Skip to content
EoP Legal Submissions
EoP Legal Submissions
Ecology of Peace Culture Legal Submissions and Correspondence: clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits are the enablers of all local, national and interational – race, religious, class and gender – resource conflict.
  • Home
  • Official State Responses
  • WiP Law Collapse
  • Correspondence
    • Content & Hacked Updates
    • Multi-Tasking Summary
  • Conflict of Cultures
    • EoP v WiP
      • EoP v WiP ism
      • EoP v WiP Academia
      • EoP v WiP Activist
      • EoP v WiP Charity
      • EoP v WiP DeInd/Pop’n
      • EoP v WiP Elections
      • EoP v WiP Ethics
      • EoP v WiP Gender
      • EoP v WiP History
      • EoP v WiP Investing
      • EoP v WiP Law
      • EoP v WiP Media
      • EoP v WiP Military
      • EoP v WiP Nat Security
      • EoP v WiP Peacenik
      • EoP v WiP Privilege
      • EoP v WiP Psych
      • EoP v WiP Religion
      • EoP v WiP STRATINT
  • EoP TRC: Abel Kane Cold War
    • EoP TRC Draft Statements
  • International
    • CH Fed Council
      • EoP PoW Sub
    • EoP Interpol
      • LJ v BB & RHET
      • LJ v Unashamedly Ethical
    • EoP v BIS
    • EoP v OIC
    • EoP v OPCW
    • ICC: Intl Crim Crt
      • EoP v ECCC
      • EoP v ICTY
        • Pros v Radovan Karadzic
      • EoP v Nobel et al
      • Hague v Israel
      • LJ v Truth Reconciliation Commission
    • ICJ
      • EoP v PCA
      • IR v USA
    • UN: United Nations
      • EoP Cop 21
      • EoP v IAEA
      • UNWGAD
        • CA Prisoners v USA
        • J Assange v UK-SE
    • MultiNational Groups
      • EoP v Alt Right
      • EoP v Antifa
      • EoP v ASEAN
      • EoP v Ecocide Lawyers
      • EoP v Indigenous Groups
      • EoP v IWW
      • EoP v Masonic Lodges
      • EoP v MeToo Movement
      • EoP v MIC
      • EoP v OPEC
      • EoP v TGP Oligarchs
      • EoP v TPP
      • EoP v US Mafia
      • EoP v Vets 4 Peace
      • EoP v WTO
  • Africa
    • EoP v Africa Oligarchs
    • EoP v OAU
    • BW: Botswana
      • EoP v BW PM / Pres
    • GH: Ghana
      • EoP v GH PM / Pres
    • MW: Malawi
      • EoP v MW PM / Pres
    • SC: Seychelles
      • EoP v SC PM / Pres
    • SO: Somalia
      • EoP v SO PM / Pres
    • TZ: Tanzania
      • EoP Tanzania Police
    • UG: Uganda
      • EoP v UG PM / President
    • ZA: South Africa
      • CCT: Concourt
        • Alien v Afriforum
        • LJ v SANEF
        • The Citizen v Robert McBride
      • EC: Electoral Court
        • LJ v IEC
        • LJ v SA Pol Parties
      • SCA: Sup. Crt of Appeal
        • Afriforum v Malema
        • LJ v HWS & WN
      • HC: High Crt
        • Afriforum v J Malema
        • EoP 2019 v RSA
        • EoP v ZA PM / President
        • LJ v Brian Heuvel et al
        • LJ v CRL Rights Comm
        • LJ v Graeme Johnstone et al
        • LJ v JS Selebi & 6 Others
        • LJ v Legal Practice Council
        • LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu
        • LJ v N Mapisa-Nqakula
        • LJ v Speaker Grg Cncl
        • LJ v State
        • ZA v Jacob Zuma
      • MC: Magistrates Crts
        • EoP v BE Boon
        • EoP v Eeben Barlow
        • EoP v Eugene de Kock
        • EoP v Garden Route Mncps
        • EoP v Gen C Viljoen
        • EoP v George Herald
        • EoP v Johann Rupert
        • EoP v Karen Marshall
        • EoP v Patrice Motsepe
        • EoP v SA High Schools
        • EoP v TRC
        • LJ v Brad Blanton
        • LJ v Clive Johnstone
        • LJ v CyberSmart
        • LJ v Demian Johnson
        • LJ v Dept of Transport
        • LJ v Estate Gill Elliott
        • LJ v Fees Commission
        • LJ v Frode & Talitha Moe
        • LJ v FW de Klerk
        • LJ v Giselle Rausch
        • LJ v Jeremy Gauntlett QC
        • LJ v Mikhail Petrakov
        • LJ v Minister of Justice
        • LJ v MWeb
        • LJ v P de Lille
        • LJ v Robert McBride
        • LJ v SA Mediation Orgs
        • LJ v Unashamedly Ethical
        • State v L Johnstone
        • State v Reitz 4
        • ZA v Vicki Momberg
      • HPCSA
        • HPCSA v Wouter Basson
      • ICASA: EoP v ODM
      • EoP SA Police Dept
    • ZW: Zimbabwe
      • EoP ZW Police Dept
      • EoP v ZW PM / President
  • Americas
    • OAC IACHR
      • LJ v ACLU UN & OSJI
    • AR: Argentina
      • EoP v AR PM / Pres
    • BO: Bolivia
      • EoP BO Police
      • EoP v BO PM / Pres
    • BR: Brazil
      • EoP v BR PM / Pres
      • EoP v Glenn Greenwald
    • BZ: Belize
      • EoP BZ Police
      • EoP v Guy McPherson
    • CA: Canada
      • CA v BH Sherman
      • CA v Meng Wanzhou
      • EoP CA Police Dept
      • EoP v CA PM / Pres
      • EoP v Jordan Peterson
      • EoP v Judgy Bitch
      • EoP v Lars Lih
      • EoP v Lauren Southern
      • EoP v Romeo Dallaire
      • EoP v Seb Ronin
    • CL: Chile
      • EoP v CL PM / Pres
    • CO: Colombia
      • EoP CO Police
      • EoP v CO PM / Pres
    • CR: Costa Rica
      • EoP CR Police
      • EoP v CR PM / Pres
    • CU: Cuba
      • EoP v CU PM / Pres
    • EC: Ecuador
      • EoP v EC PM / Pres
    • GT: Guatemala
      • EoP GT Police
      • EoP v GT PM / Pres
    • GY: Guyana
      • EoP v GY PM / Pres
    • HN: Honduras
      • EoP v HN PM / Pres
    • HT: Haiti
      • EoP v HT PM / Pres
    • LC: Saint Lucia
      • EoP v LC PM / Pres
    • MX: Mexico
      • EoP MX Police
      • EoP v Enrique Nieto
      • EoP v MX PM / Pres
    • PA: Panama
      • EoP v PA PM / Pres
    • PE: Peru
      • EoP v PE PM / Pres
    • PY: Paraguay
      • EoP v PY PM / Pres
    • USA
      • Dept of Justice
        • EoP US Police Dept
        • EoP v US DoJ Spec Cnsl
        • DoJ v Deutschebank
        • FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation
          • LJ v BB & RHET
          • LJ v Templeton Foundation
      • Dept of State
        • EoP v US Sec State
      • SCOTUS
        • Alien on Pale Blue Dot v RCFP
        • EoP Obs: Antonin Scalia
        • EoP SJC: Neil Gorsuch
        • EoP v ACLU
        • US v Bradley Manning
        • EoP v Van Jones & Jeffrey Lord
      • EoP v US Oligarchs
      • AK: Alaska
        • EoP v Sarah Palin
        • US v Israel Keyes
      • AR: Arkansas
        • EoP v Wes Clark
      • CA: California
        • CA v BP
        • EoP v Christine B Ford
        • EoP v Derrick Jensen
        • EoP v Kevin MacDonald
        • EoP v Lierre Keith
        • EoP v Michael C Ruppert
        • EoP v Michael Franzese
        • EoP v Rose McGowan
        • EoP v Tony Robbins
        • EoP v Twitter
        • First Unitarian Church v NSA
        • Kate Steinle vs García Zárate
        • LJ v Ann Johnson Family
        • LJ v Weebly Hackers
        • US v Eddie Gallagher
        • US v Elizabeth Holmes
      • CO: Colorado
        • EoP v Carolyn Baker
        • EoP v Theo Wilson
        • US v Matthew Riehl
      • CT: Connecticut
        • EoP v Ray Dalio
      • DC: Washington DC
        • CCR v USA
        • Eddie Wise v USDA
        • EoP v Barack Obama
        • EoP v Brett M Kavanaugh
        • EoP v DHS
        • EoP v Donald Trump
        • EoP v FCC
        • EoP v FEC
        • EoP v George W Bush
        • EoP v James Mattis
        • EoP v Omarosa M-Newman
        • EoP v Richard Spencer
        • EoP v Stephen Bannon
        • EoP v Trump Oligarchs
        • EoP v US Congress
        • EoP v US Peace Rep
        • EoP v US Political Parties
        • EoP v US Senate
        • John Doe v James Mattis
        • McV20 v TP20 & BH20
        • US v Donald Trump
        • US v GRU / Netyksho
        • US v Internet Research Agency
        • US v Maria Butina
        • EoP CPAC17
      • FL: Florida
        • EoP v Ann Coulter
        • US v Esteban Santiago-Ruiz
        • US v Nikolas Cruz
        • US v Roger Stone
        • USA v Michael Dunn
      • GA: Georgia
        • US v Reality Winner
      • HI: Hawaii
        • EoP v Douglas Chin
      • ID: Idaho
        • EoP v Bowe Bergdahl
        • EoP v Michael Hoffman
      • IL: Illinois
        • US v TJ McVeigh
      • KS: Kansas
        • US v Glenn Miller
      • KY: Kentucky
        • EoP v Larry Flynt
        • LJ v Ken Bone
        • LJ v Rose Mudd Perkins
      • LA: Louisiana
        • EoP v Green Army Lt Gen Russel Honore
      • MA: Massachusetts
        • EoP v Beth Wilkinson
        • EoP v Dmitry Orlov
        • EoP v Keith Harmon Snow
        • US v Kevin Spacey
        • US v Rick Singer
      • MD: Maryland
        • Bo Gritz v Donald Trump
        • EoP v Black Lives Matter
        • EoP v Duty 2 Warn Psych
        • EoP v Roosh V
        • US v Bradley Manning
        • US v Chris Hasson
        • US v Jarrod Ramos
      • ME: Maine
      • MI: Michigan
        • EoP v Ekow Yankah
        • EoP v Stan Goff
      • MT: Montana
        • EoP v Ted Turner
        • US v Ted Kaczynski
      • NC: North Carolina
        • EoP Ft Bragg
        • EoP v Gen M Dempsey
        • EoP v John A Brown Jnr
        • EoP v Trad Youth Network
        • NC: Bill 774: Turtle Island
      • NM: New Mexico
        • EoP v Mike Sliwa
        • EoP v Valerie Plame
      • NV: Nevada
        • EoP v Jason G Brent
        • US v Darren Mack
        • US v Stephen C Paddock
      • NY: New York
        • ACLU v J Clapper
        • Bernard Bey v B & Vicky Manley
        • Clifford v Trump
        • DNC v RU-GRU
        • EoP v Billy Wimsatt
        • EoP v Charles Hall
        • EoP v Hillary Clinton
        • EoP v Margaret K Salamon
        • EoP v Rudy Giuliani
        • EoP v Stuart Schneiderman
        • HK Darweesh v DJ Trump
        • US v El Chapo
        • US v Harvey Weinstein
        • US v Jeremy Hammond
        • US v Lev Parnas
        • US v Michael Cohen
        • US v Sayfullo Saipov
      • OH: Ohio
      • OR: Oregon
        • Chernaik v Brown
        • EoP v Alliance 4 World Scientists
        • EoP v Gary Lorin
        • EoP v Lana Lokteff
        • US v Ammon Bundy
        • US v Chris Harper-Mercer
      • PN: Pennsylvania
        • EoP v Daryle Jenkins
      • SC: South Carolina
        • US v Dylann Roof
      • SD: South Dakota
        • Sioux Tribe v USACE
      • TX: Texas
        • EoP v Brene Brown
        • EoP v George HW Bush
        • US v Devin P Kelley
        • US v Mark Conditt
        • US v Patrick Crusius
      • VA: Virginia
        • EoP 2020 v USA
        • EoP v Colin Powell
        • EoP v Gen David Goldfein
        • EoP v Gen Robert Neller
        • EoP v Gen SA Cheney
        • EoP v James Comey
        • EoP v Michael Flynn
        • LJ v BB RH
        • US v C Cantwell
        • US v Edward Snowden
        • US v John W Lindh
        • US v Julian Assange
        • US v Paul Manafort
      • WA: Washington
        • EoP v Dahr Jamail
        • Karnosky v Trump
      • WI: Wisconsin
        • US v Samy Hamzeh
      • WV: West Virginia
        • State v WV EPA
    • VE: Venezuela
      • EoP v Nicolas Maduro
      • EoP VE Police
  • AU Asia
    • EoP v AU-AS Oligarchs
    • AU: Australia
      • AU v Richard Cousins
      • EoP AU Police
      • EoP v AU High Comm’r
      • EoP v AU Political Parties
      • EoP v Christine Assange
      • EoP v David Holmgren
      • EoP v Jinho Choi
      • EoP v Julia Gillard
      • EoP v Kevin Rudd
      • EoP v Scott Morrison
      • EoP v VADM R Griggs
    • CN: China
      • EoP Tibetan Sup Justice Comm
      • EoP v Dalai Lama
      • EoP v Jack Ma
    • IN: India
      • EoP v IN PM / Pres
    • JP: Japan
      • EoP JP Police Dept
      • EoP v Shinzo Abe
      • Japan v Satoshi Uematsu
    • KH: Cambodia
    • KP: North Korea
      • DPRK v Otto Warmbier
      • EoP v Kim Jong-un
    • KR: South Korea
      • EoP v Moon Jae in
      • EoP v Women Across DMZ
    • MY: Malaysia
      • EoP v MB Mohamad
    • NZ: New Zealand
      • EoP NZ Police Dept
      • EoP v NZ PM / Pres
      • NZ v Brenton Tarrant
      • NZ v David Gray
    • PH: Philippines
      • EoP v Rodrigo Duterte
      • Greenpeace v Chevron
    • SG: Singapore
      • SG Police Dept
      • SG v Nick Leeson
    • VN: Vietnam
      • EoP v Tran Dai Quang
  • Europe
    • COE: Council of EU
      • Aarhus Conv Comp Comm
        • 13-82: Norway
          • DE: Re: Peak NNR
          • UK: Guardian
      • Curia Court
        • Curia: LJ v Aarhus CCC
      • ECHR: EU Crt of Human Rights
        • LJ v Norway
      • EoP v Diem25
      • EoP v EU Oligarchs
      • EoP v EU President
      • EoP v TF50 Brexit
      • EoP v EU Parliament
    • EoP v EU Royal Families
    • AT: Austria
      • EoP AT Police Dept
      • EoP v Bilderberg & WEF
      • EoP v Martin Sellner
    • BE: Belgium
      • EoP v BE PM / Pres
    • CH: Switzerland
      • EoP CH Police Dept
      • EoP v CH PM / Pres
      • EoP v Dignitas
    • CZ: Czech Republic
      • EoP Czech Police
      • EoP v CZ PM / Pres
    • DE: Germany
      • DE Police Dept
      • DE v Beate Zschape et al
      • EoP v DE PM / Pres
      • EoP v Hasso Plattner
      • EoP v RAF
    • DK: Denmark
      • EoP v DK PM / Pres
    • ES: Spain
      • EoP ES Police
      • EoP NTE GMCAT
      • EoP v ES PM / Pres
    • FI: Finland
      • EoP v FI PM / Pres
    • FR: France
      • EoP FR Police Nationale
      • EoP NTE GMG
      • EoP v Alain de Benoist
      • EoP v FR PM / Pres
      • EoP v Generation Identitaire
      • EoP v Gilet Jaune
      • EoP v Guillaume Faye
      • FR v Carlos the Jackal
      • FR v Jerome Kerviel
      • FR v Redouane Lakdim
    • GR: Greece
      • EoP GR Police
      • GR v Lilia Botuseva
    • HU: Hungary
      • EoP v HU PM / Pres
    • IE: Ireland
      • EoP v IE PM / Pres
    • IS: Iceland
      • EoP v IS PM / Pres
    • IT: Italy
      • EoP Italy Police
      • EoP v IT PM / Pres
    • Jus Sanguinis RoR
    • LU: Luxembourg
      • EoP v LU PM / Pres
    • NL: Netherlands
      • EoP Netherlands Police
      • EoP v NL PM / Pres
      • NL v Gokman Tanis
      • People v Shell
    • NO: Norway
      • EoP NO Police
      • EoP v NO PM / Pres
      • NO v Philip Manshaus
      • Norway v Anders Breivik
    • PL: Poland
      • EoP v PL PM / President
    • PT: Portugal
      • EoP v PT PM / Pres
    • RS: Serbia
      • EoP Serbia Police
      • EoP v RS PM / President
    • SE: Sweden
      • EoP Sweden Police
      • EoP v Greta Thunberg
      • EoP v SE PM / Pres
    • SI: Slovenia
      • EoP v SI PM / President
    • SK: Slovakia
      • EoP v SK PM / Pres
    • UK: United Kingdom
      • EoP UK Police Dept
      • EoP v Bill Browder
      • EoP v Business for New EU
      • EoP v Earl of Inchcape
      • EoP v Extinction Rebellion
      • EoP v Frank Ellis
      • EoP v James Lawrence
      • EoP v Jayda Fransen
      • EoP v Michael Portillo
      • EoP v Millenial Woes
      • EoP v Prime Minister
      • EoP v Royal Family
      • EoP v Sargon of Akkad
      • EoP v Tara McCarthy
      • EoP v Trevor Phillips
      • EoP v UK Parliament
      • EoP v Wikileaks
      • JPE de Souza v Home Sec
      • LJ v Speaker HoC
      • UK v Anjem Choudary
      • UK v Ann Sarcoolas
      • UK v Michael Adebolajo
      • UK v Shrien Dewani
      • UK v Thomas Mair
  • M-East Asia
    • EoP v M-East Oligarchs
    • AE: United Arab Emirates
      • EoP v AE PM / Pres
    • AF: Afghanistan
      • EoP v AF PM / Pres
      • EoP v Gen R Dostum
      • US v Osama Bin Laden
    • BH: Bahrain
      • EoP v BH PM / Pres /King
    • EG: Egypt
      • EoP v EG PM / Pres
    • IL: Israel
      • EoP ILSC
      • EoP v Cmds IL Security
      • EoP v Gen Gershon Hacohen
      • EoP v IL PM / Pres
      • EoP v Knesset
      • EoP v LTC Peter Lerner
      • EoP v Martin van Creveld
    • IQ: Iraq
      • EoP v IQ PM / Pres
    • IR: Iran
      • EoP v Ayatollah Khomeni
      • EoP v IR PM / Pres
      • EoP v Javad Zarif
    • JO: Jordan
      • EoP v JO PM / Pres / King
    • LB: Lebanon
      • EoP v LB PM / President
    • PK: Pakistan
      • EoP PK Police
      • EoP v Gen A Ghafoor
      • EoP v PK PM / Pres
    • PS: Palestine
      • EoP v PLO M Abbas
    • QA: Qatar
      • EoP v QA PM / Emir
    • SA: Saudi Arabia
      • EoP v Alwaleed bin Talal
      • EoP v SA PM / King / Prince
    • SY: Syria
      • EoP v SY PM / Pres
    • TR: Turkey
      • EoP TR Police
      • EoP v Jamal Khashoggi
      • EoP v TR PM / Pres
  • RU Eurasia
    • EoP NTE GMRU
    • EoP v RAIPON
    • EoP v RU Oligarchs
    • AM: Armenia
      • EoP v AM PM / Pres
    • AZ: Azerbaijan
      • EoP v AZ PM / Pres
    • BY: Belarus
      • EoP v BY Emb RSA
      • EoP v BY PM / Pres
    • EE: Estonia
      • EoP v EE PM / President
    • GE: Georgia
      • EoP v GE PM / Pres
    • LT: Lithuania
      • EoP LT Police Dept
      • EoP v LT PM / President
    • LV: Latvia
      • EoP v LV PM / President
    • RU: Russian Federation
      • EoP FSB: AM Kalganov
      • EoP RU Police Dept
      • EoP v Aleksandr Dugin
      • EoP v Ramzan Kadyrov
      • EoP v RU Central Bank
      • EoP v Sergei Skripal
      • EoP v Steven Seagal
      • RU v Ivan Golunov
      • RU v Pussy Riot
    • TJ: Tajikistan
      • EoP v TJ PM / Pres
    • UA: Ukraine
      • EoP Ukrainian Police
      • EoP v UA PM / Pres
    • UZ: Uzbekistan
      • EoP v UZ PM / Pres
  • Password 4 Protected Pages

Tag: LPC-WC: Marais Lamprecht

November 16, 2020

16 Nov: LJ Req Info: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic.

* CCMA, Zaheer Samodien, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena…

October 21, 2020

21 Oct: LJ Re YH Re Roy Elliott-Nugget Hamilton Injury Damages Claim: Edit: Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle

* Yolanda Hamilton, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht* 21 Oct: LJ Re YH Re Roy Elliott-Nugget Hamilton Injury Damages Claim: Edit: Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ…

October 20, 2020

20 Oct: LJ Re YH Re Roy Elliott-Nugget Hamilton Injury Damages Claim

* Yolanda Hamilton, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht * 20 Oct: LJ Re YH Re Roy Elliott-Nugget Hamilton Injury Damages Claim * Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GME / EoP NWO SCO:…

October 1, 2020

01 Oct: LJ: MHC 4968/20: GME Estate: Req for Info: Exec: M Steenekamp

* Marlise Steenekamp, Crawley Family, David Crawley, Dawn Meyer, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Master of the High Court Capetown: Zureena Agulhas, George Svc…

September 30, 2020

30 Sep: MHC 4968/20 / CCMA: 1279-20: CH Johnstone Affidavit

* Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Dawn Meyer. * 30 Sep: MHC 4968/20 / CCMA: 1279-20: CH Johnstone Affidavit. * Tygae: EoP Leg…

September 30, 2020

30 Sep: LJ Req Info: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic

* CCMA, Zaheer Samodien, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena…

September 18, 2020

18 Sep: LJ v GME Upd: Harddrive, Blackson & AE Johnstone affidavits

* Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Ann Johnstone, Blackson.* 18 Sep: LJ v GME Upd: Harddrive, Blackson &…

September 16, 2020

16 Sep: CCMA-ZS Re LJ Req Info: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic

* CCMA, Zaheer Samodien, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena…

September 16, 2020

16 Sep: LJ Req Info: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: LRA S 191(6) Applic

* CCMA, Zaheer Samodien, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena…

September 7, 2020

07 Sep: Ntc: WEGE 1279-20: LJ v EGME: Filing: LRA S 191(6) Applic.

* Francois van der Merwe, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Master of the High Court Capetown,…

September 4, 2020

04 Sep: MHC 4968/2020: GM Elliott: Clive Dawn Roy Adoption discussion.

* Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family: David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena Agulhas, Clive Johnstone*…

August 29, 2020

29 Aug: LJ Re SAPS Re: MHC 4968-20: Estate Gill Elliott.

* Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht. * 29 Aug: LJ Re SAPS Re: MHC 4968-20: Estate Gill Elliott. * Tygae: EoP Leg Sub:…

August 26, 2020

26 Aug: MHC 4968-20: Estate Gill Elliott: Re: SQWorms & Roy property

* Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht.* 26 Aug: MHC 4968-20: Estate Gill Elliott: Re: SQWorms & Roy property.* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ…

August 25, 2020

25 Aug: LJ Q Re: E-GMElliot: CCMA 1279-20/MHC 4968-20 proceedings

* Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution: Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Dawn Meyer, Master of the High Court, Zureena Agulhas, Yolanda van Milligen,…

August 24, 2020

24 Aug: LJ Q Re CCMA-FvdM: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott Ruling

* CCMA, Francois vd Merwe, Zaheer Samodien, The One Financial Solution, Marlise Steenekamp, David Crawley, Garden Route SPCA, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht.* 24 Aug: LJ Q Re CCMA-FvdM: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v Estate…

August 24, 2020

24 Aug: LJ Re CCMA-FvdM: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: In Limine Ruling

* CCMA, Zaheer Samodien, Francois vd Merwe, The One Financial Solution, Marlise Steenekamp, David Crawley, Garden Route SPCA, Marais Lamprech Attorneys, Cherise de Wet. * 24 Aug: LJ Re CCMA-FvdM: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v…

August 24, 2020

24 Aug: CCMA-FvdM: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: In Limine Ruling

* CCMA, Zaheer Samodien, Francois vd Merwe, The One Financial Solution, Marlise Steenekamp, David Crawley, Garden Route SPCA, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht.* 24 Aug: CCMA-FvdM: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: In…

August 6, 2020

06 Aug: LJ Re CCMA-NT: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: Set Down In Limine

* CCMA, Ntombekhaya Tshembese, Valencia Grootboom, Dawn Meyer, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht.* 06 Aug: LJ Re CCMA-NT: Re WEGE 1279-20: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott: Set Down In Limine.* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ…

July 24, 2020

24 Jul: LJ Re: CCMA 1279-20/MHC 4968-20: Transcript: Blackson Re Moira Answer

* Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Dawn Meyer, Moira, Blackson.* 24 Jul: LJ Re: CCMA 1279-20/MHC 4968-20: Transcript: Blackson Re Moira Answer.* Tygae:…

July 21, 2020

21 Jul: LJ Re: CCMA 1279-20/MHC 4968-20: Req for Case Status Info

* CCMA, Valencia Grootboom, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena Agulhas, Dawn…

July 15, 2020

15 Jul: LJ v GME: Blackson: Re: Gill Elliott Re Terms of SQWorms Barter exchange Agreement

* Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Dawn Meyer * 15 Jul: LJ v GME: Blackson: Re: Gill Elliott Re Terms of SQWorms Barter…

July 7, 2020

07 Jul: SQWorms Property Removal from 18 Chestnut St.

* Crawley Family, David Crawley, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht * 07 Jul: SQWorms Property Removal from 18 Chestnut St. * Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v…

July 7, 2020

07 Jul: CCMA 1279-20/MHC 4968-20: LJ v E-GME: 21 Jun Condonation Filing

* CCMA, Valencia Grootboom, The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, Garden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena Agulhas, Assistant…

June 21, 2020

21 Jun: MHC: 4968/2020 & CCMA 1279-20: LJ v E-GME: Filing

* The One Financial Solution, Isobel Rohwer, Marlise Steenekamp, Marais Lamprecht Attorneys, Francois Lamprecht, Crawley Family, David Crawley, Grden Route SPCA, Bruno MacDonald, Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena Agulhas, Assistant Master of High…

June 18, 2020

18 Jun: LJ Re MHC-ZA Re: 4968/2020: GM Elliott; CCMA: LJ v Estate Gill Elliott.

* Master of the High Court Capetown, Zureena Agulhas, Mbewana Sizakele, Lallie Vuyani, Assistant Master of High Court George, Yolanda van Milligen, Daniel Pretorius, Susan Pretorius, Crawley Family, David Crawley, Brand & van der Bergh…

Posts navigation

1 2 3 Next »

Responsible Freedom Ethics Notice RE Causes of Resource Conflict:

All local, national and international racial, religious, class, gender and inter-species resource conflict – whether manifesting as poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, legal, political and corporate corruption, etc – are consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources; resulting from WiP - right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits - clauses of international law.

Sincere Peaceniks: Help Abolish WiP intnl law causes of resource conflict:
Sincere peaceniks are requested to support their leaders to End Abel and Kane Cold War by implementing Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation; by signing their responsible freedom oaths and/or Ecology of Peace Policy Statements.

Under Construction & Notice to Hackers:

Under Construction:
SQSwans [archive.is/DPDrV] and Tygae [archive.is/PS3Fx] Ecology of Peace websites on Weebly were hacked and deleted by the hacker; on 24 Oct 2016. EoP correspondence to San Francisco District Attorney, Police, Weebly et al; regarding Hacking of Weebly sites is available at: EoP Legal Submissions: LJ v Weebly Hackers.

Notice to Hackers: EoP Axis MilNec Evac Auth to FSB & NSA:
Notice to Hackers available at EoP MILED Clerk; EoP Leg Sub: 29 Aug: Notice to Hackers: Re: EoP Axis MilNec Evac Authorization to FSB & NSA

Contact, Updates & RSS

TYGAE Contact & Updates information is available at: EoP MILED Clerk. RSS: Posts.
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Write by Themegraphy