13 Mar: LJ Re GMC 542/21; MHC 4968/20; CCMA 1279-20: SAgr Offers & Conflict of Cultures

* Marais Law Inc: Charl Marais, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys: Francois Lamprecht, Marlise Steenekamp, Dawn Meyer, Crawley Family: David Crawley, The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer, Master of the High Court Grg: Yolanda van Milligen, CCMA: Cameron Morajane
* 13 Mar: LJ Re GMC 542/21; MHC 4968/20; CCMA 1279-20: SAgr Offers & Conflict of Cultures.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GME / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson [mailto:eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2021 12:50 PM
To: ‘Marais Law Inc: Charl Marais’; ‘Marais Lamprecht Attorneys’; ‘Francois Lamprecht’; ‘Sonja Corker’; ‘Cherise de Wet’
Cc: ‘Master of the High Court Capetown: George Svc Point: Yolanda van Milligen’; ‘CCMA: Cameron Morajane: Case Officer: Zaheer Samodien’
Subject: GMC 542/21; MHC 4968/20; CCMA 1279-20: SAgr Offers & Conflict of Cultures
Attachment: 21-03-12_LJvEGME_01-MS_SAgr-Offer.pdf; 21-03-12_LJvEGME_02-DJM_SAgr-Offer.pdf; 21-03-12_LJvEGME_01MS-02DM_SAgr-Offer.pdf
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2021 12:51 PM
To: ‘Marlise Steenekamp’; ‘Crawley Family: David Crawley’; ‘The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer’
Subject: GMC 542/21; MHC 4968/20; CCMA 1279-20: SAgr Offers & Conflict of Cultures
Attachment: 21-03-12_LJvEGME_01-MS_SAgr-Offer.pdf; 21-03-12_LJvEGME_02-DJM_SAgr-Offer.pdf; 21-03-12_LJvEGME_01MS-02DM_SAgr-Offer.pdf

.

TO: Marais Law Inc: Charl Marais:
TO: Marais Lamprecht Attorneys: Francois Lamprecht:
CC: Marlise Steenekamp, Dawn Meyer:
CC: Crawley Family: David Crawley:
CC: The One Financial Solution:
CC: Master of the High Court Grg: Yolanda van Milligen:
CC: CCMA: Cameron Morajane:
Re: 12 Mar: LJ Re GMC 542/21; MHC 4968/20; CCMA 1279-20: Settlement Agreement Offer / LJ Consent to FSB-NSA to Release of Psychotronic CCTV SurveillanceTapes; 12 Mar: LJ Re GMC 542/21; MHC 4968/20; CCMA 1279-20: DM Settlement Agreement Offer.

Charl Marais & Francois Lamprecht:

GMC 542/21; MHC 4968/20; CCMA 1279-20: SAgr Offers & Conflict of Cultures.

If either of your Elliott Estate clients have any questions to me; with regard to my Settlement Agreement Offers to Respondents: 01: Marlise Steenekamp; or 02: Dawn Meyer.

LJ Settlement Agreement Offers:
* Marlise Steenekamp [PDF: pp.03]
* Dawn Meyer [PDF: pp.03]
* Marlise Steenekamp and Dawn Meyer [PDF: pp.03]

Please indicate such interest; to enable the terms to be discussed in village idiot plain speaking [Simon Sinek: The Truth about being the Stupidest in the Room] language.

.

Invocation of Cultural Law Communication Policy:

Applicant Ecology of Peace culture communication policy:
* Ecology of Peace culture Oath: Lara Johnstone [PDF: pp.05]
* EoP culture Ego literacy Communication Policy: ego-literacy [PDF: pp.02; Excerpt: H 111/19: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution PDF: pp: 36-37/70].
* EoP culture Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands: cult-law-self-rule [PDF: pp.03; Excerpt: H 111/19: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution PDF: pp: 36-37/70].

Some of your clients appear to be members of cultures with ‘sycophancy / gatkruiping’; ‘bullshit the public relations virtue signaling’ and ‘withholding sharing of information’ communication policies’.

That’s quite okay, anyone and everyone is entitled to choose what culture they are a member of and what their cultural communication policies are. If however they relate to someone from another culture, with different communication policies, then its helpful to know that the individuals in conflict have different communication or other lifestyle cultural values; so that the issues in dispute can be resolved via fair and impartial conflict of cultures interpreters, mediators and/or juridical arbitrators:

[23.7] The Harmonization of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law states: “Differences in culture are always likely to generate differences in law with consequent conflicts of law … The purpose of choice of law rules is to select the law that will do justice in the case. It is the court’s power (and responsibility) to decide which law to apply, paying due regard to the parties’ interests and their choice of legal system.” It also provides for the following principles governing choice of law disputes: (a) The nature of the conflict: where it is assumed that an individuals personal law is a matter of their cultural affiliation; (b) Parties may select the law to be applied; based upon objective and subjective reasonableness tests; (c) Nature and form of a prior transaction; if parties disagree on each others choice of applicable cultural law; (d) Subject matter and environment of a transaction; if deeper clarification about cultural orientation is required; (e) The litigants’ cultural orientation; which can include the court taking notice of details as diverse as the parties’ place of residence, occupation, religion, education, style of dress, eating and sleeping habits, use of bank accounts, preparation of wills and consultation with attorneys, communication style, etc; (f) Exemption from customary or common law; as justified by the principle that every person should be free to pursue a culture of choice, which implies that people may not be involuntarily bound by a system of personal law; and  legal certainty: where an individual can unequivocally declare in advance of any litigation their personal law; (g) Unifying choice of law. [SALC, June 1988: Report on Conflicts of Law 76; as quoted by applicant in: LJ v CRLRC: HoA: PDF: pp.44: Conflicts of Cultural Law & Invocation of Cultural Law: para 23-25/27; pp.14-17/44]

Generally speaking I avoid as much as possible relating with individuals who are members of cultures with ‘sycophancy / gatkruiping’ aka ‘bullshit the public relations virtue signaling’ aka ‘withholding sharing of information’ communication policies; for numerous reasons:

I am one of if not South Africa’s most incompetent gatkruiper. I simply prefer sincerity and honest relating; to get what I want in terms of fully informed consenting relating agreements, to relate to others who know what they want; are willing to fairly reciprocate in terms of labour, information and resource sharing cooperate on issues of mutual interest. As a sincere peacenik; I’d rather be friends or neighbours with a honest fully informed consenting cannibal [Guardian: Victim of cannibal agreed to be eaten]; than a two faced hypcrit nobel laureate thief.

My preference is to avoid conflict early in any friendship / relationship; by clearly clarifying my preferences, by engaging in fully informed consenting relationships; so that the other individual knows where they stand. In a fully informed eco-literacy non-discriminatory context I am EoP Hendrik Verwoerd [cult-law-self-rule: PDF: pp.03] on steroids: There is not one person in South Africa or globally – rich or poor, white or black, old or young, man or woman, straight or gay, religious or secular – that can say: Lara did not answer my question; or Lara refused to give me a written answer to my written question.

I am one of if not South Africa’s most competent Radical Honoursty [CCT 23-10: LJ RH culture PDF: pp.02] active listener [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle].

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Marais Law Inc: Charl Marais:
Marais Law Inc: Charl Marais (charl@marais-law.com)

Marais Lamprecht Attorneys: Francois Lamprecht:
Marais Lamprecht Attorneys (info@mllegal.co.za); Francois Lamprecht (francois@mllegal.co.za); Sonja Corker (sonja@mllegal.co.za); Cherise de Wet (cherise@mllegal.co.za)

Marlise Steenekamp, Dawn Meyer:
Marlise Steenekamp (marlise@theonefs.co.za); Dawn Meyer: 072 569 5555.

Crawley Family: David Crawley:
Crawley Family: David Crawley (crawleydavid1@gmail.com);

The One Financial Solution:
The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer (isobel@theonefs.co.za);

Master of the High Court – CT: Zureena Agulhas; Grg: Yolanda van Milligen:
Master of the High Court Capetown: George Svc Point: Yolanda van Milligen (YVanMilligen@justice.gov.za):

CCMA: Cameron Morajane:
CCMA: Cameron Morajane: Case Officer: Zaheer Samodien (ZaheerS@CCMA.org.za);

.

Leave a Comment