EoP Answers to US Defence Secretary Rumsfeld Q re: GWOT Global War on Terror Metrics and EoP v WiP Referendum suggestions submitted to PM Benjamin Netanyahu, transparency copies filed with Israel Supreme Court is one of the EoP Legal Submission cases involving EoP scientific and cultural law recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
EoP Ansa to Donald Rumsfeld’s GWOT Metrics Question:
A transparency copy of EoP Answer to Donald Rumsfeld’s Question was submitted to PM Benjamin Netanyahu; copies submitted to Israel Supreme Court Justices: Pres: Miriam Naor; Vice Pres: Elyakim Rubinstein; Justices: Salim Joubran; Esther Hayut; Hanan Melcer; Yoram Danziger; Neal Hendel; Uzi Vogelman; Yitzchak Amit; Zvi Zylbertal; Noam Sohlberg; Uri Shoham; Daphne Barak-Erez; Menachem Mazuz; Anat Baron; sent to Israel Supreme Court via PM Netanyahu’s former Justice Minister: Tzipi Livni – ציפי לבני.
“An important unanswered question I asked back in 2003: Today we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. Are we capturing, killing or deterring and dissuading more terrorists every day than the madrassas and the radical clerics are recruiting, training and deploying against us?”
– Former US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld 2015 facebook publication of his 2003 question to US Joint Chiefs of Staff; 15-02-12_drumsfeld-globalwaronterrormetricsq.
Generals and Admirals
My Secretary of Defence Working Hypothesis Argument is to abolish the War is a Masonic Breeding Slaves and Cannon Fodder Fertility Religion for Human Sacrifice and Profit Racketfounded on Vatican Roman Empire Canon Law slavery [ para 20-50 ] social contract and implement an Ecology of Peace social contract that has a crystal clear metric to determine between Eco-Innocent and Scarcity Combatant:
* EoP supporters: Please provide me with your buck stops here written support and a strategy for implementing an EoP social contract.
* WiP supporters: Please provide me with your argument and evidence that implementing an EoP social contract is flawed and unworkable.
If you had no Generals and Admirals willing to consider the EoP argument and provide you with their buck stops here support; see resignation advice to General Martin Dempsey and Sgt Maj Brian Battaglia.
If you had any Generals and Admirals willing to consider the argument and provide you with their buck stops here support; if any of them gave a fuck about responding to you face to face or in writing; listen to those who disagree. If their argument is persuasive change your mind and continue your support for the Masonic Human Factory Farming War is Peace social contract. If their argument is not persuasive insist that the DoD policy be unanimous either way: EoP supporters honourably and publicly resign informing the public and world of their EoP reasons for resigning; or WiP supporters honourably resign and allow EoP supporters to attempt to implement the EoP social contract policy and see if it can be done.
– EoP Leg Sub: 11 Feb: PM Bibi Netanyahu: Re: Donald Rumsfeld: Re: Important Global War on Terror metrics question.
EoP v WiP Referendum:
EoP v WiP Referendum submission suggestion was made to PM Netanyahu as part of EoP v WiP NWO Neg: New Rules or No Los Pepes Rules Negotiations.
A few additional EoP Middle East Referendum ideas. The referendum process:
Truthseeking Network and Outreach:
Any middle east nation interested in exploring the possibility of interest of other middle east nations should appoint someone as an official ‘EoP referendum’ Truthseeker negotiator or whatever you want to call them. Such person may then visit other Middle East nations to enquire (a) their level of interest; (b) if interested: what kind of support they could need to help them through the process; (c) if not interested: what obstacles are the source of their lack of interest. If all Middle East nations are interested and/or all objections are overcome and relevant mutual support requested provided; process may be implemented.
Media notice & objections:
All mainstream media publications and editors are legally notified of EoP referendum. Any mainstream media publication, editor or journalists who object to the referendum are to file a legal brief of objection [ For example: In Israel it could be to Chairman of Israeli Election Committee: Supreme Court Judge Salim Joubran or any alternative judicial process implemented to handle EoP referendum objections ]; within a particular time period. Same referendum options are applied to all media objectors as to citizen voters. Once process complete.
Public notice & discussion:
Public are notified of referendum options, with dedicated website of information in all national languages. All mainstream print and television media publications must display on their front page; or during their television news reports; information about the EoP Referendum and where citizens can find our more information or get a copy of the EoP Referendum Notice for their investigation and enquiry prior to their voting decision making.
Vote and consequences:
The simple referendum options for all Middle East citizens consideration are based upon the following Ecology of Peace Facts:
1. Earth is not flat. 2. Non-renewable and renewable resources are finite. 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource depletion, resource scarcity and consequently resource war conflict. 4. To sustainably protect and conserve natural resources in accordance to local and national carrying capacity limits; and restrict national and international inter-cultural resource war conflict; humans must implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.
* I vote to support the leaders of my nation and all Middle East nations to support the non-violent implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that supports the implementation of an EoP international law social contract that restricts all the worlds nations citizens to procreating and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits. I shall deliver my non-violent legal statement of EoP unconditional or conditional cooperation to the [ relevant court or office to receive EoP cooperation statements and monitor that EoP cooperation terms are not being violated. If allegedly violated such violations are referred to relevant court for adjudication. ]
* I object to the leaders of my nation and all Middle East nations supporting the non-violent implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that restricts all the worlds nations citizens to procreating and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits. I shall deliver my non-violent legal objection brief arguments and evidentiary reasons to [ relevant court or office setup to deal with any objections ] within the required time period provided; and understand that should I fail to do so; my objection shall no longer be considered an honourable non-violent objection but shall be dealt with in the same manner as citizens who refuse to vote.
All legal and illegal citizen residents – irrespective of class, race, gender, religion or social status – over an agreed upon age; shall be required to vote. Their vote shall not be secret, but a statement of their legal non-violent public declaration as a citizen in support of; or in opposition to the Middle East nations support for the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.
All citizens who refuse to vote shall be imprisoned; or if required placed in contained refugee camps; until they provide the relevant court with reasons and evidence justifying their objections; and the court upholds their objections as reasonable. Detained citizens who have not provided the court with their objections within 6 months of being detained shall be forcibly sterilized. Detained citizens who have not provided the court with their objections within 1 year of being detained shall be moved to camps where they shall be required to grow their own food and provide all their own medical and survival resources. All detained citizens shall be granted their preferred state assisted suicide option; at any time of the process; but shall be required to decide on their state assisted suicide option in the absence of having provided the court with their objections within 2 years of being detained.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 09 Mar: PM Netanyahu & Muslims Leaders: Re: Additional EoP Referendum Option Ideas.
Ecology of Peace culture Legal Correspondence submitted to Israel Supreme Court: Pres Justice Asher Grunis; via Hatnuah Political party leader: Tzipi Livni and Israel Ambassadors in Pretoria and Washington DC [PDF].
EoP Legal Submissions EoP ILSC correspondence.