religious, socio-ideological, sexual or gender identity, may agree to form a Cultural Law Self Rule community homeland, which can be as small as an agreement between two people, a family or village within a nation; or as large as a continental territory including a few nations; where the individuals within that territory have provided their fully informed consent to practicing a particular group shared ‘Cultural Law’.
 As long as the particular ‘cultural law’ is based on the fully informed consent of all individuals within the particular ‘cultural law’ homeland community; and the ‘cultural law’ is practiced within the confines of the particular cultural law homeland community’s territory; it is lawful; irrespective of how offensive it may be to the cultural values of a neighbouring homeland with different racial, religious, class, gender groups cultural law agreement values.
 Any groups cultural law is lawful within that cultural law homeland community’s territory; and cannot be legally restricted or punished by a different group of individuals who have different subjective racial, religious or gender cultural laws, within their cultural law homeland territory.
 There is no restriction whatsoever on the choice of any groups fully informed consenting ‘cultural law’; as long as it (a) does not violate EoP Scientific procreation and consumption laws; and (b) is based upon fully informed consent of all individuals within the privacy territory of the individuals ‘self rule cultural law homeland’. For example: Armin Meiwes and Bernd Brandes fully informed consent cannibalism , etc.
Cultural Law Homeland Rights and Duties:
 Cultural law homeland rights will only apply to individuals or groups of individuals objectively and subjectively abiding by EoP Scientific laws:
 If or where a homeland agrees on a cultural law that restricts travel across their property ration homeland to individuals who are not members of their cultural law homeland agreement; they should clearly and simply notify neighbour property ration territories, and include a ‘Whites / Blacks / Sharia Muslims / Jews Only Homeland’ public notice at roads entering their homeland; where clear and simple definitions of ‘whites, blacks, sharia muslims, jews’ are provided.
 Ultimately as property swaps enable individuals with similar ‘cultural law homeland’ values to find property rations on the outskirts of existing homelands; enabling them to join a particular homeland, different homelands can create nature corridors between their homelands to protect their cultural values and minimize relating friction with homeland neighbours who have conflicting racial, religious, gender etc cultural law values.
Nazis can live in their cultural law self rule homeland practicing their Heil Hitler goosestepping virtue signaling; next to a Black Panther cultural law self rule homeland practicing their Hail Geronimo Garvey goosestepping virtue signaling.
Similarly cannibals can live in a cultural law self rule homeland, practicing their Cannibalism sexual preferences; next to a Vegan homeland practicing their vegan food religion preferences.
To be or not to be Vaccinated: Citizens abiding by EoP Scientific law [PDF: pp.49-52/71] are granted Cultural Law Self Rule Homeland [PDF: pp.35-36/71] rights: Citizens who subjectively (a) believe vaccines are bad, will be able to choose to live in Fuck Vaccines Cultural law self rule homelands; (b) want everyone in their homeland to be vaccinated can choose to live in Love Vaccines Cultural Law Homelands; (c) don’t care whether their neighbours are vaxxers or anti-vaxxers, can live in We Dont Give a Vaccine Fuck cultural law self rule homelands.
To be or not to be a Cannibal: Citizens abiding by EoP Scientific law [PDF: pp.49-52/71] are granted Cultural Law Self Rule Homeland [PDF: pp.35-36/71] rights: Citizens who subjectively (a) believe fully informed consent cannibalism is bad; can choose to live in Fuck Cannibalism Cultural law self rule homelands [PDF: pp.35-36/71]; (b) want everyone in their homeland to be fully informed consenting cannibals can live in Love Cannibalism Cultural Law Homelands; (c) don’t care whether their neighbours are fully informed consenting cannibals within the privacy of their own homes; or not, can live in We Dont Give a Cannibal Fuck cultural law self rule homelands.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 Apr: McVeigh2020: EoP Re: Why did Trump defund WHO / Obama endorse Biden?.
On 09 March 2001, Armin Meiwes met Bernd-Jürgen Brandes, an engineer from Berlin, took him home and killed him. Over the following months with his victims consent he dined on his flesh. Armin: [Human flesh] tastes like pork, a bit more harsh. Looking for a willing volunteer, Meiwes posted an advertisement on the website The Cannibal Cric (a defunct forum for people with a cannibalism fetish). Meiwes’s post stated that he was “looking for a well-built 18- to 30-year-old to be slaughtered and then consumed.” Bernd Jürgen Armando Brandes, an engineer from Berlin, answered the advertisement in March 2001. Many other people responded to the advertisement but backed out; Meiwes did not attempt to force them to do anything against their will. The two made a videotape when they met on 9 March 2001 in Meiwes’s home, in the small town of Wüstefeld, west of Rotenburg an der Fulda, showcasing Meiwes amputating Brandes’s penis (with his agreement) and the two men attempting to eat it together. Before doing so, Brandes swallowed twenty sleeping pills, and a bottle of cough syrup, likely causing an effect of slowed breathing and extreme tiredness. Brandes initially insisted that Meiwes attempt to bite his penis off. This did not work, and ultimately, Meiwes used a knife to remove Brandes’s appendage. Brandes apparently tried to eat some of his own penis raw but could not, because it was too tough and, as he put it, “chewy”. Meiwes then fried the penis in a pan with salt, pepper, wine, and garlic; he then fried it with some of Brandes’s fat, but by then it was too burnt to be consumed. He then chopped the penis up into chunks and fed it to his dog. According to court officials who saw the video (which has not been made public), Brandes may already have been too weakened from blood loss to eat any of his penis. Meiwes then ran Brandes a bath, before going to read a Star Trek book, while checking back on Brandes every fifteen minutes, during which time Brandes lay bleeding in the bath. Brandes continued to drift in and out of consciousness before finally collapsing again. After long hesitation and prayer, Meiwes killed Brandes by stabbing him in the throat, after which he hung the body on a meat hook. The incident was recorded on a four-hour videotape. Meiwes dismembered and ate the corpse over the next ten months, storing body parts in his freezer under pizza boxes and consuming up to 20 kilograms (44 lb) of the flesh. According to prosecutors, Meiwes committed the act for sexual pleasure. – Wikipedia: Armin Meiwes; Docs: Interview with a Cannibal.
» EoP Leg Sub: 01 Apr: EoP Re MP-BB: What to worry about next; 03 Apr: EoP Covid Cold War Obs: Crozier v NavSec; US v Moreno.
EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Michael Rectenwald (email@example.com); Michael Rectenwald (firstname.lastname@example.org)