23 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombudsman Info

* Judge Siraj Desai, Foundation for Human Rights, Unfinished Business of TRC, Ahmed Mayet, Min of Justice & Correctional Services, Ronald Lamola, Judge John Hlope, Judge Nathan Erasmus, Legal Practice Council: Kathleen Dlepu, Craig Lucas, CRL Rights Commission, Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza, Desmond Tutu, Mpho Tutu van Furth, DL Tutu Legacy Foundation, Piyushi Koetcha, Tutu HIV Foundation, Lavinia Browne, TutuTeach Foundation, The Elders, IJR, Brian McConnell, Charles Villa-Vicencio, Dept of Justice TRC Unit, Mochubela Seekoe, CCMA, Cameron Morajane, Francois van der Merwe, AU-ZA Pres Ramaphosa, ZA-UN: Jerry Matjila, AU-UN Fatiam Mohammed, RU Pres Vladimir Putin, RU-ZA Amb Ilya Rogachev; RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya
* 23 Dec: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombudsman Info
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v MoJ, LJ v CRLRC, LJ v LPC, LJ v TRC, EoP v TRC, EoP v Nobel, LJ v GME, EoP v ZAPM, LJ v RU-ZA Emb, LJ v LS / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMRU: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson [mailto:eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:07 PM
To: ‘Siraj Desai: Foundation for Human Rights’; ‘Unfinished Business of TRC: Ahmed Mayet’; ‘Katarzyna Zdunczyk’; ‘SACTJ: Shirley Gunn’
Cc: ‘Min of Justice & Correctional Services Minister Ronald Lamola’; ‘Zanele Ndlovu’; ‘Chrispin Phiri’; ‘Bruce Sarela’; ‘Delsy Moraba’; ‘Mfuzo Zenzile’
Subject: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Services Ombudsman Info
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:09 PM
To: ‘WCP-HC: Chief Registrar: Ruanne David’; ‘Judge Erasmus Registrar: Faadiah Davids’
Subject: CC: J Hlope & Erasmus: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Svc Ombud Info
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:10 PM
To: ‘Craig Lucas’; ‘Legal Practice Council’; ‘Director: Kathleen Dlepu’; ‘Provincial Director: Gauteng: JS Grobler’; ‘Engela Pienaar’; ‘Western Cape: Frank Dorey’; ‘KZN: P Arnold-Mfusi’; ‘Free State: Tumelo Leope’; ‘Edward Mafadza’; ‘Maureen Chauke’; ‘Kgositoi Sedupane’; ‘Kgaogelo Makgoba’; ‘CRL Rights Commission’; ‘Vinolia Mashwayi’; ‘Khulisiwe Sithole’
Subject: CC: LPC, CRLRC: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Svc Ombud Info
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:12 PM
To: ‘Desmond Tutu via Mpho Tutu van Furth’; ‘DL Tutu Legacy Foundation: Piyushi Koetcha’; ‘Romaney Pinnock’; ‘Tutu HIV Foundation’; ‘Lavinia Browne’; ‘TutuTeach Foundation’; ‘The Elders’; ‘IJR: Brian McConnell’; ‘Charles Villa-Vicencio’; ‘Stanley Henkeman’; ‘Simone Naidoo’; ‘Board of Directors: Hugh Corder’; ‘Lovell Fernandez’; ‘Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela’; ‘Gerhard Kemp’; ‘Dumisa Ntsebeza’; ‘Jeremy Sarkin’; ‘Glenda Wildschut’; ‘Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge: Embrace Dignity’; ‘Deborah Posel’; ‘Salona Lutchman’; ‘Kwadwo Owusu’; ‘Policy Dirs: Jan Hofmeyr’; ‘Tim Murithi’; ‘Ric Amansure’; ‘Felicity Harrison’; ‘Dept of Justice TRC Unit: Mochubela Seekoe: Lufuno Mmbadi’; ‘Thapelo Mokushane’
Subject: CC: LJvTRC: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Svc Ombud Info
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:13 PM
To: ‘CCMA Director: Cameron Morajane’; ‘Amos Tshabalala’; ‘Firgil Philips’; ‘Caren-Lee Small’; ‘Case Officer: Zaheer Samodien’; ‘CCMA: Francois van der Merwe’
Subject: CC: CCMA: EoP Law Req for J Desai Legal Svc Ombud Info
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:17 PM
To: ‘Office of Presidency’; ‘Robert Ngobeni’; ‘Malebo Sibiya’; ‘David Dabede Mabuza’; ‘ZA-UN Amb: Jerry Matthews Matjila’; ‘AU-UN Amb Fatiam Kyari Mohammed: Legal Council: Namira Negm: Esther Azaa Tankouj’
Cc: ‘Kremlin: President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office’; ‘RU-US Emb: Anatoly Antonov’; ‘Min of Foreign Affairs: Spokesperson: Maria Zakarova’; ‘RU-ZA Emb: Ilya Igorevich Rogachev’; ‘RU-NL Emb: Alexander Vasilievich Shulgin’; ‘RU-EU Emb: Vladimir Chizhov’; ‘RU-UK Emb Alexander Vladimirovich Yakovenko’; ‘RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya: Fedor Strzhizhovskiy’
Subject: CC: RU-ZA Pres: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations

.

TO: Judge Siraj Desai
Dep Chair Supervisory Board:
Foundation for Human Rights

CC: LJ v CRLRC / LPC
» HC-WCPD: Judge President Hlope & Judge Erasmus
» Legal Practice Council: Kathleen Dlepu:
» CRL Rights Commission: Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza:

CC: LJ v TRC:
» TRC Chair: Desmond Tutu:
» IJR: Charles Villa-Vicencio, Brian McConnell
» Dept of Justice TRC Unit: Mochubela Seekoe

CC: CCMA:
» Director: Cameron Morajane:
» Commissioner: Francois van der Merwe:

CC: Min of Justice & Correctional Services: Ronald Lamola
CC: WiP Law voters SA President Cyril Ramaphosa
» AU-ZA Pres Ramaphosa, ZA-UN: Jerry Matjila, AU-UN Fatiam Mohammed
CC: EoP Law Voters SA President: Vladimir Putin
» RU Pres Vladimir Putin, RU-ZA Amb Ilya Rogachev; RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya:
Ref: 31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations

Judge Desai:

EoP Law Req for Legal Services Ombudsman Info.

SA Gov: President Cyril Ramaphosa has appointed recently retired Judge Sirajudien Desai as the Legal Services Ombud in terms of Section 47 of the Legal Practice Act No. 28 of 2014. In terms of the Legal Practice Act, Judge Desai is empowered to investigate complaints, alleged maladministration, within the ambit of the Act, and actions which may affect the integrity of the legal profession, among others. Following discussions with Justice and Correctional Services Minister Ronald Lamola, the President appointed Justice Desai to advance and safeguard the integrity of the legal profession in the country. “Judge Desai has devoted the greater part of his life to serving the nation as a judge and I am confident he will take the legal profession to new heights by ensuring that those in the profession meet the ethical standards required in a legal system that serves all South Africans with fairness and dignity within the rule of law,” said President Ramaphosa. The appointment of Judge Desai is with effect from 16 December 2020 for a term of seven years. [SA News: Judge Desai appointed as legal services ombud]

Legal Practice Act of 2014: To provide a legislative framework for the transformation and restructuring of the legal profession in line with constitutional imperatives so as to facilitate and enhance an independent legal profession that broadly reflects the diversity and demographics of the Republic; to provide for the establishment, powers and functions of a single South African Legal Practice Council and Provincial Councils in order to regulate the affairs of legal practitioners and to set norms and standards; to provide for the admission and enrolment of legal practitioners; to regulate the professional conduct of legal practitioners so as to ensure accountable conduct; to provide for the establishment of an Office of a Legal Services Ombud and for the appointment, powers and functions of a Legal Services Ombud; to provide for a Legal Practitioners’ Fidelity Fund and a Board of Control for the Fidelity Fund; to provide for the establishment, powers and functions of a National Forum on the Legal Profession; and to provide for matters connected therewith [SA Gov: Legal Practice Act of 2014].

I don’t know if your appointment ‘with effect from 16 December’ was a conscious response from President Ramaphosa and/or Min of Justice Lamola; to EoP applicants 12 Dec 2020 correspondence to CCMA Director Morajane [12 Dec: LJ Ntc Re: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic]; which includes Min of Justice TRC Unit as one of the LJ v TRC respondents.

Please note, that if the CCMA have not provided me with (a) the name of the Senior Commissioner; and (b) the Senior Commissioner has not clarified the date by when s/he intends to provide his/her ruling; by 17:00 hrs on 16 December 2020, I shall interpret such actions as a – ‘CCMA is for WiP law only applicants aka fuck off with your EoP law application to CCMA’ message – from CCMA Director Morajane; and – no offence taken – proceed with the primary [10 Sep: Upd Filing: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic] and secondary [Ref: 08 Sep: LJ v EGME Upd Re H45-19/18912-19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other; 08 Sep: LJ v EGME Upd Re WEGE 1063-20: LJ v TRC & Two Others] LRA S 191(6) Application issue in dispute matters in alternative – EoP law culture applications welcome – juridical venue/s [eop-v-wip-law].
» EoP Leg Sub: 12 Dec: LJ Ntc Re: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic; 16 Dec: EoP Re Hallam-Hedges-Brown-Ramphele Climate Troublemakers; 19 Dec: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q to TP20 & BH20: SecDef: Chris Miller & Lloyd Austin.

I imagine your appointment was at least partially a psychotronically manipulated [OSI: Alex Jones: Dr John Hall; Amazon: A New Breed Satellite Terrorism; Amazon: Guinea Pigs: Technologies of Control; Bibliotecapleyades: JSC Akwei v NSA] response from one or more military intelligence agency.

CNN: Is there a simpler way of saying all this? Yes, provided by Sarah Isgur, who tweeted [whignewtons: 12 Dec 2020] this: “From a wise friend: So, just so I understand what the Alito/Thomas blurb is about, SCOTUS is effectively saying ‘get the eff off my lawn’ while Alito/Thomas are like ‘you’re welcome to ring the doorbell but no way are we opening the door to you weirdos?’ EXACTLY” [CNN: Explaining the Supreme Court’s ruling denying Trump and how Alito and Thomas didn’t dissent]
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 Dec: EoP Re Hallam-Hedges-Brown-Ramphele Climate Troublemakers; 19 Dec: McV20: EoP Law Voter Q to TP20 & BH20: SecDef: Chris Miller & Lloyd Austin

Active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle] is part of EoP law [eop-v-wip-law] ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.36-37/70] legal services conflict resolution communication relationship practices; to enable clear communication, that does not waste any friend, foe, neutral observer, potential ally convert or impartial or enemy prosecutor, judge, or jurors time. Put differently: If Bram Fischer [Nelson Mandela: Gentlemen the time for talking is over. The only path to change is through the bullet and the bomb: An Act of Defiance: Trailer; Bram Fischer: Trailer; Operation Production: All young girls or women opposing the wishes of the ANC young cadres were reminded, that it was every woman’s obligation to give birth to new soldiers, in order to replace those warriors killed in the liberation struggle. The idiom of the adolescents referred to these patriotic efforts as ‘operation production.’ Because of exactly this reason it was forbidden for the girls to use contraceptives: Academia: Johannes Harnishfeger: Witchcraft and the State in SAfrica; IG: 13-02-20] or Noura Erekat [Yaser Arafat: The womb of the Arab woman is my strongest weapon; Village Voice: Battle of the Wombs; Craig Johnson: Half-Full: Population Growth in Israel] was an ego-eco literate legal services practitioner, (a) if Mandela had asked him for his – how can the ANC/PLO legally and nonviolently overthrow the Apartheid government – legal services advice, prior to launching MK military insurgency anti-apartheid guerrilla war, (b) a summary of EoP lawyer Fischer’s Q&A advice would have been: [A] If you are EoP law revolutionaries; sign your EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oaths], setup an ANC EoP Axis Oath office and ask all ANC members to sign their EoP Axis Oaths; to provide me a mandate to file EoP legal applications to Verwoerdtopia Apartheid courts [ie. similar to those that have been filed by EoP Applicant to Mandelatopia Apartheid courts: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70| lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56 | lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83 | tc-v-rm: 31 Aug: TN: EoP Law definitions: sincere peacenik and corruption]; to ask National Party leadership to cooperate with us to build a global EoP Axis Alliance coalition to abolish WiP international law; [B] If you are WiP law revolutionaries, ask a WiP law revolutionary lawyer; I am not a competent WiP law revolutionary paralegal.
» EoP Leg Sub: 21 Oct: LJ Re YH Re Roy Elliott-Nugget Hamilton Injury Damages Claim: Edit: Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle.

Secular WiP law legal services practitioners have negligently or intentionally for hundreds of years – like their religious Kane Babylon WiP law innocence for sale indulgences [08 Aug: EoP Law Re: Babylon – Innocence for $ale Indulgences – WiP Law] predecessors – been in the process of bullshit the public relations verbal diarrhea legal services transformation from one WiP-ism [eop-v-wip-ism] flavour of WiP law, to a new WiP-ism flavour [IG: 14-08-27] of WiP law [eop-v-wip-law]; while legal reformers negligently and/or intentionally (a) failed to analyse and expose the WiP law causes of resource conflict, (b) clearly define their EoP international law strategic goal, and (c) build an unconditional and conditional cooperator EoP Axis Alliance to accomplish their strategic reform of WiP international law goal to abolish the clauses of WiP law that are the root cause of all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict issues in dispute, which WiP law legal services officials pretend they give a fuck about solving.

A public or private, religious or secular legal services official either sincerely gives a fuck about sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal services; or they do not. If they do: they will [A] clearly define their definition of sincere peacenik / honourable warrior; [B] cooperate with other legal officials who sincerely give a fuck about being sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal services practioners, to test their definition for scientific accuracy with regards to sincere peaceniks / honourable warriors whose non-violent/violent activism activities are strategically focused on abolishing the root causes of all resource conflict; [C] cooperate to build a sincere peacenik / honourable warrior unconditional and conditional cooperator alliance; to enable [C1] unconditional and/or conditional cooperator ally warrior individuals who meet and abide by the definition to receive priority sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal defence legal services; [C2] a clear and simple legal certainty measurable definition clarity education outreach to potential cooperator allies.
» EoP Leg Sub: 23 Jul: EoP Law Re: Neal Katyal Re BLM Portland v Trump DHHS.

Brad Blanton: That’s what you do when you grow up; you start having enough courage to tell the truth. What is bad about not being honest? You are wrapped up in your own mind. You are trapped in your own mind. You can’t do anything but think about what it is that you haven’t told somebody and how you are deceiving them. You keep thinking now who did I tell what. You can’t keep track of all the ways in which you modified what you reported to other people and so you end up thinking, what did I say, what am I going to do, what am I trying to get them to do for me, what am I trying to do to manipulate them. You are all wrapped up in trying to get people conned into doing what you want, and when you are wrapped up in that you don’t actually enjoy it when you get what you want, cause you know you just conned them into it. So a way in which you really enjoy getting what you want, is that you ask for it, and they say ‘yeah go ahead you can have it’, then you can enjoy it and be really happy, but if you conned your way into it you can’t enjoy it and be happy. So the idea is being able to be happy and be related to people and not be guarded and careful and protected and afraid of being found out. That’s a lousy way to live. It’s a better way to live out loud, let the chips fall where they may, have a few hard times now and then but they get cleaned up when everyone tells the truth. … At about 12 or 13 we start playing a game of pretending that we are not pretending, when we are. We do that in order to play a kind of secret hero role to ourselves and try to get everyone to acknowledge us as being heroic and so we are going to pretend to be whatever we think will help us to get them to give us what we want. So when you learn to pretend that you are not pretending, when you are, that’s a big problem, its called the major problem of adulthood, of our whole civilization. .. They lie to get what they want and when they get what they want by lying, they can’t enjoy it. Why don’t they just ask for what they want? Because they are afraid they might not get it. So they build a story to be able to manipulate others to get what they want. [Radical Honesty: The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth. SHO: Brad Blanton: And Nothing But the Truth; Radical Honesty: 01:02:03: EoP RH FR: Caveat]
» EoP Leg Sub: 09 Apr: EoP Re: Russel Brand 12 Addiction Steps, Social Anxiety and Trust; 21 Apr: EoP Re: Arif Putin to Pena-Taliban: Simple Question: What do you want?.

The Western Cape High Court has for twenty years, been a negligent and/or intentional covert WiP Law Only High Court; with the negligent and/or intentional covert consent of all Western Cape High Court judges [HC-WCPD: 28 Jul: LJ Req Judge Hlope Info Re H45-19/18912-19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other], which included yourself.

I am currently the only EoP law culture [eop-axis-oath] practitioner in South Africa, and globally.

LPC-CL: …. as you are aware, [the LPC] is the regulatory body for the legal profession.
EoP-LJ: LPC officials should make up their minds as to whether the LPC is an EoP and WiP law, or WiP Law Only legal profession regulatory body. Until it does so: EoP MILED Clerk is the legal regulatory body for the EoP law legal profession [EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF].  The supreme national and global national security priority for EoP law culture is building an EoP Axis Alliance to submit EoP UN Resolution to UN General Assembly; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71; lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation to a global low tech organic family farm agrarian economy.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 May: LJ Re LPC-CL Re: LJ v NMN: Draft Settlement Agreement.

EoP oath is a mutual cooperation energy return on energy invested [sq-eroei: eop-v-wip-investing] promise – a form of labour or information barter exchange reciprocity [Dmitry Orlov Twilight of the Antipodes: Reciprocity as a form of social-currency; particularly where other forms of currency have collapsed due to economic collapse. Reciprocity builds stronger relationships; even some animals practice reciprocity such as when a cat that is taken care of by its owner, it will bring it a dead mouse to say thank you.] – purchase of labour or information sharing cooperation with very clear unambiguous honest communication as to what the collective strategic goal is. If or when there is a mutual overlap agreement on strategic goal between two or more individuals, they can sign an unconditional or conditional cooperator oath, to clarify their cooperator commitment to the strategic goal. The oath is a process to learn to practice in decision-making, communication and relating responsible freedom self government 24/7/365: If or when my ego gets in the way of me cooperating, towards our strategic goal; I will not run away or play some passive aggressive egomindfuck games. I will be my own or your Sgt Major and bitch slap my own or your fragile ego Private through the face with clear sincere verbal feedback, to help quick resolution of our misunderstanding, disagreement with you my fellow Oath co-operator; to enable us to uphold our cooperation agreement towards our shared strategic goal, through potentially difficult times. It’s a statement of: our strategic goal is our cooperative master, not our individual ego’s.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jul: McV20 Re: Greg Johnson NB Principles; Richard Spencer: Trump WN Congame; 29 Jul: EoP Obs: Everytime they make it – abolish babylon idea meritocracy – plain kissed, the worlds intelligence chiefs held their breath.

EoP MILED Clerk: EoP Law Ballot Voter Registration: One responsible freedom oath [eop-axis-oath: LJ] wo/man ballot; one vote.
» EoP Leg Sub: 01 Dec: EoP Ntc CISA: EoP Law voter USA 2020 Pres Election Results; 14 Dec: Filing: Clerk of Congress: EoP Law Voter Electoral College Vote (excl AZ) Registration with Clerk of Congress: McVeigh: 527, Trump: 0; Biden: 0.

Wikileaks/Dept of State: US Consul Capetown: (2). Attorney Essa Moosa spoke with him last week, says Mandela fully expects that on February 2 De Klerk will announce the unbanning of the ANC, PAC and other organizations, the lifting of the State of Emergency, the return of political exiles to South Africa, and the release of several political prisoners including Mandela himself. Implementation of the announcements would come swiftly after de Klerks speech at the opening of parliament. (3). The SAG is concerned over ANC relations with the SACP and over the working definition of “One Man One Vote,” among other “white fears” issues. Mandela has passed de Klerks “proposals” on these topics to the ANC. The organizations announcement that it is willing to negotiate even while apartheid laws remain in place may be part of the ANC’s reply to the SAG. [Wikileaks: 17 Jan 1990: 90CAPETOWN97_a: Essa Moosa Talks About Mandela and Other Topics]
» EoP Leg Sub: 17 Dec: EoP Law Voter Filing: HSGAC: Examining Irregularities in 2020 Election

As of date the EoP law definition of sincere peacenik / honourable warrior objective reality [eop-rh-fr: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp. 43-47/70] has not been legally declared as scientifically or culturally inaccurate; in any negligent or intentional WiP Law Only court, by any negligent or intentional WiP law prosecutor and/or lawyer or their psychiatrists or psychologists or well funded clients.

Put differently, courts that have granted me access to file a Pro Se application; have issued verbal and written dismissal rulings; none of which included any legal finding alleging anything that could remotely be interpreted as a legal finding alleging scientific or cultural inaccuracy of any EoP law principle.

Dismissal Rulings: Three verbal: two from a magistrate and one from Judge [lj-v-crlrc: 01 Nov: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC: Pro Se Set Down: 01 Nov 2019 Hearing  Transcript] and two written CCMA Commissioner [lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.01; lj-v-gme: PDF: pp.04].  The Clerk subsequently provided a written referral for one [lj-v-bb: PDF: pp.01] and the Court Manager requested Magistrate Essel to provide his ruling in writing; whereupon he clarified the reasons for the case’s dismissal being that it had not included the alternative option of a ruling of financial damages against the respondent [lj-v-ftm: PDF: pp.01]. LJ v FTM was amended and refiled including the options of financial damages [lj-v-ghj: PDF: pp.44]. LJ v CRLRC, LJ v GME and LJ v TRC was appealed to the Labour Court, in terms of Labour Relations Act Section 191 (6): Referral from CCMA Director [PDF: pp.67]. The CCMA refused to provide the name of the Senior Commissioner to whom the application was referred to; resulting in my 12 Dec correspondence to Director Morajane; possibly partially triggering your Legal Ombudsman Services appointment.

Please note, that if the CCMA have not provided me with (a) the name of the Senior Commissioner; and (b) the Senior Commissioner has not clarified the date by when s/he intends to provide his/her ruling; by 17:00 hrs on 16 December 2020, I shall interpret such actions as a – ‘CCMA is for WiP law only applicants aka fuck off with your EoP law application to CCMA’ message – from CCMA Director Morajane; and – no offence taken – proceed with the primary [10 Sep: Upd Filing: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic] and secondary [Ref: 08 Sep: LJ v EGME Upd Re H45-19/18912-19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other; 08 Sep: LJ v EGME Upd Re WEGE 1063-20: LJ v TRC & Two Others] LRA S 191(6) Application issue in dispute matters in alternative – EoP law culture applications welcome – juridical venue/s [eop-v-wip-law].
» EoP Leg Sub: 12 Dec: LJ Ntc Re: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic.

Presumably the – Dismissal rulings without Written Reasons for any enquiry into merits of EoP v WiP law issues in dispute – negligent and/or intentional WiP Law Only commissioners, magistrates and judges lacked the courage to confront (a) their own EoP v WiP legal existential identity; and if WiP law Only; to honourably declare themselves as such; and refer the case to an EoP and WiP law conflict of legal cultures juridical arbitrator; who could conduct an EoP v WiP law parties conflict of cultures enquiry [LJ v CRLRC: PN, HoA & Draft Order PDF: para: 7.3: pp.04/44; para: 23: pp.14-16/44] by requesting (b) the lawyers and their clients to confirm themselves as EoP law unconditional or conditional cooperators and/or alternatively to demand (c) the lawyers honestly advertise themselves to the EoP law applicant, court and/or their clients as WiP law only lawyers, and (c) the respondents honestly declare themselves to the EoP law applicant, court and their lawyers; as WiP Law only respondents.

.

Relief Requested:

Please confirm whether Legal Services Ombudsman office will be willing to:

[A] appoint an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures juridical official to conduct an enquiry into EoP v WiP law issues in dispute between EoP applicant and Legal Practice Council [lj-v-lpc]; with the purpose of the Legal Services Ombudsman authorizing the assistance of counsel order [PDF: pp.21-44/44] requested by the EoP law applicant, in H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC application [PN, HoA & Draft Order: PDF: pp.44; Bundle: Primary Docs: A: PDF: pp.132; Secondary Docs: B1: PDF: pp.73; B2: PDF: pp.168, B3: PDF: pp.156]; or alternatively;

[B] formally recommend the referral of LJ v CRLRC issues in dispute – and if appropriate aforementioned others related thereto – to Judge Colin Lamont or – if appropriate – Judge Sandile Ngcobo [09 Nov: LJ v CRLRC: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge], who have demonstrated their lack of bias towards EoP law Pro Se applications, by honourably accepting EoP law Pro Se applications to their court proceedings; to enable Judge Lamont to conduct aforementioned EoP v WiP law issues in dispute enquiry; by zoom, as part of Judge Lamont’s High Court proceedings; or alternatively;

[C] whether the Legal Services Ombudsman has any alternative mediation and/or juridical enquiry truthseeking recommendations for resolution of EoP v WiP law issues in dispute.

.

Summary of EoP v WiP Law Issues in Dispute:

The question is whether EoP SciCult law [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] or WiP Babylon law should be master intnl law; that’s all. [EoP Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF; 08 Aug: EoP Law Re: Babylon – Innocence for $ale Indulgences – WiP Law].
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jan: EoP v WiP Law Relevance Defns A: Re JManchin: If its relevant I want to hear it.

The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from Sandile Ngcobo [WP: Sandile Ngcobo] SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict. …. The EoP TRC Amcius was supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Michael Maher on media censorship of overpopulation causes of resource conflict: Written Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 May: 03 May: Ngcobo Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae.

The EoP TRC Amicus was also supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Brad Blanton.
* 02 Dec 2009: Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’; submitted into the High Court, Western Cape, Case # 19963-09, Application for Review, of conviction of Lara Johnstone, of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, on the charge of ‘crimen injuria’ [PDF].
* 18 May 2010: CCT 23-10: Written Statement of Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness [PDF]
* Dr Blanton subsequently angrily verbally withdrew all his written expert witness affidavits in response to an EoP TRC application filed on behalf of Anders Breivik [26 Jul: Radical Honesty Coaching Blog Discussion: Re: Norway v. Breivik/Berwick: Application to Chief Justice Tore Schei ITO Article 85: Treason: PW]. As of date Dr Blanton has refused to clarify whether his verbal withdrawal of his expert witness affidavits was simply angry ranting or his sincere legal intentions; by formally withdrawing his expert witness affidavits per affidavit in writing.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Nov: Timothy J McVeigh: Formal Apology: Re: Fraud of Radical Honesty Cult; 16 Dec: EoP Re: Seeds of Russiagate are in FBI-VA: LJvBB complaint; 20 Jun: LJ Req LJ v BB Info Help to Page Co Sheriff: Chad Cubbage; 06 Jun: McV20: EoP Re: BB: Radical Honesty is bullshit psych therapy. I’m just trying to make a buck; 12 Sep: McVeigh2020 EoP Sci-Cult Law Judge Picks; 23 Sep: McV20 Re: JGB Re McV20 Re: Romney Re: Senate SCOTUS election / RH: So, you think you’re honest, hmmmm; 26 Oct: EoP Re LJvBB: RH Circle: Req for Unfinished Business Info Complaint; 02 Nov: EoP Ntc Re LJvBB EoP Req for Info to Radical Honesty Circle; 02 Nov: EoP Law Ntc Re: WiP Law Radical Honesty Circle.

TO: Min State Security: SSA Foreign Branch Director: Robert McBride
CC: Brad Blanton:
CC: Sheriff Chad Cubbage; FBI-VA: David Archey:
Ref: CCT 23-10: Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm]: Judge Ngcobo LJ Amicus Ruling [PDF]: EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] is updated version of LJ Amicus submission to Citizen v McBride. Re: Supporting Expert Witness Affidavits: T Michael Maher [PDF]; Brad Blanton [lj-v-bb: 20 Jun: LJ Req LJ v BB Info Help to Page Co Sheriff: Chad Cubbage].
» EoP Leg Sub: 31 Aug: EoP Ntc to SANEF: EoP Law definitions: sincere peacenik and corruption.

The Mogoeng [Wikipedia: Mogoeng Mogoeng] Concourt have not accepted EoP law Pro Se applications. The Mogoeng Judicial Service Commission have not yet responded to EoP law request for an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures court Judge, to rule upon EoP law citizens applications when in dispute with WiP law lawyers, judges or citizens [09 Nov: LJ v CRLRC: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge].
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Q for New Nation Movement & People’s Dialogue.

EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; has been submitted electronically or formally served to parties and courts in the following political and legal proceedings – as of date no respondent has exposed any scientific or cultural law error – [A] US Presidential Campaign: McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.55-96/350]; [B] US Courts: Criminal No EP-20-U4: US v Patrick Crusius [us-v-pwc: PDF: pp.156-197/261]; [C] South Africa: George High Court: (i) H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56]; (ii) H 213/19 LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others [lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83]; [D] South Africa: CCMA: Comm for Conciliation Mediation & Arbitration: 1063-20: LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Two Others [lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137]; [E] UK Courts: (i) LJ v Speaker House of Commons and Ten Others [lj-v-shoc: PDF: pp.43-84/88]; (ii) UK Extradition Proceedings: US v Julian Assange [us-v-jpa: PDF: pp.59-100/143]; [F] New Zealand Courts: CRI-2019-009-2468: New Zealand v Brenton Tarrant [nz-v-bt PDF pp.156-197/261]; [G] Intnl Court of Justice: Treaty of Amity Proceedings: Iran v USA [ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143].

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Siraj Desai: Foundation for Human Rights:
Siraj Desai: Foundation for Human Rights (info@fhr.org.za); Unfinished Business of TRC: Ahmed Mayet (amayet@fhr.org.za); Katarzyna Zdunczyk (kzdunczyk@fhr.org.za); SACTJ: Shirley Gunn (director@hrmc.org.za)

Min of Justice & Correctional Services Minister Ronald Lamola:
Min of Justice & Correctional Services Minister Ronald Lamola (Ministry@justice.gov.za); Zanele Ndlovu (ZaneNdlovu@justice.gov.za); Chrispin Phiri (CPhiri@justice.gov.za); Bruce Sarela (BSarela@justice.gov.za); Delsy Moraba (DeMoraba@justice.gov.za);  Mfuzo Zenzile (MZenzile@justice.gov.za)

**

WCP-HC: Chief Registrar: Ruanne David:
WCP-HC: Chief Registrar: Ruanne David (RDavid@judiciary.org.za)

Faadiah Davids: Registrar to Judge NC Erasmus:
Judge Erasmus Registrar: Faadiah Davids (fdavids@judiciary.org.za)

Legal Practice Council: Kathleen Dlepu:
Craig Lucas (craigl@lpc.org.za); Legal Practice Council (info@lpc.org.za); Director: Kathleen Dlepu (directorgp@lpc.org.za); Provincial Director: Gauteng: JS Grobler (directorgp@lpc.org.za); Engela Pienaar (engelap@lpc.org.za);  Western Cape: Frank Dorey (directorwc@lpc.org.za); KZN: P Arnold-Mfusi (directorkzn@lpc.org.za); Free State: Tumelo Leope (directorfs@lpc.org.za)

CRL Rights Commission: Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza:
Edward Mafadza (Eddie@crlcommission.org.za); Maureen Chauke (maureen@crlcommission.org.za); Kgositoi Sedupane (asedupane@crlcommission.org.za); Kgaogelo Makgoba (Kgaogelo@crlcommission.org.za); CRL Rights Commission (info@crlcommission.org.za); Vinolia Mashwayi (vinoiah@crlcommission.org.za); Khulisiwe Sithole (khulisiwe@crlcommission.org.za)

Desmond Tutu, Mpho Tutu van Furth, DLTLF, Tutu HIV Fnd, Elders:
Desmond Tutu via Mpho Tutu van Furth (mphotutu2012@gmail.com); DL Tutu Legacy Foundation: Piyushi Koetcha (info@tutu.org.za); Romaney Pinnock (romaney@tutu.org.za); Tutu HIV Foundation (info@hiv-research.org.za); Lavinia Browne (Lavinia.Browne@hiv-research.org.za); TutuTeach Foundation (info@tututeach.org); The Elders (media@theelders.org);

IJR: Charles Villa-Vicencio, Brian McConnell, Stanley Henkeman:
IJR: Brian McConnell (info@ijr.org.za); Charles Villa-Vicencio (conflictresolution@georgetown.edu); Stanley Henkeman (shenkeman@ijr.org.za); Simone Naidoo (snaidoo@ijr.org.za); Board of Directors: Hugh Corder (hugh.corder@uct.ac.za); Lovell Fernandez (lfernandez@uwc.ac.za); Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela (pumlagm1@gmail.com); Gerhard Kemp (gkemp@sun.ac.za); Dumisa Ntsebeza (ntsebeza@mweb.co.za); Jeremy Sarkin (jeremy.sarkin@fd.unl.pt); Glenda Wildschut (Glenda.Wildschut@uct.ac.za); Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge: Embrace Dignity (info@embracedignity.org.za); Deborah Posel (Deborah.Posel@uct.ac.za); Salona Lutchman (salona.lutchman@uct.ac.za); Kwadwo Owusu (kwadwo.owusu@cdhlegal.com); Policy Dirs: Jan Hofmeyr (jhofmeyr@ijr.org.za); Tim Murithi (tmurithi@ijr.org.za); Ric Amansure (ramansure@ijr.org.za); Felicity Harrison (fharrison@ijr.org.za);

Dept of Justice TRC Unit: Mochubela Seekoe:
Dept of Justice TRC Unit: Mochubela Seekoe: Lufuno Mmbadi (lmmbadi@justice.gov.za); Thapelo Mokushane (tmokushane@justice.gov.za);

**

CCMA Director: Cameron Morajane:
Cameron Morajane (Communications@CCMA.org.za); Amos Tshabalala (AmosT@CCMA.org.za); Firgil Philips (FirgilP@CCMA.org.za); Caren-Lee Small (CarenS@CCMA.org.za); Case Officer: Zaheer Samodien (ZaheerS@CCMA.org.za);

CCMA: Commissioner: Francois van der Merwe:
Francois van der Merwe (fvdmerwe@law.co.za);

**

AU-ZA Pres Ramaphosa, ZA-UN: Jerry Matjila, AU-UN Fatiam Mohammed:
Office of Presidency (president@po.gov.za); Robert Ngobeni (Robert@presidency.gov.za); Malebo Sibiya (malebo@presidency.gov.za); David Dabede Mabuza (Deputypresident@presidency.gov.za); ZA-UN Amb: Jerry Matthews Matjila (Matjilaj@dirco.gov.za); AU-UN Amb Fatiam Kyari Mohammed: Legal Council: Namira Negm: Esther Azaa Tankouj (yamboue@africa-union.org);

RU Pres Vladimir Putin, RU-ZA Amb Ilya Rogachev; RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya:
Kremlin: President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office (press_office@prpress.gov.ru); RU-US Emb: Anatoly Antonov (RusPressUSA@mid.ru); Min of Foreign Affairs: Spokesperson: Maria Zakarova (ministry@mid.ru); RU-ZA Emb: Ilya Igorevich Rogachev (ruspospr@mweb.co.za); RU-NL Emb: Alexander Vasilievich Shulgin (rusembassynl@mid.ru); RU-EU Emb: Vladimir Chizhov (russia.eu@mid.ru); RU-UK Emb Alexander Vladimirovich Yakovenko (info@rusemb.org.uk); RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya: Fedor Strzhizhovskiy (press@russiaun.ru);

.

Leave a Comment