08 Mar: Draft: USDP v NLD: EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Office Resolution Settlement Agreement Offer to resolve 2020 election irregularities resulting in declaration of One Year State of Emergency on 01 February 2021

* ICJ: Intnl Court of Justice, Philippe Gautier, Joan E. Donoghue, Kirill Gevorgian, Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, Xue Hanqin, GMPM Adama Barrow, GM-PK Emb: Tahir H. Schon, GM-CH Emb: Yassin Abu Ied, MMPM Min Aung Hlaing: MM-EG Emb: U Myint Lwin, MM-UN Emb: Hau Do Suan, NLD: National League for Democracy: Aung San Suu Kyi, IR Pres Hassan Rouhani; IR-EG Amb Mohammed Dost, IR-PK Amb Seyed Ali Hosseini, US Pres Joe Biden, US-EG Amb Thomas Goldberger, US-PK Amb David Hale.
* 08 Mar: EoP Law Voter Mediation Ntc: ICJ: Gambia v Myanmar. 09 Mar: McV20: EoP TN ICJ: EoP Law Voter Mediation: GM v MM: Draft: EoP GM v MM EoP Axis Alliance Settlement Agreement: EoP Axis Alliance GM-MM JCPOA [PDF: GM-MM JCPOA: pp.01-10/52; EoP UN Res: pp.11-52/52]; Draft: USDP v NLD: EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Office Resolution Settlement Agreement Offer to resolve 2020 election irregularities resulting in declaration of One Year State of Emergency on 01 February 2021 [PDF: pp.14]
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, McV v USA, EoP v ICJ, GM v MM, EoP v GMPM, EoP v MMPM, EoP v IRPM, EoP v JBiden, EoP v J Zarif, LJ v L Sisulu, EoP v USPR, Iran v US / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

Draft: MM Parliament EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Office Resolution

.

In the INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS; and US COURT OF APPEALS DC CIRCUIT and US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO and US COURT OF APPEALS: TENTH CIRCUIT, USA and EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT; HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA and INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, THE HAGUE

In the matter/s between:

Timothy McVeigh 2020 – Applicant

and

United States of America – Respondent

IACHR: _______________________

Petition for EoP Prisoner of WiP Law War Declaratory Order

**************************************

Timothy McVeigh 2020 – Applicant

and

Donald Trump 2020, Biden Harris 2020 – Respondents

CADC: ________________________

Petition for EoP PoW of WiP Law War Declaratory Order.

**************************************

United States – Plaintiff

and

Timothy James McVeigh – Defendant

10th Crt: 119 F.3d 806
CO: No. 96-CR-68-M

Re: Conviction and Sentence of McVeigh for 19 Apr 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing

**************************************

Lara Johnson – Applicant

and

Lindiwe Sisulu: Min of Intnl Relations & Cooperation; Hasso Plattner: RSA Rep. of Giving Pledge; Helene Budliger Artieda, Swiss Amb; Masimba Tafirenyika: UN Amb; Lin Songtian: China Amb; Marcus Cornaro: EU Amb; Didier Vanderhasselt: Belgium & NATO Amb; Jessye Lapenn: US Ch D’Affairs; Mikhail Petrakov: Russia Amb – Respondents

Grg High Crt: H 111/2019

Notice of McVeigh Faked Execution; EoP / OKC TRC UN Resolution Negotiations

Req EoP/OKC TRC: EoP UN Resolution; or No EoP/OKC TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide vote info.

**************************************

The Gambia  – Applicant
and
Myanmar – Respondent
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
State Administrative Council Chairman: Min Aung Hlaing, and Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) – Applicants
and
President Win Myint; State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi; and National League for Democracy (NLD) – Respondents
Draft: EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Office Resolution Settlement Agreement Offer to resolve 2020 election irregularities resulting in declaration of One Year State of Emergency on 01 February 2021

.

HOUSE RESOLUTION _______________

.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Chairman Hlaing (for himself and State Counsellor Suu Kyi) submit the following Draft EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Mandate resolution; for referral to the Committee on the Judiciary; to authorize the setting up of an official EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Office; for Myanmar officials and citizens EoP Axis Alliance voter registration.

.

RESOLUTION

 .

[A] INTRODUCTION:

Confirming that House Members understand that:

[1] Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Law concepts between {brackets} refer to EoP UN Resolution sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal definitions, in EoP Law Voter Mediation: International Court of Justice: The Gambia v Myanmar: Draft EoP Axis Alliance GM-MM JCPOA[1].

[2] EoP UN Resolution has been submitted electronically or formally served to parties and courts in the following political and legal proceedings: [A] US Presidential Campaign: McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020[2]: Encl: pp.27-68/275[3]; pp.31-72/326[4]]; [B] US Courts: Criminal No EP-20-U4: US v Patrick Crusius [us-v-pwc pp.156-197/261[5]]; [C] South Africa: George High Court: (i) H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [lj-v-ls[6]: PDF[7]: pp.25-66/70]; (ii) H 225/19: LJ v Speaker George Municipality and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc: pp.17-54/56[8]];  (iii) H 213/19 LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others [lj-v-nmn: pp.11-76/83[9]]; [D] South Africa: CCMA: Comm for Conciliation Mediation & Arbitration: 1063-20: LJ v Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Two Others [lj-v-trc: pp.30-71/137[10]]; [E] UK Courts: (i) LJ v Speaker House of Commons and Ten Others [lj-v-shoc: 43-84/88[11]]; (ii) UK Extradition Proceedings: US v Julian Assange [us-v-jpa: pp.59-100/143[12]];  [F] New Zealand Courts: CRI-2019-009-2468: New Zealand v Brenton Tarrant [nz-v-bt pp.156-197/261[13]]; [G] Intnl Court of Justice: Treaty of Amity Proceedings: Iran v USA [ir-v-us: pp.59-100/143[14]].

[3] EoP Axis Alliance global and national security definition can be summarized as building an ego/eco-literate {ego-eco-literacy} EoP Axis Alliance {eop-rh-fr} to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law; politically via UN General Assembly – EoP UN Resolution – vote; or legally via International Court of Justice – EoP UN Resolution – Declaratory Order.

[4] EoP UN Resolution implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; will [A] enable global orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release {prisoner-pardon}, land reform {eop-landreform} and denuclearization {eop-denuke-defn} – economic degrowth shut down of the Babylon War is Peace Ponzi Swamp economy {eop-sdwipecon} transition to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy; by [B] requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed {one-child-law} and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits {eop-footprint}; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool {crimes-of-aggression}; [C] nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath {responsible-freedom} citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule territorial homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities {cult-law-self-rule}; and (ii) guaranteed for life property ration (property-ration} land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] ECOLOGY OF PEACE RADICAL HONOURSTY OBJECTIVE REALITY:

Confirming that House Members hereby confirm our objective and subjective sincere peacenik / honourable warrior reality truth as follows:

[5] EoP HR FR Objective Truth:

[5.1] EoP RH FR: Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:

[A] Earth is not flat.

[B] Resources are finite.

[C] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.

[D] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.

[E] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.

[F] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy {ego-eco-literacy} – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

[6] Subjective EoP Axis Alliance Voter Registration Office Cooperator Truth:

[61.] To provide Myanmar officials and citizens with the opportunity to provide us with their sincere peacenik / honourable warrior mandate:

[6.2] We hereby confirm that we are willing to draft legislation for submission to Parliament; to authorize the Dept of Justice to set up an official EoP Axis Oath office – aka EoP Law Voter Registration Office – for Myanmar officials and citizens who identify as sincere peaceniks / honourable warriors to register as EoP Law Voters; by signing their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths; to provide Chairman: Min Aung Hlaing and State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi; with an EoP Axis Alliance Mandate; to formally submit EoP UN Resolution to UN General Assembly; for UNGA – EoP v WiP Law Referendum – vote.

.

[C] SUMMARY: ABEL EOP V KANE WIP LAW / ELECTIONS:

EoP v WiP Law: Concepts between {brackets} refer to EoP UN Resolution sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal definitions.

[7] EoP v WiP Law:

[7.1] EoP Scientific and Cultural {eop-scicultlaw} – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally requires citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint]; and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements [ego-eco-literacy]; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[7.2] The Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality {eop-rh-fr} conscious strategic goal for implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law is an egalitarian responsible freedom [responsible-freedom] stable – no population & economic consumption growth above ecological carrying capacity limits – sustainable low tech family farm agrarian village and primitivist nomad society living in peace; with no palaces, prisons, mental institutions, homeless and unemployed, where rape and murder are so rare, they don’t have words for it.[15]

[A] In Martin Luther / Sayyid Qutb terminology: EoP Law prohibits innocence for – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – sale indulgences Kufr juridical rulings.

[7.3] Babylon WiP law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[A] The conscious or unconscious strategic goal of WiP law is a hierarchical slavery freedumb society where the military, legal, political, religious and legal elite profiteer of cheap – economic sexual and/or military – cannon fodder labour and homeless and unemployed misery of the masses; with plenty of racial, religious, class or gender resource conflict for the elite to parasitically profiteer from to build themselves military, religious, corporate and polegal palaces, cheap labour prisons and mental institutions slavery plantations, where rape and murder are so plentiful, WiP Only BDSM addicted to misery judges don’t need to subscribe to porn channels, because they have reality rape and murder porn tv channels in their courts.[16]

[B] In Martin Luther / Sayyid Qutb terminology: Babylonian Kufr WiP Law socio-polegally and economically profit from innocence for – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – sale indulgences Kufr juridical rulings.

[8] EoP v WiP Courts:

[8.1] An ‘EoP Only’ Court – generally in a national polegal system dominated by WiP law whose juridical transformation goals are to transform the judiciary into an EoP legal system – only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously – unconditional or conditional cooperator – members of the Ecology of Peace culture.

[8.2] An unconscious Babylon ‘WiP Only’ court unconsciously accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of EoP and Babylon WiP cultures.

[8.3] A conscious Babylon ‘WiP Only’ court consciously only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of Babylon WiP cultures.

[8.4] An unconscious EoP and WiP court accepts applications from all individuals irrespective of whether they are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace or Babylon WiP cultures.

[8.5] A conscious EoP and WiP court accepts applications from all individuals irrespective of whether they are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace or Babylon WiP cultures; requires applicants, counsel and jury members to unambiguously clarify whether they are EoP or WiP culture accused / defendants, applicants / respondents, counsel and jury.

[9] EoP v WiP Activists:

[9.1] EoP Civil Disobedience – unconditional or conditional co-operator – Activist engages in non-violent or violent activism – generally in a national polegal system dominated by WiP law – that violates one or more national or international Babylon WiP legal statute; on behalf of implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as national or international law.

[A] If tried in a Babylon WiP court, they are denied EoP necessity defence exposing difference between EoP and WiP law, tried in accordance to WiP law, and if convicted, sentenced according to WiP law.

[B] If tried in EoP and WiP court; they are allowed EoP necessity defence, tried in accordance with EoP and WiP conflict of cultural laws principles[17]; if their EoP evidence exposes scientific and/or cultural law errors in WiP law, the judge’s ruling amends such scientific or cultural WiP law errors; if convicted they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression {crimes-of-aggression} sentencing guidelines.

[C] If tried in EoP Court, they are allowed EoP necessity defence, if their EoP evidence exposes scientific and/or cultural law errors in EoP scientific and cultural law, the judge’s ruling amends such EoP law errors; if convicted they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression sentencing guidelines.

[9.2] Babylon WiP Civil Disobedience Activist engages in non-violent or violent activism presumably as a result of lack of ego/eco literacy character – generally in a national polegal system dominated by EoP law – that violates one or more national or international Ecology of Peace legal statute; on behalf of implementing Babylon WiP law as national or international law.

[A] If tried in EoP Scientific law court, they are allowed WiP scientific necessity defence, if (a) their WiP evidence exposes scientific law errors in EoP scientific law, the judge’s ruling amends such EoP law errors; if (b) convicted for lack of ego/eco literacy character; they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression sentencing guidelines.

[B] If tried in EoP Cultural law court, they are allowed WiP cultural necessity defence, (i) if their WiP evidence exposes cultural law errors in EoP cultural law, the judge’s ruling amends such EoP law errors; (ii) if convicted for lack of ego/eco literacy character; they are sentenced in accordance with EoP Crimes of Aggression sentencing guidelines.

[10] EoP v WiP Legal Applications:

[10.1] EoP culture legal applications advocate on behalf of [A] implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing EoP Scientific and Cultural law.

[10.2] Babylon WiP culture legal applications consciously or unconsciously, advocate on behalf of [A] implementing Babylon WiP law as national or international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing Babylon WiP law.

[11] EoP v WiP Elections or Referendums:

[11.1] An EoP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon EoP national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in EoP elections and referendums are legally prohibited from covertly and/or overtly bribing each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.

[11.2] A Babylon WiP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon Babylon WiP clauses of national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in Babylon WiP elections and referendums consciously or unconsciously covertly and/or overtly bribe each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.

 .

[D] CURRENT EOP AXIS ALLIANCE VOTER REGISTRATION

[12] Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) law voters [eop-axis-oath[18]] are called among others EoP John Brown abolitionist; Abel Steppe Aryan and/or responsible freedom oath voters. EoP voters vote on behalf of the candidate most likely to legally, politically and/or if necessary militarily[19] [mil-nec[20]] cooperate to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law, via EoP UN Resolution.

[13] Currently – in the absence of any State having authorized an EoP Axis Oath office; or any global philanthropist having decided to fund a civil court monitored civil society EoP Axis Oath office in Myanmar or any nation – an Ecology of Peace law [eop-v-wip-law[21]] Veto – WiP Law Breeding Womb War and Ego Consumption War – Swamp Elections [veto-swamp-elec[22]] voter [eop-axis-oath[23]]; can join the EoP Axis Alliance voter block by submitting their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oath[24]] to EoP MILED Clerk for filing into SA George High Court: H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [lj-v-ls[25]: PDF[26]: pp.70] court proceedings; to provide one or more LJ v LS Heads of State with an EoP Axis Alliance UNGA / ICJ mandate.

Current EoP Axis Alliance Voter Block Policy:

[14] EoP MILED Clerk [eop-axis-oath[27]: LJ[28]] votes on behalf of all national / global EoP law voters for the EoP law candidate.

[15] If more than one EoP Law candidate in any election; EoP MILED Clerk votes on behalf of EoP voters; for the EoP law candidate with the greatest EoP law advocacy commitment track record.

[16] If no EoP Law candidate in any election; EoP MILED Clerk votes on behalf of the EoP and WiP law candidate willing to cooperate to become an EoP law candidate, if provided an EoP law mandate. If none: EoP MILED Clerk abstains from voting in the particular election.

[17] Election Commission Accepts Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[17.1] Pending UNGA/ICJ EoP v WiP law vote/ruling: If a nations election commission potentially accepts Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[A] EoP MILED Clerk votes on behalf of potential EoP law voters; and notifies the Election Commission of the EoP Axis Alliance voter blocks vote; providing the Election Commission officials with the opportunity to make a formal enquiry into the EoP v WiP law voter issues; with the purpose of recommending a formal State EoP Axis Oath office for officials and citizens to file their EoP Axis Alliances Oaths; or an EoP v WiP law referendum to enable formal EoP v WiP law voting resolution on the EoP v WiP law voter issues in dispute.

[B] If such a formal EoP Axis Oath Office is established for officials and citizens to file their EoP Axis Alliances Oaths; or an EoP v WiP law referendum to enable formal EoP v WiP law voting resolution on the EoP v WiP law voter issues in dispute; is held; and no citizens or officials register themselves as EoP Axis Alliance citizens; the EoP vote is withdrawn and rendered null and void.

[18] Election Commission Does Not Accept Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[18.1] Pending UNGA/ICJ EoP v WiP law vote/ruling: If the Election Commission formally does not accept Ecology of Peace law citizen votes:

[A] EoP MILED Clerk advocacy actions in response to such Election Commission ruling is dependent on the likelihood of potential EoP law candidates or voters in such nation; willing to – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior – cooperatively legally enquire into reasonableness of the Election Commissions evidentiary decision-making.

[19] Election is Contested by Candidates or Voters:

[19.1] Pending UNGA/ICJ EoP v WiP law vote/ruling: If the election is contested by candidates or voters.

[19.2] EoP MILED Clerk advocacy actions in response to the election being contested by candidates or voters; depends on whether the candidate or voters contesting the election are potential EoP law voters or candidates.

[A] If the election is being contested by intentional WiP Law Only candidates and/or voters; EoP MILED Clerk does not get involved in the WiP Law Only v WiP Law Only candidate / voters contesting the WiP law Only election dispute.

[B] If the election is being contested by a potential Saperstein EoP Law candidate/s or voter/s; EoP MILED Clerk will – subject to time and resource availability – inform them of EoP v WiP Law election negotiations information, for their personal EoP v WiP law candidate / voter decision making. If there is potential Saperstein minded EoP law voter interest: EoP MILED Clerk cooperates with such potential EoP law candidates and/or voters.

[C] Moshe Saperstein: You realize I am a religious fanatic; but there is small degree of rationality in me. If someone – the government, the United Nations, the United States, you name it – had come to me & said [voting to support EoP scientific sincere peacenik / honourable warrior international law] to give up [overbreeding & overconsumption], would benefit the safety of Israel. … We will [EoP Axis Oath Alliance cooperate & ration; or ] pack our bags & go. [EoP Amended[29]: Highway 51: Withdrawal from Gaza[30].]

EoP Axis Oath Voter Registration:

[20] EoP Axis Oaths:

[20.1] The purpose of an EoP Axis Oath is as follows:

[A] An EoP Axis Oath serves the purpose of EoP Axis Alliance unconditional or conditional cooperator voter registration.

[B] An EoP Axis oath [eop-axis-oath[31]] is also a promise – a form of labour or information barter exchange reciprocity [Dmitry Orlov Twilight of the Antipodes[32]] – purchase of labour or information sharing cooperation with very clear unambiguous honest communication as to what the collective strategic goal is. If or when there is a mutual overlap agreement on strategic goal between two or more individuals, they can sign an unconditional or conditional cooperator oath, to clarify the level of their unconditional or conditional cooperator commitment to the strategic goal. The oath is a process to learn to practice in decision-making, communication and relating responsible freedom self government 24/7/365: If or when my ego gets in the way of me cooperating, towards our strategic goal; I will not run away or play some passive aggressive egomindfuck games. I will be my own or your Sgt Major and bitch slap my own or your fragile ego Private through the face with clear sincere verbal feedback, to help quick resolution of our misunderstanding, disagreement with you my fellow Oath co-operator; to enable us to uphold our cooperation agreement towards our shared strategic goal, through potentially difficult times. It’s a statement of: our strategic goal is our cooperative master, not our individual ego’s.

[21] There are two types of EoP Axis Oaths:

[A] Unconditional co-operator; and

[B] Conditional co-operator.

[22] Unconditional Co-operator Oath:

[22.1] An unconditional co-operator oath confirms the oath takers commitment to unconditional ego-eco literacy EoP TRC strategic and tactical negotiations cooperation; towards the EoP UN Resolution strategic global and national security goal. If or when EoP SciCult Law is implemented as international law; all citizens shall be required to sign their EoP Axis Oath.

[22.2] Draft Text of an Unconditional Cooperator aka Responsible Freedom Oath:

[A] I want to: [A] acquire access to EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw[33]] (i) prisoner release [prisoner-pardon[34]] right, and/or (ii) property ration [property-ration[35]] self sufficient survival right; and/or (iii) cultural law self rule [cult-law-self-rule[36]] homeland right; and/or (iv) global land reform [eop-landreform[37]] and denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn[38]] opportunity; and/or [B] cooperate to enforce EoP Scientific and Cultural law to (i) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (ii) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (iii) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits.

[B] I consequently hereby consent to EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw[39]] procreating, consuming and relating responsibilities:

[C] Scientific Law:

[a] Scientific Law refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint[40]] defines how procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limit is measured.

[D] Cultural Law:

[a] Fully Informed Consenting Agreements. Cultural law refers to any racial, religious or gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy[41]] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement.

[E] Individuals Rights under EoP Scientific & Cultural Law:

[a] Property Ration [property-ration[42]] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom[43]] oaths and abide by EoP Scientific and Cultural law.

[b] Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [cult-law-self-rule[44]] for two or more citizens who have provided each other with their fully informed consent to practicing a particular group shared ‘Cultural Law’ on their collective property rations homeland territory.

[F] Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific and Cultural Law:

[a] Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression[45]]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression.

.

[23] Conditional Co-operator Oath Statement:

[23.1] A conditional co-operator oath provides EoP Axis Alliance Heads of State, with a fully informed consent written oath EoP Axis Alliance mandate to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law, via UN General Assembly vote and/or Intnl Court of Justice Declaratory Order.

[23.2] Draft Text of a Conditional Co-operator Oath:

[A] I hereby declare my conditional co-operator mandate consent for the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law {eop-scicultlaw} as international law; to [A] enable orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release {prisoner-pardon}, land reform {eop-landreform} and denuclearization {eop-denuke-defn} – economic degrowth shut down of the Babylon War is Peace Ponzi Swamp economy {eop-sdwipecon} transition to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy; by [B] requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed {one-child-law} and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits {eop-footprint}; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool {crimes-of-aggression}; [C] nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath {responsible-freedom} citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule territorial homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities {cult-law-self-rule}; and (ii) guaranteed for life property ration (property-ration} land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] I further understand that if or when EoP SciCult law is implemented as international law, I shall – like all global citizens – legally be required to cooperate and sign my unconditional cooperator responsible freedom oath; and should I refuse; I shall be convicted of negligent and/or intentional crimes of aggression {crimes-of-aggression}.

.

Signed at ________________________, this __________ day of __________________ 2020.

.

___________________________________
Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP)  Chairwo/man:
____________________________________
Commissioner of Oaths.

.

.

___________________________________
National League for Democracy (NLD) Chairwo/man:
____________________________________

Commissioner of Oaths.

.

.

———- Footnotes ——–

[1] http://gm-v-mm.tygae.org.za/pdf/21-03-07_McVvUSA_EoP-GM-MM_EoPUNRes.pdf

[2] http://mcveigh2020.com / http://mcveigh.tygae.org.za 
http://mcveigh2020.tygae.org.za/pdf/ia/20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_GrgCrtStp.pdf

[3] http://mcveigh2020.tygae.org.za/pdf/ia/20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_A-E_Ppp275.pdf

[4] http://mcveigh2020.tygae.org.za/pdf/ia/20-02-07_IASoS_McVeigh2020_A-E_Epp326.pdf

[5] http://us-v-pwc.tygae.org.za/pdf/20-08-22_QvBHT-USv-PWC_EoPTRCAmiciAfd_Encl_A-G.pdf

[6] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/

[7] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_NoM-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf

[8] http://lj-v-sgmc.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-09-18_LJvSGMC_FN-NoM-Afd-Enc_CrtStp-Sgd.pdf

[9] http://lj-v-nmn.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-09-09_LJvNMN_FS-NoM-Corr-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf

[10] http://eop-v-trc.tygae.org.za/pdf/ccma/20-03-26_LJvTRC_CCMA-RefF-EnclAB_Sgd.pdf

[11] http://lj-v-shoc.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-10-07_LJvSHoC_FN-NoM-Afd-Encl.pdf

[12] http://us-v-jpa.tygae.org.za/pdf/20-09-20_USvJPA_IRvUS_EoPTRCAmiciAfd_Encl.pdf

[13] http://nz-v-bt.tygae.org.za/pdf/20-08-22_QvBHT-USv-PWC_EoPTRCAmiciAfd_Encl_A-G.pdf

[14] http://ir-v-us.tygae.org.za/pdf/20-09-20_USvJPA_IRvUS_EoPTRCAmiciAfd_Encl.pdf

[15] Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – Day Brown: Proto Indo-European

[16] ”Any EoP paralegal can tell you that in any Babylon WiP Only court room, Media publication or Citizen Assembly charity; all the Babylon WiP Only lawyers or editors do, before their – busdriver from Basingstoke – citizen jury/readers; is control the information flow the – caterer from Clapham – jurors/readers receive from their designated Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future – aka pretend we give a fuck about racial, religious, class, gender, intergenerational resource conflict justice; while doing fuck all to cooperate to abolish the root procreation / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limit clauses of international law causes of all resource conflict – experts and stakeholders. Then Basingstoke / Clapham jurors/readers can provide the Babylon WiP Only lawyers, charities, and environmentalists with a ‘democratic credibility rubber stamp’ endorsement of their Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future law solutions. [07 Oct 2019: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons: Affidavit: para.40, Afd: pp.15/18; LJvSHoC pp.26/88].

[17] * Paul Meerts: Culture and International Law: “Although not often explicitly mentioned, culture is always at the centre of law and politics.”
* Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In re Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A); at 397 the Appellate Division held that neither common nor customary law was prima facie applicable. Courts had to consider all the circumstances of a case, and, without any preconceived view about the applicability of one or other legal system, select the appropriate law on the basis of its inquiry. Schreiner J.A. said lifestyle of is a choice of law factor: “Aside from an express choice of laws all connecting factors with conflict of personal laws are designed to determine, in an objective manner, the cultural orientation of the parties. Because the laws involved are conceived in terms of culture …. the connecting factors must be conceived in like terms. The most direct access to a person’s cultural leanings would clearly be his or her lifestyle”.

* SALC, Sept 1999: Report on Conflicts of law: P.22: 1.58. The Constitution now provides an entitlement for invoking customary law in legal suits. Because ss 30 and 31 specifically guarantee an individual and a group’s right to pursue a culture of choice, it could be argued that application of customary law has become a constitutional right. Previously, the state had assumed complete discretion in deciding whether and to what extent customary law should be recognized, an attitude typical of colonial thinking, for Africans were subject to whatever policies the conquering state chose to impose on them. Now, however, the state has a duty to allow people to participate in the culture they choose, implicit in this duty is a responsibility to uphold the institutions on which that culture is based.’
* SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76: The Harmonization of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law states: “Differences in culture are always likely to generate differences in law with consequent conflicts of law … The purpose of choice of law rules is to select the law that will do justice in the case. It is the court’s power (and responsibility) to decide which law to apply, paying due regard to the parties’ interests and their choice of legal system.” It also provides for the following principles governing choice of law disputes: (a) The nature of the conflict: where it is assumed that an individuals personal law is a matter of their cultural affiliation; (b) Parties may select the law to be applied; based upon objective and subjective reasonableness tests; (c) Nature and form of a prior transaction; if parties disagree on each others choice of applicable cultural law; (d) Subject matter and environment of a transaction; if deeper clarification about cultural orientation is required; (e) The litigants’ cultural orientation; which can include the court taking notice of details as diverse as the parties’ place of residence, occupation, religion, education, style of dress, eating and sleeping habits, use of bank accounts, preparation of wills and consultation with attorneys, communication style, etc; (f) Exemption from customary or common law; as justified by the principle that every person should be free to pursue a culture of choice, which implies that people may not be involuntarily bound by a system of personal law; and legal certainty: where an individual can unequivocally declare in advance of any litigation their personal law; (g) Unifying choice of law.

[18] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/

[19] 10 Aug: DRAFT: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law

10 Aug: DRAFT: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law

[20] http://mil-nec.tygae.org.za

[21] http://eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za/

[22] http://veto-swamp-elect.tygae.org.za/

[23] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za

[24] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za

[25] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za

[26] http://lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-05-10_LJvLS_NoM-Afd-Encl_Sgd-CrtSvc.pdf

[27] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/

[28] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za/pdf/za/17-09-19_WC-Grg_Johnstone-Lara.pdf

[29] Moshe Saperstein: The borders of the State of Israel are what God gave us in the Bible. Political circumstances may be such that we cannot occupy those borders at a particular time, but it is according to the Bible simply forbidden, to give up what you possess. You realize of course that I am a religious fanatic; but there is some small degree of rationality in me. If someone had come to me and said that giving up Gaza and Northern Samaria, would actually benefit the safety of the rest of Israel. Even though I believe it’s a mistake, I can understand it. We will pack our bags and we can go. But nobody, not the government, not the United Nations, not the United States, you name it. Nobody has explained what the benefit is to Israel for pulling out of here. And all I ever hear is Give Peace a Chance. Leaving here is a bold move for peace. What bold move for peace? It’s absolutely senseless. Everyone out here is so laid back, they are practically laid out. I would have preferred an old age home. Its true, I’ve been ready for an old age home since my Bar Mitzvah, but since she calls the shots, and wanted to go out and have an adventure, before they send us to the glue factory.. We came out here. [Highway 51: Withdrawal from Gaza ]

[30] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB42YjUNCZU

[31] http://eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za

[32] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecfxl1wZDpE

[33] http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/      archive.is/QneCw

[34] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/prisoner-pardon/          archive.fo/rXKVD

[35] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/property-ration/    archive.fo/AWxH8

[36] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/cult-law-self-rule/    archive.fo/BfgMu

[37] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/land-reform/         archive.is/2c9XD

[38] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-denuke-defn/        archive.is/ofrGD

[39] http://eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/      archive.is/QneCw

[40] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/eop-footprint/        archive.is/Guli3

[41] http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/eop-rh-cult-info/ego-eco-literacy/             archive.fo/q4sMD

[42] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/property-ration/    archive.fo/AWxH8

[43] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/responsible-freedom/       archive.is/rXzYe

[44] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/cult-law-self-rule/    archive.fo/BfgMu

[45] http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-nwo-scp/crimes-of-aggression/    archive.is/esaH6

.

Leave a Comment