LJ v CRL Rights Comm

LJ v CRL Rights Comm – George High Court: Case H 45/19: Lara Johnson v CRL Rights Commission et al – is an EoP Legal Submission that involves EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.



01: CRL Rights Commission:

Request CRL Rights Commission clarify what information they require from applicant in order to confirm in writing applicants Ecology of Peace cultural membership.

02: Legal Practice Council:

Does the Legal Practice Council know of any lawyers who would be willing to legally represent an individual who is a member of an Ecology of Peace culture?

Does the Legal Practice Council know if there are any lawyers in South Africa who would be willing to represent applicant in a capacity of Assistance of Counsel / Standby Counsel?:

Assistance / Standby Counsel [Wikipedia: Standby Counsel; Federal Public Defender: Your Role as Standby Counsel]. Assistance/Standby counsel provide technical tactical assistance to individuals representing themselves Pro Se. Assistance/Stand by counsel peruse the applications and/or pleadings; to ensure that documents filed – affidavits, applications etc – are technically correct in accordance to court procedure requirements; to avoid wasting the courts time; and/or the respondents attorneys requesting the case be dismissed or thrown out of court on a legal technicality: ‘incorrectly formatted, filed, or signed’ legal documents. Standby counsel are generally used by activist minded individuals who have legal reform strategies that lawyers may be reluctant to pursue passionately.

Request the Legal Practice Council issue a short factual statement confirming the results of aforementioned request, confirming that the applicant’s efforts to find a lawyer in South Africa willing to legally represent her in a capacity of (a) representation of counsel in accordance to her cultural values; or (b) assistance / standby counsel; to enable applicant to represent herself in accordance to her cultural values, but with assistance of a standby counsel to ensure that my documentation is in accordance to legal formatting requirements?.


Court Filed Documents

  • 18 Feb 2019: Notice of Motion, Founding Affidavit & Application for Referral to Negotiation / Mediation [PDF]
  • 16 May 2019: Responses to Invitation to Negotiation and/or Mediation: Transcript: 13 Feb to 16 Apr 2019 correspondence [PDF]
  • 25 Jun 2019: Sheriff Service [PDF]
  • 25 Jun 2019: Pro Se CRLRC: Answering Affidavit [PDF]
  • 12 Aug 2019: Negotiation Correspondence: 27 Jun – 15 Jul 2019 [PDF]
  • 12 Aug 2019: Applicant Reply Affidavit [PDF]



EoP Leg Sub LJ v CRL Rights Comm correspondence


Page Setup: 18 Feb 2019 [archive.fo/drL9i]. Last Updated: 01 Sep 2019