EoP v WiP Enemy

Ecology of Peace Law — like EoP media, religion, charity, psychology, academia etc — is founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality; providing advocacy and information on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing Ecology of Scientific and Cultural law as international law; to enable orderly and humane de-industrialization and depopulation; that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

Masonic War is Peace Law — like WiP academia, religion, charity, psychology, media etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc parasitically profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources.


EoP v WiP Enemy Definition:

EoP Law Strategic Policy Enemy Definition:

The EoP law definition of enemy is documented in among others EoP TRC correspondence to IJR: Stanley Henkeman and Lady Feral: Alana McLaughlin [20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy; 28 Dec: EoP Re: Alana McLaughlin: A note on transgender military service]

Generally speaking if your individual identity is that of conscious or unconscious Babylonian, then your enemy is probably a Babylonian Jew or Babylonian Kike or Babylonian sand nigger, or Babylonian cracker, or Babylonian communist, or Babylonian capitalist, etc, depending on your conscious or unconscious preferred racial / religious / ideological bias.

If you are an EoPeacenik [eop-axis-oath]; then your enemy is (a) the Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; that allow individuals who call themselves citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, and consequent racial, religious, class, national, gender and inter-generational resource conflict; (b) the individuals of any race, religion, class or gender who consicously and intentionally obstruct the abolition of Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; and its replacement with Ecology of Peace clauses of international law; requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, classes and genders to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements. [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]

The strategic policy [AJ: Former Undercover CIA Officer Talks War and Peace] enemy of ego/eco literate [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.36-37/70] and a majority of ego/eco illiterate persons of all races, religions and genders; is global Babylon WiP international law [eop-v-wip-law] that enables and allows procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, that is the root cause enabler of imperialism and its nationalist and homophobic and racist and ideological bigotry racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict. …… Strategic vs Tactical Enemies: Most of those Trans for Trump homonationalist imperialist whom you consider your enemies are – unconscious lack of ego/eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy] character – tactical – not strategic – enemies. You can spend your time finding unconditional or conditional cooperators to help you accomplish your strategic goal to abolish your strategic enemy; or waste your time picking fights with unconscious tactical enemies. Put differently they are eco and/or ego illiterate. The greater your ego/eco literacy, the greater your chances of reaching any of them who are potentially secretly sincerely confused; and helping them to gain ego/eco literacy skills.
» EoP Leg Sub: 28 Dec: EoP Re: Alana McLaughlin: A note on transgender military service]

Obedience Consciousness & Enemy Definitions:

Robert McElvaine says that men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behaviour and achievement. I don’t know if he is right or not, men have been involved in much of the creation of the global legal structure that is built upon definitions, which are a form of single standard metric measurement. .

Because men cannot compete with women’s capabilities in the crucial realms of reproduction and nourishing offspring, McElvaine argues, men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behavior and achievement. They create separate definitions of “manliness” which are based on a false opposition to “womanliness.” A “real man” has been seen in most cultures as “notawoman.” – Amazon: Robert McElvaine: Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History; Wikipedia: Eve’s Seed.

Aisha Ahmad appears to say that Arabian women prefer single simple and clear standard rules, even if they don’t like those rules, but if they understand the rules then they can protect themselves and their families survival; by obeying the rules.

“I can see the price of war on every single one of the price tags in the bazaar. … There’s a moment where you fear in your body that any rules are better than no rules. If you have complete anarchy and no one is constrained in any way, then there’s nothing I can really do to protect myself. But if there’s a system of rules, even if I don’t like the rules, that at least I can think, how can I play by them so that I can keep myself alive.” – Aisha Ahmad; CBC Radio: Follow the money to understand why Islamist groups succeed, says Jihad & Co author
» IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution

Stanley Milgram obedience studies found no difference between biological genders in terms of their obedience and disobedience to what they subjectively considered unjust laws or orders [Brian Burak: Milgram Experiment; HeroicImaginationTV:Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority]. Nestar Russell and Annette Bolton’s Milgram obedience studies research appears to indicate that – generally speaking – a significant majority of the 1% global elite of all genders; object to clear and simple global single standard of international laws rules; and the 98% will obey a single standard system of rules, even if they don’t particularly like some of those rules.

97.5 % of normal people, prefer to obey ethical laws: Nestar Russell and Annette Bolton: Awareness of impending climate catastrophe has greatly increased over the last 30 years. Increasing awareness, however, has not translated into decreasing but instead increasing greenhouse gas emissions.  …… Interestingly, as illustrated by Milgram’s previously mentioned Subject Free to Choose Shock Level condition, when ordinary people at the end of an organisational chain (e.g., consumers) are aware of the harmful consequences of their actions and they are then offered the unimpeded option to act ethically, 97.5 per cent chose to do so. As long as their self-interests are not too heavily compromised by manipulative up-stream meddling, Milgram’s research clearly illustrates that most people prefer to pursue what they understand to be the morally right course of action. Thus, perhaps more than any other factor, our present inability to avert climate catastrophe is largely an abuse of (mostly higher) power and a total failure of leadership. The fish rots from the head down. – MPDI: “Climate Catastrophe and Stanley Milgram’s Electric Shock “Obedience” Experiments: An Uncanny Analogy” [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report.

So the focus of EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants is (a) finding out whether there are sufficient numbers of the 02% elite who have no objections to the EoP Scientific and Cultural law single standard of scientific procreation, consumption and cultural honesty relating standard laws; and do not object to them being submitted to UN General Assembly for voting into international law; (b) if any 2% elite have objections: whether those objections are scientific or cultural; and whether the parties filing the objections are interested in truthseeking evidentiary enquiry to ascertain the in/accuracy of their scientific and/or cultural objections. If any 2% elite’s scientific or cultural law objections to EoP SciCult law are accurate, then EoP SciCult law can be amended to remove such errors.

Some individuals and/or groups of individuals who consider themselves enemies want to be reconciled, and some don’t. Under EoP SciCult international law, those who don’t want to be reconciled can live in Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [cult-law-self-rule], where they can avoid contact with those they consider enemies.


Summary Conclusion:

Prior to EoP SciCult Law:
The WiP law clauses of international law allowing procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits are the enemy to be abolished. To the extent that there are individuals who consciously and intentionally obstruct abolition of the WiP law clauses of international law, they are secondary enemies [Gandhi: I want to change their minds, not kill them for weaknesses we all possess. Poverty is the worst form of violence]. An – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior genepool – enemy is an objective and/or subjective 2% elite decision-maker; who consciously and intentionally endorses WiP law; who (a) objects to abolition of WiP international law and global implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law single scientific standard of procreation, consumption and cultural subjective honesty relating standard laws documented in EoP – Gandhi Roosevelt – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70]; and (b) has fuck all commitment to ego literate scientific evidentiary truthseeking to ascertain the scientific in/accuracy of his/her ‘peacenik / warrior expert’ objections.

Under EoP SciCult Law:
An – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior genepoool – enemy will be any citizen convicted of intentional EoP SciCult law crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.31-33/70].
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jan: EoP Re: NYT-RG: How to Defeat America’s Homegrown Insurgency / CHPM TN Senators Feinstein & Hawley: IACHR: McV 2020 v USA: EoP PoW Voter Petition.



EoP Leg Sub: Conflict of Cultures: EoP v WiP Enemy Definition correspondence.


Page Setup: 05 Feb 2021.
Last Updated: 01 Mar 2021